Bupivacaine hydrochloride was supplied from Hana Pharm. Co. Ltd (Korea). Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose -K100M (MW, 10000) was obtained from DOW chemical Co. Ltd (USA). Tetrahydrozoline was purchased from Sigma Aldrich Inc., (Sigma Aldrich, USA). Lauric acid, oleic acid and caprylic acid were purchased from Tokyo Kasei Kogyo Co., Ltd (Japan). One-methyl-2-pyrrolidone and 2-pyrrolidone were purchased from Acros organics (Acros organics, USA). Myristic acid, linoleic acid, polyoxyethylene-23-lauryl ether (Brij 35), polyoxyethylene-2-oleyl ether (Brij 92), and polyoxyethylene-23-lauryl ether (Brij 72) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Oleyl macrogol-6 glycerides, caprylocaproyl mcarogol-8 glycerides, propylene glycol mono caprylate, propylene glycol laurate, and propylene glycol monolaurate were gifts from Gattefose (Gattefose, France). Acetnitrile was HPLC grade from J.T. Baker Inc. (J.T. Baker, USA). All reagents of analytical grade were used without further purification. Double distilled water was used for all studies.
Measurement of viscosity and bioadhesive strength
To select the optimum concentration of HPMC-K100M, various concentrations of HPMC gel (1%, 2% and 3%) were prepared, respectively. Each gram of HPMC was dissolved with stirring in hot water to make a 100 g solution.
The viscosity of each gel (100 g) was measured at room temperature with a rotary type viscometer (Haake viscometer, Germany). The sensor system was MV II. The sensor was inserted into a gel sample in the MV II cup and adjusted to a rate of shear of 1.8 (sec-1) and sample equilibration took approximately 45 sec. The viscosity of sample was then determined by multiplying the observed reading by the shear rate.
To evaluate the bioadhesive strength of HPMC correctly, rats’ intestines were used (
10,
11). The adhesive capacity of HPMC was determined by measuring the maximum detachment force and the adhesion work with an auto peeling tester (C.K. Trading Co. Ltd. Korea). Cyanoacrylate adhesive was used to fix the intestinal mucosa to the upper and lower support. The HPMC gel (1 g) was placed at room temperature on the both supports. Upon contact of the gel-intestine mucosa, a force (contact pressure, 50 gf) was applied for five minutes. The detachment procedure was performed at the speed of 150 mm/min until the complete detachment of the components was achieved. The force required to completely separate the two components was recorded as the adhesion force. The adhesion force was calculated as N (Newton force).
Preparation of bupivacaine-HPMC gels containing enhancer and vasoconstrictor
Two grams of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) was dissolved in hot water to make 35 g solution. Bupivacaine (1%) and each enhancer (5%), tetrahydrozoline (0.05%), were added with vigorous stirring to the above HPMC solution and water was added to make a 100 g gel. The appearance of the prepared gel was transparent.
Release of bupivacaine from the HPMC gels
The
in-vitro release of bupivacaine from the HPMC gels was examined using the modified Keshary-Chien cell. The diameter of the cell was 2 cm, providing 3.14 cm
2 effective constant areas between the membrane and the bulk solution of 20 mL. The flux of bupivacaine from the HPMC gels was determined using phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.4) as a receptor. The synthetic cellulose membrane (SPECTRA/POR
Ⓡ MW 12-14,000, pore size, 0.2 um) was mounted on the receptor compartment of the diffusion cell (
12). Five grams of prepared HPMC gels containing bupivacaine was placed in intimate contact with the cellulose membrane and the donor cap was covered with parafilm and clamped. The sampling port was sealed with parafilm to prevent the evaporation of the receptor medium. The receptor solution was maintained at 37°C through a circulating water bath and stirred constantly at 400 rpm. Before the experiment, the system was tested to remove the remaining air bubble in receptor site.
To formulate the appropriate drug concentration, the drug release from the gels was studied at drug concentrations of 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2% (w/w) at 37°C in a controlled water bath. The total medium from the receptor compartment was withdrawn at predetermined intervals to maintain a sink condition and immediately replaced with the same amount of fresh phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.4). Each data point represents the average of three determinations.
HPLC determination of bupivacaine
Bupivacaine was assayed using HPLC. The HPLC system had a pump (Knauer, DE/K-120, USA.), ultraviolet detector (Waters 484, USA), C18 column (250 x 4.6mm, 5um), degaser, and an integrator (D520A, Youngin scientific Co., Ltd., Korea). The mobile phase was composed of a mixture (70:30:0.1, v/v) of water, acetonitrile, and phosphoric acid. A flow rate of 1.0 mL/min yielded an operation pressure of ~1000 psi. The UV detector was operated at the wavelength of 210 nm. Under these conditions, the bupivacaine peak appeared at the retention time of 7.4 min. The calibration curves of bupivacaine were linear within the range of 2-500 ng/mL. The intra- and inter-day coefficients of variation for bupivacaine were less than 1.5%.
Permeation of bupivacaine from the HPMC gels through the rat skin
A healthy male rat (Sprague Dawley rat strain) with 7-8 weeks old (270-300 g), was sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The hair of abdominal area was carefully removed with an electric clipper. A square section of the abdominal skin was excised. After the incision, the adhering fat and other visceral debris in the skin were carefully removed from the undersurface with tweezers. The excised skin was used immediately.
The freshly excised full-thickness skin sample was mounted on the receptor site of the diffusion cell with the stratum corneum side facing upwards into the donor compartment and the dermal side facing downwards into the receptor compartment.
The in-vitro permeation of bupivacaine from the HPMC gels was examined using the modified Keshary-Chien cell for 120 min. The diameter of the cell was 2 cm, providing 3.14 cm2 effective constant areas and the volume of the diffusion cell was 20 mL. The flux of bupivacaine from the HPMC gels was determined using phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.4) as a receptor. Appropriate amount of gels (1 g) was placed on the stratum corneum side and covered with round glass plate and clamped. Receptor medium was phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.4) to achieve the sink condition and maintained 37°C through a circulating water bath. Total samples (20 mL) were withdrawn at predetermined intervals (every 30 min) and immediately replaced with an equal volume of fresh medium. Permeation quantities of bupivacaine were analyzed using HPLC at 210 nm. Each data point represents the average of three determinations.
The cumulative amount of bupivacaine through the rat skin was plotted against the time (min). A linear profile was observed for 2 h and the slope of the linear portion of the curve was determined through the linear regression. The effectiveness of penetration enhancers was defined as the enhancement factor (EnF). EnF was calculated using the following equation:
EnF = (flux of HPMC gels containing enhancers) / (flux of the control)
Tail flick Test
Healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats with 7-8 weeks old (270-300 g), were purchased from Daehan Laboratory Animal Research Co. (Choongbuk, Republic of Korea), and were given a commercial rat chow diet (No. 322-7-1, Superfeed Co., Gangwon, Republic of Korea) and tap water ad libitum. The animals were housed (four per cage) in laminar flow cages maintained at 22 ± 2°C and 50-60% relative humidity under a 12:12 h light-dark cycle. The experiments began after allowing at least one week for acclimation. The experiments were performed in accordance with the “Guiding Principles in the Use of Animals in Toxicology” adopted by the Society of Toxicology (USA) in July, 1989, and revised in March, 1999. The Animal Care Committee of Chonnam National University (Gwangju, Republic of Korea) approved the design and conduct of this study (2008-
12).
The heat radiant tail flick assay, developed by D’Amour and Smith in the 1940s (
13), is a commonly used experimental model for thermo-pain quantification. In this test, a rodent tail is exposed to a light source (radiant heat) and the latency of tail withdrawal from the heat source is recorded and analyzed. Depending on the experimental settings, the tail flick technique can be used to determine the basal nociception level, the analgesic effectiveness of pharmacological agents, and tolerance formation.
The rats were divided into four groups containing three rats each: control gel group, bupivacaine gel group, bupivacaine gel containing enhancer group and bupivacaine gel containing enhancer and vasoconstrictor group.
The statistical significance of the differences between the formulations was tested using the Student’s paired t-test. It was defined to be statistically significant when p < 0.05. Each data point represents the average of three determinations. All values were reported as mean ± standard deviation.
The rat was fixed on a tail-flick-test apparatus (Tail flick anesthetic meter, Harvard Co. Ltd. USA) with the tail of 10 cm from its tip, exposed to heat from a projector lamp. A single control switch simultaneously activated the light and a timer and the timer was stopped automatically when the tail flicked. The time interval between switching on the light to flick of the tail was recorded. A 50 sec cut-off time was used to avoid thermal injury. A dose of 50 mg of drug gel was applied to the root of the tail on the midline. The tail flick anesthetic test was started after the administration and the test was done every 5 min until the duration time fell to control value.
The area under the effective curve from the beginning till the end of 120 min (AUEC
0→120 min) of the rat tail flick test curve was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule. The efficacy factor in local anesthetic effects of bupivacaine after topical application of bupivacaine gel containing polyoxyethylene 2-oleyl ether was compared with the control gel devoid of any additives (
14). The efficacy factor (EfF) was calculated using the following equation:
EfF = (AUEC of bupivacaine gels containing enhancer) / (AUEC of the control gel)