Preparation of the extract
Rheum ribes (1500 gr) was collected from Saman (kahkesh) region of Chaharmahal Va Bakhtiari province in Iran (Latitude: 32º27'36.54" N, Longitude: 50º55'6.32" E, Height: 1921.15 m). The sample was identified by experts at the Medical plant center, Medical Faculty, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. A voucher specimen (SKUMS No. 318) has been deposited in the herbarium of Medical Faculty, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. Roots and rhizomes were separated, washed and ground. To prepare hydro-alcoholic extract, 250 g of the ground herb was macerated in two liters of methanol and water (1 liter of each) for four days. Then it was filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure using a rotary apparatus. Remaining contents were transferred into Petri dishes and were put into an oven with 37ºc temperature to be dried up. The powdered extract was dissolved in water and used when it was needed (
21).
Determination of radical scavenging activity of Rheum ribes extract
Determination of Radical scavenging activity of RR extract was determined according to Moon and Terao (
22) with a slight modification based on ability to scavenge 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) stable radicals. Briefly, various concentrations of the extract (5-60 µg/ml) were mixed with DPPH solution in ethanol (2 ml). The reaction mixture was shaken at room temperature in a dark room. After 35 min at room temperature, the absorbance was recorded at 517 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Biochrom Ltd, England) (
22). Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) was used as a positive control.
IC 50 indicates the concentration of the extract which neutralizes 50% of free radicals of DPPH and is stated as the inhibitory percentage of extract. Inhibition of free radical by DPPH (%) was calculated as follows:
I (%) = 100 × (A control - A sample)/ A control
Determination of total phenolic content of Rheum ribes extract
Total phenolic content was determined as described by Singlton (
23) with minor modification. 500 µl extract solution (1 mg extract in 10 ml ethanol) was added to 5 ml Folin-Ciocalteu reactive (10%) and after 3 min. shaking, 3 ml of Na
2CO
3 (2%) was added and was shaken again. After 1 h at room temperature, absorbance was measured at 760 nm. Gallic acid was used as the standard for the calibration curve. Total phenolic content was calculated as µg Gallic acid equivalent (GAEq) by using the following linear equation according the calibration curve. The result is average of triplicate analyses.
Absorbance = 0.0039 (GAEq) + 0.0035
Animals
Male Wistar rats, (age: 8 weeks, weigh: 250-300 g), were purchased from Pasteur institution (Tehran, Iran). Rats were housed in groups of four at 25ºC with controlled 12/12-h light/dark cycle. Food and water were freely available. All experiments were executed in Spring season (3 Months) and were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use at Laboratory Animals and were approved by Research and Ethics Committee at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. Animals were assigned randomly into six different groups with eight rats in each group:
Group 1: Control group received distilled water (i.p.) without surgery.
Group 2: NBM lesioned rats (NBML) in which both Nucleus Basalis of Meynert were bilaterally destroyed and received distilled water (i.p.) after recovery from the surgery.
Group 3 and 4: NBML + RR (250, 500) in which NBM nuclei were bilaterally destroyed and then received the Rheum ribes extracts (250 and 500 mg/kg, i.p., respectively) for 20 days after recovery from the surgery.
Groups 5: and 6: Intact + RR (250, 500), normal animals which received
Rheum ribes extracts (250 or 500 mg/kg, i.p., respectively) for 20 days without any surgery. Doses were chosen based on previous studies (
24).
Stereotaxic Surgery
Animals were anesthetized using ketamine hydrocholoride (110 mg/kg, i.p.) and xylazine (4 mg/kg, i.p.) injections. Rats were implanted with a twisted bipolar stainless-steel electrode (Plastic Products MS 301/1, 0.25 mm in diameter; Bilaney, Düsseldorf, Germany) in one hemisphere under conventional stereotaxic procedures. The electrode was conducted into the NBM with the incisor bar set at -2.7 mm below the interaural line and according to the following coordinates from the stereotaxic atlas of AP: –1.30 mm from bregma, L: ± 2.8 mm from midline, and DV: -8.00 mm from cranium surface (
25). The NBM lesions were made by electrolysis using a current intensity of 2 mA for 15 s. The electrode was withdrawn after induction of lesion at each side. The incision was cleaned and sutured and then the rats were returned to their home cages and allowed 10 days for recovery before behavioral evaluations (
6).
Passive Avoidance Test
A shuttle box apparatus was used for passive avoidance test. The apparatus consisted one lighted chamber and one dark chamber with grid door. Electrical shocks are transferred by a separated stimulator to grid floor of the shuttle box. This test was performed for each rat for four consequently days. In the first and second days, each rat was put and released in the device to habituate for 60 s. In the third day, an acquisition trial was performed in which animals were initially placed in the lighted compartment and the door between the two compartments was opened 20 seconds later. The initial latency (t1) for a rat to enter the dark compartment was measured. When rat enters the dark compartment, the door was closed and an electric foot-shock (1 mA for 1 s) was delivered through the stainless steel rods with a constant current shock generator. All animals examined, entered the dark compartment within 60 s as cut-off latency in the training session, and received a foot-shock. Step-through latency (t2) for animals was recorded on fourth day using same paradigm, but without foot-shock (
7).
Water Maze Test
Morris water maze was used for spatial learning and memory assessment. Water maze was located in a room with extra cues (such as clock, poster, table, etc.) around it. Test was performed in a circular tank (diameter, 139 cm; height, 60 cm) which was filled with opaque water (22 ± 1°C) up to 25 cm. A metal round platform with diameter of 10 cm was submerged in the center of one of the quadrants (target quadrant). The place of the platform was in the same position on all trials. A video camera was fixed 1.4 m above the center of the tank and all trials were recorded for later data analysis. For testing learning abilities, animals were trained to perform 2 trials per day (with an inter trial interval of 10 min.) for five consecutive day. In each trial, rats were randomly placed into the water from one of the quadrants and the time from start point to escape onto the platform was measured. Animals had to find the hidden platform within 60 s. If rats could not find the platform, they were led toward the platform to find it. As soon as the rats found the platform, they were let to stay on it for 30s to explore the place of hidden platform using extra cues (
26). On the sixth day, rats were individually subjected to a probe trial session for testing the memory by removing the platform and allowing animals to swim for 60 s to search for platform (
27).
Ferric Reducing/Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay
Approximately 5 cc Blood samples were collected from heart of intact rats which had received RR extract and the antioxidant power assay was performed by measuring its ability to reduce Fe
3+ to Fe
2+ with FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power) test according to the procedure described by Benzie and Strain (
28). FeSO4 (100 – 1000 µM concentration range) was used as a standard in FRAP assay. The results are average of triplicate analyses and are expressed in µg/ml.
Measurement of Malondialdehyde (MDA)
Malondialdehyde has been the most important biomarker in determining lipid peroxidation in the last 30 years (
29). The plasma level of MDA was determined as described by Karatas et al. using high performance liquid chromatography instrument (HPLC). Chromatographic determinations were performed on a high-performance liquid chromatography equipped with an 1100 series pump and a UV absorbance detector. An HP 3395 integrator was employed to record retention times, chromatograms, and evaluate peak heights. A technopak 10u C18 reversed-phase column (emission 553 and excitation 515) was used. MDA standards were prepared from 1, 1, 3, 3-tetraethoxypropane.
The optimized assay was carried out as follows: 50 µl plasma or the standard was treated with 50 µl (0.05%) BHT (in absolute ethanol), followed by the addition of 400µl H
3PO
4 (0.44 M) and 100 µl TBA (Butylated hydroxytoluene) (42 mM), vortexed and then incubated for 60 min at 100˚C the reaction was stopped by cooling at 4˚C, then 250 μl of n-butanol was added for extraction of MDA-TBA complex. The solution was vortexed and then centrifuged for 5 min at 14 000 rpm to separate two phases. The supernatant (20 µl) was injected into the HPLC system (
30). All data are average of triplicate analyses.
Statistical Analysis
All the results were expressed as mean ± SE and data was analyzed in SPSS software (ver. 19) using one-way analysis of variance test (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc LSD test. T-test was used for comparing the amount of MDA between control and Alzheimer group. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.