Assessment Of Distracters In Multiple-Choice Tests

authors:

avatar Maryam Sadat Kaveh Tabatabaee 1 , * , avatar Akbar Derakhshan 2

Faculty Member of Nursing-Midwifery School, Mashad University of Medical Sciences.
Director of Education Development Center, Mashad Universtty of Medical Sciences.

how to cite: Kaveh Tabatabaee M S, Derakhshan A. Assessment Of Distracters In Multiple-Choice Tests. J Med Edu. 2002;2(1):e104980. https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v2i1.891.

Abstract

Background The aim of using distracters in multiple-choice questions (MCQs) is to distract those who don't know the correct answer of the question. The MCQs must be designed in a way that the students who have  reached  the  pre-determined  educational  objectives,  have a  better chance  in finding  the  correc1 answer than those who have not. Therefore, a question has an appropriate efficacy when more /ow-grade students are attracted to the distracters than high-grade students.Purpose  Considering  the  important  role  of  distracters  in differentiating  between low  and  high-grade students, this research studies the distracters in the multiple-choice tests (MCTs) given in Mashad Medical School in the first semester of 1001-2002.Method  In this descriptive study,  the data of 21 MCTs performed in one semester  were collected  and recorded  by  Optical  Mark  Reader  (OMR).  From 128-1 questions,  6-12  MCQ ques1io11s  were sampled randomly, and the numbers of low and high-grade students choosing the distracters were compared and analyzed using SPSS software.Results The efficacy of 45.9% of distracters was ''relatively weak" to "extremely weak",  with "relatively weak", "weak", "very weak"  and  "extremely  weak"  distractors  having a  prevalence of  11.4%, 10%, 15.1% and 9.4% respectively. Extremely weak distracters were those that had a negative impact. Which means the high-grade students were more attracted than the low-grades. Of the MCQs. -12.7% had one. and one third of the questions had two weak distracters. Among all 6- questions. only 15.1% had three good distracters.Conclusion Our study showed that more than half of he distracters had a weak quality. So we suggested that before performing a test, the experts ' opinion about the designed questions should be obtained and considered to minimize the technical problems of the questions. Keywords  multiple-choice test, distracter.

Fulltext

The body of the article can be found in the PDF file.

References

  • 1.

    References are available in the PDF file.