Plant material
Plant material used in this study was collected in Roudbar, in the northern province of Iran (Gilan). After identifying the samples by a qualified botanist, the voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of Department of Pharmacognosy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (voucher number: 1114).
Preparation of the extracts
Defatted aqueous extract: Olives (1 Kg) were first chopped and extracted with boiling water (1000 mL) then filtered through a two-layer mesh. In order to remove remained oil, water extract was transferred to a decantation apparatus, mixed with petroleum ether and shaken well 3 times, until oil was separated. The water-soluble portion was concentrated almost to dryness and stored in 2-8 ºC until used. The extract was dissolved in normal saline at the desired concentration just before using.
Defatted methanol extract: Olives (1 Kg) were soaked in 1000 mL methanol at room temperature for 48 h. The extract was filtered with filter paper and this process was repeated twice. After that, solvent was removed using rotatory evaporator under vacuum and dry methanol extract was obtained. Then the extract was defatted with petroleum ether.
Extracts were stored in airtight containers at 2-8 ºC for further testing.
Animals
Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 150-200 g were obtained from Razi institute, Karaj, Iran. The animals were kept under a 12 h light/dark cycle in a controlled condition at room temperature (22 ± 2 °C) and had free access to food and water. All the procedures were in accordance with the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by institutional animal care and use committee in Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. In all experiments tried to use the minimum number of animals.
Formalin test
To determine the anti-nociceptive activity of the extracts, formalin test was used. The procedure was the same as the method described previously (
9). Aqueous and methanolic extracts (300, 450, and 600 mg/Kg), sodium salicylate as positive control (300 mg/Kg), and normal saline as control (1 mL/Kg) were given intraperitoneally (
i.p), 30 min before running the formalin test. After pretreatments with the extracts, 50 μl of 2.5% formalin in saline was injected subcutaneously into the planar surface of the animal hind paw and the behavior of the animal (favoring, lifting, licking, and shaking of the injured paw) was monitored for 60 min.
To assess the possible participation of the opioid system in the anti-nociceptive effect of the olive fruit extract, naloxone was injected (4 mg/Kg, i.p.) 15 min after injection of the aqueous extract and 15 min before the formalin injection in a separate group of animals.
Paw edema volume
Measurement of rat-hind paw edema was carried out by recording the volume after formalin injection according to the method of Fereidoni
et al. (
10). After 30 min
i.p. administration of the aqueous extract, 50 μL formalin 5% was injected subcutaneous to the hind paw to induce inflammation. The inflamed paw was inserted in a mercury column, which was fixed on a digital balance, to a specific area and the weight was read. The number read represented the weight of displaced mercury. Then, the paw volume is easily calculated using the following formula: V = m/ρ, in which ρ is the fluid density (13.6 g/mL) and m is the changes in weight recorded after insertion of the paw. The difference between the paw volume before and after the inflammation is the edema volume.
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as mean ± SEM. To evaluate the effect of treatment in formalin test the results were analyzed by repeated measures two-way ANOVA and post-test of Bonferroni. The area under the curve of the second phase of formalin test was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and post-hoc analysis of Tukey. Data of paw edema was also analyzed by repeated measures Two-way ANOVA and post-hoc analysis of Bonferroni to evaluate the effect of treatments. In all statistical analysis, P < 0.05 was considered as significant.