The approach to yeast identification has significantly changed in just a few decades due to rapid increase in basic biological knowledge, increased interest in the practical applications and biodiversity of this important microbial group, and enormous technological advances especially in the sphere of molecular tools. While some conventional methods are still tenable, many molecular techniques have been developed that allow for strain classification at all taxonomic levels. However, the oldest tool of microbiology, the microscope, is still a fundamental accessory for studies involving yeast biology, biodiversity and taxonomy [
16]. Lack of fermentation ability, formation of starch-like compound and formation of hyphae or Pseudohyphae, as well as presence of urease activity are important criteria in the taxonomy and identification of Rhodotorula sp; as described by Barnett et al. [
9]. Our biochemical results placed SG006 in Basidiomycetous yeasts which are concordant with the standard description of Rhodotorula sp. In addition, molecular identification by the 26S rDNA D1/D2 domain confirmed our finding. The pigmented yeasts of the genera Rhodotorula, Rhordosporidium, Sporobolomyces have the capacity to produce carotenoid [
17]. One of the most important characteristics of a carotenoid is its electronic absorption spectrum [
18]. This is a function of the chromophor, so the presence of the three-peak spectrum in visible absorption spectra of the sample determined it as carotenoids. Several studies examined the carotenoid production of Rhodotorula species. Carotenoid production in present study (4672±0.084 μg/g) was higher than that reported for Rhodotrula spp. by other authors under different culture condition [
19-
22] Martin et al. [
23] reported 1.256 μg/g for the total carotenoid concentration of
R. slooffiae which is lower than our concentration (4672 μg/g). Meanwhile, Frengova et al. reported 14.3 g/L and 2.67 mg/L for dried biomass and total carotenoid production, respectively [
24]
Such data discrepancy between different studies may be explained by differences in medium composition and experimental conditions.
R. slooffiae has higher potential to carotenoid production than R. Mucilaginosa under the same condition; although it was demonstrated that the highest value of carotenoids are produced after 48 h incubation (unpublished data). We found that MMS medium promoted carotenoid production rather than biomass accumulation whereas the highest amount of biomass was obtained by growth in YM broth. Our results are confirmed by data of Buzzini et al. [
25], Fang and Chiou [
26], Johnson and An [
27]. They have shown that the maximum values of total carotenoids are not directly correlated to the maximum value of cell biomass. Asku and Tugba-Eren [
28] and Voaides et al. [
29] have pointed out that the types of carotenoids and their relative amount may vary depend on the cultivation medium. They determined that the carotenoid contents in the cell mass reached their maximums when the cell growth in MMS medium rather than YM, a fact that can be confirmed also by the data obtained from this study.
Sequence analysis of the D1/D2 region in addition to morphological and biochemical characterization represented strain SG006 as a R. slooffiae and it indicated that SG006 is capable to produce carotenoids, although the internal transcribed spacer region is required to distinguish closely related species. The intergenic spacer region is recommended for additional differentiation of species and strains. The results from this study would be of significance for the carotenoid industries to introduce potential microorganism to produce carotenoid pigments naturally. Nevertheless, the carotenoid production by this strain in large scale will be required more detailed studies.