Abstract
Background:
Froriepia subpinnata is one of the plants used in the diet of Iranian people. Previous studies have investigated the antioxidant and antibacterial effects of this plant extract, but no study has been conducted on its anticancer properties.Objectives:
In this study, we investigated the effect of F. subpinnata extract on MCF-7 breast cancer cells.Methods:
The inhibitory effect of F. subpinnata leaf extract was determined on the growth of cancer cells by the MTT test. The ROS (reactive oxygen species) test was used to investigate the impact of the extract on intracellular oxidative stress. Flow cytometry and real-time PCR tests were used to investigate the apoptosis-related molecular processes. The GC-MS analysis was performed to determine the most abundant components.Results:
The GC-MS analysis showed that phytol, mono-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP), cinnamaldehyde, and neophytadiene constituted 60% of the extracted content. The MTT assay demonstrated that F. subpinnata leaf extract caused 50% lethality at a 400 μg/mL dose in MCF7 cells. The F. subpinnata extract at low doses decreased the ROS level for 24 hours in MCF-7, but by increasing the concentration, the ROS levels increased. At the IC50 dose (inhibitory concentration (IC) associated with 50% impact), the ROS level increased 3.5 times compared to the control group. Examining the effect of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) showed that this antioxidant agent could prevent the lethal impact of the extract and eliminate the ROS increase in MCF7 cells. Flow cytometry and real-time PCR results showed that the extract specifically induced apoptosis through the internal apoptosis pathway in this cancer cell line.Conclusions:
The F. subpinnata extract induced apoptosis by increasing ROS in MCF-7 cancer cells and can be considered for further studies.Keywords
Froriepia subpinnata Apoptosis Intracellular Oxidative Stress Breast Cancer
1. Background
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy worldwide and the main cause of cancer-related deaths. The issue of breast cancer treatment has received considerable critical attention (1). Breast cancer has become a fatal threat to women's health (2). Cancer prevention and treatment can coexist with traditional approaches. Indeed, numerous tests on breast cancer cell survival and proliferation revealed strong additive or synergistic effects of combinations of anticancer drugs/extracts from a plant that may decrease the unspecific toxicity of anticancer drugs (3). Since chemotherapeutic agents and cancer treatment methods are not very effective in cancer therapy, research on medications or new methods that affect apoptosis resistance has become more practical (4, 5).
Tumor expansion or regression is based on the balance between apoptosis and cell proliferation. Programmed cell death, which is called apoptosis, is a programmed process of cell suicide in response to specific signals, both extracellular and intracellular. Apoptosis is genetically or chemically regulated under certain conditions, such as cancer and autoimmune diseases. The ratio between apoptosis and cell proliferation controls normal growth. On the other hand, intracellular challenges such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), hypoxia, and nutrient deprivation can disrupt homeostasis regulation (6, 7). In this regard, an excessive increase in ROS levels can induce apoptosis (8, 9). Although it has been revealed in various studies that plant extracts have antioxidant properties (10-12), many studies have shown that plant extracts could increase ROS in cancer cells, which ultimately leads to apoptosis (13-15).
Investigating natural foods and their derived compounds is a continuous concern in medical research to treat cancer. Several types of papers have been conducted about chemopreventive compounds against cancers. Understanding the mutual link between natural products and apoptosis in cancer can lead to better medicines that are less toxic and act more specifically. Previous studies have indicated that natural compounds not only induced apoptosis but also reduced chemotherapy resistance (6, 16-18).
Since medicinal plants can stop the growth and development of tumor cells without serious damage to normal cells, they could be suitable medicines for cancer therapy (19-21). Froriepia subpinnata (F. subpinnata) is a medicinal plant from the Apiaceae family and native to northern Iran, which also has different species in Eurasia and Africa (22). Because of its valuable chemical compounds, the Apiaceae family has antioxidative, anticancer, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory properties (23, 24). Froriepia subpinnata has chemical compounds such as triterpenoid, saponins, flavonoids, and coumarins that help human health as an appetizer, antiseptic, antispasmodic, sedative, and anti-allergy agent (25, 26). Since this plant has antibacterial properties, it is suggested to be used in the pharmaceutical and food industries (27, 28). The most abundant compounds of this plant are p-cymen-8-ol, α-Terpinolene, limonene, E-ocimenone, neophytadiene, and β-elemene, in sequence (25).
2. Objectives
As mentioned before, breast cancer is one of the fatal diseases. Hence, this study aimed to determine the impact of F. subpinnata extract on apoptotic activity and its anticancer properties on breast cancer cell line MCF-7.
3. Methods
3.1. Preparation of Froriepia subpinnata Leaf Extract
To prepare F. subpinnata leaf methanolic extract, the leaves were dried in the shade at room temperature (22 - 25°C). Then, they were powdered by an electric mill. Next, the obtained powder was mixed with methanol (80%) and shaken for 48 hours at room temperature. Finally, to obtain a clear solution, the extract was refined several times with Whatman filter paper (Grade 1), and then the organic solvent was concentrated via a rotary evaporator at 40°C.
3.2. Essential Oil Extraction and GC-MS Analysis
The essential oil was prepared using the Clevenger method. Then, GC-MS was performed using helium gas at a 1 mL/min flow rate, and the injector temperature was set at 250°C. After maintaining a temperature of 50°C for 2 minutes, the oven temperature gradually increased at a rate of 10°C per minute. After 15 minutes, the final temperature reached 250°C. The GC-MS analysis was conducted using a Thermo Finnigan Trace DSQ GC-MS machine. A DB-5 capillary column, equipped with helium as the carrier gas, was used to operate it at a 70 eV ionization energy. We determined the constituents by comparing their relative retention time (RT) and mass spectra to those of standards, NIST, Wiley, and Adams library data of the GC-MS system, as well as literary sources.
3.3. Cell Culture and MTT Assay
The MCF-7 cell line was purchased from the Iranian Genetic Resources Center in Tehran, Iran. For the proliferation of MCF-7 cells, DMEM media containing 10% FBS and 1% antibiotics were used, while MCF-10A cells were cultured in RPMI. The incubation of cells was done at 37°C, in 5% CO2, with 95% humidity. To evaluate the viability of cells treated with the extract, the MTT assay was used. For this purpose, 5000 cells/well of the MCF-7 cell line were cultured in a 96-well plate and then incubated for 24 h. After that, F. subpinnata in different concentrations was applied to treat the cells. After 24 h treatment, the first 30 μL of the MTT solution (0.5 μg/mL in PBS) was added to each well, and then the plates were incubated for 3 h. After the culture medium was removed, 100 μL of DMSO was added to each well, and then the plate was gently shaken. Finally, the percentage of cell viability was calculated by reading the absorbance of each well at 570 nm by an ELISA reader (Eliza MAT 2000, DRG Instruments, GmbH, Marburg, Germany). The 5 mM concentration of NAC (N-acetyl cysteine) was used for the NAC and combined groups, and the solvent of both the extract and NAC was the culture medium.
3.4. Intracellular ROS Assay
The amount of ROS was measured by the ROS assay Kit (Teb Pazhouhan Razi Company) based on the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, as the cultured cells in a 96-well plate reached 80% confluency, they were treated with the intended concentrations of the extract. After 24 h, the cell culture medium was removed, and then 100 μL of ready assay buffer was added to each well. Next, the buffer was removed, and 100 μL of DCF staining buffer was added. After the plate was held at 37°C in the dark for 60 min, 100 μL of stimulator buffer was added, and the plate was kept at 37°C for 20 min in the dark. Eventually, the wells were emptied, 100 μL of the ready assay buffer was added, and the plate was read at the excitation wavelength of 485 nm and the emission wavelength of 538 nm by a plate reader (Eliza MAT 2000, DRG Instruments, GmbH, Marburg, Germany).
3.5. Gene Expression Assessment
To assess the effect of the compounds on the expression of BAX, BCL-2, and TP53 genes, real-time PCR was performed. In summary, RNA was initially extracted from treated cells with TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol. For measuring the quality and concentration of the extracted RNA, NanoDrop™ 2000/2000c spectrophotometer was used. Next, cDNA was synthesized using a Thermo Scientific Kit. Next, using RealQ Plus 2x Master Mix (AMPLIQON), real-time PCR was accomplished. The GAPDH gene was utilized as a housekeeping gene. The primers were designed for each gene and controlled for their specificity using BLAST on the NCBI site. The 2-ΔΔCT formula was used to calculate the percentage of the relative gene expression. The primers used in this study are as follows: GAPDH forward primer: '5CCCCAGCAAGAGCACAAGAGG3' and reverse primer: '5-AGGAGGGGAGATTCAGTGTGG 3'; BCL-2 forward primer: 5'TGGGGTCATGTGTGTGGA-G3' and reverse primer: 5'CGGTTCAGGTACTCAGTCATCC3'; BAX forward primer: 5'CC-CGAGAGGTCTTTTTCCGAG3' and reverse primer: 5'CCAGCCCATGATGGTTCTGAT3'; P53 forward primer: 5'ACCTAAAAGGAAATCTCACCC3' and reverse primer: 5'ACCCTGAG-CATAAAACAAGTC3'.
3.6. Flow Cytometry Analysis
The apoptosis and necrosis in the cells exposed to the extract were studied by the Annexin-V PE/7-ADD apoptosis diagnosis kit according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Briefly, the cells were treated with the extract for 24 h, then 60,000 cells were washed with PBS and suspended in 100 μL of Annexin V binding buffer, 5 μL of PE Annexin V, and 5 μL of 7-AAD (7-amino actinomycin D). Finally, after keeping them in the dark for 15 min, 400 μL of binding buffer was added, and samples were assayed with a flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ).
3.7. Statistical Analysis
We used SPSS software to analyze the data. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey test were used to estimate the significant differences among the groups. All experiments were repeated three times. The results were presented as mean ± SEM. Also, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 were defined as statistically significant levels.
4. Results
4.1. Froriepia subpinnata GC-MS Results
The GC-MS analysis of F. subpinnata leaf extract was done to specify the bioactive compounds. The GC-MS chromatogram (Table 1) showed that F. subpinnata comprised 32 compounds. The most abundant compounds of this plant extract, comprising 60% of the content, were phytol, mono-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP), cinnamaldehyde, and neophytadiene. Other identified compounds, each comprising less than 2% of F. subpinnata, were Alpha limonene, dodecane, 2-pentanone 4-hydroxy 4-methyl, tetradecane, 1-chlorooctadecane, N-hexadecyl bromide, tetra methyl adamantane, neophytadiene (isomer), phytol acetate, octadecane, hexahydro pseudoionone, eugenol, nonadecane, anozol, phthalic acid, ethyl isopropyl ester, citric acid, triethyl ester, pentacosane, hexacosane, heptacosane, guanosine, and leucoglucosan.
| Number | Compounds | RT (min) | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phytol | 16.99 | 28.89 |
| 2 | Mono-ethylhexyl phthalate | 20.97 | 14.02 |
| 3 | Cinnamaldehyde | 11.91 | 9.69 |
| 4 | Neophytadiene | 10.85 | 5.59 |
| 5 | Docosane | 16.05 | 4.67 |
| 6 | Henicosane | 15.22 | 3.36 |
| 7 | Tricosane | 16.86 | 3.3 |
| 8 | Pentadecane | 9.44 | 2.75 |
| 9 | Tetracosane | 17.64 | 2.7 |
| 10 | Eicosane | 14.36 | 2.63 |
| 11 | Hexadecane | 10.54 | 2.37 |
4.2. Froriepia subpinnata Inhibited the Viability of MCF-7 and MCF-10A Cell Lines
Froriepia subpinnata extract declined the viability of MCF-7 and MCF-10A cell lines in a dose-dependent manner. The IC50 of the extract for MCF-7 cells was about 400 μg/mL. The extract did not significantly affect cell viability up to 200 μg/mL compared to the control group (Figure 1A). Moreover, MCF-10A cells treated with the extract showed more resistance to cell death than the control group, and no meaningful effect on cell viability was seen until the dose of 300 μg/mL. The IC50 was about 450 μg/mL (Figure 1B).
Compared to the IC50 group, the combination of NAC and IC50 (combined group) significantly eliminated the inhibitory effect of the extract on the viability rate. However, the combined group had a remarkably lower survival rate than the control group. The NAC group did not have a clear change compared to the control group (Figure 1C).
The effect of F. subpinnata extract on the viability of MCF-7 cells. (A) The effect of different extract concentrations on MCF-7 cell viability after 24 hours. (B) The effect of F. subpinnata extract on the viability of MCF-10A cells. (C) The combination effect of extract (IC50) with NAC on MCF-7 cell viability after 24 hours. ** and *** illustrate significant differences compared to the control with P < 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. ### indicates a significant difference compared to the IC50 group at P < 0.001. The experiments were done thrice, and the results are presented as mean ± SD.
4.3. Froriepia subpinnata Increased the ROS Levels of MCF-7 Cells
Compared to the control group, F. subpinnata extract significantly increased the ROS levels in MCF-7 cells from the dose of 300 μg/mL onwards, depending on the duration and concentration. The IC50 induced a 3.5-time increase in the ROS level compared to the control after 24 hours. On the other hand, the 200 μg/mL dose did not noticeably affect the level of ROS; even the dose of 100 μg/mL alleviated the intracellular ROS level (Figure 2A). Although the combined group reduced the ROS level compared to the IC50, it showed a significantly higher ROS level than the control group (Figure 2B).
The ROS levels after treatment with F. subpinnata. (A) The effect of the extract on ROS level after 8, 16, and 24 hours in different concentrations. (B) The effect of IC50 and combined group on the ROS levels after 24 hours. * and *** show significant differences compared to the control with P < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively. ### indicates a significant difference compared to the IC50 group at P < 0.001. The experiments were done thrice, and the results are presented as mean ± SD.
4.4. Froriepia subpinnata-Induced Apoptosis in MCF-7 Cells
The flow cytometry results indicated that the extract at the dose of IC50 caused apoptosis in MCF-7 cells compared to the control group. The combined group eliminated apoptosis compared to the IC50 group. Despite that, apoptosis was observed in the combined group compared to the control group (Figure 3).
The flow cytometry results of the apoptotic effect of F. subpinnata extract and its combination with NAC on MCF-7 cells for 24 hours. UL: necrosis, LR: primary apoptosis, UR: late apoptosis, LL: living cells. *** shows significant differences compared to the control with P < 0.001. ### indicates a significant difference compared to the IC50 group at P < 0.001. The experiments were done three times, and the results are presented as mean ± SD.
4.5. Froriepia subpinnata Modulated Gene Expressions Related to Apoptosis in MCF-7 Cells
The expression of gene TP53 in the IC50 group was significantly higher compared to the control group. Although the expression level of this gene was lower in the combined group than in the IC50 group, it was remarkably higher compared to the control group.
A significant increase in BAX expression was observed in the IC50 group compared to the control group. The BAX expression showed lower expression in the combined group than in the IC50 group, while the BAX expression had a clear increase compared to the control group.
BCL-2 expression was noticeably lower in the IC50 group than in the control group. The expression of this gene was higher in the combined group than in the IC50 group, and it did not have a significant decrease compared to the control group (Figure 4).
The TP53, BAX, and BCL-2 gene expression levels after MCF-7 treatment with F. subpinnata (IC50 and combination of NAC and IC50) after 24 hours. * and *** show significant differences compared to the control with P < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively. ### indicates a significant difference compared to the IC50 group at P < 0.001. The experiments were done three times, and the results are presented as mean ± SD.
5. Discussion
According to the World Health Organization, cancer is one of the main causes of death worldwide. In 2020, it caused about 10 million deaths, and 2.26 million cases were due to breast cancer (29). As mentioned in previous studies, many plant extracts have been identified as effective anticancer compounds (30, 31). The Apiaceae family is a large family with more than 3,000 species worldwide. The plants of this family are famous for their medicinal properties, such as estrogenic, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antiproliferative, cytotoxic, antimicrobial, and anti-neoplastic effects. Since Apiaceae are a very important source of phytochemicals, bioactive compounds with nutritional potential, polyphenolic compounds, polyethylenes, and terpenoids, they are used for cancer prevention and treatment (31-33). Also, the anticancer properties of several plants from this family, such as Ferulago Mughlea Peşmen, Seseli petraeum, and Petroselinum crispum, have been investigated in other research studies (33-35). This is the first study of the anticancer and apoptosis-inducing properties of F. subpinnata on cancer.
The GC-MS analysis results of F. subpinnata aligned with the study of Bahrami et al. (22). However, compared to other articles, there are some differences (25, 36). It seems possible that these differences are due to various reasons, such as the difference in selected parts of the plant for sampling, the season, and the harvesting area of the plant. The GC-MS showed that the most abundant compounds of this plant have anticancer properties. As mentioned in other articles, compounds like phytol, cinnamaldehyde, and neophytadiene play a role in inducing cell death and preventing cell proliferation (37-39).
In the present research, F. subpinnata extract reduced the survival rate of MCF-7 cancer cells and increased intracellular oxidative stress. Many studies have shown that the increased intracellular oxidative stress can induce different models of cell death, including apoptosis (40). Based on observations, it can be concluded that the extract induces cell death by increasing intracellular oxidative stress. This conclusion is supported by the fact that the extract's effect on the survival rate and intracellular oxidative stress subsided when NAC was introduced. Other studies indicated that F. subpinnata has relatively good antioxidant properties (26, 41), while in the present research, high concentrations of F. subpinnata increased the ROS levels when treating MCF-7 cells. This raises questions about F. subpinnata discrepancy, which will be discussed in the following. Even though the extract showed an antioxidant effect in MCF-7 cancer cells in sub-toxic concentrations, the effect of the extract was pro-oxidant in doses that significantly decreased the survival rate. This conflicting effect has been reported in different studies of various herbal compounds. Studies have shown that plant extracts and compounds derived from them have an antioxidant effect (42, 43), yet these compounds can induce cell death and stimulate apoptosis by increasing ROS levels in cancer cell lines (44-46). As Lambert and Elias demonstrated in their study, catechins are chemical antioxidants that can quench free radical species; however, they are also related to the induction of oxidative stress in cancer cells (47). Similarly, acyl pelargonidin derivatives observed in red radishes have antioxidant and pro-oxidant properties (48). The induction of apoptosis in tumor cells can result from pro-oxidant effects (47, 49). Increasing intracellular oxidative stress by herbal compounds induced apoptosis in cancer cell lines, so it could be concluded that the extract of F. subpinnata could induce apoptosis in the MCF-7 cancer cell line. In another way, this discrepancy can be well described based on GC-MS analysis. In this regard, phytol and MEHP could increase the ROS levels while other antioxidative compounds, such as cinnamaldehyde, could decrease the ROS levels. Studies showed cinnamaldehyde was effective in significantly decreasing the levels of ROS in arthritic rats (50). On the other hand, MEHP caused strongly amplified production of ROS and activation of p53 and p21 in the LNCaP human prostate adenocarcinoma cell line (51). Similarly, another study explained the apoptotic property of phytol by increasing ROS through the induction of caspase 9 and 3 in the lung carcinoma cell line (A549) (52).
Apoptosis is one of the important processes in cells, with two internal and external pathways. The intrinsic pathway inside the mitochondria is caused by various extra and intracellular stresses, as well as oxidative stress, ultimately causing cell death. The balance between anti-apoptotic proteins and pro-apoptotic proteins regulates cell death. Anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL (member of the Bcl-2 family) prevent the release of cytochrome c; on the other hand, pro-apoptotic proteins such as BAX provoke the release of Cyt-c by activating the caspase CASP9 pathway (48, 53). Our results indicated that the extract could induce apoptosis through the internal apoptosis pathway by modulating BAX and BCL-2 expressions. These changes aligned with an increase in ROS level and TP53 expression. Various studies have shown that the Apiaceae family has pro-apoptotic and antiproliferative effects on different cancer cell lines (54, 55).
5.1. Conclusions
This study determined the anticancer properties of F. subpinnata extract for the first time. The results showed that the extract of this plant increased the level of intracellular oxidative stress and induced apoptosis in MCF-7 cancer cells. It is suggested to investigate the effect of this plant extract on cancer in animal models.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Katsura C, Ogunmwonyi I, Kankam HK, Saha S. Breast cancer: Presentation, investigation and management. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2022;83(2):1-7. [PubMed ID: 35243878]. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2021.0459.
-
2.
Ganjouzadeh F, Khorrami S, Gharbi S. Controlled cytotoxicity of Ag-GO nanocomposite biosynthesized using black peel pomegranate extract against MCF-7 cell line. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2022;71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103340.
-
3.
Levitsky DO, Dembitsky VM. Anti-breast cancer agents derived from plants. Nat Prod Bioprospect. 2014;5(1):1-16. [PubMed ID: 25466288]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4327996]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13659-014-0048-9.
-
4.
Liu W, Jin W, Zhu S, Chen Y, Liu B. Targeting regulated cell death (RCD) with small-molecule compounds in cancer therapy: A revisited review of apoptosis, autophagy-dependent cell death and necroptosis. Drug Discov Today. 2022;27(2):612-25. [PubMed ID: 34718209]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2021.10.011.
-
5.
Khorrami S, Zarepour A, Zarrabi A. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles at low temperature in a fast pace with unique DPPH radical scavenging and selective cytotoxicity against MCF-7 and BT-20 tumor cell lines. Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2019;24. e00393. [PubMed ID: 31763203]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6864360]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00393.
-
6.
Kim C, Kim B. Anti-cancer natural products and their bioactive compounds inducing ER stress-mediated apoptosis: A review. Nutrients. 2018;10(8). [PubMed ID: 30081573]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6115829]. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10081021.
-
7.
Fereidooni F, Komeili G, Fanaei H, Safari T, Khorrami S, Feizabad AK. Protective effects of ginseng on memory and learning and prevention of hippocampal oxidative damage in streptozotocin-induced Alzheimer's in a rat model. Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res. 2020;37:116-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npbr.2020.08.001.
-
8.
Samandari-Bahraseman MR, Khorsand B, Zareei S, Amanlou M, Rostamabadi H. Various concentrations of hesperetin induce different types of programmed cell death in human breast cancerous and normal cell lines in a ROS-dependent manner. Chem Biol Interact. 2023;382:110642. [PubMed ID: 37487865]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110642.
-
9.
Simon HU, Haj-Yehia A, Levi-Schaffer F. Role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in apoptosis induction. Apoptosis. 2000;5(5):415-8. [PubMed ID: 11256882]. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009616228304.
-
10.
Khanal P, Patil BM. In vitro and in silico anti-oxidant, cytotoxicity and biological activities of Ficus benghalensis and Duranta repens. Chin Herb Med. 2020;12(4):406-13. [PubMed ID: 36120176]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9476643]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chmed.2020.02.004.
-
11.
Khalaf NA, Shakya AK, Al-Othman A, El-Agbar Z, Farah H. Antioxidant activity of some common plants. Turkish J Biol. 2008;32:51-5.
-
12.
Stagos D. Antioxidant activity of polyphenolic plant extracts. Antioxidants (Basel). 2019;9(1). [PubMed ID: 31878236]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7022939]. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9010019.
-
13.
Thayyullathil F, Chathoth S, Hago A, Patel M, Galadari S. Rapid reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation induced by curcumin leads to caspase-dependent and -independent apoptosis in L929 cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;45(10):1403-12. [PubMed ID: 18762247]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.08.014.
-
14.
Juan ME, Wenzel U, Daniel H, Planas JM. Resveratrol induces apoptosis through ROS-dependent mitochondria pathway in HT-29 human colorectal carcinoma cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(12):4813-8. [PubMed ID: 18522405]. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf800175a.
-
15.
Zhang R, Humphreys I, Sahu RP, Shi Y, Srivastava SK. In vitro and in vivo induction of apoptosis by capsaicin in pancreatic cancer cells is mediated through ROS generation and mitochondrial death pathway. Apoptosis. 2008;13(12):1465-78. [PubMed ID: 19002586]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-008-0278-6.
-
16.
Samandari Bahraseman MR, Khorsand B, Esmaeilzadeh-Salestani K, Sarhadi S, Hatami N, Khaleghdoust B, et al. The use of integrated text mining and protein-protein interaction approach to evaluate the effects of combined chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive agents in cancer therapy. PLoS One. 2022;17(11). e0276458. [PubMed ID: 36367850]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9651583]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276458.
-
17.
Fulda S, Debatin KM. Sensitization for anticancer drug-induced apoptosis by the chemopreventive agent resveratrol. Oncogene. 2004;23(40):6702-11. [PubMed ID: 15273734]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207630.
-
18.
Samandari-Bahraseman MR, Sarhadi S, Esmaeili-Mahani S. Artemether effect and its interaction with vincristine and doxorubicin on human breast carcinoma MCF-7 cells. Physiol Pharmacol. 2016;20(2):117-21.
-
19.
Herrera RA, Moreno G, Araque P, Vásquez I, Naranjo E, Alzate F, et al. In-vitro chemopreventive potential of a chromone from bomarea setacea (ALSTROEMERIACEAE) against colorectal cancer. Iran J Pharm Res. 2021;20(2):254-67. [PubMed ID: 34567160]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8457729]. https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2020.113745.14466.
-
20.
Samandari-Bahraseman MR, Ismaili A, Esmaeili-Mahani S, Ebrahimie E, Loit E. bunium persicum seeds extract in combination with vincristine mediates apoptosis in MCF-7 cells through regulation of involved genes and proteins expression. Res Sq. 2022. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1759922/v1.
-
21.
Sultana S, Asif HM, Nazar HM, Akhtar N, Rehman JU, Rehman RU. Medicinal plants combating against cancer--a green anticancer approach. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(11):4385-94. [PubMed ID: 24969858]. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.11.4385.
-
22.
Bahrami A, Jamzad M, Sedaghat S. Phytochemicals and biological activities of Froriepia subpinnata (ledeb.) Baill. Extracts. J Med plant By-product. 2021;10(1):109-15. https://doi.org/10.22092/jmpb.2020.352614.1295.
-
23.
Thiviya P, Gamage A, Piumali D, Merah O, Madhujith T. Apiaceae as an important source of antioxidants and their applications. Cosmetics. 2021;8(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics8040111.
-
24.
Jorkesh A, Hamidoghli Y, Olfati J, Samizadeh H, Bakhshi D, Pala-Paul J. Phenotypic and phytochemical diversity among different accessions of gijavash (Froriepia subpinnata (Ledeb.) Baill.: An endemic medicinal plant grown in Iran. J Agric Sci Technol. 2020;22(6):1563-74.
-
25.
Mehrabanjoubani P, Ghorbani Nohooji M, Karimi E, Abdolzadeh A. The differences between Froriepia subpinnata (Ledeb.) Baill. and Pimpinella anisum L. commonly named as anarijeh based on major components of the essential oil; a marker for resolve ambiguities. J Med Plant. 2021;20(79):59-71. https://doi.org/10.52547/jmp.20.79.59.
-
26.
Nabavi SM, Ebrahimzadeh M, Nabavi SF, Jafari M. Free radical scavenging activity and antioxidant capacity of Eryngium caucasicum Trautv and Froripia subpinata. Pharmacologyonline. 2008;3:19-25.
-
27.
Bandian L, Moghaddam M, Bahraini M. Investigate the antimicrobial activity and synergistic effects of Zataria multiflora, Salvia verticillata and Froriepia subpinnata ethanolic extracts on bacterial vegetables decay. J Food Microbiol. 2021;8(1):45-57.
-
28.
Mohammadzadeh M, Mahmoudi R, Ghajarbeygi P. Evaluation of chemical composition and antibacterial properties of froriepia subpinnta essential oils from guilan region: Before and after flowering. J Essent Oil Bear Plants. 2018;21(4):1119-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060x.2018.1505555.
-
29.
Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Pineros M, Znaor A, et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int J Cancer. 2021. [PubMed ID: 33818764]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33588.
-
30.
Cayetano-Salazar L, de la Cruz-Concepcion B, Navarro-Tito N, Alvarez-Fitz P, Leyva-Vazquez MA, Acevedo-Quiroz M, et al. Ficus crocata leaf extracts decrease the proliferation and invasiveness of breast cancer cells. Heliyon. 2022;8(11). e11405. [PubMed ID: 36387436]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9647462]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11405.
-
31.
Gezici S, Sekeroglu N. Current perspectives in the application of medicinal plants against cancer: Novel therapeutic agents. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2019;19(1):101-11. [PubMed ID: 30582485]. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871520619666181224121004.
-
32.
Hashemi Z, Mortazavi-Derazkola S, Biparva P, Goli HR, Sadeghian F, Kardan M, et al. Green synthesized silver nanoparticles using feijoa sellowiana leaf extract, evaluation of their antibacterial, anticancer and antioxidant activities. Iran J Pharm Res. 2020;19(4):306-20. [PubMed ID: 33841544]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8019869]. https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2020.112523.13805.
-
33.
Gomaa SE, Friedersdorf M, El Enshasy HA, Abou-Donia MB. In vitro comparative study for anti-proliferative activity of some plant extracts, fam. Apiaceae, on HeLa cell line. Indones J Pharm. 2020;31(2). https://doi.org/10.14499/indonesianjpharm31iss2pp108.
-
34.
Filiz B, Songül K, Bostanlık D, Gül F, Ceyda Sibel K. Anticancer effect of Ferulago Mughlea Peşmen (Apiaceae) on cancer cell proliferation. Iran J Pharm Res. 2016;15(3):501-4. [PubMed ID: 27980585]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5149037].
-
35.
Cinar AS, Bakar-Ates F, Onder A. Seseli petraeum M. Bieb. (Apiaceae) significantly inhibited cellular growth of A549 lung cancer cells through G0/G1 cell cycle arrest. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2020;92(4). e20191533. [PubMed ID: 33237139]. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202020191533.
-
36.
Rustaiyan A, Mojab R, Kazemie-Piersara M, Bigdeli M, Masoudi S, Yari M. Essential oil of Froriepia subpinnata (Ledeb.) Baill. from Iran. J Essent Oil Res. 2001;13(6):405-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2001.9699707.
-
37.
de Alencar M, Islam MT, da Mata A, Dos Reis AC, de Lima RMT, de Oliveira Ferreira JR, et al. Anticancer effects of phytol against Sarcoma (S-180) and Human Leukemic (HL-60) cancer cells. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30(33):80996-1007. [PubMed ID: 37308630]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28036-4.
-
38.
Han L, Mei J, Ma J, Wang F, Gu Z, Li J, et al. Cinnamaldehyde induces endogenous apoptosis of the prostate cancer-associated fibroblasts via interfering the Glutathione-associated mitochondria function. Med Oncol. 2020;37(10):91. [PubMed ID: 32960365]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-020-01417-2.
-
39.
Selmy A, Hegazy M, El-Hela A, Saleh A, El-Hamouly M. In vitro and in silico studies of Neophytadiene; a diterpene isolated from Aeschynomene elaphroxylon (Guill. &Perr.) Taub. as apoptotic inducer. Egypt J Chem. 2023;66(10):149-61. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2023.178261.7296.
-
40.
Ryter SW, Kim HP, Hoetzel A, Park JW, Nakahira K, Wang X, et al. Mechanisms of cell death in oxidative stress. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007;9(1):49-89. [PubMed ID: 17115887]. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2007.9.49.
-
41.
Shabani E, Mahmoudisourestani M, Mahen M. Evaluation of four extraction methods on antioxidant compounds of two medicinal vegetables, froriepia subpinnata and eryngium planum. Iran J Plant Physiol. 2022;12(3):4223-30..
-
42.
Kawanishi S, Oikawa S, Murata M. Evaluation for safety of antioxidant chemopreventive agents. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005;7(11-12):1728-39. [PubMed ID: 16356133]. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2005.7.1728.
-
43.
Khan N, Afaq F, Mukhtar H. Cancer chemoprevention through dietary antioxidants: progress and promise. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2008;10(3):475-510. [PubMed ID: 18154485]. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2007.1740.
-
44.
Wu P, Yu T, Wu J, Chen J. Licochalcone a induces ROS-mediated apoptosis through TrxR1 inactivation in colorectal cancer cells. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:5875074. [PubMed ID: 32596335]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7275230]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5875074.
-
45.
Dai F, Liu GY, Li Y, Yan WJ, Wang Q, Yang J, et al. Insights into the importance for designing curcumin-inspired anticancer agents by a prooxidant strategy: The case of diarylpentanoids. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;85:127-37. [PubMed ID: 25912482]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.04.017.
-
46.
Leon-Gonzalez AJ, Auger C, Schini-Kerth VB. Pro-oxidant activity of polyphenols and its implication on cancer chemoprevention and chemotherapy. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;98(3):371-80. [PubMed ID: 26206193]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2015.07.017.
-
47.
Lambert JD, Elias RJ. The antioxidant and pro-oxidant activities of green tea polyphenols: a role in cancer prevention. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010;501(1):65-72. [PubMed ID: 20558130]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2946098]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2010.06.013.
-
48.
Wang LS, Sun XD, Cao Y, Wang L, Li FJ, Wang YF. Antioxidant and pro-oxidant properties of acylated pelargonidin derivatives extracted from red radish (Raphanus sativus var. niger, Brassicaceae). Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48(10):2712-8. [PubMed ID: 20600520]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.06.045.
-
49.
Yang Y, Wang G, Wu W, Yao S, Han X, He D, et al. Camalexin induces apoptosis via the ROS-ER Stress-mitochondrial apoptosis pathway in AML cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:7426950. [PubMed ID: 30538806]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6261074]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7426950.
-
50.
Mateen S, Shahzad S, Ahmad S, Naeem SS, Khalid S, Akhtar K, et al. Cinnamaldehyde and eugenol attenuates collagen induced arthritis via reduction of free radicals and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Phytomedicine. 2019;53:70-8. [PubMed ID: 30668414]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2018.09.004.
-
51.
Erkekoglu P, Rachidi W, Yuzugullu OG, Giray B, Ozturk M, Favier A, et al. Induction of ROS, p53, p21 in DEHP- and MEHP-exposed LNCaP cells-protection by selenium compounds. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011;49(7):1565-71. [PubMed ID: 21515331]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.04.001.
-
52.
Thakor P, Subramanian RB, Thakkar SS, Ray A, Thakkar VR. Phytol induces ROS mediated apoptosis by induction of caspase 9 and 3 through activation of TRAIL, FAS and TNF receptors and inhibits tumor progression factor Glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase in lung carcinoma cell line (A549). Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;92:491-500. [PubMed ID: 28575806]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.05.066.
-
53.
Jan R, Chaudhry GE. Understanding apoptosis and apoptotic pathways targeted cancer therapeutics. Adv Pharm Bull. 2019;9(2):205-18. [PubMed ID: 31380246]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6664112]. https://doi.org/10.15171/apb.2019.024.
-
54.
Forouhandeh H, Rezaei Param Z, Molavi O, Asgharian P, Tarhriz V. Evaluation of anti-proliferative activity of Eryngium caucasicum on melanoma cancer cells. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022;22(1):134. [PubMed ID: 35568849]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9107132]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-022-03618-w.
-
55.
Iranshahi M, Rezaee R, Najaf Najafi M, Haghbin A, Kasaian J. Cytotoxic activity of the genus Ferula (Apiaceae) and its bioactive constituents. Avicenna J Phytomed. 2018;8(4):296-312. [PubMed ID: 30377589]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6204145].