https://doi.org/10.5812/iji.101639

Antioxidant Property and Bactericidal Activity of Linum usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion (LSEO-NE) on Staphylococcus aureus

authors:

avatar Roghaye Keykhasalar 1 , avatar Masoud Homayouni Tabrizi ORCID 1 , * , avatar Pouran Ardalan 2

Department of Biology, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
Department of chemistry, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
International Journal of Infection: Vol.7, issue 2; e101639
published online: May 6, 2020
article type: Research Article
received: February 4, 2020
revised: March 29, 2020
accepted: April 9, 2020

how to cite: Keykhasalar R , Homayouni Tabrizi M, Ardalan P. Antioxidant Property and Bactericidal Activity of Linum usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion (LSEO-NE) on Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Infect. 2020;7(2):e101639. https://doi.org/10.5812/iji.101639.

Abstract

Background:

Linum usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil (LSEO) as an efficient antimicrobial compound contains various types of phytochemicals, such as lignans and phenols.

Objectives:

In the current study, we produced LSEO nanoemulsion (LSEO-NE) to study its antioxidant capacity and bactericidal activity against Staphylococcus aureus.

Methods:

The LSEO-NE was produced using the ultrasonication method and characterized by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS), and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Then, we measured its antioxidant activity utilizing both ABTS and DPPH tests at four different LSEO-NE concentrations (200, 600, 800, and 1000 µg/mL) compared to glutathione. Finally, we evaluated its bactericidal activity on S. aureus by studying Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (AST) using LSEO-NE-smeared discs compared to non-smeared and kanamycin discs.

Results:

The 67.3 nm droplets of LSEO-NE with PDI of 0.452 exhibited strong antioxidant activity, similar to glutathione, in both ABTS (IC50 = 350 µg/mL) and DPPH (IC50 = 235 µg/mL) tests. Moreover, the AST results revealed the significant sensitivity of S. aureus to LSEO-NE-smeared discs when compared to non-smeared and kanamycin discs.

Conclusions:

According to the results, LSEO-NE can be applied as a safe, natural, and effective antibiotic for bacterial infections caused by S. aureus in most organs, such as the respiratory system and skin. However, further in vivo studies are required to evaluate the LSEO-NE antibacterial efficiency against other pathogenic S. aureus strains.

1. Background

Linum usitatissimum (flax), an annual herb from the genus Linum of family Linaceae, grows in Mediterranean and temperate belts. The flax seed essential oil is known as the primordial oil applied in varnishes, bio-insecticides, paints, and herbicides. It contains flavonoids, phenols, and lignins, which can influence cell growth and survival (1, 2). Linum usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil (LSEO) has individual phytochemical components containing lignans, flavonoids, and phenolic acids, which have been approved as strong radical scavenging and antibacterial agents (3).

The medicinal application of essential oils is limited due to their low bio-accessibility and water-solubility. In this regard, various types of influencer tools called drug delivery systems have been utilized to optimize therapeutic efficiency, such as nanoemulsions of nonpolar compounds like herbal essential oils (4). The 20 to 200 nm hydrophobic or hydrophilic droplets in opposite solutions encapsulating either polar or non-polar compounds are called nanoemulsions (5).

Several types of emulsification processes are available based on the amount of consumed energy in the process of droplet formulation, including low (spontaneous) and high (ultrasound-based) energy-consuming methods. The latter method provides nanoscale emulsions by consuming ~ 108 – 1010 Watt per kilogram (W.kg-1) energy (6). It is a safe, easy, fast, and cost-effective method for nano-emulsification. The smallest droplets are the best in biological applications due to their improved absorbency, stability, and solubility (7). Currently, nanoemulsions are produced by encapsulating hydrophobic essential oil in a hydrophilic-continuous phase (8, 9). These types of nanoemulsions are widely used in the pharmaceutical industry as anticancer, antioxidant, and antimicrobial agents (10, 11).

One of the most dangerous bacterial infections is caused by Staphylococcus aureus strains, especially in the skin and respiratory system (12). Different types of antibiotics, such as kanamycin, have been introduced for the treatment of such infections (13). However, several undesirable side effects have been reported for kanamycin consumption, such as ototoxic effects (14). Thus, the search for a less toxic and safe compound seems to be required.

2. Objectives

This study aimed to prepare LSEO Nanoemulsions (LSEO-NE) and characterize it using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS), and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Then, its antioxidant activity was evaluated, utilizing both ABTS and DPPH tests. Finally, the bactericidal activity of LSEO-NE was investigated against S. aureus.

3. Methods

3.1. Material

We obtained Linum usitatissimum seed essential oil (flaxseed oil, commercially available, Dr. Zarghani, Mashhad, Iran). Nonionic surfactant Tween 80, nutrient broth medium, kanamycin, 2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS), and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) were supplied from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 12228) was purchased from the Pasteur Institute of Iran (Tehran, Iran).

3.2. LSEO-NE Preparation

The LSEO-NE was formulated by ultrasonic-based homogenizing of LSE oil and water in the presence of different volumes of nonionic surfactant Tween 80 (3, 6, and 9 mL). The hydrophilic–hydrophobic balance for Tween 80 has been defined at 15. The sonication process was done under 20 kHz frequency and 750 Watt power for 60 min (15, 16).

3.3. LSEO-NE Characterization

The LSEO-NE mean hydrodynamic size (Z-average) was analyzed in three different conditions of surfactant volume (3, 6, and 39 mL), and approved by high-resolution AFM for the smallest LSEO-NE droplets, formed in the presence of 9 mL surfactant. Moreover, the droplets’ morphology was studied by Field Emission Electron Microscopy (FESM) according to the Sun et al. methodology. Briefly, a thin layer of LSEO-NE solution was made by dropping and drying on the microscope slide (gold-coated glass). The prepared slide was used for microscopic studies (17).

3.4. ABTS and DPPH Antioxidant Tests

The ability of LSEO-NE in scavenging oxidants and free radicals was measured by two different antioxidant agents, including ABTS and DPPH, based on measuring the absorbance ratio of ABTS and DPPH free radicals against the LSEO-NE nanoemulsion by UV-vis absorption spectroscopy. Briefly, following the Li et al. methodology, ABTS was detected at 734 nm before and after mixing with LSEO-NE, and according to Kedare et al., DPPH was measured at 517 nm (18, 19). The antioxidant activity (AA%) of LSEO-NE was estimated using the following formula:

AA% =SA-CA CA ×100

In the formula, SA and CA refer to sample absorbance and control absorbance, respectively.

3.5. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (AST)

The bactericidal activity of LSEO-NE was investigated using the protocol as follows. First, S. aureus ATCC 12228 was inoculated on Mueller-Hinton agar by performing a carpet culture technique. Then, antibiogram discs, including kanamycin, LSEO-NE-smeared, and null discs (6 mm diameter) were preparing and put on the inoculated-culture medium. Finally, culture was done at 37ºC for 24 hours.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 21 software. The one-way ANOVA test was used to check the significant results. The P values of less than 0.001 were defined as statistically significant.

4. Results

4.1. LSEO-NE Characterization

Depending on the amount of consumed surfactant, the droplets’ Z-average ranged from 67.3 nm to 82.6 nm. The results showed a significant relationship between the increasing volume of Tween 80 and decreasing nanoemulsion Z-average (P value ≤ 0.001) (Table 1 and Figure 1). We selected nanoemulsion with the smallest droplet size (67.3 nm) with appropriate PDI (0.452) for further analysis. Regarding Stetefeld et al., the values of less than 0.7 PDI indicate the mono-distribution process. Therefore, the estimated Z-average values were valid and reliable (20). However, further analyses such as AFM and SEM approved the droplet size and revealed the pseudo-spherical morphology of nanodroplets, respectively (Figure 2A and B).

The impact of Tween 80 (non-ionic surfactant) on LSEO-NE DLS measurement data. A, B, and C show the impact of 3, 6, and 9 mL of Tween 80 on particle sizes. LSEO-NE: L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion. DLS: Dynamic Light Scattering; PDI: Polydispersity index.
The impact of Tween 80 (non-ionic surfactant) on LSEO-NE DLS measurement data. A, B, and C show the impact of 3, 6, and 9 mL of Tween 80 on particle sizes. LSEO-NE: L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion. DLS: Dynamic Light Scattering; PDI: Polydispersity index.
Figure 1.

The impact of Tween 80 (non-ionic surfactant) on LSEO-NE DLS measurement data. A, B, and C show the impact of 3, 6, and 9 mL of Tween 80 on particle sizes. LSEO-NE: L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion. DLS: Dynamic Light Scattering; PDI: Polydispersity index.

The LSEO-NE size characterization. A: AFM results; the brilliant circle shows the nanoemulsion diameter (61.61 nm) (green line and number) while the blue line and the number indicate the length of the line. B: SEM image of LSEO-NE droplets; pseudo-spherical droplets are detected at the agglomerated size, which may be due to the SEM preparation process. LSEO-NE: L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion; AFM: Atomic Force Microscopy; SEM: Scanning Electron Microscopy.
The LSEO-NE size characterization. A: AFM results; the brilliant circle shows the nanoemulsion diameter (61.61 nm) (green line and number) while the blue line and the number indicate the length of the line. B: SEM image of LSEO-NE droplets; pseudo-spherical droplets are detected at the agglomerated size, which may be due to the SEM preparation process. LSEO-NE: L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion; AFM: Atomic Force Microscopy; SEM: Scanning Electron Microscopy.
Figure 2.

The LSEO-NE size characterization. A: AFM results; the brilliant circle shows the nanoemulsion diameter (61.61 nm) (green line and number) while the blue line and the number indicate the length of the line. B: SEM image of LSEO-NE droplets; pseudo-spherical droplets are detected at the agglomerated size, which may be due to the SEM preparation process. LSEO-NE: L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion; AFM: Atomic Force Microscopy; SEM: Scanning Electron Microscopy.

Table 1.

Droplet Size of LSEO-NE in Three Different Emulsification Conditions; LSEO-NE: Linum usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion.

Surfactant Volume (mL)Z-Average (nm)Polydispersity Index
382.60.420
671.60.309
967.30.452

4.2. LSEO-NE Antioxidant Activity

Both ABTS and DPPH tests demonstrated a significant relationship between the increasing doses of LSEO-NE and the decreasing concentrations of ABTS/DPPH free radicals, when compared to glutathione (Figure 3A and B). The estimated IC50 was about 350 µg/mL and 235 μg/mL in the ABTS and DPPH assays, respectively. The results revealed the strong antioxidant activity of LSEO-NE, which seemed to make them safe for even in-vivo applications. However, several types of in-vivo studies need to be designed to verify the toxic potential.

The LSEO-NE antioxidant activity. A: Refers to the % antioxidant activity by the rate of ABTS inhibition, and shows the IC50 of LSEO-NE (350 µg/mL) in the inhibition of ABTS free radicals. B: Refers to the % antioxidant activity by the rate of DPPH inhibition, and shows the IC50 of LSEO-NE (235 µg/mL) in the inhibition of DPPH free radicals. LSEO-NE: L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion.
The LSEO-NE antioxidant activity. A: Refers to the % antioxidant activity by the rate of ABTS inhibition, and shows the IC50 of LSEO-NE (350 µg/mL) in the inhibition of ABTS free radicals. B: Refers to the % antioxidant activity by the rate of DPPH inhibition, and shows the IC50 of LSEO-NE (235 µg/mL) in the inhibition of DPPH free radicals. LSEO-NE: L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion.
Figure 3.

The LSEO-NE antioxidant activity. A: Refers to the % antioxidant activity by the rate of ABTS inhibition, and shows the IC50 of LSEO-NE (350 µg/mL) in the inhibition of ABTS free radicals. B: Refers to the % antioxidant activity by the rate of DPPH inhibition, and shows the IC50 of LSEO-NE (235 µg/mL) in the inhibition of DPPH free radicals. LSEO-NE: L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion.

4.3. Bactericidal Activity of LSEO-NE

The bacterial growth pattern in the presence of antibiogram discs exhibited a significant antibiotic sensitivity in bacteria around the LSEO-NE-smeared disc compared to negative and positive (kanamycin) discs (Figure 4). It was detectable regarding the presence of an inhibited growth zone around the disc (transparent ring). However, several bacterial strains and further antimicrobial tests such as the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) test is required to define the specificity and strength of its antibiotic activity.

The LSEO-NE bactericidal activity. The image exhibits cultured S. aureus bacteria on Mueller-Hinton agar medium and reveals their sensitivity to the LSEO-NE-smeared disc (A) compared to negative (B) and positive (kanamycin) (C) control antibiogram discs. LSEO-NE: L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion. The white arrows indicate the bactericidal zone of discs.
The LSEO-NE bactericidal activity. The image exhibits cultured S. aureus bacteria on Mueller-Hinton agar medium and reveals their sensitivity to the LSEO-NE-smeared disc (A) compared to negative (B) and positive (kanamycin) (C) control antibiogram discs. LSEO-NE: L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion. The white arrows indicate the bactericidal zone of discs.
Figure 4.

The LSEO-NE bactericidal activity. The image exhibits cultured S. aureus bacteria on Mueller-Hinton agar medium and reveals their sensitivity to the LSEO-NE-smeared disc (A) compared to negative (B) and positive (kanamycin) (C) control antibiogram discs. LSEO-NE: L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil Nanoemulsion. The white arrows indicate the bactericidal zone of discs.

5. Discussion

In this study, we used L. usitatissimum essential oil (flaxseed essential oil) to prepare nanoemulsion using ultrasonication. Then, we characterized it for size and assessed its antioxidant and antibacterial efficacies. Linum usitatissimum (flax) has been widely used as an effective natural therapeutic agent for various types of disorders, such as inflammation, blood pressure, and acne (3). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study producing nanoemulsions of flaxseed essential oil for use to evaluate the antioxidant capacity and bactericidal activity against S. aureus strains. We produced nanoemulsion with pseudo-spherical droplets containing L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil (LSEO-NE) in 67.3 nm sizes (Figures 1 and 2) and showed their strong antioxidant activity (Figure 3). Moreover, its bactericidal property was measured by the AST method against S. aureus. The results approved the remarkable antibiotic property of LSEO-NE (Figure 4).

Staphylococcus aureus, a Gram-positive facultative anaerobic microbiota member, is often found on the skin and the upper respiratory tract. It can also act as an opportunistic pathogen in skin infections (abscesses), respiratory infections (sinusitis), and poisoned food. Staphylococcal infections are considered as common life-threatening disorders. Most pathogenic S. aureus strains are resistant to antibiotics, such as Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MSRSA). The prescribed antibiotics such as penicillin, cephalosporin, clindamycin, vancomycin, etc. have potentially various types of side effects. Moreover, there are no vaccines for S. aureus yet to be approved (21-23). Therefore, the investigation of alternative natural and safe antibiotics is ongoing by microbiologists.

Various types of plant essential oils and extracts have been recognized as antioxidants and antibiotics such as Lavandula (Angustifolia), Thymus (Vulgaris), peppermint (Mentha), Cajuput, Cinnamon, Clove, Eucalyptus, Sage (Salvia officinalis), and L. usitatissimum (24-32). The in vivo studies have approved the antibacterial activity of L. usitatissimum nonessential oils against bacterial strains such as S. aureus, E. coli, and Streptococcus agalactiae, and they were effective in bovine mastitis treatment (32). We investigated the bactericidal activity of L. usitatissimum Seed Essential Oil (LSEO) as a nanoemulsion delivery system against S. aureus. The presence of phenols, lignin, and flavonoids has made LSEO an exclusive phytochemical complex affecting cell growth and survival (2). It has the potential to be more efficient if encapsulated with amphiphilic molecules in nanoemulsion. Two main compounds of flaxseed essential oil, including unsaturated fatty acids and lignin are responsible for antibacterial activities (33, 34). Making the essential oils in the form of nanoemulsion causes the oil constitutes to become more stable with better efficiency (35).

Nanoemulsions as suitable drug delivery systems have shown a promising horizon in medicine for prevention and/or treatment purposes because of their ability to be more absorbable and bio-compatible, which are the two main important properties required in pharmaceutical approaches (36). In this regard, depending on their contents, they have been used to deliver their contents more efficiently with fewer possible side effects as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antibacterial compounds (37-39). The eucalyptus, neem, thyme, lemongrass, and clove essential oils are among the plant essential oils used in nanoemulsion delivery systems (37, 40-44).

The lignans repository consists of the main polyphenolic compounds in L. usitatissimum, which are prominent antioxidant compounds due to their potential of free radical scavenging (45). In the current study, this was approved by decreasing ABTS and DPPH free radicals with increasing doses of LSEO-NE (Figure 3). Flavonoids, as natural antibiotics, and phenolic acids of LSEO are the main components responsible for its antibacterial activity (46, 47). Structural heterocyclic N/O, alkylamino chains, and phenyl groups can increase the flavonoids activity and make them efficient in inhibiting the bacterial DNA replication, biofilm formation, energy metabolism, and member porin function. Moreover, flavonoids can lead to a significant alteration in membrane permeability (47). In this regard, the transparent ring around LSEO-NE-smeared antibiogram discs confirmed the induction of LSEO-NE sensitivity in S. aureus, which seemed to be affected by flavonoids and phenolic acids synergistically (Figure 4). However, further complementary studies are required to clarify the bactericidal mechanisms. The antioxidant activity of LSEO-NE makes it safe for treating bacterial infections.

5.1. Conclusion

According to the results, the nanoemulsion of L. usitatissimum seed essential oil can significantly scavenge radicals and induce an inhibitory effect on the S. aureus growth and proliferation cycle. In other words, the antioxidant activity of LSEO-NE, along with its bactericidal property and bio-accessibility makes LSEO-NE a suitable and safe antibiotic. Therefore, it can be used as a safe, natural, and efficient anti-S. aureus agent. However, further in-vivo and in-vitro studies are required to evaluate the LSEO-NE bactericidal efficiency against other pathogenic S. aureus strains.

References

  • 1.

    Amin T, Thakur M. Linum usitatissimum L.(Flaxseed)–A multifarious functional food. Online International Interdisciplinary Research Journal. 2014;4(1):220-38.

  • 2.

    Hussain S, Anjum FM, Butt MS, Khan MI, Asghar A. Physical and sensoric attributes of flaxseed flour supplemented cookies. Turkish Journal of Biology. 2006;30(2):87-92.

  • 3.

    Banerjee K, Thiagarajan P. Linum usitatissimum L.(Flax) plant and its seed oil a review. JCHPS. 2015;8(4):623-8.

  • 4.

    Nishitani Yukuyama M, Tomiko Myiake Kato E, Lobenberg R, Araci Bou-Chacra N. Challenges and future prospects of nanoemulsion as a drug delivery system. Current pharmaceutical design. 2017;23(3):495-508.

  • 5.

    Solans C, Izquierdo P, Nolla J, Azemar N, Garcia-Celma MJ. Nano-emulsions. Current opinion in colloid & interface science. 2005;10(3-4):102-10.

  • 6.

    Date AA, Desai N, Dixit R, Nagarsenker M. Self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems: formulation insights, applications and advances. Nanomedicine. 2010;5(10):1595-616.

  • 7.

    Mahdi Jafari S, He Y, Bhandari B. Nano-emulsion production by sonication and microfluidization—a comparison. International Journal of Food Properties. 2006;9(3):475-85.

  • 8.

    Sarker DK. Engineering of nanoemulsions for drug delivery. Current drug delivery. 2005;2(4):297-310.

  • 9.

    Wasan KM. Role of lipid excipients in modifying oral and parenteral drug delivery: Basic principles and biological examples. John Wiley & Sons; 2007.

  • 10.

    Borthakur P, Boruah PK, Sharma B, Das MR. 5 - Nanoemulsion: preparation and its application in food industry. In: Grumezescu AM, editor. Emulsions. Academic Press; 2016. p. 153-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804306-6.00005-2.

  • 11.

    Jaiswal M, Dudhe R, Sharma PK. Nanoemulsion: an advanced mode of drug delivery system. 3 Biotech. 2015;5(2):123-7. [PubMed ID: 28324579]. [PubMed Central ID: PMCPmc4362737]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-014-0214-0.

  • 12.

    Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG. Staphylococcus aureus Infections: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Management. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2015;28(3):603-61. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00134-14.

  • 13.

    Pengov A, Ceru S. Antimicrobial drug susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine and ovine mammary glands. Journal of dairy science. 2003;86(10):3157-63.

  • 14.

    Wrześniok D, Rok J, Beberok A, Rzepka Z, Respondek M, Pilawa B, et al. Kanamycin induces free radicals formation in melanocytes: An important factor for aminoglycosides ototoxicity. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2019;120(2):1165-73.

  • 15.

    Ghosh V, Saranya S, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N. Cinnamon oil nanoemulsion formulation by ultrasonic emulsification: investigation of its bactericidal activity. Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology. 2013;13(1):114-22.

  • 16.

    Qian C, McClements DJ. Formation of nanoemulsions stabilized by model food-grade emulsifiers using high-pressure homogenization: factors affecting particle size. Food Hydrocolloids. 2011;25(5):1000-8.

  • 17.

    Sun H, Liu K, Liu W, Wang W, Guo C, Tang B, et al. Development and characterization of a novel nanoemulsion drug-delivery system for potential application in oral delivery of protein drugs. International journal of nanomedicine. 2012;7:5529-43. [PubMed ID: 23118537]. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S36071.

  • 18.

    Li P, Huo L, Su W, Lu R, Deng C, Liu L, et al. Free radical-scavenging capacity, antioxidant activity and phenolic content of Pouzolzia zeylanica. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society. 2011;76(5):709-17.

  • 19.

    Kedare SB, Singh RP. Genesis and development of DPPH method of antioxidant assay. Journal of food science and technology. 2011;48(4):412-22. [PubMed ID: 23572765]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0251-1.

  • 20.

    Stetefeld J, McKenna SA, Patel TR. Dynamic light scattering: a practical guide and applications in biomedical sciences. Biophysical reviews. 2016;8(4):409-27.

  • 21.

    Redi D, Raffaelli CS, Rossetti B, De Luca A, Montagnani F. Staphylococcus aureus vaccine preclinical and clinical development: current state of the art. New Microbiol. 2018;41(3):208-13. [PubMed ID: 29874390].

  • 22.

    Cunha BA. Antibiotic side effects. Med Clin North Am. 2001;85(1):149-85. [PubMed ID: 11190350]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70309-6.

  • 23.

    Rayner C, Munckhof WJ. Antibiotics currently used in the treatment of infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Intern Med J. 2005;35 Suppl 2:S3-16. [PubMed ID: 16271060]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0903.2005.00976.x.

  • 24.

    Blažeković B, Yang W, Wang Y, Li C, Kindl M, Pepeljnjak S, et al. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of essential oils of Lavandula× intermedia ‘Budrovka’and L. angustifolia cultivated in Croatia. Industrial Crops and Products. 2018;123:173-82.

  • 25.

    Mancini E, Senatore F, Del Monte D, De Martino L, Grulova D, Scognamiglio M, et al. Studies on Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Five Thymus vulgaris L. Essential Oils. Molecules. 2015;20(7):12016-28. [PubMed ID: 26140436]. [PubMed Central ID: PMCPmc6332365]. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200712016.

  • 26.

    Stringaro A, Colone M. Antioxidant, Antifungal, Antibiofilm, and Cytotoxic Activities of Mentha spp. Essential Oils. Medicines. 2018;5(4). [PubMed ID: 30347861]. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines5040112.

  • 27.

    Dahiya P. Evaluation of in vitro antimicrobial potential and phytochemical analysis of spruce, cajeput and jamrosa essential oil against clinical isolates. International Journal of Green Pharmacy (IJGP). 2016;10(1).

  • 28.

    Kawatra P, Rajagopalan R. Cinnamon: Mystic powers of a minute ingredient. Pharmacognosy Res. 2015;7(Suppl 1):S1-6. [PubMed ID: 26109781]. [PubMed Central ID: PMCPmc4466762]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.157990.

  • 29.

    Cui H, Zhang C, Li C, Lin L. Antimicrobial mechanism of clove oil on Listeria monocytogenes. Food control. 2018;94:140-6.

  • 30.

    Sebei K, Sakouhi F, Herchi W, Khouja ML, Boukhchina S. Chemical composition and antibacterial activities of seven Eucalyptus species essential oils leaves. Biol Res. 2015;48:7. [PubMed ID: 25654423]. [PubMed Central ID: PMCPmc4417289]. https://doi.org/10.1186/0717-6287-48-7.

  • 31.

    Cutillas AB, Carrasco A, Martinez-Gutierrez R, Tomas V, Tudela J. Salvia officinalis L. Essential Oils from Spain: Determination of Composition, Antioxidant Capacity, Antienzymatic, and Antimicrobial Bioactivities. Chem Biodivers. 2017;14(8). [PubMed ID: 28477412]. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201700102.

  • 32.

    Kaithwas G, Mukerjee A, Kumar P, Majumdar DK. Linum usitatissimum (linseed/flaxseed) fixed oil: antimicrobial activity and efficacy in bovine mastitis. Inflammopharmacology. 2011;19(1):45-52.

  • 33.

    Zuk M, Dorotkiewicz-Jach A, Drulis-Kawa Z, Arendt M, Kulma A, Szopa J. Bactericidal activities of GM flax seedcake extract on pathogenic bacteria clinical strains. BMC biotechnology. 2014;14(1):70.

  • 34.

    Fadzir UA, Darnis DS, Mustafa BE, Mokhtar KI. Linum usitatissimum as an antimicrobial agent and a potential natural healer: A review. Archives of Orofacial Science. 2018;13(2).

  • 35.

    Prakash A, Baskaran R, Nithyanand P, Vadivel V. Effect of Nanoemulsification on the Antibacterial and Anti-biofilm Activities of Selected Spice Essential Oils and Their Major Constituents Against Salmonella enterica Typhimurium. Journal of Cluster Science. 2019:1-13.

  • 36.

    Sharma N, Bansal M, Visht S, Sharma PK, Kulkarni GT. Nanoemulsion: A new concept of delivery system. Chronicles of Young Scientists. 2010;1(2):2.

  • 37.

    Ziani K, Chang Y, McLandsborough L, McClements DJ. Influence of surfactant charge on antimicrobial efficacy of surfactant-stabilized thyme oil nanoemulsions. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2011;59(11):6247-55.

  • 38.

    Farshi P, Tabibiazar M, Ghorbani M, Hamishehkar H. Evaluation of antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity of cumin seed oil nanoemulsion stabilized by sodium caseinate-guar gum. Pharm. 2017.

  • 39.

    Yen C, Chen Y, Wu M, Wang C, Wu Y. Nanoemulsion as a strategy for improving the oral bioavailability and anti-inflammatory activity of andrographolide. International journal of nanomedicine. 2018;13:669-80. [PubMed ID: 29440893]. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S154824.

  • 40.

    Sakulku U, Nuchuchua O, Uawongyart N, Puttipipatkhachorn S, Soottitantawat A, Ruktanonchai U. Characterization and mosquito repellent activity of citronella oil nanoemulsion. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2009;372(1-2):105-11.

  • 41.

    Anjali CH, Sharma Y, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N. Neem oil (Azadirachta indica) nanoemulsion—a potent larvicidal agent against Culex quinquefasciatus. Pest management science. 2012;68(2):158-63.

  • 42.

    Pant M, Dubey S, Patanjali PK, Naik SN, Sharma S. Insecticidal activity of eucalyptus oil nanoemulsion with karanja and jatropha aqueous filtrates. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2014;91:119-27.

  • 43.

    Salvia-Trujillo L, Rojas-Graü A, Soliva-Fortuny R, Martín-Belloso O. Physicochemical characterization of lemongrass essential oil–alginate nanoemulsions: effect of ultrasound processing parameters. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2013;6(9):2439-46.

  • 44.

    Anwer MK, Jamil S, Ibnouf EO, Shakeel F. Enhanced antibacterial effects of clove essential oil by nanoemulsion. Journal of oleo science. 2014:ess13213.

  • 45.

    Hu C, Yuan YV, Kitts DD. Antioxidant activities of the flaxseed lignan secoisolariciresinol diglucoside, its aglycone secoisolariciresinol and the mammalian lignans enterodiol and enterolactone in vitro. Food and chemical toxicology. 2007;45(11):2219-27.

  • 46.

    Cueva C, Moreno-Arribas MV, Martin-Alvarez PJ, Bills G, Vicente MF, Basilio A, et al. Antimicrobial activity of phenolic acids against commensal, probiotic and pathogenic bacteria. Res Microbiol. 2010;161(5):372-82. [PubMed ID: 20451604]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2010.04.006.

  • 47.

    Xie Y, Yang W, Tang F, Chen X, Ren L. Antibacterial activities of flavonoids: structure-activity relationship and mechanism. Curr Med Chem. 2015;22(1):132-49. [PubMed ID: 25245513]. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867321666140916113443.