The Effect Of Contextual Factors On Results Of Teaching Evaluation In College Of Medicine, Tehran University Of Medical Sciences (2003)

Z Meshkani; F Hossein Abadie

doi:10.22037/jme.v6i1.813

Journal of Medical Education for Future Demands

Former Title: Journal of Medical Education | The Official Journal of School of Medical Education and Learning Technologies

https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v6i1.813

The Effect Of Contextual Factors On Results Of Teaching Evaluation In College Of Medicine, Tehran University Of Medical Sciences (2003)

Author(s):

Z Meshkani^1,*,

F Hossein Abadie²

1Director of photography educational development office (Tehran university of Medical Sciences)

2Director of educational Testing Services (Tehran university of Medical Sciences).

Journal of Medical Education for Future Demands:Vol. 6, issue 1; e105141

Published online:Apr 11, 2009

Article type:Research Article

Received:Mar 07, 2009

Accepted:Apr 11, 2009

How to Cite:Z MeshkaniF Hossein AbadieThe Effect Of Contextual Factors On Results Of Teaching Evaluation In College Of Medicine, Tehran University Of Medical Sciences (2003).J Med Edu.6(1):e105141.https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v6i1.813.

Abstract

Background: The use of students rating in order to improve faculty teaching has increased during last 25 years, and some universities rate all faculties teaching by students.Purpose: To study the influence of some instructor contextual variables in evaluating faculty teaching such as, gender, age, rank, teaching experience and status of employment of faculty.Methods: The available data from evaluation of 3 semesters (2001, 2002, and 2003) for 91 faculty members of medical basic sciences were analyzed as the dependent variables, the instrument for this study was self administered Likert's type questionnaire which administered in the last session of teaching. The effect of variable like gender, rank, teaching experiences, employment status are examined on evaluation score of faculty .The statistical t-test, Leven's and Pearson correlation were used to analyses the data.Results: Of all participant 67% were men. 5.6%of them aged less than 35, 52.2% of subjects were between 35-50years old and 42.2%were older than 50. Of all faculties 16.6% were full professor, 23.4% associate and 56%were assistant professor.4% of the faculty were instructor. There was no statistical significant association between the mean score and variances of evaluation scores Conclusion: The finding of this study showed there were no statistically differences between the dependent and independents variables. However the weak negative correlation was found between age and teaching experience. It means young and less experienced faculty gets better score in student rating.

Keywords

Faculty Evaluation

Student's Survey

Fulltext

The body of the article can be found in the PDF file.

References

1.
References are available in the PDF file.

comments

Crossmark

Checking

Share on

Comments

Number of Comments:0

Cited by

CrossRef 0

Metrics

Get Permission (article level)

Purchasing Reprints

Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here ( https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.

Search Relations

Author(s):

Z Meshkani:[PubMed][Scholar]
F Hossein Abadie:[PubMed][Scholar]