The polymicrobial nature of gastrointestinal diseases is clinically significant (
21). Specifically,
H. pylori infection is a primary cause of gastritis and gastric ulcers in humans and is also considered a risk factor for gastric cancer. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer,
H. pylori infection is classified as a group I carcinogen in humans (
22). Over 50% of the world’s population is infected with
H. pylori, although the infection rate varies between countries (
23), ranging from 85% to 95% in developing countries and 30% to 50% in developed countries (
24). Early diagnosis is crucial for effective management and the appropriate prescription of antibiotics to eradicate the pathogen and prevent its complications. There are various invasive and non-invasive techniques for diagnosing
H. pylori infection (
25), including microbiological culture (
26), rapid urease test (RUT), biopsy-based PCR (
27), urea breath test (UBT) (
28), stool antigen tests (SAT) (
29), and serological assessments (
30). Stool specimens are used in molecular tests for the non-invasive detection of
H. pylori DNA (
31). The ureC PCR method targets the urease C (ureC) gene. It was once incorrectly believed that the ureC gene was associated with urease formation (
32). However, it was later discovered to be involved in the production of phosphoglucosamine mutase, which plays a role in bacterial cell wall synthesis, and it is now known as the glmM gene (
33).
In our study, the prevalence of
H. pylori in patients, as determined by PCR, was found to be 24.29%, with a prevalence of 22.22% in men and 24.67% in women. A previous study conducted in 2019 on 350 stool samples, comprising 37% women and 63% men aged between 1 and 68, reported that 41% of the samples were positive for
H. pylori using the PCR method (
34). Another study, carried out in 2022 on 124 samples, found that 81.52% were positive for
H. pylori via PCR (
28). Additionally, a 2022 study aimed at detecting
H. pylori in patient stool samples using the multiplex urea PCR method reported a 65% positivity rate (
35).
Helicobacter pylori antibodies, including IgA and IgG, can be detected in stool, blood serum, and saliva through serological methods such as ELISA (
27,
29). In our study, the mean levels of
H. pylori IgA and IgG antibodies in patients were 5.83 ± 5.12 and 47.01 ± 56.66, respectively. A 2020 study focusing on identifying
H. pylori in cases of gastric ulcers, conducted on 137 samples, found that 29.2% were positive for IgA and 71.5% for IgG based on ELISA results (
28). Furthermore, a 2022 study aimed at diagnosing
H. pylori in patients with peptic ulcers using blood samples revealed that 52% of the samples tested positive via ELISA (
36).
These findings highlight the variability in H. pylori prevalence across different populations and studies, emphasizing the necessity of employing accurate diagnostic methods to ensure effective detection and subsequent treatment of H. pylori infections. The use of both PCR and ELISA can provide complementary insights, aiding in better management of associated gastrointestinal diseases.
The choice of diagnostic technique for
H. pylori infections is influenced by factors such as sensitivity, specificity, cost considerations, and clinical status (
10). Each testing method presents unique limitations, advantages, and disadvantages depending on clinical circumstances and patient history (
37). Polymerase chain reaction is noted for its high sensitivity and specificity, exceeding 95%, compared to other conventional methods (
38). In our study, using PCR results as the gold standard for identifying
H. pylori, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting
H. pylori IgA were 88% and 89%, respectively, while for IgG, they were 76% and 94%.
A 2021 study that diagnosed
H. pylori infection using both invasive and non-invasive methods in patients with digestive disorders reported that 81% of samples were positive via the qPCR method, whereas 53% were positive via the ELISA method. In this study, the sensitivity and specificity of the IgG ELISA test were found to be 73.5% and 85.3%, respectively, with PCR identified as the method with the highest accuracy and sensitivity (
25).
Further, a 2019 study analyzing diagnostic methods for identifying
H. pylori reported that, based on the PCR method, 51.9% of the 102 samples tested positive, compared to 30.4% positivity for IgA using ELISA. The sensitivity and specificity reported were 66.8% and 75%, respectively (
39). Another comparative study in 2018 between real-time PCR and ELISA found that, for 87 samples, the PCR method had a detection rate of 81.6%, while the ELISA method had a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 60%, respectively (
40).
These studies underscore the critical link between
H. pylori infections and various digestive system diseases, such as gastric ulcers, duodenal ulcers, gastric flatulence, and gastric adenocarcinoma (
41). In our study, a significant correlation was observed between clinical symptoms, such as nausea and flatulence, and a history of gastrointestinal malignancy, with positive Helicobacter PCR results. This finding emphasizes the importance of selecting an appropriate diagnostic approach for
H. pylori to ensure accurate detection and effective management of gastrointestinal diseases linked to this bacterium.
In a study conducted in 2018, the prevalence of
H. pylori infection was reported as 64.39%, and all patients with abdominal pain, frequent belching, and abdominal bloating tested positive for
H. pylori infection (
42). In a 2019 study of 158 samples,
H. pylori was found to be associated with stomach cancer, a history of malignancy, family history, and age (
43). Additionally, in the Balabel study conducted in 2022, bloating, nausea, and heartburn were most commonly associated with
H. pylori infection (
44).
As seen in the results of our study, it is important to consider symptoms such as nausea, bloating, and a history of malignancy in individuals with H. pylori. Due to the high sensitivity and specificity of the PCR method, this test has been introduced as the gold standard for detecting H. pylori in stool samples. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA method were also high, suggesting that these two methods should be used together in the diagnosis of Helicobacter infection.
5.1. Limitations
This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of ELISA and PCR for detecting H. pylori, but it faces notable limitations. The small sample size of 70 participants may not represent a broader population, potentially affecting the generalizability of the results. Relying on both stool and serum samples poses challenges in maintaining consistent quality, risking DNA degradation and compromised results. Conducted in a single Tehran laboratory, the study may be subject to location-specific biases. The short three-month timeframe may not capture seasonal variations affecting H. pylori prevalence, highlighting the need for expanded research with larger sample sizes and broader geographic and temporal coverage.
5.2. Conclusions
This study highlights the critical importance of accurately diagnosing H. pylori infections, which are strongly linked to various gastrointestinal diseases, such as gastritis, gastric ulcers, and gastric cancer. By comparing the diagnostic accuracy of ELISA and PCR methods, the research provides valuable insights into optimizing detection strategies for H. pylori. Polymerase chain reaction demonstrates higher sensitivity and specificity compared to ELISA, making it a more reliable gold standard for diagnosing this infection. Given that the prevalence of H. pylori varies significantly across populations and the infection is classified as a group I carcinogen, timely and accurate diagnosis is essential for effective management and treatment. Establishing optimal cut-off points for IgA and IgG, as identified in this study, allows for enhanced diagnostic precision, which can lead to better-targeted therapeutic interventions and improved patient outcomes. This research underscores the necessity of selecting appropriate diagnostic techniques, considering the clinical context, to ensure the effective management of H. pylori-related gastrointestinal diseases.