Plasma characterization
According to the recorded waveforms demonstrated in
Figure 4b, the applied operating current and peak to peak voltage were measured at 50 mA and 6 kV, respectively. The pulse duration for both waveforms was about 45 μs, and the plasma jet device was working at 0.75 W power. This power is not too much high to produce a high-temperature plasma. The homogeneous plasma effluent with around 45 mm length at 4 slm gas flow rate is demonstrated in
Figure 1c. Its temperature under this operating condition is about 25.4
oC which confirms that it is cool.
Figure 1e represents a typical He plasma emission spectrum which is recorded at distance Z = 3 cm from the nozzle. The interaction of plasma discharges with ambient air leads to the formation of a high concentration of gaseous RONS. According to
Figure 1e, He as the carrier gas identified with a specific wavelength at 706 nm and atomic oxygen (
1O) emitted peaks are shown in 777.4 and 844.6 nm, respectively. There are two hydrogen spectral lines related to H
α and H
β at wavelengths of 656 nm and 486 nm due to the humidity of ambient air in the spectrum. Besides, the OH and NO molecules are represented with peaks at 309 and 258 nm, respectively. Also, as reported by M. Simek
et al. in the case of a plasma discharge in environmental air, vibrational excited N
2 molecules emit violet light at wavelengths under 400 nm (second positive system, C
3Π
u→B
3Π
g) and above 400 nm (first negative system N
2+) (48). A summary of plasma characterizations is listed in
Table 1.
pH, conductivity, and temperature of PAW
The main reason for the acidification of water and its electrochemical properties after treating with cold plasma jet is mostly due to the production of H
+ ions in PAW. The conductivity and pH of PAW are reported in
Figure 2 as functions of exposure time with plasma jet. As shown in
Figure 2a, conductivity increased from 3.16 μS/cm to 102.36 μS/cm due to electron and anion concentration produced in PAW and, the pH behaved the same but in the opposite direction after plasma treatment. In the PAW samples, the concentration of H
+ ion is higher in competition with OH radicals. In this case, the pH level decreased to 3.25 after 6 min of plasma treatment (
Figure 2b). It means that an increase in water conductivity is directly correlated with decreasing the pH level. The acidifying solutions with low pH values are crucial for cell toxicity effects (
49). In addition, after 6 min of plasma exposure, the temperature increased up to 33.8
oC that is lower than the survival temperature of 37
oC of cells under incubation conditions. It means that differences in the water temperature before and after plasma treatment do not affect the cell’s viability.
Figures 2c-2e present temperature variation versus PAW exposure time and PAW temperature before and after plasma exposure. This result proves that plasma exposure produces an acidified medium at room temperature that is enhanced to induce toxicity in cancer cells.
RONSconcentration measurement
Figure 3a presents a semi quantify trend of some RONS generated in the gas phase using OES. In this plot, the ratio of optical intensities related to the NO (258 nm), OH (309 nm), N
2 (357 nm), and atomic oxygen O (777 nm) lines are normalized to the He line intensity at (706 nm) in vary interspace from 0.5 to 4.5 cm along with the effluent in the same applied power and gas flow rate. The results show that the normalized intensities of gaseous product generated in the plasma effluent tail at 3 cm from the nozzle are higher than in the closer distance to the nozzle and the interspace between 35 mm to 45 mm of effluent was an optimized source of RONS, so that the plasma source was set up at 40 mm above the water surface. As shown in
Figure 3, according to our measurement, untreated water contains 0.1, 30.88, and 143 μM of NO
2-, NO
-3, and H
2O
2 RONSs, respectively. Therefore, a time-dependent irradiation increase of H
2O
2 as a product of OH (
Figure 3b), NO
2- and NO
3- as products of nitric oxide (
Figure 3c), and O (
Figure 3d) was observed in the plasma-irradiated water.
The concentration of generated RONSs increases with increasing the treatment time but not with the linear behavior. In the H
2O
2 case, the concentration reached to more than 2-fold of the initial value (340 μM) after 2 min of plasma treatment and, following, its molarity reaches to 418.5 and 471.6 μM for 4 min and 6 min treatment, respectively. The concentration of produced H
2O
2 is related to some parameters like surface to volume ratio of treated water, well diameter, treatment time, post-treatment storage time, and applied voltage (
32). Machala
et al. reported that the lower power leads to produce O
3, H
2O
2, and NO
3-, while in the higher power, NO
-2 generation is dominant (
21). Findings indicate that in 0.75W power, NO
-2 concentration is lower than other species. NO
2- was not produced in high concentration in comparison with H
2O
2 and NO
-3. For nitrogen-containng RONS, molarities rise about 2-fold in a 6min case while their value is comparable for 2 min and 4 min plasma treatment. The final concentrations of NO
2- and NO
-3 after 6min plasma exposure were measured 7.9 μM and 93.5 μM, respectively show that in the same condition, NO
-3 concentration is higher than NO
2-.
Metabolic activity and morphology of cancer cells
PAW in different exposure times was used for melanoma cancer cells treatment
in-vitro (
Figure 4). The PAW led to a significant increase in B
16F
10 cell death (
Figures 4a-4d), and a significant decrease in the cell’s metabolic activity was observed at 24h post-treatment (
Figure 4e). There is an acceptable conformity between metabolic activity results and morphological change in melanoma cancer cells. Cell death has been shown in optical microscopy as changes in cell morphology. It is characterized by a sequence of morphological changes like cell shrinkage, fragmentation of cells to small ones, membrane-bound, and enclosed by the surrounding cells like a bubble (
50). According to
Figure 4a the concentration and morphology of B
16F
10 cells in the control group is approximately fully dense and adhered to the plate bottom, while in PAW treatment groups, especially in 4 min and 6min PAW, the morphology and shape of cells are relatively smaller and more rounded. B
16F
10 cells indicated decreasing in metabolic activity after the incubation related to the NO
-2 and H
2O
2 concentration in PAW. Thus the induction of apoptosis in cancer cells corresponds to the RONS concentration that is directly proportional to the plasma exposure time in PAW. Kurake
et al. proved that despite H
2O
2, NO
-2 has no significant anticancer properties lonely even in high concentrations up to 200 mM (
21). In addition, the supplementation of cell cultures with NO
2- at low concentrations did not show cytotoxic effects on the tested cell line (
32) while Peroxynitrous acid can be generated through the reaction of H
2O
2 and NO
2- at acidic pH and maybe the oxidative species, which induce a cytotoxic effect in cancer cells.
Cell apoptosis
One of the most relevant mechanisms of an anticancer approach is the induction of programmed cell death (apoptosis). Apoptosis consists of two pathways: The intrinsic pathway and the extrinsic pathway. Mitochondrial leakage of cytochrome c activates caspase 3 and initiates the intrinsic pathway. On the contrary, the extrinsic pathway involves the activation of membrane receptors that subsequently activate the caspase 8. To identify the death mode of PAW treatment in melanoma cancer cells, flow cytometry was subsequently employed. In B
16F
10 cells (
Figure 5), PAW led to a significant decline in the percentage of cells negative for active caspases 3 (
Figure 5e) being a marker of apoptosis. The expression of caspase 3 in the control group without adding the PAW has been demonstrated in
Figure 5a and is about 2.03% (equivalent to normalized 1%). The percentage of caspase 3 experssion in B
16F
10 cells treated with different exposure times of PAW is normalized to the control group and is determined by 3.50%, 3.80%, and 6.82% for 2 min, 4 min, and 6 min PAW, respectively. The result suggested that increasing the exposure time can trigger cell injury due to PAW treatment and thus leading to apoptosis-associated caspase 3 activation. The initial level of ROS in cancer cells is higher than that of normal cells due to the high metabolism of cancer cells. Therefore, the ROS in cancer cells passes the threshold much easier than in the normal cells after exerting additional ROS stress using PAW. As a result, cancer cells experience stronger apoptosis than normal cells after plasma treatment (
51). CAP within the production of RONSs and increasing a certain dosage of intracellular ROS can trigger a complex sequence of biological responses in tissues and cells (
4). It annihilates cancer cells while inducing the lowest damage to normal cells. CAP leads to increases in both extra and intracellular RONS (
50). It is confirmed that the presence of RONS and its product
in-vivo and
in-vitro induces oxidative and nitrosative stress and leading to apoptotic and necrotic death depending on the dosage (
24). Recently a new model has been suggested which is based on aquaporins (AQPs) that is the only confirmed H
2O
2 channel in the cytoplasmic membrane (
52). Biologists have confirmed that most cancer tissues tend to express more AQPs in the cytoplasmic membrane than in normal homologous tissues (
53). After plasma treatment, the H
2O
2 produced by cold plasma spreads significantly faster in cancer cells than that in normal homologous cells (
52). Multiple studies try to explain the reason for cancer cell’s sensitivity to CAP. They suggest that it is due to faster proliferation (
54), changing lipid composition of the cell plasma membrane (
55), lower concentration of cholesterol (56), weakened antioxidant, and higher ROS concentration in cancer cells rather than normal cells (
57). Our results are in line with reports on other tumor cell lines; for instance, their efficacy was investigated in many different types of cancer cell lines, including B
16F
10 (
3,
12) SKOV-3 ovarian (
13), pancreatic (
14), LL/2 lung cancer (
15), Cholangiocarcinoma (
16), Osteosarcoma (
17), and others as
in-vitro and
in-vivo.
Physical characterization of plasma source during treatment of water: (a) schematic diagram of plasma source (b) representation of voltage (blue) and current (red) waveforms (c) He plasma jet used in this study (d) thermographic picture of plasma jet and (e) typical optical emission spectra of He plasma in air. All data was recorded at 4 kV and 20 kHz
Physicochemical properties of plasma-activated water (PAW) after 6 min of plasma exposure at 0.75W. (a) conductivity (mean ± SD (n = 3)), (b) pH heat map and (c) temperature as a function of exposure time. and heat map of PAW (d) before and (e) after 6 min plasma exposure
| Parameter | Value |
|---|
| Plasma jet temperature | ~ room temperature |
| Electron temperature | 0.55 eV |
| Power | 0.75 W |
| Voltage and Current profile | sinusoidal and periodic |
| Current magnitude | ~ 50 mA |
| Peak to peak voltage | 6 kV |