In the present study, administration of exogenous CB1 receptor agonist ACEA and TRPV1 receptor antagonist CPZ produced protective effect against acute PTZ-induced seizure. However, administration of the cannabinoid reuptake inhibitor VDM11 at the doses of 1 and 10 mg/Kg did not have any effect on this model of seizure. Moreover, co-administration of CPZ with either ACEA or VDM11 antagonized the antiseizure effect of both ACEA and CPZ.
The convulsive action of PTZ is mainly due to its stimulating effect on neurons which is largely mediated through its GABA
A receptor antagonist properties (
8), although its action on sodium and calcium channels could also give rise to an overall increase in excitability of neurons. Moreover, PTZ can interfere with calcium-dependent cytoplasmic reactions via inhibition of related protein kinase activity (
9,
10).
The role of TRPV1 receptors in seizure and epilepsy has been shown in many studies [for review, please see 11]. Activation of TRPV1 receptors caused calcium influx into neuron and subsequent increase in calcium dependent kinase activation (
12) which favor increase in glutamatergic transmission, post synaptic stimulation (-) and hippocampal network excitability (
16). Therefore, TRPV1 channel antagonists could be considered as potential protective drugs (
17,
11,
18), although there is evidence regarding the anti-seizure effects of TRPV1 agonists (
19) in both PTZ- and MES-induced seizure models. In our study, pretreatment of mice with TRPV1 receptor antagonist produced protection against PTZ-induced seizure. This action is likely mediated through effects on both transmitter release and cation channels. Although electrophysiological studies assumed that the TRPV1 receptors may presynaptically enhance the release of GABA (
20), however, some studies indicate that the TRPV1 receptors play an important role in cellular mechanism underlying a form of LTD triggered at hippocampal glutamatergic synapses on GABAergic interneurons which is thought to underlie synaptic plasticity leads to epilepsy induction (
16,
21). This type of LTD was blocked by a TRPV1 channel antagonist and was absent in hippocampal slice from TRPV1 knock-out mice (
16).
The concomitant activation of TRPV1 and CB1 receptors leads to either a stronger stimulation of TRPV1 activity or to its inhibition depending on which signaling pathway is activated (
22). There are some instances regarding interaction between CB1 and TRPV1 receptors in anxiety-like behavior of experimental animals. Pretreatment of mice with CPZ showed that the anxiolytic effect evoked by AEA might be due to the interaction with the CB1 cannabinoid receptor, whereas TRPV1 receptors seem to be involved in AEA anxiogenic action (
23). In other study, it was shown that simultaneous indirect activation of CB1 receptors by FAAH inhibition, and antagonism at TRPV1 receptors produced more anxiolytic action in mice (
24). However, in our study, co-administration of CPZ and ACEA did not increase the protective effect of ACEA, but rather attenuated its anticonvulsant action compared to that when administered alone. It could be suggested that while an anticonvulsant action of the exogenous cannabinoid receptor agonist was observed in this study, however, its inhibiting effect on synaptic GABA transmission could interact with the effects of TRPV1 receptor antagonist on PTZ-induced seizure threshold.
Activation of CB1 receptor agonist causes inhibition of both glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic transmission (
25). Prevention of endocannabinoid reuptake by VDM11 increases AEA levels and augments its effect on both CB1 and TRPV1 receptors. Previous studies showed that AEA can activate CB1 receptors at relatively lower doses compared with the dose of AEA required to activate TRPV1 receptor (
23). TRPV1channel activation is associated with the increase in excitatory synaptic input to dentate gyrus granule cells in an epilepsy model (
26). In this study, augmentation of endocannabinoid levels at synapses induced neither increase nor decrease in PTZ-induced seizure threshold, which could suggest no protective effect of VDM11 against PTZ-induced seizure at least in doses applied in this study. On the other hand, co-administration of VDM11 and CPZ attenuated the anti-seizure action of CPZ. This is likely due to VDM11-induced increased levels of AEA which could surmount CPZ in occupying TRPV1 receptor and eventually attenuate the anti-seizure activity of CPZ.
In conclusion, the results of the present study suggested the protective effect of both exogenous cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists and TRPV1 channel antagonists in acute PTZ-induced seizure model. However, augmentation of endocannabinoid effect could not achieve a protection against PTZ-induced seizure. Moreover, co-administration of cannabinoids and CPZ attenuated the protective effect of these compounds which could suggest an interaction between the cannabinoid and TRPV1 receptorial systems in pharmacological mechanism of acute PTZ-induced seizure.