Scrotal problem in pediatric patients is a pathology that presents with scrotal pain, erythema, swelling, hydroceles, and edema. It is commonly caused by TAT, incarcerated scrotum, TT, and EO and occasionally by trauma, hemorrhage, testicular malignancy, and idiopathic scrotal edema (
3). Experienced pediatric surgeons can identify the cause of scrotal pathology by taking a clinical history and performing a clinical examination (
4). However, differentiation between TT and TAT causes a dilemma in the early stages of the disease. Based on our experience, scrotal tenderness, cremasteric reflex, and erythema are useful diagnostic signs of TT and TAT. We believe that scrotal exploration is a safe procedure when performed with the knowledge of an accurate diagnosis.
The necessity for early treatment of TT to avoid testicular infarction is well recognized (
5,
6). TT reduces blood supply to the testis, which subsequently leads to hemorrhage, infarction, and necrosis. Many studies have shown that testicular infarction begins within the first 2 hours of TT onset, irreversible damage occurs after 6 hours, complete infarction develops after 24 hours, and fertility function is inevitably diminished thereafter (
1,
7). Statistical analysis indicates that aggressive treatment performed within 6 h of TT onset has a 93% testicular salvage rate. In contrast, only 10% of cases are resolved after 24 hours (
8). Of the patient cases presented here, 22 (22/31, 71%) underwent orchiectomy surgery even though the treatment initiation was not delayed. This finding can be explained by delays in seeking medical attention. Inadequate care offered by less experienced first line pediatric surgeons is the major cause in most cases.
A literature review suggests that the incidence of TAT is quite different from that of TT (
9,
10) and that the incidence of TAT could, in theory, be higher than that of TT (
11). In our investigation, TAT accounted for 49% (32/65) of cases. This value is considered lower than actual rates and may be explained by an unwillingness to visit a doctor’s office or the pain automatically subsiding after a few days. TAT commonly leads to appendage swelling, necrosis, and finally absorption. Surgical intervention in cases of TAT may not be necessary. For patients diagnosed with TT, surgical scrotal exploration can offer a differential diagnosis, thus minimizing the risk of testicular loss through misdiagnosis (
12). However, treatment approaches are constantly debated. Even medical professionals advocating for conservative management acknowledged that 22% of cases require urgent explorative surgery for differential diagnosis and that 14% of patients receiving conservative management develop persistent pain, which requires testicular excision (
13). Of the cases reviewed in our analysis, two patients with a primary diagnosis of TAT were confirmed as having TT. Therefore, any risks of avoiding testicular loss are not wasted. On the other hand, scrotal exploration and excision of the torted appendage under general anesthetic is a safe procedure with minimal morbidity (
9). This enables an accurate diagnosis, relieves symptoms, and alleviates the anxiety of a patient’s parents.
CDS is considered the primary imaging modality for the evaluation of diverse etiologies. Reported diagnostic performance values for CDS of TT were 69–86% sensitive, 87–100% specific, and 73–97% accurate. CDS has a reported positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 97.5% (
14-
16). Furthermore, CDS together with clinical evaluations is a reliable technique for the identification of TT (
7). In our reviewed cases, patients with acute scrotum were transferred immediately and scrotal CDS examinations were performed without delay. This proved to be a reliable initial strategy for minimizing testicular loss. Moreover, Soccorso et al. (
17) suggest that scrotal CDS should not be used as an emergency investigation, while surgical exploration of the scrotum in patients experiencing pain must be performed urgently without a preoperative morphologic assessment.
Orchiectomy rates vary widely in the literature and are 39–71% in most series (
18-
20). The orchiectomy rate in our analysis was higher than the published values. The major cause for the high orchiectomy rate is considered to be the inherent delay in seeking early care. The median duration of symptoms experienced by patients included in our analysis was 30 hours, while the median degree of torsion was 450°. The results suggest that factors that cause treatment delays are critical for patients with torsion. TT is a common source of litigation in urological practice (
21,
22). The most common reasons for litigation tend to be delayed diagnosis, missed diagnosis, and treatment delays. In our geographical region, more multicenter collaborative efforts are needed with rural hospitals to improve diagnostic accuracy. Cases of acute scrotum, particularly TT, should be accurately diagnosed. Testicular function, and the testis itself, can only be preserved or salvaged in patients who receive a differential diagnosis and undergo surgical procedures without delay.