1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Animals
3.2. Chemicals
3.3. Preparation and Isolation of RPTCs Cells
3.4. Assay for Cell Viability
3.5. Measurement of Mitochondrial Activity, Normalization, and Isolation
3.6. Study Design
3.7. ROS Measurement in the RPTCs
3.8. Analysis of the MMP in the RPTCs
3.9. Test for Lysosomal Membrane Damage in RPTCs
3.10. Lipid Peroxidation Measurement in the RPTCs
3.11. The RPTCs GSH and GSSG Measurements
3.12. Test for Caspase-3 Activity in the RPTCs
3.13. Screening of Cellular Uptake Mechanism of Isolated Mitochondria
3.14. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Function Assay of Freshly Isolated Mitochondria in Mitotherapy
Mitochondrial health assurance assays. Evaluation of succinate dehydrogenase (A) and potential of mitochondrial membrane (B) of isolated mitochondria. SDH activity was measured through 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) dye following two-hour incubation. Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) was measured by using Rh123 following two-hour incubation. Values were demonstrated as mean ± SD (n = 3). ns. No marked difference vs. zero time in the control group (P < 0.05).
4.2. The Effect of Mitochondrial Transplantation on Viability Assay
Evaluation of cytotoxicity lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). A, Cisplatin toxicity on renal proximal tubular cells (RPTCs) at different concentrations; B, Prevention of LDH leakiness on RPTCs with different concentrations of freshly isolated mitochondria. Values were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ****Significant difference vs. indicated groups (P < 0.0001). *Significant difference vs. the control group (P < 0.05).
Effect of mitochondrial transplantation on cisplatin-induced lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) leakiness. Prevention of LDH leakiness on renal proximal tubular cells (RPTCs) at different times by female and male mitochondrial transplantation (200 µg/mL). Values are expressed as the mean of three separate experiments (± SD). ****Significant difference vs. control RPTCs (P < 0.0001). ####Significant difference vs. cisplatin group (P < 0.0001). ##Significant difference vs. cisplatin group (P < 0.01). & significant difference vs. M-mitotherapy group (P < 0.05).
4.3. The Effect of Mitochondrial Transplantation on ROS Level
Effect of mitochondrial transplantation on cisplatin-induced ROS production. Evaluation of low and high mitochondria administration (A) and the difference between female and male mitochondria administration (B). Values were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). **** (P < 0.0001) significant difference vs. indicated groups. * Significant difference between two mitotherapy groups (P < 0.05).
4.4. The Effect of Mitochondrial Transplantation on MMP Assay
Effect of mitochondrial transplantation on cisplatin-induced Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) collapse. Evaluation of low and high mitochondria administration (A) and the difference between female and male mitochondria administration (B). Values were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). **** (P < 0.0001). *** (P < 0.001). Significant differences vs. indicated groups. * Significant difference between two mitotherapy groups (P < 0.05).
4.5. The Effect of Mitochondrial Transplantation on Lysosomal Membrane Integrity
Effect of mitochondrial transplantation on lysosomal membrane leakiness. Comparison of low and high mitochondria administration (A) and the difference between male and female mitochondria administration (B). Values were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). **** Significant differences vs. indicated groups (P < 0.0001). ** Significant difference between two mitotherapy groups (P < 0.01). * Significant difference between two mitotherapy groups (P < 0.05).
4.6. The Effect of Mitochondrial Transplantation on Lipid Peroxidation
Effect of mitochondrial transplantation on lipid peroxidation (LPO). Comparison of low and high mitochondria administration (A) and the difference between male and female mitochondria administration (B). Values were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). **** Significant difference vs. control RPTCs (P < 0.0001). #### Significant difference vs. cisplatin-treated RPTCs (P < 0.0001). *** Significant difference vs. control RPTCs (P < 0.001). ** Significant difference vs. cisplatin-treated RPTCs (P < 0.01). * Significant difference between two mitotherapy groups (P < 0.05).
4.7. The Effect of Mitochondrial Transplantation on GSH Level
Mitochondrial transplantation effect on glutathione (GSH) and GSSG. lack of glutathione determination (A, C) and GSSG determination (B, D) in renal proximal tubular cells (RPTCs). Renal proximal tubular cells were treated with cisplatin, and freshly isolated mitochondria were added. Values were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). **** Crucial difference vs. control RPTCs (P < 0.0001). #### Crucial difference vs. cisplatin-treated RPTCs (P < 0.0001). ** Crucial difference vs. cisplatin-treated RPTCs (P < 0.01). * Crucial difference between two mitotherapy groups (P < 0.05).
4.8. The Effect of Mitochondrial Transplantation on Caspase-3 Activity
Effect of mitochondrial transplantation on caspase‐3 activity in renal proximal tubular cells (RPTCs) affected by cisplatin. The caspase‐3 activity was lower in the control group, and in the cisplatin group significantly increased. The caspase-3 activity was suppressed in all mitotherapy groups. Values were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). **** Significant difference vs. control RPTCs (P < 0.0001). #### Significant difference vs. cisplatin-treated RPTCs (P < 0.0001). ** Significant difference.
4.9. The Effect of Endocytosis in the Internalization of the Isolated Mitochondria
Inhibition of mitochondrial transplantation functions by cytochalasin D. Pre-incubation of renal proximal tubular cells (RPTCs) with cytochalasin D significantly inhibits the effectiveness of mitochondrial transplantation. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay (A), ROS formation (B), caspase-3 activity (C), and ATP content (D). Values were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). **** Significant difference vs. mitotherapy group (P < 0.0001). ** Significant difference vs. mitotherapy group (P < 0.01). * Significant difference vs. mitotherapy group (P < 0.05).










