Only a few reports have described the anesthetic implications of IBM, which is somewhat surprising considering that patients with this disease often sustain injuries as a result of falls (
6) or require cricopharyngeal procedures (e.g., surgical myotomy, botulinum toxin injection) for treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia (
7,
18,
19). Ntatsaki et al. discussed their anesthetic technique for a patient with IBM who required serial electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for treatment of severe psychotic depression (
20). These authors used a reduced dose of mivacurium to facilitate endotracheal intubation during each ECT because they were concerned about sensitivity to neuromuscular blockers and postoperative respiratory complications. The approach provided satisfactory intubating conditions, but it did modestly delay emergence after ECT because the duration of neuromuscular blockade exceeded the length of the short procedure. The patient suffered no adverse sequelae. In contrast, two reports published in the Japanese literature emphasized that IBM may be associated with postoperative pulmonary complications after general anesthesia. Igari and colleagues used a reduced dose of rocuronium in a patient with IBM undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia because they were concerned about postoperative respiratory depression (
21). Indeed, the authors were unable to extubate their patient after reversal of neuromuscular blockade, most likely because of underlying pulmonary dysfunction related to IBM. Similar to the authors’ approach in the current patient, Nakano et al described endotracheal intubation without the use of a neuromuscular blocker after induction of general anesthesia in an elderly man with IBM undergoing a jejunostomy, but this patient developed postoperative aspiration pneumonia (
22). The current patient did not have a history of compromised pulmonary function and was easily extubated after surgery. His oropharyngeal dysphagia also did not interfere with his ability to swallow liquids nor did he describe a history consistent with chronic aspiration. Indeed, he did not develop aspiration pneumonia after surgery. Marinho et al. reported a unique approach to anesthesia in a patient with IBM who underwent percutaneous thoracic vertebral kyphoplasty in prone position (
23). This patient required chronic non-invasive ventilation because of poor respiratory function. The patient’s intraoperative care was managed using epidural anesthesia, conscious sedation, and bi-level positive airway pressure. In this case, the authors (
23) avoided endotracheal intubation entirely because they were concerned that the patient’s preexisting respiratory dysfunction may preclude their ability to wean the patient from mechanical ventilation after the procedure.
The current and previous (
20-
23) cases used reduced doses of or completely avoided neuromuscular blockers in patients with IBM because of theoretically enhanced sensitivity to these drugs, but with the exception of anecdotal experience, there are no data to definitively establish the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and relative safety of neuromuscular blockers in this setting. The actions of neuromuscular blockers may be prolonged in other forms of inflammatory myopathy, but this contention has not been examined systematically in controlled clinical trials and remains controversial, in part because inflammatory myopathies including IBM may not affect the functional integrity of the neuromuscular junction (
1). Flusche et al. reported that recovery from vecuronium was significantly delayed in an elderly man with polymyositis (
24), but Brown et al. reported that the durations of action of succinylcholine and atracurium both fell within the normal range in a woman with dermatomyositis (
25). Johns et al. described an abnormal contracture response to succinylcholine in a 2 year-old boy with dermatomyositis, but the duration of action of the depolarizing neuromuscular blocker was not prolonged (
26). A rise in serum potassium concentration was also observed in this case, but the effect was not overly exaggerated (
26), suggesting that succinylcholine may not precipitate dangerous hyperkalemia in patients with inflammatory myositis. Nevertheless, the use of succinylcholine is relatively contraindicated in patients with other primary muscle diseases because of an exaggerated hyperkalemic response (
27), and for this reason, the authors did not use the depolarizing neuromuscular blocker in the current patient.
In summary, there is a lack of consensus about the use of neuromuscular blockers in patients with IBM and other inflammatory myopathies. The authors avoided these drugs and were able to easily secure the patient’s airway and maintain adequate muscle relaxation using a balanced sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthetic. The current patient did not have difficulty swallowing liquids or handling secretions despite his oropharyngeal dysphagia nor did he have a history of aspiration, respiratory insufficiency, or diaphragmatic dysfunction. The presence of any of these IBM-related conditions most likely would have prompted the authors to secure the patient’s airway using a neuromuscular blocker despite the theoretical risk for a prolonged duration of action. Clinical trials are necessary to define the pharmacology of neuromuscular blockers in patients with IBM and determine whether use of these drugs contributes to postoperative respiratory insufficiency in these vulnerable patients.