Background:
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a primary treatment for renal and ureteral stones. Failure in this treatment may result in extra costs and also unwanted complications such as hemorrhage and renal edema for the patients.
IJ Radiology
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a primary treatment for renal and ureteral stones. Failure in this treatment may result in extra costs and also unwanted complications such as hemorrhage and renal edema for the patients.
Thus, the ability to estimate the possibility of destruction of stone with this method will be useful for satisfactory medical outcome. A body of evidence indicates that with the use of histogram data which is obtained by CT scan, the possibility of destruction of stone by ESWL can be estimated. Given the convenience of US (lower cost, less risk of radiation), efforts to predict the possibility of destruction of stone by applying histogram findings obtained by US, as addressed in this presentation, may be justifiable.
A total of 76 renal and ureteral radiopaque stones scheduled for treatment with extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy were included in this study. Stones less than 5 mm or greater than 20 mm were excluded. Histograms were graphed from US. This parameter was compared between the treatment success and treatment failure groups.
Of 76 stones, 7 were excluded, 55 were in success group, and 14 were in the failure group. The histogram was significantly different between the two groups (P ? 0.05) with accuracy of 80%. Furthermore, the histogram figure was the independent predictor of success or failure of ESWL.
Our results have suggested that histogram figure is a good predictor of stone amenability to ESWL. The treatment modality of the stone should be selected according to the histogram figure as a practical, simple and predictive index.
© 2014, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Singh O, Gupta S, Girish G, Aggarwal G, Mathur R. Influence of Prognostic Factors on the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Upper Urinary Tract Stone Disease. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2010;2(3):. doi:
Erami E, Faghih S, Feizzade B, Esmaili H, Azhdari Zarmehri H. Correlation of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate in patients with kidney stones. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;16(3):e155708. doi:
Rabani S, Moosavizadeh A. Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Comparative Clinical Trial Between Transureteral Lithotripsy (TUL) and Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL). Nephro-Urol Mon. 2012;4(3):556-559. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.3936
Singh S, Pawar D, Griwan M. Tamsulosin as an Expulsive Therapy for Lower Ureteric Calculus after Extra Corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Randomized Controlled Study. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2011;3(1):. doi:
Gunduz M, Ciftci I, Sekmenli T, Midhat Elmaci A, Peru H. A Comparison of Holmium YAG Laser and Electrokinetic Lithotripter in Pediatric Ureteral Stone Treatment. Inn J Pediatr. 2017;27(2):e7966. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.7966
Ordering Reprints
Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC
Author(s):