The study found that the length of stay after surgery, wound infection, and mortality rate did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the need for another surgery due to unexpanded lungs was significantly lower in the alteplase group. These findings suggest that alteplase as an intrapleural fibrinolytic may reduce the need for reoperation after empyema surgery.
As previously discussed, the use of IFAs in managing empyema has shown promising results compared to surgical decortication alone. However, the efficacy of these agents after surgery for empyema has yet to be well-studied. Nonetheless, researchers have recommended using IFAs following postoperative retained hemothoraces (
3,
9). It is worth noting that this approach has been proven safe and effective after major thoracic surgeries, such as lung transplantation (
10). On the other hand, surgical procedures for empyema thoracis often require extensive and time-consuming decortication, which can result in iatrogenic intrapleural bleeding. Additionally, even with meticulous decortication and pleurectomy, fibrins and clots may remain in the pleural cavity. Consequently, the primary cause of unexpanded lungs after surgery (aside from ventilatory complications or bronchopleural fistula) appears to be retained clots and recurrent infections (
11,
12). Thus, the use of IFAs, regardless of the type of surgery, could yield beneficial outcomes.
Fibrins can be naturally degraded by lytic enzymes such as streptokinase and urokinase (
13). Additionally, investigators have utilized other fibrinolytic agents as IFAs (
14). However, due to the absence of large-scale trials, there is no clear evidence that any single fibrinolytic agent is superior to the others in terms of outcomes. Nevertheless, when DNase is added to other fibrinolytic agents, such as tissue plasminogen activators, it can enhance fluid drainage and improve outcomes (
15).
In this study, two IFAs were utilized based on their safety profiles, well-known adverse effects, prices, and availability. Alteplase and streptokinase are both fibrinolytic agents used to dissolve blood clots. When used as an intrapleural fibrinolytic, they can effectively manage complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyemas. Alteplase is a genetically engineered form of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). It is a highly specific fibrinolytic agent that selectively activates plasminogen bound to fibrin, leading to the dissolution of the fibrin clot. Alteplase has a short half-life, which allows for quick cessation of its effect if necessary. It has a higher fibrin specificity than streptokinase, which means it is less likely to cause bleeding complications (
16). Also, streptokinase is a naturally occurring enzyme produced by Streptococcus bacteria. It binds to plasminogen and converts it to plasmin, degrading fibrin clots. Streptokinase has a longer half-life than alteplase and is less specific to fibrin, which theoretically increases the risk of bleeding complications (
17,
18).
In terms of efficacy, several studies have compared the use of alteplase and streptokinase for intrapleural fibrinolysis with mixed results. Some studies have suggested that alteplase is more effective than streptokinase in achieving complete radiological resolution of the effusion and reducing the need for surgery (
19). However, other studies have found no significant difference between the two agents regarding clinical outcomes (
20). Regarding the existing literature, we cannot introduce the best IFA due to the lack of large trials. However, this study could show the efficacy of alteplase concerning the need for reoperation.
It should be noted that the present study had some limitations, including its relatively small sample size and the fact that it was conducted at a single center. Also, it would be better to compare our results with a control group. In addition, the decision to use IFAs and the choice of which agent to use were not randomized, which could introduce some bias into the results. Also, the prophylactic use of IFAs postoperatively can increase patient healthcare fees. So, this protocol can be useful for those parents who want an extra management protocol for their children.
5.1. Conclusions
Overall, the findings of this study suggest that the use of IFAs after surgical intervention for pleural empyema may not provide significant benefits in terms of postoperative outcomes. However, using alteplase may decrease the risk of reoperation. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and to determine the optimal treatment approach for this condition.