Logo
Iran J Pharm Res

Image Credit:Iran J Pharm Res

Investigation of the Antioxidant and Cellular Toxicity Activities of Gold Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Cichorium intybus Extract on a Liver Cancer Cell Line

Author(s):
Mohammad Mohammad-AlizadehMohammad Mohammad-Alizadeh1, Ahmad AsgharzadehAhmad Asgharzadeh1,*, Maryam TatariMaryam Tatari1
1Shirvan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shirvan, Iran


IJ Pharmaceutical Research:Vol. 24, issue 1; e159348
Published online:Apr 14, 2025
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jan 07, 2025
Accepted:Apr 04, 2025
How to Cite:Mohammad Mohammad-AlizadehAhmad AsgharzadehMaryam TatariInvestigation of the Antioxidant and Cellular Toxicity Activities of Gold Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Cichorium intybus Extract on a Liver Cancer Cell Line.Iran J Pharm Res.2025;24(1):e159348.https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpr-159348.

Abstract

Background:

Liver cancer is increasing in different parts of the world and is the fourth leading cause of cancer death globally.

Objectives:

The present study aims to synthesize and analyze the characterization of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) synthesized by Cichorium intybus extract and evaluate their antioxidant and cellular toxicity activity against liver cancer cells (HepG2).

Methods:

The synthesized AuNPs were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The antioxidant activity of the nanoparticles was assessed using the DPPH test, and their cytotoxicity activity was analyzed using the MTT method.

Results:

The results indicate that the AuNPs are crystalline materials with a particle size of less than 100 nm, with a mean particle size of 23.94 nm. The FTIR study reveals the presence of biochemical groups that act as reducing factors. The results demonstrate that antioxidant activity increases with concentration, with 87% inhibition of DPPH free radical scavenging observed at 250 µg/mL. Cell toxicity results in liver cancer cell lines (HepG2) demonstrated significant cytotoxicity in a time- and dose-dependent manner. The percentage of cell viability at a concentration of 1000 µg/ml after 24, 48, and 72 hours was determined to be 45%, 51%, and 22%, respectively.

Conclusions:

The present study revealed the simple cost-effective and environmentally friendly method that could be employed from food to pharmaceutical industries.

1. Background

Today, nanoscience has offered new opportunities for the treatment of various disorders. The eco-friendly, anti-cancer, antimicrobial, and antioxidant potential of nanoparticles has been extensively explored (1-5). Among nanomaterials, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have attracted significant attention due to their potential uses in medicinal and pharmacological studies (6, 7). The AuNPs are typically considered harmless materials to employ as medicine-carrying and antimicrobial resources (8). The AuNPs have garnered extensive attention in cancer treatment due to their low toxicity, great stability, simplicity of cellular uptake, and outstanding optical activities (9, 10).

The utilization of AuNPs in cancer treatment involves two main strategies. First, AuNPs can be employed as drug-delivery structures to enhance targeted distribution and efficiency (11). They can facilitate drug delivery in tumor tissues through the enhanced permeability and retention effect (12, 13). Treatments can be directly bound to the surface of AuNPs through various interactions (14, 15). The surface of AuNPs can be modified to simplify drug delivery.

In recent years, the antioxidant activities of metal and metal-oxide nanoparticles have been considered in several studies (16-18). Antioxidants play an essential role in industries; for example, they act as additives to inhibit lipid oxidation (19, 20). Lipid oxidation is responsible for unpleasant flavors and odors in food, making them unsuitable for consumption. To extend the shelf life of food products, companies frequently use synthetic antioxidants, such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), a chief additive in the food industry (21). Although synthetic antioxidants are generally considered nontoxic, their use has some issues, as toxic effects have been detected in vitro and in vivo studies (22-24). It is proven that BHA can activate endocrine disorders and is also associated with liver cancers (25-27). Other studies have recognized the presence of synthetic phenol antioxidants in humans, such as in adipose tissues, serum, and urine (28, 29). Based on these facts, the use of synthetic antioxidants in foods is strictly limited in different countries. To overcome these problems, it is essential to find natural antioxidant alternatives that have low toxicity for human cells. These alternatives should be non-toxic and possess high antioxidant properties, allowing them to replace synthetic antioxidants.

Cichorium intybus from the Asteraceae family consists of several secondary metabolites, with main distribution regions in Europe and Asia. Various preparations of C. intybus are used to treat several illnesses. The literature review demonstrates that C. intybus L., the most well-known species of the Cichorium genus, has shown a wide range of ethnobotanical uses and has been widely employed for culinary purposes (30).

2. Objectives

The present study explores the antioxidant and cytotoxicity effects of biosynthesized AuNPs against liver cancer cells. The present work describes an easy method to fabricate AuNPs using C. intybus extract as eco-friendly, inexpensive stabilizing, and reducing agents. It also characterizes them using fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and x-ray diffraction (XRD).

3. Methods

3.1. Materials and Reagents

All materials with analytical grade were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA, for chemicals and were used as precursors for the preparation of AuNPs. The plant materials were collected from Kashmar (located in the northeast of Iran) on 10 May 2024.

3.2. Preparation of Herbal Extract and Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis

Five grams of powdered leaves were added to 100 mL of deionized water and stirred continuously for 24 hours at room temperature to ensure thorough extraction of the bioactive compounds. The resulting solution was filtered using Whatman filter paper to remove any particulate matter. The clear filtrate was stored in an Erlenmeyer flask and kept at 3°C to preserve its bioactivity for subsequent nanoparticle synthesis.

For the synthesis of AuNPs, a stock solution was prepared by dissolving 10 mg of HAuCl4 in 10 mL of deionized water. Subsequently, 10 mL of this stock solution was added to 90 mL of the herbal extract, resulting in a final volume of 100 mL. The mixture was shaken regularly at room temperature for 4 hours to facilitate the reduction of Au3+ ions and the formation of AuNPs. The synthesized AuNPs were then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes to separate the nanoparticles from the reaction mixture. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet containing AuNPs was washed once with distilled water to remove any unreacted components and impurities. This washing step was repeated to ensure the purity of the nanoparticles. The washed nanoparticles were then dried in a vacuum oven at 40°C for 24 hours to obtain powdered AuNPs. The dried nanoparticles were stored in an airtight container to prevent any contamination or oxidation until further use.

The green-fabricated AuNPs samples were exposed to various instrumental procedures such as FESEM (MIRA3, TESCAN), XRD (XRD Theta/Theta, Explorer, Italy), and FTIR (AVATAR 370 FT-IR, Thermo Nicolet, USA) analysis. Powdered AuNPs (obtained after washing) were used for characterization. For absorption spectra, FTIR, and FESEM analysis, powdered AuNPs were used to obtain their corresponding data.

3.3. DPPH Radical Scavenging Test

The antioxidant capacity of the AuNPs was assessed using the DPPH test, with BHA serving as a positive control. The free radical scavenging activity of AuNPs and standard BHA was determined using the stable radical DPPH. One milliliter of different concentrations (0, 125, 250, 500, and 1000 μg/mL) of AuNPs was mixed with 1 mL of freshly prepared DPPH (1 mM in ethanol) solution and vortexed thoroughly. The solution was then incubated at 25°C in the dark for 30 minutes. The absorbance was recorded at 517 nm using a spectrophotometer. The free radical scavenging activity was expressed as the percentage of inhibition, determined using the following formula:

3.4. Cytotoxicity of Gold Nanoparticles

The cell toxicity of the AuNPs was examined using the diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, a colorimetric method for assessing cell metabolic activity (31). Cell development was conducted in RPMI and DMEM media, supplemented with 100 μg/mL penicillin and 10% FBS, and then transferred to the incubator. Briefly, HepG2 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate and incubated for 24 hours. Various doses (0, 15.6, 31.2, 62.5, 125, and 250 μg/mL) of green-fabricated NPs were added. During this time, after each day of incubation, 20 μL of MTT dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was added to each well. At the end of the stage, the media was discarded, and the formed formazan crystals were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Subsequently, the plates were shaken, and the absorbance was measured at 590 nm.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

The results of the MTT test, antioxidant activity, and significant differences were analyzed using SPSS software and one-way ANOVA with a statistical cut-off of P < 0.05. Graphs were drawn using Microsoft Excel software. The findings were presented as the mean ± SD, with three replications performed for each test.

4. Results

4.1. X-ray Diffraction Results in Biosynthesized Gold Nanoparticle

The XRD analysis of the synthesized AuNPs reveals a highly crystalline structure, consistent with the reference pattern for gold (Au) with a cubic crystal system (Figure 1). The diffraction peaks observed at 2Theta values of 37.9883°, 44.2480°, 64.4947°, and 77.3025° correspond to the (111), (200), (220), and (311) planes, respectively. These peaks align closely with the standard reference data (PDF code: 00-001-1172) (32), indicating the presence of face-centered cubic (fcc) gold.

The PXRD analysis of the synthesized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs)
Figure 1.

The PXRD analysis of the synthesized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs)

4.2. Fourier-Transform Infrared Results and Interpretation

The FTIR spectrum of the plant extract exhibits characteristic peaks at various wavenumbers, indicating the presence of multiple functional groups (Figure 2). Notable peaks include those at 535.81 cm-1, 608.53 cm-1, and 665.63 cm-1, which are likely associated with C-H bending vibrations (33). Peaks at 760.68 cm-1 and 829.31 cm-1 correspond to aromatic C-H bending, while the peaks at 1058.43 cm-1 and 1157.83 cm-1 are indicative of C-O stretching and C-O-C stretching vibrations, respectively (34). The presence of peaks at 1246.41 cm-1 and 1322.00 cm-1 suggests C-N stretching and C-H bending vibrations. Additionally, the peaks at 1641.57 cm-1 and 1737.91 cm-1 correspond to the amide I band (C=O stretching) and carbonyl stretching vibrations, respectively (35). The broad peak at 3380.71 cm-1 is attributed to O-H stretching vibrations, indicating the presence of hydroxyl groups (36).

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of A, the plant extract; and B, biosynthesized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). The spectra display characteristic peaks corresponding to various functional groups.
Figure 2.

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of A, the plant extract; and B, biosynthesized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). The spectra display characteristic peaks corresponding to various functional groups.

4.3. Electronic Microscopy and Spectrophotometric Analysis Results of Biosynthesized Gold Nanoparticle

The FESEM images of the AuNPs provide detailed insights into their morphology and distribution (Figure 3). The high-magnification image on the left, with a scale of 200 nm, reveals that the AuNPs are predominantly spherical. The particles appear to be well-dispersed with minimal agglomeration, indicating a uniform synthesis process. The surface of the nanoparticles is smooth, which is characteristic of high-purity AuNPs.

A, Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) show the spherical morphology and smooth surface of the AuNPs; B, particle size distribution (PSD) of AuNPs
Figure 3.

A, Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) show the spherical morphology and smooth surface of the AuNPs; B, particle size distribution (PSD) of AuNPs

The particle size distribution (PSD) of the AuNPs was analyzed using FESEM images, with measurements conducted using ImageJ software and statistical analysis performed with SPSS software (Figure 3). The histogram overlaid with a bell curve represents the frequency of particles within specific size ranges, indicating a normal distribution of particle sizes. The mean particle size of approximately 23.94 nm suggests that the majority of the AuNPs are within the nanoscale range, consistent with the high-resolution FESEM images. The standard deviation of 12.533 nm indicates some variability in particle sizes, which is typical for nanoparticles synthesized through green synthesis methods (37-39). This variability can be attributed to factors such as the dose of the reducing agent, reaction time, and temperature during the synthesis process.

The PSD analysis reveals that the AuNPs exhibit a relatively narrow size distribution, with most particles falling within the range of 10 to 40 nm. The bell curve suggests a normal distribution, indicating that the synthesis method produces nanoparticles with consistent sizes. The presence of a few larger particles, as indicated by the tail of the distribution, may be due to occasional agglomeration or variations in the synthesis conditions. Hence, the PSD analysis, combined with the FESEM images, confirms the successful synthesis of AuNPs with a mean size of 23.94 nm and a relatively narrow size distribution. This consistency in particle size enhances the potential applicability of the AuNPs in various fields, including catalysis, electronics, and biomedicine (40-43).

The difference between the PSD mean particle size (23.94 nm) and the crystallite size (8.31 nm) suggests that each gold nanoparticle is likely composed of multiple crystallites (44, 45). This is a common observation in nanomaterials, where individual nanoparticles can consist of several smaller crystalline regions. The larger particle size from the PSD analysis also accounts for any surface coatings or organic residues from the plant extract, which are not considered in the crystallite size calculation (46, 47).

The lower magnification image on the right, with a scale of 500 nm, provides a broader view of the nanoparticle distribution across the surface. This image shows that the AuNPs are evenly distributed, forming a relatively homogeneous layer. The absence of large aggregates suggests that the synthesis method effectively prevents particle agglomeration, which is crucial for maintaining the exclusive activity of nanoparticles (48, 49). The uniform distribution and spherical morphology of the AuNPs are essential for their potential applications (50-52). Therefore, the FESEM images confirm the successful synthesis of high-quality AuNPs with desirable morphological characteristics.

The energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis (Figure 4) conducted on the AuNPs reveals critical details about their elemental composition, confirming the high purity and concentration of gold within the sample. The EDX spectrum exhibits distinct energy peaks specifically associated with gold, including Au Mβ, Au Mα, Au Ll, and Au La lines. These characteristic peaks, unique to gold, substantiate the successful synthesis of AuNPs with a notable degree of purity, an essential requirement for advanced nanotechnology applications. The Au La line displayed an intensity of 3.6 with a relative error of 1.48%, signifying a robust signal that supports the presence of gold with minimal background interference. Gold was quantified at 100% by both weight and atomic percent, with no significant detection of other elements, validating the high purity of the AuNPs. The PAP (Phi-Rho-Z) correction was applied, enhancing the reliability of the data by compensating for any potential matrix effects.

A, Energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) spectrum of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). The spectrum confirms the presence and high purity of gold in the nanoparticles; B, UV/Vis absorption spectrum of AuNPs
Figure 4.

A, Energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) spectrum of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). The spectrum confirms the presence and high purity of gold in the nanoparticles; B, UV/Vis absorption spectrum of AuNPs

The EDX analysis included a preliminary scan for other potential elements to confirm the purity of the sample. Elements such as iron (Fe), tantalum (Ta), iridium (Ir), dysprosium (Dy), rhenium (Re), and osmium (Os) were flagged with a 100% detection probability in general identification algorithms. However, these elements were absent from the actual sample spectrum, with no peaks of significant intensity, reinforcing the conclusion that the AuNPs were devoid of notable impurities.

In this analysis, an accelerating voltage of 15.0 kV was used to generate definitive energy peaks in EDX spectroscopy, enhancing elemental analysis reliability. A beam current of 10,000 nA provided a high signal-to-noise ratio for precise gold peak detection with minimal background interference. The analysis at 35,000x magnification allowed detailed visualization of the nanoparticle composition. Both live and preset times were 10 seconds, optimizing high-resolution spectra capture while minimizing noise. The detector, equipped with a 0.1 µm dead layer, minimized interferences for accurate low-energy x-ray detection. A 20 µm gold layer on the detector enhanced sensitivity to gold emissions, and a 10 mm2 active area provided clear spectral results. The silicon detector crystal, 3.0 µm thick with a 15 nm aluminum coating, was ideal for detecting x-rays across gold’s energy range.

The UV/Vis absorption spectrum of AuNPs provides valuable information about their optical properties and size distribution. The spectrum displays a distinct peak in the absorbance curve around the 520 - 540 nm range, which is characteristic of the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of AuNPs (Figure 4). This SPR peak arises due to the collective oscillation of conduction electrons on the nanoparticle surface when exposed to light, and it is a key feature of metallic nanoparticles (53).

4.4. Antioxidant Activity Results of Gold Nanoparticle

The DPPH radical is widely used in evaluating free radical scavenging activity due to the simplicity of the reaction (54). The absorption properties of the DPPH radical demonstrate the effectiveness of the green-fabricated AuNPs formed from the extract, compared with BHA as a positive control. As shown in Figure 5, AuNPs can scavenge DPPH radicals in a dose-dependent manner, with antioxidant activity increasing as the dose of nanoparticles is enhanced. Moreover, the results indicate that AuNPs are more effective than BHA, an industrial antioxidant, suggesting that AuNPs have greater potential than industrial antioxidants. By increasing the concentration of biosynthesized AuNPs, the percentage inhibition of DPPH free radicals increases. At a concentration of 250 µg/mL, the percentage inhibition of DPPH free radicals for biosynthesized AuNPs and BHA was observed to be 87.5% and 92.4%, respectively.

The inhibitory result of the fabricated gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) on DPPH free radicals compared to butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) as a positive control. Asterisk symbols show a significant difference between experimental groups (*** P &lt; 0.001).
Figure 5.

The inhibitory result of the fabricated gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) on DPPH free radicals compared to butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) as a positive control. Asterisk symbols show a significant difference between experimental groups (*** P < 0.001).

4.5. Cytotoxicity Results of Gold Nanoparticles Against Cancer Cell Line (HepG2)

As displayed in Figure 6, the induction of cellular toxicity by the biofabricated AuNPs is dependent on both the dose and duration of treatment. As the concentration of nanoparticles increases, the death rate of cancer cells also rises.

Cytotoxicity effect of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) on cancer cell line (HepG2). Asterisk symbols show a significant difference between experimental groups (*** P &lt; 0.001).
Figure 6.

Cytotoxicity effect of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) on cancer cell line (HepG2). Asterisk symbols show a significant difference between experimental groups (*** P < 0.001).

5. Discussion

The comparison of the FTIR spectra of the AuNPs and the plant extract indicates that several functional groups from the plant extract are present on the surface of the AuNPs. Peaks such as those at 760.81 cm-1, 1641.57 cm-1, and 1737.91 cm-1 in the plant extract are also observed in the AuNPs spectrum, suggesting that these groups are involved in the reduction and stabilization of the AuNPs. The presence of new peaks at 495.88 cm-1 and 2339.88 cm-1 in the AuNPs spectrum may indicate interactions between gold and organic molecules from the plant extract, which are crucial for the formation and stabilization of the nanoparticles (55-59). Overall, the FTIR analysis confirms that the green synthesis method effectively incorporates functional groups from the plant extract onto the surface of the AuNPs, contributing to their stability and potential applications in various fields.

Li et al. examined the antioxidant properties of flavonols, AuNPs, and flavonol-AuNPs using the DPPH method. Their results showed that flavonol-AuNPs exhibited significantly higher antioxidant properties compared to both flavonol and AuNPs when examined separately (60). Another study examined the antioxidant properties of AuNPs fabricated by Spatoglossum asperum. The results showed that synthesized AuNPs, with a 20 nm diameter, significantly scavenged the DPPH free radical, showing 73.21% inhibition at a dose of 50 µg/mL (61).

Biosynthesized AuNPs were observed to induce cytotoxicity in HepG2 cells, and the results were consistent with other reports stating that synthesized AuNPs induced oxidative stress in a dose-dependent manner, as evidenced by a decline in ROS creation and lipid peroxidation (62, 63). The cell toxicity mechanism of AuNPs generally involves the over-generation of ROS, which mediates apoptosis, causes upregulation of the BAX gene, and activates the caspase cascade while suppressing Bcl2 (64-66).

Table 1 shows the antioxidant and cytotoxicity properties of some investigations of green synthesized AuNPs and their properties. However, physicochemical procedures are extensively employed for the large-scale production of AuNPs to meet their exponentially growing potential uses in biomedical fields. The use of unsafe and expensive materials poses a significant challenge in the production of nanoparticles (67). Consequently, the challenges associated with conventional fabrication methods have motivated researchers to explore green, safe, and cost-effective approaches for the fabrication of AuNPs to meet the growing industrial demand (68-70). The photo-fabrication of AuNPs is recognized as an important method due to its eco-friendly and renewable properties. However, the use of commercially valuable herbs as reducing agents affects the effectiveness of the fabrication process. Therefore, there is a pressing need to shift focus towards discovering the reduction potential of herbal-mediated wastes for the fabrication of AuNPs. While numerous studies have confirmed the promising biocompatibility of AuNPs, comprehensive toxicological in vitro and in vivo assays are critical before AuNP-based treatments can be safely employed in humans.

Table 1.Comparison of Some Studies of Plant-Mediated Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles
SourceSize (nm)MorphologyFindingsReference
Martynia annua21SphericalThe AuNPs exhibit robust DPPH scavenging activity and effective reducing power; the AuNPs exhibit robust DPPH scavenging activity and effective reducing power.(71)
Allium cepa6 - 54SphericalThe AuNPs had lower activity when compared to normal antioxidants.(72)
Nepeta bodega20.5SphericalThe AuNPs exhibited concentration-dependent cytotoxicity on the human liver (HepG2) and breast (MCF-7) cancer cells, which were around 77.4 and 71.2% at 300 µg/mL, respectively.(73)
Pandanus canaranus37.4SphericalAs the concentration of AuNPs increased, the findings of cell viability reduced in the lung cancer cells (A549 cells).(74)
Ginkgo biloba18SphericalThe AuNPs exhibited promising in vitro dose and time-dependent antiproliferative effects against human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells.(75)
Coleus scutellarioides40SphericalA concentration-dependent impact of AuNPs on human breast cancer cells.(76)
Curcuma longa10 - 15Semi-sphericalThe AuNPs had more antioxidant activity when compared to BHA; the % lung cancer cell viability decreased significantly in all of them as the AuNPs dose increased.(77)
Thespesia lampas43SphericalThe AuNPs were significantly effective (50.47%) against head and neck cancer cells at a higher dose of 100 μg mL-1; the NPs had significant antioxidant activity when compared to standard antioxidants.(78)
Cucurbita moschata≤ 100SphericalThe AuNPs exhibited better antiproliferative activity with 47.19% viability in lung cancer cells and 42.76% in human ovarian cancer cells at a 50 μg/mL concentration.(79)
Papaya44.4SphericalThe AuNPs displayed a significant antioxidant effect (93.24% DPPH scavenging and 74.23% SOD inhibition at 100 µg/mL.(80)

Comparison of Some Studies of Plant-Mediated Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles

5.1. Conclusions

In this work, AuNPs were fabricated using an extract of C. intybus. The synthesized nanoparticles were fully characterized by FESEM, PXRD, and FTIR, with a diameter size of 23.94 nm. It appears that the extract of C. intybus prevented the aggregation of AuNPs. The extract is primarily responsible for the fabrication of AuNPs, and the nanoparticles demonstrated significant cellular toxicity effects against cancer cells in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Additionally, antioxidant experiments indicate that these nanoparticles can be employed as alternatives to synthetic antioxidants. The simplicity, low cost, and effectiveness of this procedure suggest an alternative to conventional synthetic approaches for AuNPs. The environmentally friendly fabricated AuNPs can be valuable and effective in the pharmacology and food industries.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Taghavizadeh Yazdi ME, Darroudi M, Amiri MS, Zarrinfar H, Hosseini HA, Mashreghi M, et al. Antimycobacterial, Anticancer, Antioxidant and Photocatalytic Activity of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using Berberis Integerrima. Iran J Sci Technol Transactions A: Sci. 2021;46(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-021-01226-w.
  • 2.
    Es-Haghi A, Amiri MS, Taghavizadeh Yazdi ME. Ferula latisecta gels for synthesis of zinc/silver binary nanoparticles: antibacterial effects against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria and physicochemical characteristics. BMC Biotechnol. 2024;24(1):51. [PubMed ID: 39090578]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11292920]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-024-00878-x.
  • 3.
    Dobrucka R. Synthesis of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Using Echinacea purpurea Herba. Iran J Pharmaceut Res. 2017;16:753-9.
  • 4.
    Taghavizadeh Yazdi ME, Qayoomian M, Beigoli S, Boskabady MH. Recent advances in nanoparticle applications in respiratory disorders: a review. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1059343. [PubMed ID: 37538179]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10395100]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1059343.
  • 5.
    Taghavizadeh Yazdi ME, Nourbakhsh F, Mashreghi M, Mousavi SH. Ultrasound-based synthesis of ZnO·Ag2O3 nanocomposite: characterization and evaluation of its antimicrobial and anticancer properties. Res Chemical Inter. 2021;47(3):1285-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-020-04355-w.
  • 6.
    Ghorani-Azam A, Mottaghipisheh J, Amiri MS, Mashreghi M, Hashemzadeh A, Haddad-Mashadrizeh A, et al. Resveratrol-Mediated Gold-Nanoceria Synthesis as Green Nanomedicine for Phytotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2022;27(8):227. [PubMed ID: 36042163]. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2708227.
  • 7.
    Hashemzadeh V, Hashemzadeh A, Mohebbati R, Arefi RG, Yazdi MET. Fabrication and characterization of gold nanoparticles using alginate: In vitro and in vivo assessment of its administration effects with swimming exercise on diabetic rats. Open Life Sci. 2024;19(1):20220869. [PubMed ID: 38645750]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11032099]. https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-0869.
  • 8.
    Sarma PP, Rai A, Baruah PK. Recent Advances in the Development of Antibiotics-Coated Gold Nanoparticles to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024;13(2). [PubMed ID: 38391510]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10886052]. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13020124.
  • 9.
    Turkmen Koc SN, Rezaei Benam S, Aral IP, Shahbazi R, Ulubayram K. Gold nanoparticles-mediated photothermal and photodynamic therapies for cancer. Int J Pharm. 2024;655:124057. [PubMed ID: 38552752]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124057.
  • 10.
    Mousavi-Kouhi SM, Beyk-Khormizi A, Amiri MS, Mashreghi M, Hashemzadeh A, Mohammadzadeh V, et al. Plant Gel-Mediated Synthesis of Gold-Coated Nanoceria Using Ferula gummosa: Characterization and Estimation of Its Cellular Toxicity toward Breast Cancer Cell Lines. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(7). [PubMed ID: 37504827]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10381807]. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14070332.
  • 11.
    Nguyen LN, Ngo W, Lin ZP, Sindhwani S, MacMillan P, Mladjenovic SM, et al. The mechanisms of nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours. Nature Rev Bioengineer. 2024;2(3):201-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-024-00154-9.
  • 12.
    Jakhmola A, Hornsby TK, Kashkooli FM, Kolios MC, Rod K, Tavakkoli JJ. Green synthesis of anti-cancer drug-loaded gold nanoparticles for low-intensity pulsed ultrasound targeted drug release. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2024;14(9):2417-32. [PubMed ID: 38240946]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-024-01516-x.
  • 13.
    Munderere R, Gulfam M, Ali I, Kim SH, Vu TT, Park SH, et al. Redox-Responsive Gold Nanoparticles Coated with Hyaluronic Acid and Folic Acid for Application in Targeting Anticancer Therapy. Molecules. 2024;29(7). [PubMed ID: 38611843]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11013442]. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29071564.
  • 14.
    Dridi N, Jin Z, Perng W, Mattoussi H. Probing Protein Corona Formation around Gold Nanoparticles: Effects of Surface Coating. ACS Nano. 2024;18(12):8649-62. [PubMed ID: 38471029]. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c08005.
  • 15.
    Sang D, Luo X, Liu J. Biological Interaction and Imaging of Ultrasmall Gold Nanoparticles. Nanomicro Lett. 2023;16(1):44. [PubMed ID: 38047998]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10695915]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01266-4.
  • 16.
    Mobaraki F, Momeni M, Jahromi M, Kasmaie FM, Barghbani M, Yazdi MET, et al. Apoptotic, antioxidant and cytotoxic properties of synthesized AgNPs using green tea against human testicular embryonic cancer stem cells. Process Biochemist. 2022;119:106-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2022.05.021.
  • 17.
    Javadi F, Taghavizadeh Yazdi ME, Baghani M, Es-haghi A. Biosynthesis, characterization of cerium oxide nanoparticles using Ceratonia siliqua and evaluation of antioxidant and cytotoxicity activities. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab08ff.
  • 18.
    Es-haghi A, Javadi F, Taghavizadeh Yazdi ME, Amiri MS. The Expression of Antioxidant Genes and Cytotoxicity of Biosynthesized Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Against Hepatic Carcinoma Cell Line. Avicenna J Med Biochemist. 2019;7(1):16-20. https://doi.org/10.34172/ajmb.2019.04.
  • 19.
    Wu H, Bak KH, Goran GV, Tatiyaborworntham N. Inhibitory mechanisms of polyphenols on heme protein-mediated lipid oxidation in muscle food: New insights and advances. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64(15):4921-39. [PubMed ID: 36448306]. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2146654.
  • 20.
    Suhag R, Ferrentino G, Morozova K, Zatelli D, Scampicchio M, Amorati R. Antioxidant efficiency and oxidizability of mayonnaise by oximetry and isothermal calorimetry. Food Chem. 2024;433:137274. [PubMed ID: 37666126]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137274.
  • 21.
    Han B, Shang Y, Wang H, Shen Y, Li R, Wang M, et al. Prevalence of synthetic phenolic antioxidants in food contact materials from China and their implications for human dietary exposure through take-away food. J Hazard Mater. 2024;473:134599. [PubMed ID: 38788569]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134599.
  • 22.
    Kakade S, Bote H, Sarvalkar P, Sharma KK, Pawar P. Effects of Common Food Additives on HepG2 Cells: Accumulation of Reactive Oxygen Species and Induction of Cell Damage and Death. ES Food Agroforest. 2024;17:1142. https://doi.org/10.30919/esfaf1142.
  • 23.
    Jiang Y, Wang C, Ma L, Gao T, Wang Y. Environmental profiles, hazard identification, and toxicological hallmarks of emerging tire rubber-related contaminants 6PPD and 6PPD-quinone. Environ Int. 2024;187:108677. [PubMed ID: 38677083]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108677.
  • 24.
    Wang W, Chen Y, Fang J, Zhang F, Qu G, Cai Z. Toxicity of substituted p-phenylenediamine antioxidants and their derived novel quinones on aquatic bacterium: Acute effects and mechanistic insights. J Hazard Mater. 2024;469:133900. [PubMed ID: 38442600]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133900.
  • 25.
    Zeng Z, Hu J, Xiao G, Liu Y, Jia D, Wu G, et al. Integrating network toxicology and molecular docking to explore the toxicity of the environmental pollutant butyl hydroxyanisole: An example of induction of chronic urticaria. Heliyon. 2024;10(15). e35409. [PubMed ID: 39170477]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11336633]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35409.
  • 26.
    Xiong G, Zhang H, Peng Y, Shi H, Han M, Hu T, et al. Subchronic co-exposure of polystyrene nanoplastics and 3-BHA significantly aggravated the reproductive toxicity of ovaries and uterus in female mice. Environ Pollut. 2024;351:124101. [PubMed ID: 38710361]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124101.
  • 27.
    Chauhan SS, Garg P, Parthasarathi R. Computational framework for identifying and evaluating mutagenic and xenoestrogenic potential of food additives. J Hazard Mater. 2024;470:134233. [PubMed ID: 38603913]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134233.
  • 28.
    Ji X, Liu J, Liang J, Feng X, Liu X, Wang Y, et al. The hidden diet: Synthetic antioxidants in packaged food and their impact on human exposure and health. Environ Int. 2024;186:108613. [PubMed ID: 38555663]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108613.
  • 29.
    Liu R, Mabury SA. Synthetic Phenolic Antioxidants: A Review of Environmental Occurrence, Fate, Human Exposure, and Toxicity. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(19):11706-19. [PubMed ID: 32915564]. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05077.
  • 30.
    Kiers AM, Mes TH, van der Meijden R, Bachmann K. A search for diagnostic AFLP markers in Cichorium species with emphasis on endive and chicory cultivar groups. Genome. 2000;43(3):470-6. [PubMed ID: 10902710]. https://doi.org/10.1139/g00-024.
  • 31.
    Rahimi E, Asefi F, Afzalinia A, Khezri S, Zare-Zardini H, Ghorani-Azam A, et al. Chitosan coated copper/silver oxide nanoparticles as carriers of breast anticancer drug: Cyclin D1/P53 expressions and cytotoxicity studies. Inorganic Chemist Communications. 2023;158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2023.111581.
  • 32.
    Hanawalt JD, Rinn HW, Frevel LK. Chemical Analysis by X-Ray Diffraction. Industrial Engineer Chemist Ana Ed. 2002;10(9):457-512. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50125a001.
  • 33.
    Smith B. Infrared Spectral Interpretation. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203750841.
  • 34.
    Stuart BH. Infrared Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Applications. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470011149.
  • 35.
    Coates J. Interpretation of Infrared Spectra, A Practical Approach. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2000. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470027318.a5606.
  • 36.
    Choi JH, Cho M. Computational IR spectroscopy of water: OH stretch frequencies, transition dipoles, and intermolecular vibrational coupling constants. J Chem Phys. 2013;138(17):174108. [PubMed ID: 23656115]. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4802991.
  • 37.
    Huston M, DeBella M, DiBella M, Gupta A. Green Synthesis of Nanomaterials. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021;11(8). [PubMed ID: 34443960]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8400177]. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11082130.
  • 38.
    El-Sayyad GS, Elfadil D, Mosleh MA, Hasanien YA, Mostafa A, Abdelkader RS, et al. Eco-friendly Strategies for Biological Synthesis of Green Nanoparticles with Promising Applications. BioNanoScience. 2024;14(3):3617-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-024-01494-x.
  • 39.
    Shafiq A, Deshmukh AR, AbouAitah K, Kim BS. Green Synthesis of Controlled Shape Silver Nanostructures and Their Peroxidase, Catalytic Degradation, and Antibacterial Activity. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(6). [PubMed ID: 37367289]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10299563]. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14060325.
  • 40.
    Bano A, Dawood A, Saira F, Malik A, Alkholief M; Rida, et al. Enhancing catalytic activity of gold nanoparticles in a standard redox reaction by investigating the impact of AuNPs size, temperature and reductant concentrations. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):12359. [PubMed ID: 37524756]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10390509]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38234-2.
  • 41.
    Sangwan S, Seth R. Synthesis, Characterization and Stability of Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) in Different Buffer Systems. J Cluster Sci. 2021;33(2):749-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-020-01956-8.
  • 42.
    Votkina D, Trelin A, Semin V, Lyutakov O, Svorcik V, Petunin P, et al. Size-dependent plasmonic activity of AuNPs for the rational design of catalysts for organic reactions. Catalysis Sci Technol. 2024;14(13):3707-18. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4cy00084f.
  • 43.
    Kapil N, Cardinale F, Weissenberger T, Trogadas P, Nijhuis TA, Nigra MM, et al. Gold nanoparticles with tailored size through ligand modification for catalytic applications. Chem Commun (Camb). 2021;57(82):10775-8. [PubMed ID: 34586128]. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cc04165g.
  • 44.
    ISO. Representation of Results of Particle Size Analysis-Part 2: Calculation of Average Particle Sizes/Diameters and Moments From Particle Size Distributions. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2002. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/57641.html.
  • 45.
    Li Q, Kartikowati CW, Horie S, Ogi T, Iwaki T, Okuyama K. Correlation between particle size/domain structure and magnetic properties of highly crystalline Fe(3)O(4) nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9894. [PubMed ID: 28855564]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5577113]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09897-5.
  • 46.
    Mittal AK, Chisti Y, Banerjee UC. Synthesis of metallic nanoparticles using plant extracts. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31(2):346-56. [PubMed ID: 23318667]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.01.003.
  • 47.
    Agarwal H, Venkat Kumar S, Rajeshkumar S. A review on green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles – An eco-friendly approach. Resources-Efficient Technol. 2017;3(4):406-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reffit.2017.03.002.
  • 48.
    Baig N, Kammakakam I, Falath W. Nanomaterials: a review of synthesis methods, properties, recent progress, and challenges. Materials Adv. 2021;2(6):1821-71. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ma00807a.
  • 49.
    kazemi S, Hosseingholian A, Gohari SD, Feirahi F, Moammeri F, Mesbahian G, et al. Recent advances in green synthesized nanoparticles: from production to application. Materials Today Sust. 2023;24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100500.
  • 50.
    Hammami I, Alabdallah NM, jomaa AA, kamoun M. Gold nanoparticles: Synthesis properties and applications. J King Saud Uni - Sci. 2021;33(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101560.
  • 51.
    Huang H, Liu R, Yang J, Dai J, Fan S, Pi J, et al. Gold Nanoparticles: Construction for Drug Delivery and Application in Cancer Immunotherapy. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(7). [PubMed ID: 37514054]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10383270]. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15071868.
  • 52.
    Kumalasari MR, Alfanaar R, Andreani AS. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs): A versatile material for biosensor application. Talanta Open. 2024;9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talo.2024.100327.
  • 53.
    Zarharan H, Bagherian M, Shah Rokhi A, Ramezani Bajgiran R, Yousefi E, Heravian P, et al. The anti-angiogenesis and antioxidant activity of chitosan-mediated synthesized selenium-gold nanostructure. Arabian J Chemist. 2023;16(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.104806.
  • 54.
    Taghavizadeh Yazdi ME, Khara J, Housaindokht MR, Sadeghnia HR, Esmaeilzadeh Bahabadid S, Amiri MS, et al. Biocomponents and Antioxidant Activity of Ribes khorasanicum. Int J Basic Sci Med. 2018;3(3):99-103. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijbsm.2018.18.
  • 55.
    Yasmin A, Ramesh K, Rajeshkumar S. Optimization and stabilization of gold nanoparticles by using herbal plant extract with microwave heating. Nano Converg. 2014;1(1):12. [PubMed ID: 28191395]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5270968]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-014-0012-8.
  • 56.
    Patel KN, Trivedi PG, Thakar MS, Prajapati KV, Prajapati DK, Sindhav GM. Gold nanoparticles synthesis using Gymnosporia montana L. and its biological profile: A pioneer report. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2023;21(1):71. [PubMed ID: 37358697]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10293534]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-023-00525-6.
  • 57.
    Boruah JS, Devi C, Hazarika U, Bhaskar Reddy PV, Chowdhury D, Barthakur M, et al. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using an antiepileptic plant extract: In vitro biological and photo-catalytic activities. RSC Adv. 2021;11(45):28029-41. [PubMed ID: 35480751]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9038048]. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra02669k.
  • 58.
    Muddapur UM, Alshehri S, Ghoneim MM, Mahnashi MH, Alshahrani MA, Khan AA, et al. Plant-Based Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles and Theranostic Applications: A Review. Molecules. 2022;27(4). [PubMed ID: 35209180]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8875495]. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041391.
  • 59.
    Folorunso A, Akintelu S, Oyebamiji AK, Ajayi S, Abiola B, Abdusalam I, et al. Biosynthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity of gold nanoparticles from leaf extracts of Annona muricata. J Nanostruct Chemist. 2019;9(2):111-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-019-0301-1.
  • 60.
    Li X, Ni T, Xu R. Study on the preparation of novel flavonol-gold nanoparticles antioxidants and the mechanism of protein corona formation. J Molecular Struct. 2023;1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.136413.
  • 61.
    Govindaraj M, Suresh M, Palaniyandi T, Viswanathan S, Wahab MRA, Baskar G, et al. Bio-fabrication of gold nanoparticles from brown seaweeds for anticancer activity against glioblastoma through invitro and molecular docking approaches. J Molecular Struct. 2023;1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.135178.
  • 62.
    Kumar D, Mutreja I, Chitcholtan K, Sykes P. Cytotoxicity and cellular uptake of different sized gold nanoparticles in ovarian cancer cells. Nanotechnology. 2017;28(47):475101. [PubMed ID: 29027909]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aa935e.
  • 63.
    Bin-Jumah MN, Al-Abdan M, Al-Basher G, Alarifi S. Molecular Mechanism of Cytotoxicity, Genotoxicity, and Anticancer Potential of Green Gold Nanoparticles on Human Liver Normal and Cancerous Cells. Dose Resp. 2020;18(2):1559325820912150. [PubMed ID: 32284699]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7139184]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559325820912154.
  • 64.
    Jawaid P, Rehman MU, Zhao QL, Misawa M, Ishikawa K, Hori M, et al. Small size gold nanoparticles enhance apoptosis-induced by cold atmospheric plasma via depletion of intracellular GSH and modification of oxidative stress. Cell Death Discov. 2020;6:83. [PubMed ID: 32963811]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7483448]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-020-00314-x.
  • 65.
    Ahrweiler-Sawaryn MC, Biswas A, Frias C, Frias J, Wilke NL, Wilke N, et al. Novel gold(I) complexes induce apoptosis in leukemia cells via the ROS-induced mitochondrial pathway with an upregulation of Harakiri and overcome multi drug resistances in leukemia and lymphoma cells and sensitize drug resistant tumor cells to apoptosis in vitro. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;161:114507. [PubMed ID: 36958194]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114507.
  • 66.
    Ke Y, Al Aboody MS, Alturaiki W, Alsagaby SA, Alfaiz FA, Veeraraghavan VP, et al. Photosynthesized gold nanoparticles from Catharanthus roseus induces caspase-mediated apoptosis in cervical cancer cells (HeLa). Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47(1):1938-46. [PubMed ID: 31099261]. https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2019.1614017.
  • 67.
    Nateq Golestan M, Abbasi MR, Rakhshandeh H, Taghavizadeh Yazdi ME. Facile fabrication and characterization of silver nanoparticles by sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps puton) damaged wheat and evaluation of its antibacterial and cellular toxicity toward liver cancer cell lines. Stud Med Sci. 2023;34(10):586-97. https://doi.org/10.61186/umj.34.10.586.
  • 68.
    Mobaraki F, Momeni M, Taghavizadeh Yazdi ME, Meshkat Z, Silanian Toosi M, Hosseini SM. Plant-derived synthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles: Investigation of its antioxidant and anticancer activity against human testicular embryonic carcinoma stem cells. Proc Biochemist. 2021;111:167-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2021.09.010.
  • 69.
    Mousavi-Kouhi SM, Beyk-Khormizi A, Mohammadzadeh V, Ashna M, Es-haghi A, Mashreghi M, et al. Biological synthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles using Verbascum speciosum Schrad. and cytotoxicity properties toward HepG2 cancer cell line. Res Chem Inter. 2021;48(1):167-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-021-04600-w.
  • 70.
    Shakerimanesh K, Bayat F, Shahrokhi A, Baradaran A, Yousefi E, Mashreghi M, et al. Biomimetic synthesis and characterisation of homogenouse gold nanoparticles and estimation of its cytotoxity against breast cancer cell line. Materials Technol. 2022;37(13):2853-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2022.2081287.
  • 71.
    Palaniswamy S, Bepari A, Rajan S, Assiri RA, Shibu A, Narayasamy A, et al. Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles from Martynia annua aqueous leaves extract, its antioxidant potential and antimicrobial ability against selected wound pathogens. Inorganic Chemist Communications. 2024;170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2024.113241.
  • 72.
    İpek P, Baran MF, Baran A, Hatipoğlu A, Keskin C, Yildiztekin M, et al. Green synthesis and evaluation of antipathogenic, antioxidant, and anticholinesterase activities of gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) from Allium cepa L. peel aqueous extract. Biomass Con Biorefinery. 2023;14(9):10661-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04362-y.
  • 73.
    Sharifi-Rad M, Kishore Mohanta Y, Pohl P, Nayak D, Messaoudi M. Facile phytosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using Nepeta bodeana Bunge: Evaluation of its therapeutics and potential catalytic activities. J Photochemist Photobiol A: Chemist. 2024;446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.115150.
  • 74.
    Balamurugan V, Balasubramani G. Green synthesis and cytotoxicity evaluation of silver and gold nanoparticles using Pandanus canaranus leaf extract on Artemia salina and A549 lung cancer cells. Biomass Con Biorefinery. 2022;14(13):14433-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03586-8.
  • 75.
    Yu T, Liu L, Liu Y, Yin W. Synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Ginkgo biloba leaf extract and its in vitro anticancer effects on nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Alexandria Engineer J. 2024;104:614-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.07.130.
  • 76.
    Al-Mafarjy SS, Suardi N, Ahmed NM, Kernain D, Hisham Alkatib H, Dheyab MA. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles from Coleus scutellarioides (L.) Benth leaves and assessment of anticancer and antioxidant properties. Inorganic Chemist Communications. 2024;161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2024.112052.
  • 77.
    Yang Z, Shahriari M, Liang Y, Karmakar B, El-kott AF, AlShehri MA, et al. Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles mediated by Curcuma longa extract: Evaluation of its catalytic activity for the degradation of environmental pollutants and study of anti-lung adenocarcinoma effects. J Sci: Adv Materials Dev. 2024;9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2024.100709.
  • 78.
    Nath S, Shyanti RK, Singh RP, Mishra M, Pathak B. Thespesia lampas mediated green synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles for enhanced biological applications. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1324111. [PubMed ID: 38304863]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10832436]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1324111.
  • 79.
    Kaval U, Hosgoren H. Biosynthesis, Characterization, and Biomedical Applications of Gold Nanoparticles with Cucurbita moschata Duchesne Ex Poiret Peel Aqueous Extracts. Molecules. 2024;29(5). [PubMed ID: 38474434]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10935381]. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29050923.
  • 80.
    Patra JK, Shin HS, Yang IJ, Nguyen LTH, Das G. Sustainable Utilization of Food Biowaste (Papaya Peel) Extract for Gold Nanoparticle Biosynthesis and Investigation of Its Multi-Functional Potentials. Antioxidants (Basel). 2024;13(5). [PubMed ID: 38790686]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11118099]. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13050581.
comments

Leave a comment here


Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles