Our study showed that nitroglycerine, administered by continuous infusion during the peri-induction period of general anesthesia, was more effective than hydralazine or nifedipine in preventing increases in HR, SAP, DAP, and MAP after laryngoscopy and intubation, in patients with severe preeclampsia undergoing cesarean delivery.
Direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation cause an increase in BP and HR (
20). This cardiovascular response is presumed to be a sympathetic reflex response to mechanical stimulation of the larynx and trachea. It involves an average increase in BP of 40–50%, and a 20% increase in HR (
21). Significant elevations in serum levels of norepinephrine and epinephrine subsequent to the laryngoscopy, with and without tracheal intubation, have been reported (
22-
24). The pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation increases myocardial oxygen requirement and risk of cerebrovascular accidents, decreases uterine blood flow, and induces cardiac arrhythmias and pulmonary edema (
1,
2,
5,
25). Many drugs have been used for attenuation of these responses, but their relative efficacies have not been assessed (
26,
27). Although lidocaine is commonly used for attenuation of the adrenergic response, its efficiency, particularly in severe preeclampsia, has been questioned (
2). Preoperative opioids have been advocated for attenuation of the adrenergic response, and indeed short-acting opioids such as fentanyl have been used effectively at induction of anesthesia (
28). However, opioids are avoided by some clinicians, as they may cause substantial respiratory depression in an already compromised fetus.
Our study showed that hydralazine was ineffective for attenuation of the stress caused by laryngoscopy during induction of general anesthesia. This may be due to the slow onset and variable duration of action of this drug, as well as compensatory tachycardia, which makes it difficult to titrate its action against the hypertensive response (
29,
30). Hill et al. (
31) showed that intranasal nitroglycerine can prevent an increase in BP following laryngoscopy and intubation. Van den Berg and colleagues (
32) compared the effects of magnesium sulfate, esmolol, lidocaine, and nitroglycerine on the prevention of stress in laryngoscopy, and showed that nitroglycerine successfully prevented an increase in BP. On the contrary, magnesium sulfate and lidocaine did not have any effect on the hemodynamic changes following intubation. Further, in a study by Mikawak et al. (
33), it was shown that administration of a single dose of intravenous nitroglycerine was a safe and effective method for attenuation of the hypertensive response following intubation. In a study performed in Greece (
34,
35) women were enrolled to receive nitroglycerine before induction of anesthesia, and it was found that nitroglycerine effectively attenuated the increase in BP after laryngoscopy. Similarly, no increase in BP was seen in patients who received nitroglycerine prior to CABG surgery (
35). These results are all in agreement with the success rates observed in the current study. The purpose of treating severe hypertension is to prevent the loss of cerebral autoregulation (causing encephalopathy and hemorrhage) and to avoid congestive heart failure. Generally, physicians aim to keep SBP between 140 and 160 mmHg and DBP between 90 and 110 mmHg, because at these BP levels a reduction in either uteroplacental blood flow or cerebral perfusion pressure is unlikely. Nitroglycerine appears to maintain SAP and DAP within the desired range more successfully than nifedipine or hydralazine.
Nifedipine is one of several agents that have been used for the reduction of BP in severe preeclampsia. As a calcium channel blocker, it causes peripheral arterial vasodilatation (
36). Nifedipine was selected for analysis in this study as it is one of the most commonly-used drugs in the management of pregnancy-induced hypertension in developing countries (
37). The route of administration of nifedipine used in the current study ensured immediate contact of the total drug dose with the sublingual mucosa, where it is mainly absorbed; nevertheless, we cannot rule out partial absorption throughout the gastrointestinal tract due to unintentional swallowing, and therefore, the combined effect of both events on absolute bioavailability is not known.
It has been shown that modes of administration of nifedipine that avoid first-pass metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract, such as use of a sublingual perforated capsule, result in greater bioavailability, and a faster accumulation and more stable concentration of nifedipine in serum than methods that do not avoid first-pass metabolism (oral administration of an aspirated capsule or chewable capsule) (
38). In addition, sublingual administration methods allow for a more gradual decrease in BP than oral administration methods. Therefore, clinically, they are regarded as the most appropriate to achieve rapid onset and better control of the effects of nifedipine subsequent to its administration (
38).
The finding that the nifedipine-treated group showed both greater MAP variability and a greater maternal HR response than the nitroglycerine-treated group after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation implies that, under the present study conditions, sublingual nifedipine induces a greater variability in the arterial baroreflex system, through mechanisms that cannot be ascertained by the present study. A study by Fenakel et al. (
39) indicated that nifedipine has greater efficacy than hydralazine in achieving control of BP in severe preeclampsia. In keeping with our results, Kwawukume and Ghosh, in their study on 114 severely preeclamptic patients, found that nifedipine was more effective in controlling BP than hydralazine (
40). However, in the present study, nifedipine and hydralazine were less effective in controlling BP than nitroglycerine. Not only did the hypotensive effect of nitroglycerine begin earlier, but the therapeutic goal was also attained faster and with greater precision than with sublingual nifedipine or intravenous hydralazine. Maternal and fetal tolerance of intravenous nitroglycerine therapy appeared to be excellent in our study. Only 5 episodes of hypotension were observed in the NTG group; additionally, no case of tachycardia was seen. In the NIF and H groups, maternal hypotension was significantly more frequent; however, it was not associated with neonatal death. We noticed that a 1-min Apgar score of less than 7, seen in 10% of patients, appeared to be related to prematurity and maternal disease rather than adverse effects of the drug administered.
In conclusion, the present study found that, in women with severe preeclampsia who are managed with controlled extracellular volume expansion and MgSO4 loading and maintenance doses, a continuous IV infusion of nitroglycerine was able to attenuate the pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation to a greater extent, faster, and more precisely than the use of sublingual nifedipine or IV hydralazine, without significant adverse effects on the baby. Limitations of our study are the lack of a proper control group and incomplete data on the potential adverse effects of hydralazine, nitroglycerine, or nifedipine on the fetus and newborn. Although more research must be done, we believe that nitroglycerine infusion may provide safe and effective prophylaxis for patients with severe preeclampsia undergoing cesarean delivery under general anesthesia, in attenuating hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.