Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity in the world (
1). Among CVDs, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with significant complications (
2,
3). Coronary artery atherosclerosis is known as a chronic inflammatory process that may lead to ACS (
4,
5).
Currently, the reperfusion strategy is the standard treatment for acute myocardial ischemia (AMI). This strategy contradictory may cause cardiomyocytes dysfunction and worsens tissue damage (reperfusion injury) (
5) Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury induces an inflammatory response that causes multi-organ dysfunction. IR injury can result in about 30% to 40% mortality in the intensive care unit (
6).
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) may cause damage to the vessel wall, leading to localized inflammation of the coronary artery and vascular endothelium damage (
2). and inflammatory response (
7).
Inflammatory biomarkers are used to evaluate the prognosis of coronary heart disease associated with inflammation, including left ventricular dysfunction, AMI, or PCI-operated patients (
8).
Traditionally, vitamin D has been recognized as the main regulator of calcium and phosphorus homeostasis, as well as bone metabolism (
9). In the Intermountain Healthcare System study, which was conducted on more than 41,000 people, the association between vitamin D deficiency and coronary heart disease (CHD), MI, heart failure, stroke, hypertension and type 2 diabetes was proven (
10). In recent studies, it has been shown that calcitriol suppresses the production of pro-inflammatory mediators in adipocytes, preadipocytes, monocytes, and macrophages (
10).
Based on the pleiotropic effects of calcitriol on CHD and inflammation, this study has been designed to evaluate calcitriol effects on IR injury and inflammation in patients undergoing PCI.
Method
Ethics
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (ID: IRCT20151227025726N10). All patients provided written informed consent.
Study Design and Setting
This is a prospective randomized, single-blind, clinical trial that was conducted in a referral hospital for cardiovascular diseases in Tehran from October 2017 to September 2018.
The sample size calculation was based on the power of 80% and the level of confidence of 95%; the level of significance (α) was assumed to be 0.05. We selected the highest number for the sample size.
Patients
All patients who were more than 18 years old, referring to Shahid Modarress cath lab for elective PCI with stent placement enrolled in the study. The exclusion criteria were patients with: (
1). acute ST-segment elevated MI (STEMI); (
2). recent history (within 6 months) of MI; (
3). coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); (
4) recent vitamin D supplementation (within 1 month before PCI); (
5). unsuccessful PCI; (
6). hypercalcemia; (
7). active metabolic bone disease; (
8). renal or hepatic dysfunction; (
9). left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30%; (
10). contraindications or hypersensitivity to calcitriol; (
11). recent (1 week) consuming anti-inflammatory drugs (except aspirin and statin); (
12). breastfeeding or pregnant women; (
13). the inability to fill out or understand the consent form.
Patients’ demographic data, including sex, age, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI), were recorded. Also, drug and medical history, laboratory data, and positive family history of cardiovascular disease were documented.
All patients were randomized to the calcitriol-treated group or the control group by the systematic randomization method using computer-generated random numbers. All the patients in the intervention group were received three mcg intravenous (IV) bolus dose of calcitriol (3 ampules, CALCITRIOL ORPHATEB 1 mcg/mL injection, Mefar co., Turkey) 2 h before PCI.
All study participants received the standard PCI pre-treatment protocol of clopidogrel 300-600 mg, aspirin 300 mg, and intravenous heparin with a target activated clotting time of 250–300 seconds. All patients received 100 ± 25 ml of the contrast agent visipaque (iodixanol) during PCI. All PCIs were done by one interventional cardiologist according to the standard practice guidelines. The practitioner and the laboratory staff were blinded to the allocation. All patients were followed up for 3 months for the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including death, Q-wave MI, target vessel revascularization, and ischemic stroke.
The creatinine kinase-MB (CK-MB), cardiac troponin I (cTnI), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and high-sensitivity Interleukin-6 (hs-IL-6) levels were measured at the baseline (before giving calcitriol) and 24 h after PCI. Venous blood samples were obtained in tubes, EDTA for hs-CRP and citrate for IL-6. The tubes were centrifuged within 30 min of sample collection at 2000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature and frozen at -70 °C until analysis. Plasma concentration of CK-MB and cTnI were measured using spectrophotometry (Spectrophotometer UH4100, Hitachi, Japan) chemiluminescent immunoassays technique (IMMULITE 2000, Siemens, Germany), respectively. Plasma concentrations of hs-CRP and hs-IL-6 were analyzed using an ELISA technique (Stat Fax 2100, GMI, USA). The minimal detectable concentration of CK-MB, cTnI, hs-CRP and hs-IL-6 in blood were 1 U/L, 0.02 ng/mL, 0.02 mcg/mL and 0.03 pg/mL, respectively.
The primary outcome was the comparison of CK-MB and cTnI levels at the baseline and 24 h after PCI for assessing peri-procedural myocardial injury (PMI) as well as a comparison of hs-CRP and hs-IL-6 before and 24 h after PCI to assess the anti-inflammatory effect of IV calcitriol. The secondary outcome was the incidence of MACE (death, Q wave MI, target vessel revascularization, ischemic stroke) during a 3-month follow-up period considering the incidence timeline of MACE and the limitation in the study duration.
Statistical analysis was performed using statistical package for social sciences software (SPSS version 20.0). The normality distribution of data was assessed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Mann-Whitney and independent-sample t-test were used to compare means between the different groups. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were applied to perform the frequency analysis. Continuous data were shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). p-value < 0.05 was assumed as statistically significant.