Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci

Image Credit:Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci

Childhood Trauma, Mental Health, and Victimization Among Incarcerated Women in Iran: A Cross-sectional Study

Author(s):
Mahnaz FarahmandMahnaz FarahmandMahnaz Farahmand ORCID1,*, Hanieh TayebiHanieh Tayebi2
1Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
2Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

IJ Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences:Vol. 20, issue 1; e164010
Published online:Feb 16, 2026
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jul 02, 2025
Accepted:Jan 13, 2026
How to Cite:Farahmand M, Tayebi H. Childhood Trauma, Mental Health, and Victimization Among Incarcerated Women in Iran: A Cross-sectional Study. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2026;20(1):e164010. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs-164010

Abstract

Background:

Victimization represents a complex challenge in the lives of incarcerated women, often rooted in adverse childhood experiences. The consequences of early trauma may be further intensified within the violent and stressful prison context. Understanding these pathways is essential for designing effective interventions.

Objectives:

This study examined the relationships among childhood trauma, mental health, and victimization experiences among incarcerated women in Iran.

Methods:

A cross-sectional survey was conducted from July to November 2023 among 106 female prisoners from Yazd and Shiraz prisons. Participants were selected through purposive non-probability sampling, and recruitment from two prisons was used to achieve an adequate sample size. Eligible participants were women aged 18 - 60 years with a minimum of one year of incarceration and documented or self-reported histories of childhood abuse. Data were collected using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), the Childhood Adverse Experiences Questionnaire (CEQ), the Bullying-Victimization Scale (BVS), and the Mental Health Questionnaire (MHQ). Standardized procedures, interviewer training, validated instruments, and confidentiality safeguards were applied to reduce bias. Data were analyzed using correlation tests and structural equation modeling (SEM) in SPSS 25 and AMOS 27, with age, education, and socioeconomic status controlled as covariates.

Results:

Participants ranged in age from 18 to 60 years (34.4 ± 11.02). Regarding education, 49.1% had less than a high school diploma. In terms of socioeconomic status, 44.3% reported low and 55.7% reported middle to high status. Childhood trauma significantly predicted poorer mental health outcomes and higher levels of victimization during incarceration [β = 0.41, 95% CI (0.23, 0.58), P < 0.001]. The structural model demonstrated acceptable fit indices (CFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.032, TLI = 0.91). The SEM indicated that childhood trauma and mental health explained 23% of the variance in victimization, while the multiple regression model with control variables explained 52.9%.

Conclusions:

Findings highlight the critical role of childhood trauma in shaping mental vulnerability and victimization among incarcerated women. The results emphasize the need for trauma-informed and mental health–focused interventions in correctional settings. However, due to the non-probability sampling and modest sample size, generalizability should be approached with caution.

1. Background

Victimization is a commonplace problem faced by imprisoned women. This phenomenon is largely due to power abuse and the tendency of prisoners to assert dominance over others, leading to unequal interpersonal relationships and the commission of aggressive acts against one another (1, 2). In prisons, inmates may experience victimization in the form of physical attacks, sexual assaults, or threats to their safety (3, 4). The rate of women’s victimization varies from 30% to 50% across different prisons, and they are more likely to fall victim to physical violence than women outside prison (5). Being victimized in jail can have more severe consequences for women who experienced physical, emotional, or sexual offenses in childhood (6). These women are likely to carry the emotional and mental traumas from childhood into adulthood (7).

As numerous researchers suggest, victimization among imprisoned women often originates from certain family interactions (8) during childhood and continues into adulthood (9). According to some studies, more than two-thirds of imprisoned women grew up in disorderly and dysfunctional family environments, experiencing parental addiction, poverty, loss of parents, sexual abuse, negligence, fear, and engagement in crime-like behaviors or criminal acts (10). It has also been reported that 60% of women in prison were exposed to violence prior to incarceration, and 99% experienced at least one harmful event in their lifetime (11). Misconduct during childhood is believed to increase the risk of victimization in adulthood two- to threefold (12). While global research provides extensive insight into women’s victimization in prisons, no independent and systematic study has been conducted in Iran or made publicly accessible. This gap limits understanding of the real extent of harm experienced by female inmates and obscures critical long-term consequences.

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are highly prevalent among prisoners. A substantial body of evidence shows that incarcerated women with childhood traumas often feel incapable of controlling their lives in social interactions and daily activities due to low self-confidence (13, 14). They may struggle to defend themselves against physical risks or verbal aggression (15). These individuals commonly exhibit negative self-cognition and face a range of problems, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (2, 16). In fact, most of them grapple with significant mental health challenges (17).

Incarcerated women (68%) are more likely than men (41%) to report a diagnosed mental disorder (18), often resulting from early-life abuse and harmful experiences. Approximately 80% of imprisoned women are diagnosed with one or more psychotherapeutic problems, including depression (14.1%), post-traumatic stress disorder (1.21%), and drug abuse (30 - 60%). Additionally, the rate of self-harm among these women is 30%, and their suicide mortality is 20 times higher than that of women in the general population (19). Mental disorders occur at a higher incidence among incarcerated women (20), and the presence of such disorders substantially increases the risk of victimization, creating a vicious cycle (7, 21).

Despite extensive global research on women’s victimization in prisons, comparable studies in Iran remain scarce. Few investigations have systematically examined the prevalence, forms, or consequences of victimization among Iranian female prisoners. Given Iran’s distinct socio-cultural context — including its legal frameworks, gender norms, and support systems—these experiences are likely to differ significantly from those documented internationally, highlighting a critical knowledge gap. The study’s innovation lies in localizing international models, providing the first quantitative evidence among Iranian female prisoners, and offering a foundation for evidence-based, trauma-informed interventions tailored to women’s harms.

2. Objectives

The specific objectives of this study were: (1) To describe the characteristics of victimization experiences among incarcerated women in Iran, with particular attention to those who reported childhood trauma; (2) to investigate the association between childhood trauma and current mental health outcomes in this population; (3) to examine the role of childhood traumas and mental health in the victimization of incarcerated women.

3. Methods

This study employed a quantitative survey design using structured data collection and statistical analyses to describe the demographic characteristics of the research population, examine relationships among variables, and test the study hypotheses. A purposive, non-probability sampling strategy was adopted, guided by two predefined inclusion criteria: (1) Female inmates with a documented or self-reported history of childhood abuse, and (2) at least one year of continuous incarceration. Sampling initially commenced at Yazd Central Prison. However, due to the limited number of eligible participants, the sampling frame was extended to include Adel-Abad Prison in Shiraz to achieve an adequate sample size and improve the representativeness of the sample. The final sample consisted of 106 participants, which met the recommended minimum sample size for structural equation modeling (SEM) according to guidelines suggesting at least 100 - 200 participants for stable parameter estimates. Eligible inmates were approached by trained interviewers, provided with information about the study, and invited to participate voluntarily. A total of 106 women aged 18 - 60 years consented and completed the survey across the two sites. Data were collected between July and November 2023 using standardized self-administered instruments. Trained interviewers were present to clarify questions when needed, and confidentiality safeguards were implemented throughout the process to reduce reporting bias and protect participants’ privacy.

Childhood trauma was measured using a 13-item combined questionnaire adapted from the short form of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-SF) (22) and the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Questionnaire (1998) (23). It comprised five 5-point Likert items (one per CTQ-SF subscale) and eight ACE-derived items (three 5-point Likert, five dichotomous). Both instruments have established validity and reliability in Iranian populations (α > 0.70) (24). Internal consistency of the eight Likert items in the present sample was α = 0.80. A composite childhood trauma score was created by z-standardizing and summing the CTQ-based total (range 5 - 25) and the ACE total score (range 0 - 10) for use in subsequent analyses.

Victimization during incarceration was assessed using the 8-item victimization subscale of the revised Olweus Bullying/Victimization Questionnaire (OVS) (25). This subscale measures the frequency of various forms of bullying and victimization experienced in the past few months, rated on a 5-point scale (0 = never to 4 = several times a week). The full scale has demonstrated good reliability and validity in previous studies, including Japanese and Iranian samples (26, 27). In the present sample, exploratory factor analysis (principal axis factoring) confirmed a single-factor structure, with an eigenvalue of 4.91 explaining 61.34% of the variance and all factor loadings ranging from 0.65 to 0.85. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.80). To ensure appropriateness for adult female prisoners, three clinical psychologists independently reviewed the items for face and content validity; minor wording adjustments were made only to enhance clarity and contextual relevance without altering item meaning. Final scores were computed as the mean of the eight items (range 0 - 4), with higher scores indicating greater victimization.

Mental health was assessed using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), which includes 28 items organized into four subscales: Somatic symptoms, anxiety and sleep disturbance, social dysfunction, and depressive symptoms (28). Each subscale contains seven questions scored from 1 to 5. The reliability of the questionnaire in Iran was reported as 0.8 for a sample of 19,370 participants (29), and Cronbach’s alpha in the present study was 0.80.

Socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed through a self-reported single-item question with three response options (low, middle, high). Data normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (P > 0.05), indicating normal distribution. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic characteristics (e.g., education, age, marital status) and study variables. Pearson’s correlation was applied to examine relationships among variables, and multiple linear regression was employed to predict outcomes while controlling for potential confounders such as age, education, and marital status. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted using SPSS 25 and AMOS 27 to test the study.

4. Results

This section presents the descriptive and inferential findings of the study. First, participants’ demographic and background characteristics are summarized, followed by analyses related to the main study variables.

Table 1 presents the demographic characteristics of the sample. Regarding age, the highest proportion of participants was in the 30 - 42-year age group. Most of the women had education levels below a high school diploma. Overall, 38% of the participants had been incarcerated for one to four years. Robbery, fraud, and financial offenses were the most commonly reported crimes. Additionally, 46% of the female prisoners were married. Socioeconomic status was reported as low by 44.3% of participants and as middle to high by 55.7%.

Table 1.Demographic Characteristics of Sample
VariablesNo (%)
Age of female (y)
18 - 2931 (29.2)
30 - 4249 (46.2)
> 4324 (22.7)
Level of education
Under diploma48 (49.1)
Diploma33 (31.1)
Bachelor13 (12.3)
Masters and above8 (7.5)
Length of imprisonment (y)
< 138 (35.8)
1 - 441 (38.7)
5 - 913 (13.2)
Type of crime
Robbery, fraud , finance51 (48.1)
Conflict, murder, kidnapping13 (12.2)
Sexual2 (1.9)
Material, shoti and others26 (24.5)
Marital status
Single25 (23.6)
Married49 (46.2)
Absolute28 (26.4)
Economic status (SES)
Good18 (17.0)
Average41 (38.7)
Down47 (44.3)

Based on the findings reported in Table 2, the most frequent types of victimization experienced by the women were hatred directed at them (M = 2.47) and humiliation (M = 2.00). The most common adverse childhood experiences were impaired family functioning (M = 2.79) and domestic violence (M = 2.79). The lowest level of mental well-being was observed in the anxiety and sleep disturbance subscale (M = 18.74). In addition, participants reported experiencing parental loss (40.0%), parental substance abuse (22.0%), and parental divorce (23.0%) during childhood.

Table 2.Descriptive Statistics of Childhood Abuse, Mental Health, and Victimization
VariablesMean ± SD (y)
Items of childhood Abuse 1
Emotional abuse (threats, ridicule, insults)2.59 ± 1.678
Physical neglect (lack of proper nutrition, and dirty clothing …)2.32 ± 1.589
Emotional neglect (disregard for emotional needs, disregard …)2.71 ± 1.627
Physical abuse (beating, bruising, biting, hair pulling)2.21 ± 1.547
Sexual abuse (rape, sexual harassment, sexual violence…)1.61 ± 1.231
Impaired home functioning(financial poverty, neglect of purchasing)2.79 ± 1.683
Domestic violence (fighting and beatings)2.79 ± 1.666
Forced to do hard work2.32 ± 1.540
Items of Childhood Abuse 2
Nominal items (Yes/No)
Parental separation or divorce22.6/75.4
Death of one or both parents40.6/58.4
The parents or one of them being in prison17.8/81.1
Forced to drop out of school41.5/58.5
Substance abuse by one or both parents21.7/77.4
Items of victim
In prison, I have been called derogatory names and titles, made fun of, or harassed in other uncomfortable ways.2.00 ± 1.48
Other prisoners have excluded me from activities and inmate gatherings or have ignored me completely.1.66 ± 1.194
I have been beaten, kicked, pushed, dragged around, or locked up many times.1.87 ± 1.367
Other prisoners have lied or spread rumors about me and tried to make others hate me.2.47 ± 1.55
My money or other belongings have been damaged or taken from me.1.90 ± 1.387
I have been threatened or forced to do something I did not want to do.1.95 ± 1.362
I have been bullied by being called hurtful names or being made fun of because of my ethnicity.1.58 ± 1.104
I have been bullied with inappropriate nicknames and words that have sexual connotations.1.42 ± 1.02
Mental health
Subscale of Feeling healthy19.73 ± 7.16
Subscale of Anxiety and insomnia18.74 ± 8.10
Subscale of Correct execution of affairs23.50 ± 6.58
Subscale of severe depression21.46 ± 8.82
Overall mental health83.44 ± 25.26

Table 3 shows Pearson correlation coefficients. Childhood trauma among imprisoned women was significantly positively correlated with victimization (r = 0.52, P < 0.01) and significantly negatively correlated with overall mental health (r = -0.358, P < 0.01).

Table 3.Correlation Matrix
VariablesFeeling HealthyAnxiety and InsomniaExecution of AffairsSevere DepressionMental HealthBeing a Victim
Child abuse-0/259 a-0/260 a-0/161 b-0/159 b-0/294 a0/520 a
Feeling healthy10/662 a0/135 b0/407 a0/783 a-0/192 a
Anxiety and insomnia-10/0990/365 a0/771 a-0/238 a
Execution of affairs--10/268 a0/477 a-0/244 a
Severe depression---10/765 a-0/342 a
Mental health----1-0/358 a

a P < 0.01.

b P < 0.05.

Table 4 presents the multiple linear regression model, which was statistically significant and explained 52.9% of the variance in victimization (R² = 0.529). Childhood abuse was the strongest predictor (β = 0.641, P < 0.001). Among the control variables, length of imprisonment showed a positive effect (β = 0.230, P = 0.001), and age had a negative association (β = –0.165, P = 0.025), suggesting that younger women reported higher levels of victimization. Socioeconomic status (SES) did not contribute significantly to the prediction of victimization (β = 0.028, P = 0.697). Assumptions of multiple linear regression were checked prior to analysis, including normality, linearity, homoscedasticity, independence of errors, and collinearity (VIF < 1.5, tolerance > 0.7), confirming no violations.

Table 4.Enter Multiple Linear Regression Predicting Victimization a
ModelsUnstandardized CoefficientsStandardized CoefficientsCollinearity Statistics
BStd. ErrorBetatSigToleranceVIF
Constant1.1983.561-0.3360.737--
Traumas0.4350.0540.6418.0240.0000.7451.342
Mental health0.0260.0220.0891.1550.2510.8031.246
Age-0.1080.048-0.165-2.2760.0250.9061.104
Length of imprisonment 1.8000.5480.2303.2850.0010.9711.030
SES0.2770.7100.0280.3910.6970.9211.086

a R = 0.727, R² = 0.529, Adjusted R² = 0.505, f = 22.221 (P < 0.001).

Table 5 presents structural equation modeling (SEM) model fit indices. The RMSEA was 0.032, CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.91, and AGFI = 0.95, all indicating good model fit. The CMIN/DF Index was 1.520 (< 3), further supporting the adequacy of the model. These findings confirm the proposed relationships among childhood trauma, mental health, and victimization in the study population.

Table 5.Model Fit Indices
IndicatorModified Parsimonious Fit IndexRamsey's Fitness IndexRoot Mean Square Error of ApproximationAdaptive Fitness IndexNormalized Fit IndexToker-Louis IndexAdjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index
PGFICMIN/DFRMSEACFINFITLIAGFI
Desirable≥ 0/9≤ 0. 3≤ 0.08≥ 0.9≥ 0.9≥ 0.9≥ 0.9
Amount0.9051.5200.0320.9150.9040.9140.902

Figure 1 illustrates the model with standardized coefficients. The structural equation model indicated that trauma had the strongest direct effect on victimization. Mental health partially mediated this relationship and also independently predicted victimization. Trauma and mental health together explain 23% of the variance in victimization.

Structural equation model
Figure 1.

Structural equation model

5. Discussion

The present study examined the role of childhood trauma in shaping mental health and victimization among incarcerated women. Overall, the findings suggest that childhood trauma operates as a central vulnerability factor that undermines psychological well-being and increases susceptibility to victimization in prison. These results align with prior Iranian and international studies showing that women with adverse childhood experiences face higher risks of victimization and mental health challenges in adulthood (6, 11, 12). Similarly, early-life abuse has been linked to impaired coping strategies and heightened vulnerability to coercion and interpersonal aggression in prison settings (2, 16).

The findings revealed a significant positive association between early-life trauma and victimization, demonstrating that women with histories of childhood abuse are disproportionately vulnerable to coercion, aggression, and threats within prison settings. This aligns with prior research (5, 9, 13). Anderson et al. (11) found that childhood traumas reduce women’s self-esteem, giving them a feeling of limited control over their life in adulthood. Similarly, Faridouni et al. (12) observed that women with childhood traumas are more likely to self-blame, feel lonely, exhibit risky sexual behavior, and face a higher risk of victimization.

Childhood trauma was also associated with poorer mental health among incarcerated women. Consistent with previous research, these findings indicate that children exposed to unsafe environments and lacking stable family and emotional support (2, 9, 10, 16) often develop a fragile psychological self-concept (14). Such individuals face difficulties in forming secure and meaningful interpersonal relationships (1, 2), exhibit impaired emotional regulation, and possess limited psychological resilience (18), which heightens vulnerability to stress and mental health challenges in later life (17). Edison and Haynie (2) reported that women with childhood traumas typically have negative self-cognition and struggle to manage interactional conflicts effectively.

Furthermore, poorer mental health was associated with an increased risk of victimization in prison. Women exhibiting higher levels of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, or emotional dysregulation were more likely to experience in-prison victimization. These findings are consistent with prior research indicating that mental health difficulties can impair situational awareness and help-seeking behaviors (14), contribute to negative self-perception (2, 16), reduce the ability to cope with physical and verbal harms in prison (11, 15, 16, 21), and affect emotional and interpersonal regulation (14).

In the regression model, age, length of incarceration, and socioeconomic status were included as control variables alongside the main predictors. The results indicated that both age and length of incarceration were significantly related to victimization, with younger women experiencing higher levels of harm, possibly due to limited coping strategies and lower social capital in prison. Socioeconomic status was not significantly associated with victimization, suggesting that the homogenizing conditions of the prison environment may mitigate economic differences.

Based on these findings, the relationship between adverse childhood experiences, psychological distress, and female victimization can be conceptualized as a “trauma-psychological damage – revictimization cycle”. This cycle illustrates how early traumatic exposures and the resulting psychological injuries undermine emotional stability and self-cohesion. Through internalization, such experiences foster a fragile self-concept and heightened emotional vulnerability, which, in turn, increase susceptibility to further victimization, perpetuating patterns of violence across the individual’s life course.

5.1. Limitations

This study encounters several limitations that warrant careful consideration. First, the small sample (106 prisoners) and purposive non-probability sampling restrict generalizability and may introduce bias. Second, reliance on self-report questionnaires renders the data vulnerable to recall errors and social desirability bias. Third, the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference, while omission of possible mediating or moderating variables may have shaped the observed associations. Fourth, the prison context makes the findings highly context-specific and less transferable to other populations.

5.2. Conclusions

The present study highlights a vicious cycle of trauma–psychological damage–revictimization, underscoring how adverse childhood experiences may set the stage for long-term vulnerability to repeated victimization. The findings also suggest that women’s victimization should not be viewed solely as an individual phenomenon, but rather as a process intricately linked to familial dynamics, deprivation, addiction, and parental divorce. Variations across familial and community contexts influence how victimization manifests, thereby limiting the generalizability of these findings to wider populations. To address these limitations, future research should employ larger and more diverse samples, adopt longitudinal designs, and utilize triangulated approaches that incorporate both quantitative and qualitative methods. Such strategies would enable a deeper understanding of the complex social and environmental determinants of victimization and inform the development of more effective policies and interventions to mitigate risk and support vulnerable populations.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Saxena P, Messina N. Trajectories of victimization to violence among incarcerated women. Health Justice. 2021;9(1):18. [PubMed ID: 34313871]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8314610]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-021-00144-8.
  • 2.
    Edison S, Haynie DL. Social Support, Victimization, and Stress in a Women’s Prison: The Role of in-Prison Friendship for Reducing Perceptions of Stress. Women Crim Justice. 2023;35(4):266-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2023.2246955.
  • 3.
    Wooldredge J, Steiner B. Assessing the Need for Gender-Specific Explanations of Prisoner Victimization. Justice Q. 2014;33(2):209-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2014.897364.
  • 4.
    van Ginneken EF, Wooldredge J. Offending and victimization in prisons: New theoretical and empirical approaches. Int J Law Crime Justice. 2024;77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100667.
  • 5.
    Gama-Araujo IS, Bezerra Filho JG, Kerr L, Kendall C, Macena RHM, Mota RS, et al. Physical violence inside female prisons in Brazil: prevalence and related factors. Schi Public Health. 2020;25(2):623-32. [PubMed ID: 32022202]. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020252.10842018.
  • 6.
    Sasaki N, Watanabe K, Kanamori Y, Tabuchi T, Fujiwara T, Nishi D. Effects of expanded adverse childhood experiences including school bullying, childhood poverty, and natural disasters on mental health in adulthood. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):12015. [PubMed ID: 38797740]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11128446]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62634-7.
  • 7.
    Hikmat R, Suryani S, Yosep I, Jeharsae R, Pramukti I, Sriati A, et al. The Effect of Empathy Training on Bullying Behavior in Juvenile Prisoners: A Quasi Experiment. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024;17:4177-88. [PubMed ID: 39224485]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11368104]. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S479364.
  • 8.
    Khosravi R, Mahmoudiani S, Abedi M. Investigating the Extent and Social-Demographic Determinants of Domestic Violence Against Women. Shiraz E-Med J. 2023;24(12). https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-139559.
  • 9.
    Lemon L, Hayes J. Enhancing Trustworthiness of Qualitative Findings: Using Leximancer for Qualitative Data Analysis Triangulation. Qual Rep. 2020;25(3):604-14. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4222.
  • 10.
    Kennedy SC, Mennicke A, Paul R. Childhood Polyvictimization and Mental Health Issues among Incarcerated Women. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2020;30(3):410-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2020.1774693.
  • 11.
    Anderson JD, Pitner RO, Wooten NR. A gender-specific model of trauma and victimization in incarcerated women. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2019;30(2):191-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1673272.
  • 12.
    Fereidooni F, Daniels JK, D. Krause-Utz A, Hagenaars MA, Smeets T, Heins J, et al. Childhood maltreatment and adulthood victimization: An evidence-based model. J Psychiatr Res. 2023;167:46-62. [PubMed ID: 37832203]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.10.007.
  • 13.
    Jones MS, Burge SW, Sharp SF, McLeod DA. Childhood adversity, mental health, and the perpetration of physical violence in the adult intimate relationships of women prisoners: A life course approach. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;101:104237. [PubMed ID: 31981933]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104237.
  • 14.
    Amanya A, Ankunda G, Ainamani HE, Ndyareeba E. Child Maltreatment Increases the Risk of Self-esteem Impairment: Findings from Children and Adolescents in Uganda. East Afr J Health Sci. 2023;6(1):124-32. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajhs.6.1.1223.
  • 15.
    Tracchegiani J, Fontana A, Benzi IMA, Muzi L, Carone N. Profiles of Childhood Maltreatment and Defenses: Associations with Personality Functioning in Emerging Adulthood. J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2025;18(3):653-67. [PubMed ID: 40955401]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC12433429]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-025-00710-4.
  • 16.
    Tjoelker FM, Jeuring HW, Aprahamian I, Naarding P, Marijnissen RM, Hendriks GJ, et al. The impact of a history of child abuse on cognitive performance: a cross-sectional study in older patients with a depressive, anxiety, or somatic symptom disorder. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):377. [PubMed ID: 35484493]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9052677]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03068-6.
  • 17.
    Felipe MT, García SDO, Babarro JM, Arias RM. Social Characteristics in bullying Typology: Digging deeper into description of bully-victim. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011;29:869-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.316.
  • 18.
    Bronson J, Berzofsky M. Indicators of mental health problems reported by prisoners and jail inmates, 2011–12. Washington (DC), USA: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2017. 15 p.
  • 19.
    Bright AM, Higgins A, Grealish A. Women's experiences of prison-based mental healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative literature. Int J Prison Health. 2023;19(2):181-98. [PubMed ID: 35192246]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10427976]. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-09-2021-0091.
  • 20.
    Casey RC, Bentley KJ, McDonald SE. Mental Health Difficulties of Incarcerated Women: The Influence of Childhood and Adulthood Victimization. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2020;19(3):241-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2020.1713258.
  • 21.
    Daquin JC, Daigle LE. Mental disorder and victimisation in prison: Examining the role of mental health treatment. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2018;28(2):141-51. [PubMed ID: 28857326]. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2056.
  • 22.
    Bernstein DP, Stein JA, Newcomb MD, Walker E, Pogge D, Ahluvalia T, et al. Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abuse Negl. 2003;27(2):169-90. [PubMed ID: 12615092]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00541-0.
  • 23.
    Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14(4):245-58. [PubMed ID: 9635069]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00017-8.
  • 24.
    Chegeni M, Haghdoost A, Shahrbabaki ME, Shahrbabaki PM, Nakhaee N. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Abuse Short Form. J Educ Health Promot. 2020;9:140. [PubMed ID: 32766325]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7377151]. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_15_20.
  • 25.
    Olweus D. Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1994;35(7):1171-90. [PubMed ID: 7806605]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01229.x.
  • 26.
    Kizuki M, Fujiwara T, Shinozaki T. Adverse childhood experiences and bullying behaviours at work among workers in Japan. Occup Environ Med. 2020;77(1):9-14. [PubMed ID: 31744857]. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-106009.
  • 27.
    Rezapour M, Soori H, Khodakarim S. [Testing psychometric properties of the perpetration of bullying and victimization scales with olweus bullying questionnaire in middle schools]. Saf Promot Inj Prev. 2013;1(4):212-21. FA.
  • 28.
    Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med. 1979;9(1):139-45. [PubMed ID: 424481]. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700021644.
  • 29.
    Noorbala AA, Bagheri YSA, Asadi LM, Vaez MMR. [Mental health status of individuals fifteen years and older in Tehran-Iran (2009)]. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 2011;16(4):479-83. FA.

Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.