3.1. Plant Collection
The plant was collected at the beginning of June 2021 in Penjwan Mountain, Kurdistan region, Northeast of Iraq. Assistant Professor Dr. Azad Rastegar identified and authenticated the plant in the Forests and Rangelands Research Department, Kurdistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (HKS), Iran. The specimen is deposited in the HKS herbarium under the voucher number HKS-15006.
3.2. Plant Extraction and Analysis
About 1000 g of the clean leaves of H. lasiopetalum were sliced, shade-dried for 7 - 10 days, and finely powdered. The powder was soaked in pure methanol and ethyl acetate (1:10) separately at room temperature for three days, followed by filtration using filter paper (Whatman No. 1). The solution was then removed using a rotary evaporator at 40 - 45°C to obtain the crude extract. The yield was 300 mg of H. lasiopetalum leaf extract (HLE) from each kilogram of fresh plant leaf. Finally, we proceeded with using the methanolic extract for the toxicity study.
3.3. Animal Groups
A toxicity study was conducted following the guidelines outlined in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guideline No. 407 for chemical testing (
11). Accordingly, 24 male Sprague Dawley rats, aged 6 - 8 weeks, weighing 150 - 160 grams, were randomly divided into four groups (n = 6). Group 1 (G1) consisted of normal rats without any treatment (CN: Control negative), while Group 2 (G2) received oral administration of a low dose of HLE (LD; 300 mg/kg body weight). Group 3 (G3) and Group 4 (G4) were orally administered a median dose (MD; 600 mg/kg) and a high dose (HD; 900 mg/kg) of HLE, respectively. The administration process was conducted using force-feeding with ball-tipped needles over a period of exactly four consecutive weeks.
3.4. Clinical Observations and Body Weight Measurements
Each rat's body weight (BW) was measured once a week, and any differences in BW were observed and recorded. To ensure a consistent dose per kg of BW, the amounts of herbal extract to be administered were recalculated weekly based on the new BW of the experimental rats. Throughout the 28-day period, the animals were monitored daily for clinical/behavioral abnormalities, toxicological symptoms, feed consumption, and gross appearance.
3.5. Animal Sacrifice and Sample Collection
At the end of the experiment and after overnight fasting (> 12 hours), all the rats were sacrificed under deep anesthesia using a mixture of ketamine and xylazine (0.4 mL), and blood samples were obtained via cardiac puncture. Then, half of the collected blood (3 mL) was transferred to ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) vacuum blood collection tubes, shaken immediately to mix well, and analyzed directly without delay to determine total and differential white blood cells (WBC), whole red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb), and platelets using an automatic hematology analyzer (Cell Dyn, 3700, Abbott, USA). At the same time, the other half of the blood was used for serum collection after centrifugation (at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes) at room temperature for serum biochemistry (hepatic and renal function parameters with electrolytes and serum proteins). On the other hand, samples of the heart, liver, and kidneys were removed, rinsed in normal saline to remove excess blood, cut into sections of about 0.5 cm² in size, and fixed in 10% formalin for at least 48 hours for histopathological examination.
3.6. Serum Biochemistry
The concentrations of serum total protein, albumin, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), urea, creatinine, total serum bilirubin (TSB), and electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, and phosphate) were determined using a fully automated analyzer Cobas 311 (Roche, Germany) with standardized kits.
3.7. Histopathological Examination
The fixed samples were placed in plastic cassettes and dehydrated using an automated tissue processor (Leica ASP300, Germany) through a series of ascending ethanol alcohol (60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100%), followed by three steps of cleaning with xylene. The processed tissues were embedded and blocked with melted paraffin using an automated wax embedder at 60 - 70°C (Leica EG1160, Germany), and the blocks were trimmed and sectioned to about 5×5×4 µm in size using a rotary microtome (Leica RM2155). The tissue sections were mounted on glass slides using a hot plate (Leica HI1220, Germany) and subsequently deparaffinized sequentially with 100 %, 90 %, and 70 % ethanol for 2 minutes each, then cleaned with a xylene solution for half an hour and dried. Finally, the tissue sections were rinsed in tap water, stained with Harris’s hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and examined under a light microscope (Nikon, Japan).
3.8. Semi-quantitative Lesion Scoring
Lesion scoring was estimated semi-quantitatively via image analyzer software (AmScope, 3.7) using a microscope eyepiece camera (MD500, 2019), and tissue samples were analyzed under the light microscope (NOVEL XSZ-N107T, China). Consequently, vacuolar degenerations within the liver sections and the number of inflammatory cells were estimated as the mean percentage of calculated cell numbers from randomly selected ten microscopic fields under high-power magnification (100×). The mean average was calculated as a percentage and compared statistically. Vascular congestion was estimated in micrometers and evaluated as an area of the mean percentage. Meanwhile, in kidney sections, semi-quantitative evaluation of renal tubular vacuolar degeneration and glomerular atrophy were measured similarly to liver sections.
On the other hand, scoring within the myocardial sections, including inflammatory and myocardial degenerative cells, was counted in a total of 10 fields randomly chosen under high-power magnification. Then, the mean average was calculated as percentages. The area of edema was assessed in micrometers and statistically calculated as the mean percentage of the given area. Finally, the mean rate of all calculated values was expressed as the following lesion scoring system (score 0 - 10% as no lesions; score 10 - 25% as mild; score 25 - 50% as moderate; score 50 - 75% as severe; score 75 - 100% as critical lesions).
3.9. Ethical Approval
Measures were taken to minimize pain and discomfort, and experiments followed the ARRIVE Guidelines for animal ethics and the experimental protocol was approved by the scientific and Ethical Committees of the College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Iraq (No. 155/11/8/2021/UoS) after intensive revision. Thus, procedures were used to diminish animal pain and discomfort.
3.10. Statistical Analysis
The experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the results were expressed as mean ± SD and analyzed statistically using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS, IBM, Chicago, USA, version 26.0). A post hoc comparison test, a one-way ANOVA, was performed using the Duncan test. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.