In the last two decades, the epidemiology of MRSA infections has changed from healthcare-associated (HA)-MRSA to community-associated (CA)-MRSA as a causative agent of infection in clinical settings (
14-
16). On the other hand, the prevalence of MRSA infections has emerged as a serious problem since MRSA strains are resistant to most antibiotics, particularly β-lactams. Based on recent studies, the nasal colonization of
S. aureus plays a major role in the pathogenesis and epidemiology of infections (
17). At present, the prevalence of the MRSA nasal carriage is increasing in the healthy population. For instance, in a study performed in Jordan, the frequency of the MRSA nasal carriage was 7.5% in a healthy population (
18). In a similar study conducted in Western Nepal, 32 out of 204 (15.7 %) healthcare workers were
S. aureus carriers, of which 21.9% (7 cases) were MRSA (
19). In the present study, the frequency of nasal carriage of
S. aureus was examined in a healthy population. Based on the results, 60 out of 400 (15%) students were nasal carriers of
S. aureus and 2.18% (11/400) of the students were MRSA-positive based on the phenotypic test.
Our results are consistent with previous results reported by Khanal et al. in 2015 that highlighted the MRSA nasal carriage rate of 3.4% (7/204) among health care workers in Western Nepal (
19). In the present study, 18.34% of the
S. aureus-positive samples were resistant to erythromycin and cefoxitin and 11.67% were resistant to oxacillin. These findings are not consistent with a previous study of nasal carriers of
S. aureus in nursing students that reported the rate of
S. aureus positivity as 32.5%, MRSA as 10%, and resistance to erythromycin as 30% (
20). According to our results, 6.67% of the isolates were resistant to clindamycin that contradicts the findings of da Silva et al. in Pernambuco; they assessed resistance to clindamycin among nursing staff in a teaching hospital and reported that 11.9% of the nasal carriers were resistant to clindamycin (
21). Currently, a notable increase is reported in the prevalence of MDR among MRSA isolates that imposes a serious menace on public health (
22).
In the present study, from 60
S. aureus-positive isolates, 31.66% (19 cases) were MDR-positive. This result is consistent with a previous study in Kashan, Iran, that reported 26.3% of healthy children were nasal carriers of
S. aureus, 29.3% were MDR-positive, and 35.9% were MRSA-positive (
23).
The results of PCR indicated that the mecA gene was present in 54.54% (36/60) of the
S. aureus isolates while only 11.67% of the
S. aureus isolates were resistant to oxacillin. As a result, 6.25% of the students were OS-MRSA carriers. These results indicate the increasing prevalence of OS-MRSAs in the healthy population of Iran concerning the results of a study performed in 2013 on 173 nurses in Iran that reported 4.6% of the cases were MRSA carriers and only 1.15% of the MRSA isolates were OS-MRSA (
24). In a study performed on healthcare workers in two African countries, 2.4% of the individuals were OS-MRSA carriers that can transfer it to patients as the reservoirs of OS-MRSA (
25). Recent studies indicate an increase in the prevalence of oxacillin-susceptible mecA-positive
S. aureus in human infections (
26,
27).
Since OS-MRSA isolates carry the mecA gene but are sensitive to oxacillin, they could be wrongly identified as MSSA if the detection of the mecA gene is not tried (
28). In the present study, one of the isolates (1.5%), which was an MRSA-MDR strain, was positive for the TSST-1 gene. This result is consistent with the results by Hogan et al. in 2016 regarding the detection of the TSST-1 gene among students in Madagascar in which, 1.9% of the students were positive for the TSST-1 gene (
29).