After molecular examination, a total of 60
M. simiae patients were identified. Previously, Velayati et al. showed that
M. simiae, with a frequency of 28.3%, was the most prevalent clinical NTM in Iran (
10). Our result with a similar 25% detection ratio for
M. simiae (compared to 240 NTM specimens) was consistent with their report. Heidarieh et al. noticed that out of 88 clinical slow-growing mycobacteria,
M. simiae was detected in more than 50% of the cases (48 strains) (
27). Also, Baghaei et al. demonstrated that out of 185 pulmonary patients referred to the National TB Reference Laboratory of Iran during 2002 - 2009,
M. simiae was isolated from 26 cases (
1). Among the other Middle Eastern countries, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Kuwait recently reported a few identified
M. simiae cases. In contrast, the actual increasing rate of
M. simiae infection in Lebanon raised to 47% (
11,
28,
29). This highlights the notion that people with a particular ethnic origin, especially in the Middle East, are more prone to infection with
M. simiae (
28), indicating the importance of performing widespread research on these pathogenic mycobacteria.
Surprisingly, a total of 60 M. simiae strains were identified as subtype I. Since almost all mycobacterial specimens are referred to the National TB Reference Laboratory, subtype I may be confirmed as the most prevalent M. simiae subtype in Iran.
Recently, Hamieh et al. from Lebanon reported that males were predominantly (55%) infected with
M. simiae (
28). So, a higher proportion of males were infected with
M. simiae in this study (58.33% males vs. 41.66% females). The World Health Organization (WHO) global report on the higher risk of TB in males could also be generalized into
M. simiae infections in the Middle East and, in particular Iran (
30). This may be associated with environmental, nutritional, and human genetic factors or host immunological response (
31-
33), but more gender-based investigations are necessary in this regard. Also, this study is the first to report that males and the elderly are more susceptible to infection with
M. simiae in Iran.
Mycobacterium simiae strains are resistant to a wide range of recommended antibiotics for NTM treatment (
12). Moreover, Heidarieh et al. illustrated that
M. simiae strains in Iran were resistant to almost 80% of recommended mycobacterial antibiotics, which makes the selection of the most applicable regimen more elusive (
27).
Given ATS recommendations (
12), the susceptibility results also showed that
M. simiae strains were resistant to both RIF and INH (100%). Hamieh et al. showed that
M. simiae was 100% resistant to both RIF and INH, whereas Heidarieh et al. reported 77% resistant cases only to RIF (
28). Thus, despite some similarities between
M. tuberculosis and
M. simiae, the first-line anti-TB drugs should be excluded from the treatment regimen of
M. simiae patients.
Susceptibility of the cases to the second line anti-TB agents was completely in contrast. When both AMK and KAN showed 91.66% susceptibility, the sensitivity of the isolates to CIP was 88.33%. Only one patient was resistant to RIF, INH, AMK, KAN, and CIP. Compared to previous research with a high frequency of
M. simiae, AMK was a far better selection with 88% susceptibility against
M. simiae in Lebanon and more than half in Iran, but CIP was far less effective (100% resistant in Lebanon and 81% in Iran) (
27,
28).
On the other hand, global reports on
M. simiae treatment approaches have suggested the superiority of fluoroquinolones, including MOX, LEV, and CIP compared to the most common aminoglycosides (AMK and KAN), while our data demonstrated the higher susceptibility of
M. simiae subtype I to AMK and KAN (
12,
30). However, the slight difference between the susceptibility of the two groups of antibiotics (3.33%) may be ignored. This may be associated with differences between the performed methods to evaluate the susceptibility of the strains to antibiotics, different responses of
M. simiae subtypes to the same antibiotic, and the studied countries or regions. Compared to the previous data from the Middle East, the latter is more reliable, where AMK revealed a better treatment response (
27,
28). But an overall conclusion is not possible because of the following:
(1) No related study has been published to evaluate the association between different subtypes of M. simiae and the effective antibiotic regimen.
(2) Most of the previous studies on drug susceptibility of
M. simiae have examined the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) using proportional methods (
26).
(3) The limitation of
M. simiae studies, particularly in the Middle East region, including Iran (
11,
12,
27,
34).
In addition, combination therapy by LVX-CLR and TMP/SMX demonstrated that almost one-fourth of the patients (25.71%) were treated, and 57.14% of the cases failed treatment. Heidarieh et al. revealed that
M. simiae isolates were resistant to CLR and TMP/SMX, as Hamieh et al. also showed 81% resistance to TMP/SMX but only 6% resistant to CLR (
27,
28). Considering the same drug in use and the region, the far difference in CLR susceptibility among Iranian and Lebanese patients may be related to the different isolated
M. simiae subtypes, but further subtyping-based research is needed. Altogether, due to the reliable susceptibility proportion of the second-line anti-TB agents in Iran,
M. simiae patients could additionally receive AMK, and CIP may potentially replace LEV.
Comparing AMK and KAN, the global reports mostly recommended the use of AMK, while our data showed no differences between their susceptibility. Thus, regardless of the same study population and the drug susceptibility in vitro, and no differences in gender response to both antibiotics, AMK superiority in the treatment of
M. simiae is more likely related to the specific isolated subtype (subtype I) or clinical-biochemical characteristics of the drug. The ATS recommendations and previous studies for treating patients infected with
M. simiae somewhat confirm this theory (
12-
36).
Although ATS recommends using fluoroquinolones in the treatment of
M. simiae (
12), due to the resistance of some
M. simiae strains to CIP, 100% reliability of CIP is not possible. On the other hand, ATS reported a better response of MOX/LEV in the majority of
M. simiae cases, but as previously shown, for those Iranian
M. simiae infected patients with suspected TB, who had been treated by the first-line anti-TB regimen, a combination of second-line therapy by CLR and CIP for two months or more saved them (
37). So, highlighting the role of
M. simiae subtypes in response to different fluoroquinolones, CIP showed better efficacy in treating
M. simiae patients in Iran.
In conclusion, subtype I was exclusively identified among M. simiae patients in Iran. Molecular detection of drug resistance suggests that AMK/KAN, in conjunction with CIP, would likely comprise useful components of the antimicrobial drug regimen for patients infected with M. simiae subtype I.