The results of the study showed that the mean days of mechanical ventilation decreased from 27 to 17 days in vitamin D group, but it did not reach statistical significance. Maybe the vitamin D deficiency could be one of the several culprits in the dependence on the ventilator and may prolong the time of weaning from the ventilator. In a study Quraishi
et al., measured plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in critically ill surgical patients on ICU admission and concluded that 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were inversely associated with the duration of respiratory support (
16).
Another interesting finding of current study was effect of high dose vitamin D on all-cause mortality of the patients. Our results revealed that the number of survived patients was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control. Therefore, high-dose vitamin D injections can increase the survival rate of the patients.
The adequate vitamin D levels are necessary to regulate the function of the immune system, and its deficiency leads to an impairment of immune function. This could led to increased risk of infections, particularly ventilator-associated pneumonia, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ dysfunction syndromes which could increase mortality rate and length of ICU stay (
17,
18).
The results of vitamin D supplementation are controversial. In a study Aygencel
et al. reported that the mortality rate was significantly higher in the vitamin D insufficient group compared to the vitamin D sufficient group but vitamin D deficiency in this study was not an independent risk factor for mortality (
19). In another study, Putzu
et al. revealed that vitamin D administration, in critically ill patients, could decrease the mortality without significant adverse events. In addition, Miroliaee,
et al., showed that vitamin D supplementation, in patients with ventilator associated pneumonia, can significantly reduce the procalcitonin (
20). Also, our results revealed that vitamin D supplementation could decrease mortality rate and ICU length of stay. In contrast to our results, Langlois
et al., in a systematic review concluded that Vitamin D administration does not improve clinical outcomes (
7).
In our study despite one injection of 300,000 units vitamin D by IM rout, 25-OH vitamin D level did not increased significantly 7 days after administration. Amrein
et al. showed that taking high oral doses in patients with vitamin D deficiency could improve its blood level within 2 days. In this study, 540000 units of oral medication were administered to the patients in the intervention group, which was more than the dose of our study. Unlike our results, they found an improved level of vitamin D above 25 ng/dL that did not match the results of this study. However, the effect of its improvement on the prognosis of patients was not evaluated (
21). In another study Gorman
et al. revealed that in subjects receiving a single high dose IM injection of vitamin D, serum 25-OH vitamin D levels increased at 3, 4, and 24 weeks post-injection, peaking at 4 weeks. This finding is in concordance with our results, which showed no increase in serum vitamin D level one week post-injection (
22).