Effect of Osthole on the Control of Listeriosis

authors:

avatar Javad Abkhoo 1 , avatar Somayeh Jahani ORCID 2 , *

Institute of Plant Biotechnology, University of Zabol, Zabol, IR Iran
Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR Iran

how to cite: Abkhoo J, Jahani S. Effect of Osthole on the Control of Listeriosis. Int J Infect. 2016;3(4):e39029. https://doi.org/10.17795/iji.39029.

Abstract

Background:

Listeria monocytogenes is the causal agent of listeriosis, a foodborne infection.

Objectives:

Osthole has antibacterial properties, but its mechanisms of action is still unknown.

Materials and Methods:

Two millimoles of osthole was inoculated in the broth culture of Listeria monocytogenes. To study the mechanism of action, the ATP levels of cells were measured.

Results:

Listeria monocytogenes was controlled using 2 mM of osthole. Treatment of L. monocytogenes by 2 mM osthole had no effect on the ATP level.

Conclusions:

Probable mechanism of suppression of energy generation is suppression of the rise in glucose.

1. Background

Listeria monocytogenes is a species of bacteria, which causes the infection listeriosis (1), responsible for an estimated 1600 diseases and 260 deaths in the United States of America (USA) (2).

Plants can be useful sources of antimicrobial agents. Osthole (chemical formula shown in Figure 1) is isolated from several medicinal plants such as Cnidium monnieri. Osthole has antituberculous properties (3).

More than one mechanism can be involved in osthole activity. However, a pertinence of mechanisms may be discounted if the inhibition of energy generation occurs. These are because cells which cannot generate energy are unable to change their metabolism to adapt to the antimicrobial treatment.

2. Objectives

The aim of this study was to measure antibacterial activities and mechanisms of action of osthole.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. The Antimicrobial Agent and Culture Conditions of L. monocytogenes

Osthole was supplied by Sigma-Aldrich. Listeria monocytogenes was grown on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar.

3.2. Determination of Bactericidal Concentrations of the Osthole

Concentrations of cultures were adjusted by dilution with the TSB + YE. Bactericidal concentrations of the osthole were determined as described by Shabala et al. (4).

3.3. Determination of ATP Level

The bacteria were grown to their growth phase as described above. The ATP level was determined as described by Shabala et al. (4).

3.4. ATP Analysis

ATP content of samples was measured by a light output reaction (5) in that light output was amplified by the DEAE-dextran (6).

3.5. Measurement of Protein Content

Protein content of cell suspensions was measured by utilization a modified Lowry method.

4. Results

The experiment was carried out to measure the concentration of osthole required for the bactericidal activity against L. monocytogenes. Bactericidal effects were defined as a > 1-log depletion in the number of CFU in comparison with those of controls. Minimum concentration of the needed osthole for a bactericidal activity against L. monocytogenes was 2 mM (Figure 2).

The suppressive effect on ATP generation: When glucose was supplied to L. monocytogenes cell in 25 mM HEPES, the ATP level was altered compared to the level in controls (Figure 3A). Incubation of L. monocytogenes with 2 mM osthole inhibited the uptake of ATP (Figure 3A). Furthermore 2 mM of osthole had no effects on ATP level when the energized cell was treated (Figure 3B).

Chemical Formula of 7-Methoxy-8-Isopentenoxycoumarin
Chemical Formula of 7-Methoxy-8-Isopentenoxycoumarin
Effect of Osthole on Listeria monocytogenes in TSB ± YE at 20°C and pH 7.0
The data are the average of three experiments
Cellular ATP Concentrations Expressed as Femtomoles Per Microgram of Protein From L. monocytogenes in 25 mM HEPES Buffer (pH 7.0) at 20°C
Cellular ATP Concentrations Expressed as Femtomoles Per Microgram of Protein From L. monocytogenes in 25 mM HEPES Buffer (pH 7.0) at 20°C

(A) Cells were exposed to osthole at zero time, and all treatments except the buffer treatment were energized with 0.25% glucose for 5 minutes. (B) All treatments except the buffer treatment were energized with 0.25% glucose at zero time, and osthole was added at five minutes. The treatments included buffer, glucose, osthole (2 mM) and CCCP (10 µM). The data are the average of three experiments, and values, which are significantly different as determined by the Student t test (P = 0.05), are indicated by different letters.

5. Discussion

When applied to L. monocytogenes prior to glucose, it was observed that osthole inhibited the uptake in ATP level, which occurred in the controls. However, the osthole did not cause ATP reduction from the cell energized by glucose (7).

The current study findings are in contrast with the ion transport model for activities suggested by Ultee et al. (8) for the carvacrol. Carvacrol is bactericidal to Bacillus cereus at concentrations of 1.5 to 2 mM (9). Addition of 0.15 mM of carvacrol also disjoined membrane potential (10, 11). When the effects of carvacrol on the growth of B. cereus were compared with the effects of the related molecule, it was found which concentration of the molecules possessing the hydroxyl group were needed to the growth suppression (12). It is hard to differentiate between membrane disruptions and ion transport, and carvacrol is reported to uptake the staining of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1, 13).

The CCCP may be anticipated in reducing ATP pools to preserve its normal pH; the bacteria utilize ATPase to export H+ (4, 14). The ATPase suppression is a real possibility as Rico-Munoz et al. (15) demonstrated which propyl gallate could reduce the activity of ATPase of S. aureus.

The L. monocytogenes has two glucose systems (16-18). It seems that osthole inactivates the transport mechanisms. The membrane effects cannot be decreased, as Walsh et al. (19) showed the potassium decline from E. coli treated with the eugenol.

5.1. Conclusions

The obtained results indicated the suppression of energy metabolisms of L. monocytogenes when the cell is treated with osthole.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Helander IM, Alakomi HL, Latva-Kala K, Mattila-Sandholm T, Pol I, Smid EJ, et al. Characterization of the Action of Selected Essential Oil Components on Gram-Negative Bacteria. J Agricul Food Chemist. 1998;46(9):3590-5. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf980154m.

  • 2.

    Khan SH, Badovinac VP. Listeria monocytogenes: a model pathogen to study antigen-specific memory CD8 T cell responses. Semin Immunopathol. 2015;37(3):301-10. [PubMed ID: 25860798]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-015-0477-5.

  • 3.

    Wei J, Guo N, Liang J, Yuan P, Shi Q, Tang X, et al. DNA microarray gene expression profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis when exposed to osthole. Pol J Microbiol. 2013;62(1):23-30. [PubMed ID: 23829074].

  • 4.

    Shabala L, Budde B, Ross T, Siegumfeldt H, Jakobsen M, McMeekin T. Responses of Listeria monocytogenes to acid stress and glucose availability revealed by a novel combination of fluorescence microscopy and microelectrode ion-selective techniques. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(4):1794-802. [PubMed ID: 11916698].

  • 5.

    Lundin A. Use of firefly luciferase in ATP-related assays of biomass, enzymes, and metabolites. Methods Enzymol. 2000;305:346-70. [PubMed ID: 10812612].

  • 6.

    Ishida A, Yoshikawa T, Nakazawa T, Kamidate T. Enhanced firefly bioluminescence assay of ATP in the presence of ATP extractants by using diethylaminoethyl-dextran. Anal Biochem. 2002;305(2):236-41. [PubMed ID: 12054452]. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.2002.5680.

  • 7.

    Lauret R, Morel-Deville F, Berthier F, Champomier-Verges M, Postma P, Ehrlich SD, et al. Carbohydrate Utilization in Lactobacillus sake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(6):1922-7. [PubMed ID: 16535331].

  • 8.

    Ultee A, Bennik MH, Moezelaar R. The phenolic hydroxyl group of carvacrol is essential for action against the food-borne pathogen Bacillus cereus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(4):1561-8. [PubMed ID: 11916669].

  • 9.

    Ultee A, Gorris LG, Smid EJ. Bactericidal activity of carvacrol towards the food-borne pathogen Bacillus cereus. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;85(2):211-8. [PubMed ID: 9750293].

  • 10.

    Bowles BL, Miller AJ. Antibotulinal properties of selected aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes. J Food Prot. 1993;56(1):788–94. [PubMed ID: 15144736].

  • 11.

    Ultee A, Kets EP, Smid EJ. Mechanisms of action of carvacrol on the food-borne pathogen Bacillus cereus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(10):4606-10. [PubMed ID: 10508096].

  • 12.

    Kwon JA, Yu CB, Park HD. Bacteriocidal effects and inhibition of cell separation of cinnamic aldehyde on Bacillus cereus. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2003;37(1):61-5. [PubMed ID: 12803558].

  • 13.

    Lambert RJW, Skandamis PN, Coote PJ, Nychas GJE. A study of the minimum inhibitory concentration and mode of action of oregano essential oil, thymol and carvacrol. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;91(3):453-62.

  • 14.

    Wendakoon CN, Sakaguchi M. Inhibition of amino acid decarboxylase activity of Enterobacter aerogenes by active components in spices. J Food Prot. 1995;5(1):280–3. [PubMed ID: 15144476]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.1956.x.

  • 15.

    Rico-Munoz E, Bargiota EE, Davidson PM. Effect of selected phenolic compounds on the membrane-bound adenosine triphosphatase of Staphylococcus aureus. Food Microbiol. 1987;4(1):239–49. [PubMed ID: 14766915]. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26674-0.

  • 16.

    Blaszyk M, Holley RA. Interaction of monolaurin, eugenol and sodium citrate on growth of common meat spoilage and pathogenic organisms. Int J Food Microbiol. 1998;39(3):175-83. [PubMed ID: 9553796].

  • 17.

    Brul S, Coote P. Preservative agents in foods: mode of action and microbial resistance mechanisms. Int J Food Microbiol. 1999;50:1–17. [PubMed ID: 25962418]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-015-0151-y.

  • 18.

    Parker C, Hutkins RW. Listeria monocytogenes Scott A transports glucose by high-affinity and low-affinity glucose transport systems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63(2):543-6. [PubMed ID: 9023935].

  • 19.

    Walsh SE, Maillard JY, Russell AD, Catrenich CE, Charbonneau DL, Bartolo RG. Activity and mechanisms of action of selected biocidal agents on Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(2):240-7. [PubMed ID: 12534815].