Among 200 patients mostly with heart valve replacement, 185 individuals (112 females and 73 males; mean age 54.7 ± 14) who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Distribution of the daily dosage of warfarin was 0.28 to 12.10 mg/day among all the patients while the mean daily dose of warfarin was 4.26 ± 2.43 mg/day. The descriptive statistics of the patients’ demographic, biologic, and clinical variables are shown in
Table 1.
The VKORC1 (rs 9923231, -1639 G>A) polymorphism, genotype frequencies were 20.5%, 40.5%, and 38.9% for GG, GA, and AA genotypes, respectively. The allelic frequency for VKORC1 -1639 A was 60%. In the studied population the CYP2C9 *2 mutant allele frequency was found to be 12.6%. Out of 170 patients, 39 were heterozygous (CT) (22.9%) and 2 were homozygous (TT) (1.2%). The CYP2C9 *3 mutant allele frequency was found to be 25.8%. Out of 170 individuals, 82 were heterozygous (AC) (48.2%) and 3 were homozygous (CC) (1.8%). Overall genotype frequency for CYP2C9 was determined to be CYP2C9 *1/*1 (35.7%), *1/*2 (16.2%), *1/*3 (35.1%), *2/*2 (1.6%), *2/*3 (9.2%), and *3/*3 (2.2%). No significant deviation from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium was observed for CYP2C9 variants (P > 0.05).
The results of the mean comparison among the studied patients’ cohort revealed that the mean of warfarin dose had not significant difference with sex, heart valve type, smoke, diabetes, and hypertension (
P > 0.05). The patients who consumed alcohol with the mean warfarin dose of 6.39 ± 2.45 mg/day (
vs. non-alcohol consumers) had significantly higher and the Turkish patients with the mean warfarin dose of 4.16 ± 2.52 mg/day (
vs. other ethnicities) had significantly lower warfarin dose requirement (
P > 0.05). The Pearson correlation result showed significantly negative association between age and warfarin dose (r = -0.371,
P < 0.001) (
Table 2).
Comparison of the mean warfarin doses requirements among
VKORC1 -1639 genotypes revealed significant differences between the genotypes. Mean warfarin dose requirement was obtained 6.13 ± 2.59 mg/day for people with genotype GG, 4.15 ± 1.92 mg/day for genotype GA and 3.37 ± 2.29 mg/day for the genotype AA. Pairwise comparisons of mean warfarin dose requirements among the patients with GG, GA, and AA genotypes indicated significant differences (
P < 0.001 for GG vs GA and GG vs AA,
P = 0.02 for GA
vs. AA). Also, the mean of warfarin dose requirements significantly differed among
CYP2C9 genotypes. Pairwise comparisons of warfarin dose requirements across the patients with genotypes of
*1/
*1 (5.10 ± 2.40 mg/day),
*1/
*2,
*1/
*3 (3.65 ± 2.18 mg/day), and
*2/
*2,
*2/
*3,
*3/
*3 patients (4.32 ± 2.82 mg/day) indicated that the mean warfarin dose requirement of the people with genotype
*1/
*1 significantly differed from that of the studied cohort with the genotype
*1/
*2,
*1/
*3 (
P < 0.001). However, the comparisons among
*1/
*1
vs. *2/
*2,
*2/
*3,
*3/
*3 (
P = 0.22) and
*1/
*2,
*1/
*3
vs.*2/
*2,
*2/
*3,
*3/
*3 (
P = 0.54) showed no significant differences (
Table 3). The simultaneous effect of the variant alleles of
VKORC1 -1639 G>A and
CYP2C9 is shown in
Figure 1.
Final regression model results of warfarin dose requirement showed significant effects of age, hypertension, and genotype on warfarin dose (
P < 0.001) (
Table 4). The negative impact of age was significant on warfarin dose (
β = -0.02,
P < 0.001). Hypertensive patients had a higher warfarin dose requirement (
β = 0.27,
P < 0.001). The examination of the
VKORC1 -1639 G>A genotype effect indicates that the patients with AA (β = -0.62,
P < 0.001) and GA genotypes (
β =-0.43,
P = 0.001) had lower warfarin dose requirement compared to GG genotype. The patients with *1/*2, *1/*3 (
β = -0.34,
P < 0.001) and *2/*3, *2/*3 (
β = -0.28,
P = 0.017) of
CYP2C9 genotype had lower warfarin dose requirement compared to *1/*1 genotype. The stepwise evaluation of the effect of the patients’ demographic, biologic, and clinical variables and genotypes indicated that the order of variables elimination from regression models, according to weakest impact, were as follows: sex, smoking, alcohol, diabetes, ethnicity, BMI and in the final step the valve type was excluded from the model.