Abstract
Background:
Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are rolled in severe infections in animals and nosocomial infections in humans. Given that staphylococci other than Staphylococcus aureus are often reported only as CoNS in medical diagnosis laboratories, this study aimed to determine the exact species of this type of staphylococci in clinical samples.Objectives:
This study also aimed to evaluate antibiotic resistance, the ability to carry cfr, qacA/B, mecA, and vanA genes, and the diversity of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) elements in mecA-carrying isolates.Methods:
Staphylococcus spp. strains were isolated from the blood samples of children admitted to Imam Reza Hospital in Bojnurd, Northeastern Iran, between 2013 - 2019. All CoNS isolates were evaluated for resistance to vancomycin and oxacillin using agar screening and other routine anti-CoNS antibiotics using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, based on the latest Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The CoNS strains were isolated based on conventional methods and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism. The PCR was applied to determine the diversity of SCCmec elements in the CoNS isolates.Results:
In this study, 203 isolates were confirmed as CoNS belonging to nine staphylococci spp. S. capitis and S. epidermidis were the top two common CoNS. Type III was the dominant SCCmec type in mecA+ isolates.Conclusions:
The findings of this study showed that CoNS isolated from blood cultures have a relatively high diversity and antibiotic resistance. Therefore, further attention should be paid to the isolation of these strains in laboratories, and they should not be easily considered as contamination.Keywords
Staphylococcus Coagulase Drug Resistance Polymerase Chain Reaction
1. Background
Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are among the most prevalent bacteria isolated from clinical samples in medical microbiology laboratories. These bacteria commonly belong to normal flora and are regarded as contaminants in positive blood cultures. In some cases, such as immunocompromised patients and patients using indwelling devices, they can be opportunistic pathogens causing hospital-acquired infections (1-3). The CoNS are ranked among the first five common pathogens related to hospital-acquired infections, and a variable number of CoNS infections led to hospitalization (4). The CoNS can be a reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes in plasmid or other mobile genetic elements. The primary concern is the ability to exchange resistance-related elements between CoNS and Staphylococcus aureus. The most resistant CoNS are S. hominis, S. haemolyticus, and S. epidermidis (5, 6). Due to the ability of CoNS to acquire conjugative plasmids, to date, these bacteria are highly resistant to penicillin, oxacillin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, gentamycin, and erythromycin (6, 7).
Methicillin resistance is usually related to the mecA gene that encodes PBP2a with a low binding affinity to the methicillin family. The mecA gene is located on staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) (8). These genetic elements are highly variable, and to date, 13 SCCmec types have been introduced in Staphylococcus spp. isolates from animals and humans (9, 10). Other important resistance mechanisms in staphylococci are the enzymatic change of antibiotics, removal of antibiotics from the cell, and reduction of the binding affinity of antibiotic molecules to targets (2). In recent years, a homolog of the mecA gene called mecC was discovered in S. aureus and some other staphylococci spp. This gene produces a protein similar to PBP2a but, in the nucleotide sequence, differs from mecA and shows about 68% sequence similarity. This gene is located on the SCCmec XI element (11).
Staphylococci strains containing the mecC gene are usually isolated from animals and sometimes humans in Western Europe (12).
2. Objectives
Due to the preliminary diagnosis of non-aureus staphylococci under the general title of CoNS in most medical diagnostic laboratories of Iran and the importance of these bacteria as human pathogens and their ability to act as a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance genes for other virulent bacteria, this study investigated these bacteria at the species level, their antibiotic resistance, and their ability to carry mecA/vanA and cfr-qacA/B genes and the diversity of SCCmec elements in CoNS isolates, isolated from the blood cultures of patients admitted to a 96-bed teaching hospital in Bojnurd, Northeastern Iran.
3. Methods
3.1. Sample Collection
This study evaluated 203 CoNS spp. strains isolated from the blood samples of children admitted to Imam Reza Hospital in Bojnurd, Northeastern Iran. The CoNS ruled out contaminants and were selected as pathogens based on a laboratory-based algorithm and clinical examinations by related physicians (13). The clinical criteria included the presence of one or more of the following factors based on the patient’s history:
(1) persistent fever, (2) hypotension, (3) leucopenia or leukocytosis, (4) invasive devices, (5) immunodeficiency, (6) sepsis, (7) long-term stay in the intensive care unit, (8) use of an intravenous catheter, and (9) surgery or procedures, such as dialysis.
The laboratory criteria included the pure growth of CoNS in cultures and identical isolates from two or more culture media.
3.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
The antibiogram test was performed using tetracycline (TET), cefoxitin (CEF), moxifloxacin (MOX), levofloxacin (LEV), erythromycin (ERY), rifampicin (RIF), clindamycin (CLN), penicillin (PEN), gentamicin (GEN), minocycline (MIN), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (COT), vancomycin (VAN), and linezolid (LIN) antimicrobial disks using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method (MASTDISCSTM, UK) based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (14).
3.3. CoNS Genus Identification
The CoNS strains were isolated based on conventional microbiology laboratory tests containing colony morphology, microscopic evaluation using gram staining, and biochemical tests, including catalase, acetoin production, coagulase, susceptibility to novobiocin and polymyxin B, pyrrolidonyl arylamidase test, ornithine decarboxylase test, and fermentation of glucose, mannitol, mannose, maltose, trehalose, and sucrose (15-18). Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) test was performed to verify phenotypic test results (19).
3.4. Genomic DNA Extraction
The genomic DNAs of CoNS isolates were extracted using the Addbio Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (KR-2000, Addbio, South Korea). Lysostaphin was used in addition to lysis buffer at a final concentration of 20 µg/mL.
3.5. PCR-RFLP for CoNS Species Identification
This study used degenerate primers (forward: 5-GCCAAAAGAGACTATTATGA-3 and reverse: 5-ATTGYTTACCYGTTTGTGTACC-3) to amplify the fragment of the dnaJ gene with a variable length (20). The PCR amplification was performed using TaKaRa Gradient PCR TP600 thermal cycler in a volume of 50 µL using TAKARA Emerald Amp Max PCR pre-mixed Master Mix (TaKaRa, Japan). The thermal setting included the incubation of the PCR mixture for 180 seconds at 94°C and then short cycling by five cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, 45°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 60 seconds. Then, the mixture was amplified in 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, an annealing step at 50°C for 30 seconds, an extension step at 72°C for 60 seconds, and a final extension step at 72°C for 180 seconds (20). The PCR products were evaluated using 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis containing SYBR™ Safe Stain (Sinaclone, Iran). As previously described, this study used the XapI restriction enzyme that provides specific enzymatic digestion profiles for the staphylococcal subspecies (19). Digestions were performed using 5 µL of the PCR products in a total volume of 15 µL with 1 µL reaction buffer in addition to 10 U of the XapI endonuclease enzyme (Fermentas, Germany) for 3 hours at 37°C. Then, agarose gel electrophoresis was performed on the digestion product using 2% agarose gel (Fermentas), and the produced fragments were evaluated using DNA safe stain and an ultra violet gel documentation system (19).
3.6. PCR Detection of Antimicrobial and Disinfectant Resistance Genes
The presence of the vanA, mecA, cfr, and qacA/B genes was evaluated by PCR using the primers in Table 1, as previously described.
Primer Sequences Used in This Study
| Gene | Primer Sequence | Product Size (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| mecA | 5′-ATGTATGTGCGATTGTATTGC-3′ | 584 | (21) |
| 5′-AGAAGATGGTATGTGGAAGTTAG-3′ | |||
| vanA | 5′-ATCAAGCGGTCAATCAGTTC-3′ | 713 | (22) |
| 5′-GGCAAGTCAGGTGAAGATG-3′ | |||
| cfr | 5′-ACCATATAATTGACCACAAGCAGC-3′ | 746 | (23) |
| 5′-TGAAGTATAAAGCAGGTTGGGAGTCA-3′ | |||
| qacA/B | 5′-CCACTACAGATTCTTCAGCTACATG -3′ | 417 | (24) |
| 5′-CTATGGCAATAGGAGATATGGTGT -3′ |
3.7. SCCmec Typing
Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec typing was performed as previously described (25).
3.8. Statistical Analysis
The results were transferred to a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet for analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 16.0). Similarities or differences were evaluated using an analysis of variance test. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
4. Results
A total of 203 infectious isolates belonged to nine species of staphylococci. Among the aforementioned isolates, S. capitis (n = 44) was the most common species, followed by S. epidermidis (n = 32), S. warneri (n = 29), S. haemolyticus (n = 25), S. hominis (n = 21), S. simulans (n = 17), S. caprae (n = 17), S. cohnii (n = 14), and S. hyicus (n = 4) (Figure 1). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that penicillin resistance (94.1%) had the highest resistance rate in CoNS spp. A low resistance rate was detected for linezolid (3.9%), and vancomycin resistance was not observed in any of them (Table 2).
Prevalence of coagulase-negative staphylococci in blood cultures
| Staphylococcus epidermidis | S. capitis | S. caprae | S. cohnii | S. haemolyticus | S. hominis | S. hyicus | S. simulans | S. warneri | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEN | 28 (87.5) | 39 (88.6) | 16 (94.1) | 12 (85.7) | 22 (88) | 20 (95.2) | 4 (100) | 25 (94.1) | 25 (86.2) | 191 (94.1) |
| ERY | 15 (46.9) | 27 (61.4) | 10 (58.8) | 8 (57.1) | 15 (60) | 12 (57.1) | 2 (50) | 10 (58.8) | 15 (51.7) | 114 (56.2) |
| CEF | 17 (53.1) | 20 (45.4) | 9 (52.9) | 9 (64.3) | 10 (40) | 13 (61.9) | 1 (25) | 8 (47.1) | 13 (44.8) | 100 (49.3) |
| TET | 14 (43.75) | 27 (61.4) | 7 (41.2) | 7 (50) | 12 (48) | 13 (61.9) | 3 (75) | 10 (58.8) | 17 (58.6) | 110 (54.2) |
| CLN | 15 (46.9) | 24 (54.5) | 10 (58.8) | 6 (42.9) | 15 (60) | 8 (38.1) | 3 (75) | 7 (41.2) | 15 (51.7) | 103 (50.7) |
| LEV | 18 (56.2) | 28 (63.6) | 8 (47.1) | 6 (42.9) | 7 (28) | 10 (47.6) | 2 (50) | 8 (47.1) | 11 (37.9) | 98 (48.3) |
| MOX | 12 (37.5) | 12 (27.3) | 7 (41.2) | 5 (35.7) | 6 (24) | 10 (47.6) | 1 (25) | 6 (35.3) | 14 (48.3) | 73 (36) |
| COT | 13 (40.6) | 19 (43.2) | 7 (41.2) | 8 (57.1) | 8 (32) | 12 (57.1) | 0 (0) | 7 (41.2) | 14 (48.3) | 39 (43.3) |
| GEN | 18 (56.2) | 20 (45.4) | 6 (35.3) | 7 (50) | 15 (60) | 14 (66.7) | 2 (50) | 9 (52.9) | 15 (51.7) | 106 (52.2) |
| RIF | 20 (62.5) | 24 (54.5) | 8 (47.1) | 8 (57.1) | 16 (64) | 11 (52.4) | 3 (75) | 9 (52.9) | 16 (55.2) | 115 (56.6) |
| MIN | 8 (25) | 12 (27.3) | 6 (35.3) | 5 (35.7) | 6 (24) | 7 (33.3) | 1 (25) | 6 (35.3) | 10 (34.5) | 61 (30) |
| VAN | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| LIN | 5 (15.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (14.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 8 (3.9) |
These results were also certified using the PCR-RFLP method. The mean of mecA-positive isolates was 22% by the PCR method. All the species had the qacA/B genes ranging from 25% to 58% (except S. hyicus), and the highest percentage was related to S. caprae. The cfr gene was found in S. epidermidis (15.6%) and S. hominis (14.3%) (Figure 2). In this study, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≤ 4 μg/mL was observed in 90% of the CoNS spp., and none of them had a vancomycin MIC of ≥ 32 μg/mL. SCCmec type III had the highest percentage of nine species of CoNS (Table 3). Other SCCmec types were not observed in S. cohnii and S. hyicus (except SCCmec type III).
Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance genes in coagulase-negative staphylococci
Results of Agar Screening, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, and Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Typing Tests of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Species a
| Growth on Oxacillin Agar Screening Media | Growth on Vancomycin Agar Screening Media | Oxacillin MIC | Vancomycin MIC | SCCmec Type | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤ 0.25 | ≥ 0.5 | ≤ 4 | 8 - 16 | ≥ 32 | I | II | III | IV | V | |||
| Staphylococcus epidermidis | 17 (53.1) | 2 (6.2) | 15 (46.9) | 17 (53.1) | 31 (96.9) | 2 (6.2) | 0 (0) | 2 (11.8) | 2 (11.8) | 10 (58.8) | 2 (11.8) | 1 (10) |
| S. capitis | 20 (45.4) | 0 (0) | 24 (54.5) | 20 (45.4) | 44 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 16 (80) | 4 (20) | 0 (0) |
| S. caprae | 9 (52.9) | 2 (11.8) | 8 (47.1) | 9 (52.9) | 15 (88.2) | 2 (11.8) | 0 (0) | 3 (33.3) | 0 (0) | 5 (55.5) | 1 (11.1) | 0 (0) |
| S. cohnii | 9 (64.3) | 0 (0) | 5 (35.7) | 9 (64.3) | 14 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 9 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| S. haemolyticus | 10 (40) | 3 (12) | 15 (60) | 10 (40) | 22 (88) | 3 (12) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 7 (70) | 3 (30) | 0 (0) |
| S. hominis | 13 (61.9) | 1 (4.8) | 8 (38.1) | 13 (61.9) | 20 (95.2) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 2 (15.4) | 0 (0) | 8 (61.5) | 3 (23.1) | 0 (0) |
| S. hyicus | 1 (25) | 0 (0) | 3 (75) | 1 (25) | 4 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| S. simulans | 8 (47.1) | 1 (5.9) | 9 (52.9) | 8 (47.1) | 16 (94.1) | 1 (5.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 4 (50) | 3 (37.5) | 1 (12.5) |
| S. warneri | 13 (44.8) | 3 (10.3) | 16 (55.2) | 13 (44.8) | 26 (89.6) | 3 (10.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (7.7) | 2 (15.4) | 7 (53.8) | 3 (23.1) | 0 (0) |
5. Discussion
The CoNS are rolled in severe infections in animals and nosocomial infections in humans, particularly in immunocompromised hosts, and show a high rate of multiple antimicrobial resistance (26). In this study, 203 patients were confirmed as CoNS belonging to nine staphylococci spp. Moreover, S. capitis and S. epidermidis were the top two common CoNS spp. Furthermore, 13 antibiotics were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. The results showed that penicillin, rifampicin, and erythromycin had the highest resistance rates in CoNS spp. A low resistance rate was detected for linezolid (3.9%), minocycline (30%), and moxifloxacin (36%). Therefore, these antibiotics should be cautiously selected for CoNS treatment. Consistent with the results of most previous studies, vancomycin resistance was not observed in CoNS spp. (27, 28). The results are in line with the results of previous studies wherein Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common species of CoNS (28, 29). Additionally, Giormezis’s study in Greece (30) showed that S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus are responsible for 71.1% and 29.1% of CoNS infections, respectively.
A recent survey by Cui et al. about CoNS isolated from hospitalized patients in China showed that from 157 patients, the most prevalent species were S. hominis and S. epidermidis, respectively. All CoNS had a high resistance to penicillin, erythromycin, and oxacillin. Resistance to rifampicin and gentamicin was low, and none of the CoNS was resistant to linezolid or vancomycin (31). A study by Pedroso et al. about CoNS isolated from patients with bloodstream infections acquired in Brazil reported that the highest resistance belonged to benzylpenicillin (100%) and oxacillin (93.1%). The resistance of vancomycin (1.7%) had a low rate, and there was no resistance to tigecycline (32). The results of Paiva et al.’s study on CoNS isolates from blood samples obtained at a hospital in Porto, Portugal, showed that all 130 CoNS isolates were mecA-positive and identified as S. epidermidis (66.9%), S. haemolyticus (10.0%), S. hominis (9.2%), and S. capitis (8.5%), and the MICs of vancomycin ranged from 0.38 to 3 and 0.25 to 2 g/mL by E-test and broth microdilution method, respectively (33).
A study by Mittal et al. reported that all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (MIC range: 1 - 4 μg/mL) (34). In this study, MIC of ≤ 4 μg/mL was also observed in about 90% of CoNS spp., and none of them had a vancomycin MIC of ≥ 32 μg/mL. Intermediate resistance to vancomycin (MIC range: 8 - 16 μg/mL) was not observed in S. capitis, S. cohnii, and S. hyicus. The results obtained by Nahaei et al. showed that the agar screening oxacillin method had a good relationship with PCR results (35). In the current study, the number of mecA-positive isolates was higher than agar-screening oxacillin-positive in nine species of staphylococci. In the agar screening oxacillin method, the highest growth rate was observed in S. cohnii (64.3%) and S. hominis (61.9%). The highest resistance on vancomycin agar screening media was observed in S. haemolyticus (12%) and S. caprae (11.8%).
In addition, the present study showed a difference between PCR and disk diffusion results. Methicillin resistance was 22% and 49.3% in PCR and disk diffusion methods, respectively. The CoNS isolates that showed phenotypical resistance to oxacillin but did not have the mecA gene might possess other mechanisms for resistance. Nahaei et al. reported that 10 CoNS isolates not containing the mecA gene were resistant to oxacillin using the disk diffusion method, and nine CoNS containing the mecA gene were susceptible to oxacillin disk screening. These differences might be related to the presence and the absence of the mecA gene expression and heteroresistance to oxacillin (35).
In other previous studies, the mecA gene was detected in 79% of CoNS (36). Genotypic analyses of Pedroso et al. showed that 40% of CoNS isolates were positive for mecA, and the vanA gene was not observed in any of them. Moreover, the highest percentage of SCCmec was observed in type IIIB (32.2%) (32). In this study, SCCmec type III was dominant. Other SCCmec types were not observed in S. cohnii and S. hyicus (except SCCmec type III). Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec III could have been obtained from the hospital setting, patients, or healthcare workers, and it can be classified as a hospital-acquired infection. Another recent study by Taha et al. reported that two mecA-positive S. lugdunensis belonged to SCCmec IVa; however, it was previously thought that SCCmec exists only in Staphylococcus aureus (37).
The cfr gene is associated with linezolid resistance. The resistance created by the cfr gene is usually plasmid-borne and can encode resistance to pleuromutilins, phenols, lincosamides, and streptogramin (38, 39). In a study by Mittal et al., linezolid resistance was observed in S. haemolyticus, S. cohnii, and S. arlettae. The aforementioned study suggested that S. arlettae could be an emerging pathogen (34). Dinakaran et et al. reported the isolation of S. arlettae from the blood culture in cardiovascular diseases (40). In the present study, linezolid resistance was observed in S. epidermidis (15.6%) and S. hominis (14.3%). These findings are consistent with the results of the presence of the cfr gene in both bacteria. Linezolid resistance might be created due to the horizontal transfer of resistance mediated by the cfr gene between patients.
The qacA/B genes caused reduced susceptibility to a wide range of antimicrobial organic cations. The current study’s findings showed that all species had the qacA/B genes ranging from 25% to 58% (except S. hyicus), and the highest percentage was related to S. caprae. Taheri et al. reported that the qacA/B genes were detected in 3% of CoNS isolates (41). In another study, the qacA/B genes were detected in susceptible and resistant samples (53%) to chlorhexidine (42). The evidence showed a strong relationship between reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine and the presence of qacA/B genes (43, 44). Different studies reported the detection of the qacA/B genes and the susceptibility of chlorhexidine depending on the region studied (45, 46).
5.1. Conclusions
This study evaluated antibiotic-resistant staphylococci, the ability to carry mecA/vanA and cfr-qacA/B genes, and the diversity of SCCmec elements in CoNS isolates. S. capitis and S. epidermidis were the two common species of CoNS. Moreover, rifampicin was the target of the highest resistance, and multidrug resistance was commonly observed in staphylococcal spp. Vancomycin resistance was not observed in any of the methods used. This antibiotic can be selected for CoNS treatment. In the PCR method, the mean of mecA-positive isolates was 22%; nevertheless, 49.3% of CoNS isolates were resistant to cefoxitin using the disk diffusion method. The difference in phenotypic and genotypic results might return to the presence of another resistance mechanism. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type III as a hospital-acquired infection had the highest percentage of nine species of CoNS. The cfr gene was observed in S. epidermidis and S. hominis, which is related to linezolid resistance. Additionally, in this study, all species had the qacA/B genes (except S. hyicus), and the highest percentage was related to S. caprae. Due to the abundance of mecA genes and results of phenotypic methods between CoNS isolates, the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains is increasing. Furthermore, due to the difference between phenotypic and genotypic results, it is better to use phenotypic and genotypic methods simultaneously. Finally, due to the high prevalence of these bacteria and the high antibiotic resistance of these strains, further attention should be paid to these bacteria in infection control processes in hospitals.
References
-
1.
Shrestha LB, Bhattarai NR, Khanal B. Antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation among coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from clinical samples at a tertiary care hospital of eastern Nepal. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:89. [PubMed ID: 28883911]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5579930]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0251-7.
-
2.
Lenart-Boron A, Wolny-Koladka K, Stec J, Kasprowic A. Phenotypic and Molecular Antibiotic Resistance Determination of Airborne Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus spp. Strains from Healthcare Facilities in Southern Poland. Microb Drug Resist. 2016;22(7):515-22. [PubMed ID: 26978225]. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2015.0271.
-
3.
Franca A, Gaio V, Lopes N, Melo LDR. Virulence Factors in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. Pathogens. 2021;10(2):170. [PubMed ID: 33557202]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7913919]. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020170.
-
4.
Deyno S, Fekadu S, Seyfe S. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of coagulase negative staphylococci clinical isolates from Ethiopia: a meta-analysis. BMC Microbiol. 2018;18(1):43. [PubMed ID: 29801462]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5970528]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-018-1188-6.
-
5.
Pereira VC, Romero LC, Pinheiro-Hubinger L, Oliveira A, Martins KB, Cunha M. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: a 20-year study on the antimicrobial resistance profile of blood culture isolates from a teaching hospital. Braz J Infect Dis. 2020;24(2):160-9. [PubMed ID: 32084346]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9392043]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2020.01.003.
-
6.
Becker K, Both A, Weisselberg S, Heilmann C, Rohde H. Emergence of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020;18(4):349-66. [PubMed ID: 32056452]. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2020.1730813.
-
7.
Obajuluwa AF, Onaolapo JA, Olayinka BO, Adeshina GO. Antibiotics susceptibility pattern of coagulase negative staphylococci isolates from orthopaedic patients. Int Educ Appl Sci Res J. 2016;1(3):4-7.
-
8.
Jin Y, Zhou W, Zhan Q, Zheng B, Chen Y, Luo Q, et al. Genomic Epidemiology and Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Bloodstream Infections in China. mSystems. 2021;6(6):e0083721. [PubMed ID: 34726482]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8562482]. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00837-21.
-
9.
Jiang N, Li J, Fessler AT, Wang Y, Schwarz S, Wu C. Novel pseudo-staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec element (phiSCCmecT55) in MRSA ST9. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(3):819-20. [PubMed ID: 30445603]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky457.
-
10.
Lakhundi S, Zhang K. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31(4):e00020-18. [PubMed ID: 30209034]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6148192]. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00020-18.
-
11.
Loncaric I, Kubber-Heiss A, Posautz A, Ruppitsch W, Lepuschitz S, Schauer B, et al. Characterization of mecC gene-carrying coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. isolated from various animals. Vet Microbiol. 2019;230:138-44. [PubMed ID: 30827379]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.02.014.
-
12.
Schwarz S, Fessler AT, Loncaric I, Wu C, Kadlec K, Wang Y, et al. Antimicrobial Resistance among Staphylococci of Animal Origin. Microbiol Spectr. 2018;6(4). [PubMed ID: 29992898]. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0010-2017.
-
13.
Bhosle PS, Thakar VH, Modak M. Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus Species Isolated from Blood Culture: A Pathogen or a Contaminant? Natl J Lab Med. 2022;11(4):MO05-9. https://doi.org/10.7860/njlm/2022/55619.2671.
-
14.
Besharati R, Ghafouri M, Safamanesh S, Khosrojerdi M, Ghazvini K, Nojumi S, et al. Molecular Epidemiology of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Harboring Hospital-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Septicemic Children, Northeastern Iran, Bojnurd. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2019;12(2):e68183. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.68183.
-
15.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). M100-S24: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M100-S24. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI; 2014.
-
16.
Mbanga J, Masuku S, Luphahla S. Antibiotic Resistance Patterns and Virulence Factors of Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus Associated with Urinary Tract Infections in Bulawayo Province, Zimbabwe. J Adv Med Med Res. 2016;11(3):1-9.
-
17.
Pinheiro L, Brito CI, Pereira VC, Oliveira A, Bartolomeu AR, Camargo CH, et al. Susceptibility Profile of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus Isolated from Blood Cultures to Vancomycin and Novel Antimicrobial Drugs over a Period of 12 Years. Microb Drug Resist. 2016;22(4):283-93. [PubMed ID: 26623676]. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2015.0064.
-
18.
Bhatt P, Tandel K, Singh A, Kumar M, Grover N, Sahni AK. Prevalence and molecular characterization of methicillin resistance among Coagulase-negative Staphylococci at a tertiary care center. Med J Armed Forces India. 2016;72(Suppl 1):S54-8. [PubMed ID: 28050071]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5192199]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.03.007.
-
19.
Hauschild T, Stepanovic S. Identification of Staphylococcus spp. by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of dnaJ gene. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(12):3875-9. [PubMed ID: 18832127]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2593281]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00810-08.
-
20.
Shah MM, Iihara H, Noda M, Song SX, Nhung PH, Ohkusu K, et al. dnaJ gene sequence-based assay for species identification and phylogenetic grouping in the genus Staphylococcus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57(Pt 1):25-30. [PubMed ID: 17220435]. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64205-0.
-
21.
Havaei SA, Moghim S, Shahin M, Azimian A, Ghanbari F, Shokri D, et al. [A Comparison between Polymerase Chain Reaction, Oxacillin Agar Dilusion and Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion Methods in Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus Aureus]. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2013;31(232):466-74. Persian.
-
22.
Azimian A, Asghar Havaei S, Fazeli H, Naderi M, Ghazvini K, Mirab Samiee S, et al. Genetic analysis of a vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain isolated in Iran. mBio. 2012;3(6):e00442-12. [PubMed ID: 23170001]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3509435]. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00442-12.
-
23.
Kehrenberg C, Schwarz S. Distribution of florfenicol resistance genes fexA and cfr among chloramphenicol-resistant Staphylococcus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(4):1156-63. [PubMed ID: 16569824]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1426988]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.50.4.1156-1163.2006.
-
24.
Miyazaki NH, Abreu AO, Marin VA, Rezende CA, Moraes MT, Villas Boas MH. The presence of qacA/B gene in Brazilian methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102(4):539-40. [PubMed ID: 17607497]. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0074-02762007000400018.
-
25.
Boye K, Bartels MD, Andersen IS, Moller JA, Westh H. A new multiplex PCR for easy screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus SCCmec types I-V. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13(7):725-7. [PubMed ID: 17403127]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01720.x.
-
26.
Nanoukon C, Argemi X, Sogbo F, Orekan J, Keller D, Affolabi D, et al. Pathogenic features of clinically significant coagulase-negative staphylococci in hospital and community infections in Benin. Int J Med Microbiol. 2017;307(1):75-82. [PubMed ID: 27876296]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.11.001.
-
27.
Siti NM, Wan Nazirah WAB, Rosni I, Mohamed AN, Salbiah N. Species distribution and clinical profiles of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolated from blood cultures among paediatric patients in Hospital Kuala Lumpur. Med J Malaysia. 2020;75(3):266-73. [PubMed ID: 32467543].
-
28.
Shrestha LB, Bhattarai NR, Khanal B. Comparative evaluation of methods for the detection of biofilm formation in coagulase-negative staphylococci and correlation with antibiogram. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:607-13. [PubMed ID: 29731649]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5926075]. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S159764.
-
29.
Bhatt P, Tandel K, Singh A, Mugunthan M, Grover N, Sahni AK. Species distribution and antimicrobial resistance pattern of Coagulase-negative Staphylococci at a tertiary care centre. Med J Armed Forces India. 2016;72(1):71-4. [PubMed ID: 26900227]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4723702]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.12.007.
-
30.
Giormezis N, Kolonitsiou F, Foka A, Drougka E, Liakopoulos A, Makri A, et al. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal bloodstream and prosthetic-device-associated infections: the role of biofilm formation and distribution of adhesin and toxin genes. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63(Pt 11):1500-8. [PubMed ID: 25082946]. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.075259-0.
-
31.
Cui J, Liang Z, Mo Z, Zhang J. The species distribution, antimicrobial resistance and risk factors for poor outcome of coagulase-negative staphylococci bacteraemia in China. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:65. [PubMed ID: 31044070]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6480775]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0523-5.
-
32.
Pedroso S, Sandes SHC, Filho RAT, Nunes AC, Serufo JC, Farias LM, et al. Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Human Bloodstream Infections Showed Multidrug Resistance Profile. Microb Drug Resist. 2018;24(5):635-47. [PubMed ID: 29683776]. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2017.0309.
-
33.
Paiva RM, Mombach Pinheiro Machado AB, Zavascki AP, Barth AL. Vancomycin MIC for methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus isolates: evaluation of the broth microdilution and Etest methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(12):4652-4. [PubMed ID: 20861345]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3008465]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01182-10.
-
34.
Mittal G, Bhandari V, Gaind R, Rani V, Chopra S, Dawar R, et al. Linezolid resistant coagulase negative staphylococci (LRCoNS) with novel mutations causing blood stream infections (BSI) in India. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):717. [PubMed ID: 31412801]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6694603]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4368-6.
-
35.
Nahaei MR, Shahmohammadi MR, Ebrahimi S, Milani M. Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci and Surveillance of Antibacterial Resistance in a Multi-Center Study from Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8(8):e19945. [PubMed ID: 26468362]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4600999]. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.19945v2.
-
36.
Perez LR, Antunes AL, Barth AL, d'Azevedo PA. Variations of agar screen tests for detection of methicillin resistance in staphylococci: focus on cefoxitin. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;26(4):267-70. [PubMed ID: 17318477]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-007-0275-7.
-
37.
Taha L, Stegger M, Soderquist B. Staphylococcus lugdunensis: antimicrobial susceptibility and optimal treatment options. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38(8):1449-55. [PubMed ID: 31144243]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6647525]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03571-6.
-
38.
Rajan V, Kumar VG, Gopal S. A cfr-positive clinical staphylococcal isolate from India with multiple mechanisms of linezolid-resistance. Indian J Med Res. 2014;139(3):463-7. [PubMed ID: 24820843]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4069743].
-
39.
Bonilla H, Huband MD, Seidel J, Schmidt H, Lescoe M, McCurdy SP, et al. Multicity outbreak of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis associated with clonal spread of a cfr-containing strain. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(7):796-800. [PubMed ID: 20726771]. https://doi.org/10.1086/656281.
-
40.
Dinakaran V, Shankar M, Jayashree S, Rathinavel A, Gunasekaran P, Rajendhran J. Genome sequence of Staphylococcus arlettae strain CVD059, isolated from the blood of a cardiovascular disease patient. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(23):6615-6. [PubMed ID: 23144377]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3497490]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01732-12.
-
41.
Taheri N, Ardebili A, Amouzandeh-Nobaveh A, Ghaznavi-Rad E. Frequency of Antiseptic Resistance Among Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated From a University Hospital in Central Iran. Oman Med J. 2016;31(6):426-32. [PubMed ID: 27974958]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5099399]. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2016.86.
-
42.
do Vale BCM, Nogueira AG, Cidral TA, Lopes MCS, de Melo MCN. Decreased susceptibility to chlorhexidine and distribution of qacA/B genes among coagulase-negative Staphylococcus clinical samples. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):199. [PubMed ID: 30813914]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6391772]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3823-8.
-
43.
Prag G, Falk-Brynhildsen K, Jacobsson S, Hellmark B, Unemo M, Soderquist B. Decreased susceptibility to chlorhexidine and prevalence of disinfectant resistance genes among clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis. APMIS. 2014;122(10):961-7. [PubMed ID: 24628476]. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12239.
-
44.
Zhang M, O'Donoghue MM, Ito T, Hiramatsu K, Boost MV. Prevalence of antiseptic-resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci colonising nurses and the general population in Hong Kong. J Hosp Infect. 2011;78(2):113-7. [PubMed ID: 21507521]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2011.02.018.
-
45.
Wassenaar TM, Ussery D, Nielsen LN, Ingmer H. Review and phylogenetic analysis of qac genes that reduce susceptibility to quaternary ammonium compounds in Staphylococcus species. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2015;5(1):44-61. [PubMed ID: 25883793]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4397847]. https://doi.org/10.1556/EUJMI-D-14-00038.
-
46.
Damavandi MS, Safarpour Dehkordi M, Dehghan A, Heibati F, Taghaddosi R, Gholipour A. Detection of Antiseptic Resistance Genes among Staphylococcus aureus Colonising Nurses and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Clinical Specimens at Teaching Hospitals in Southwest of Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2017;10(1):e39285. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.39285.