Interdisciplinarity; Out of Semantic Confusion in Iran

Authors

Shahram YazdaniShahram Yazdani ORCID1, Maryam HajiahmadiMaryam  Hajiahmadi ORCID1,*, Sareh ShakerianSareh Shakerian ORCID2
1School of Management & Medical Education Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Community Based Educational Health System Department, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: School of Management & Medical Education Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Valiasr street, next to Toraj alley, Tehran, Post code: 19839-63113, Iran. Phone: +98 (21) 26210092; Fax: +98 (21) 26210093 Email: [email protected], [email protected][email protected]

Journal of Medical Education for Future Demands:Vol. 18, issue 1; e102539
Published online:Jan 31, 2019
Article type:Research Article
Received:Mar 10, 2020
Accepted:Dec 25, 2018
How to Cite:Yazdani S, Hajiahmadi M, Shakerian S. Interdisciplinarity; Out of Semantic Confusion in Iran. J Med Edu. 2019;18(1):e102539. doi:

Abstract

Background: The concept of interdisciplinarity that we recognize today, was initially formed in
1920 in the United States. During this period, the United States Social Science Research Council
expressed its interest in interdisciplinary research. Interdisciplinarity is a multidimensional word with
various meanings and interpretations. It is considered as the newest unknown critical, educational,
and organizational concept in the modern academic environment. In this study, we defined
interdisciplinarity and the characteristics of the underlying concepts to present an analytical definition
of the concept of interdisciplinarity.
Methods: Walker and Avant’s concept analysis method was used. This method is a systematic approach
often used for analyzing relatively new concepts. In order to obtain and extract the applications of
interdisciplinarity and its defining characteristics, we searched different databases and used keywords.
Five main domains that form the defining structure of interdisciplinarity were emerged. Those domains
include nature, integration, method, goal, and levels of interdisciplinarity.
Results: We identified five domains major of “ interdisciplinarity: “nature,” “integration”, “method”,
“goal”, and “levels” of interdisciplinarity. Based on the defining attributes a definition is formulated
for the concept of interdisciplinarity.
Conclusion: This study, achieving a simple and elegant concept, resolved the differences between the
different perspectives in this field and helped us design the theoretical and practical model.

Highlights

Fulltext

The full text of this article is available on the PDF file.

References

  • 1.
    The References of this article are available on the PDF file.

Copyright

© 2019, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

17
Feb
2024
Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Hybrid Concept Analysis

Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Hybrid Concept Analysis

Fateme Monjazebi,
Vahid Zamanzadeh,
Fereshteh Najafi

Monjazebi F, Zamanzadeh V, Najafi F. Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Hybrid Concept Analysis. Med Surg Nurs J. 2023;12(2):e145282. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/msnj-145282

1
Jul
2013

How to Define an Author? Awareness of Authorship Criteria

Mahsa Ghajarzadeh,
Mehdi Mohammadifar,
Saeid Safari

Ghajarzadeh M, Mohammadifar M, Safari S. How to Define an Author? Awareness of Authorship Criteria. Anesth Pain Med. 2013;3(1):226-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.10877

15
May
2021
A Model for the Taxonomy of Research Studies: A Practical Guide to Knowledge Production and Knowledge Management

A Model for the Taxonomy of Research Studies: A Practical Guide to Knowledge Production and Knowledge Management

Shahram Yazdani,
Armin Shirvani,
Peigham Heidarpoor

Yazdani S, Shirvani A, Heidarpoor P. A Model for the Taxonomy of Research Studies: A Practical Guide to Knowledge Production and Knowledge Management. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2021;9(4):e112456. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/pedinfect.112456

28
Mar
2018

Hidden Curriculum: An Analytical Definition

Mohammad Reza Andarvazh,
Leila Afshar,
Shahram Yazdani

Andarvazh MR, Afshar L, Yazdani S. Hidden Curriculum: An Analytical Definition. J Med Edu. 2017;16(4):e105592. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v16i4.18061

26
May
2011

Evaluation of diagnostic criteria of DSM-IV-TR for diagnosis of internet addiction disorder

S. Salman Alavi,
Fereshteh Jannatifard,
Mehdi Eslami,
Hossein Rezapour

Alavi SS, Jannatifard F, Eslami M, Rezapour H. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria of DSM-IV-TR for diagnosis of internet addiction disorder. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2011;13(6):e93833. doi:

More by these authors

Shahram YazdaniPubMedScholar
Maryam HajiahmadiPubMedScholar
Sareh ShakerianPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics