Evaluation Of The Approved Research Proposals In Harnedan University Of Medical Sciences

Hossein Mahjoub; GholamHossein Sadri

doi:10.22037/jme.v1i4.910

Journal of Medical Education for Future Demands

Former Title: Journal of Medical Education | The Official Journal of School of Medical Education and Learning Technologies

Outlines

Abstract
References
Copyright

https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v1i4.910

Evaluation Of The Approved Research Proposals In Harnedan University Of Medical Sciences

Author(s):

Hossein Mahjoub^1,*,

GholamHossein Sadri²

1Assistant Professor of ft1edical Statistics, School of Public Health, Hamedan Medical University of ft1edical Sciences.

2Assistant Professor of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hamedan University of ft1edical Sciences.

Journal of Medical Education for Future Demands:Vol. 1, issue 4; e104967

Published online:Apr 11, 2009

Article type:Research Article

Received:Apr 05, 2009

Accepted:Apr 11, 2009

How to Cite:Hossein Mahjoub, GholamHossein Sadri, Evaluation Of The Approved Research Proposals In Harnedan University Of Medical Sciences.J Med Edu.2009;1(4):e104967.https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v1i4.910.

Abstract

Background Evaluating the research projects in qualitative and quantitative terms is necessary to clarify their advantages and disadvantages and to resolve the possible failures.Purpose the study aims to assess the quality of the approved research projects. The objective is to de termine whether the design of the research in the approved proposals is accurate in regard of different scientific aspects.Methods Questionnaires of78 approved research proposals in University of Medical Sciences, ·which were conducted by a faculty member, has been evaluated in terms of the principles of sampling, study methodology and consistency between these two items.Results Mistakes in sampling techniques, with a rate of 45.2%, were more evident than other items. 10.3% of study methodologies were incorrect, and the consistency of methodology and sampling was inaccurate in 26. 7% of projects. 53.8% of projects had some kind of mistake in them.Conclusion Holding advanced workshops on research methodology and more strict supervision at the time of approving research projects are recommended.

Keywords

Fulltext

The body of the article can be found in the PDF file.

References

1.
References are available in the PDF file.

comments

Crossmark

Checking

Share on

Comments

Number of Comments:0

Cited by

CrossRef 0

Metrics

Get Permission (article level)

Purchasing Reprints

Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here ( https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.

Search Relations

Author(s):

Hossein Mahjoub:[PubMed][Scholar]
GholamHossein Sadri:[PubMed][Scholar]