1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Ethics Statement
3.2. Clinical Samples
3.3. Cell Cultivation
3.4. Drug Treatment
3.5. MTT Assay
3.6. Cell Transfection
3.7. qRT-PCR
| Name of Primer | Sequences |
|---|---|
| HSP90-F | GCTCCAAGGGTTGACATGGT |
| HSP90-R | TGTAACTCATGGACGCAGGG |
| HAKAI-F | GCGAGCCGAATCATGGATCA |
| HAKAI-R | ATCACCAGGTGGAGCCTTTG |
| E-cad-F | GCTGGACCGAGAGAGTTTCC |
| E-cad-R | CAAAATCCAAGCCCGTGGTG |
| N-cad-F | TGGGAAATGGAAACTTGATGGC |
| N-cad-R | TGGAAAGCTTCTCACGGCAT |
| Vimentin -F | TCCGCACATTCGAGCAAAGA |
| Vimentin-R | TGAGGGCTCCTAGCGGTTTA |
| Snail-1-F | AAGATGCACATCCGAAGCCA |
| Snail-1-R | CATTCGGGAGAAGGTCCGAG |
| GAPDH-F | AATGGGCAGCCGTTAGGAAA |
| GAPDH-R | GCGCCCAATACGACCAAATC |
Abbreviations: F, forward primer; R, reverse primer
3.8. Western Blot
3.9. Transwell Invasion Assay
3.10. Matrigel-based Tube Formation Assay
3.11. Drug Affinity Responsive Target Stability Assay
3.12. Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) Assay
3.13. Heterotopic Bladder Carcinoma in Nude Mice
3.14. Immunohistochemistry
3.15. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. High Expression of HAKAI in Bladder Cancer Tissues
HAKAI is highly expressed in bladder cancer and associated with poor prognosis; A, qRT-PCR; and B, western blot were used to detect the expression of HAKAI mRNA and protein in bladder cancer; C, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to analyze the relationship between HAKAI expression and patient survival. Paired t-test was used for the two-group comparisons. ** P < 0.01, carcinoma group vs. para-carcinoma group.
4.2. Daurisoline Suppressing Viability of Bladder Cancer Cells
Daurisoline suppresses the viability of bladder cancer cells; MTT assay tested the toxicity of daurisoline to A, 5637; B, T24; C, EJ; and D, SV-HUC-1 cells. One-way analysis of variance was used for the multi-group comparisons, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001, daurisoline (1, 2, 5, 10, or 20 μM) group vs. daurisoline (0 μM) group.
4.3. Daurisoline Suppressing Invasion and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Bladder Cancer Cells and Angiogenesis of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells
Daurisoline suppresses invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of bladder cancer cells and angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells; A, Transwell assay assessed the invasion of 5637 and T24 cells treated with daurisoline or DMSO; B, qRT-PCR; and C, western blotting measured the expressions of E-cad, N-cad, vimentin, and Snail-1 in treated 5637 and T24 cells; D, matrigel-based tube formation assay assessed the angiogenesis of HUVECs cultured in conditioned medium of treated 5637 and T24 cells. An unpaired t-test was used for the two-group comparisons.
4.4. Daurisoline Exerting Tumor Suppressive Effects by Inhibiting HAKAI Protein in Bladder Cancer Cells
Daurisoline exerts tumor-suppressive effects by inhibiting HAKAI protein in bladder cancer cells; A, qRT-PCR; and B, western blotting measured the expression of HAKAI in 5637 and T24 cells treated with daurisoline or DMSO; C and D, the expression of HAKAI in 5637 and T24 cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-HAKAI or pcDNA3.1. After cell transfection and daurisoline treatment, E, transwell assay assessed the invasion of 5637 and T24 cells; F, qRT-PCR; and G, western blotting measured the expressions of E-cadherin (E-cad), N-cadherin (N-cad), vimentin, and Snail-1 in 5637 and T24 cells; H, matrigel-based tube formation assay assessed the angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) cultured in conditioned medium of 5637 and T24 cells. An unpaired t-test was used for the two-group comparisons. One-way analysis of variance was used for the multi-group comparisons, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
4.5. Daurisoline Targeting Heat Shock Protein 90 to Promote the Degradation of HAKAI Protein
Daurisoline targets HSP90 to promote the degradation of the HAKAI protein; A, Drug affinity responsive target stability (DARTS) assay verified the binding between daurisoline and heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) in 5637 cells; B, co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay verified the binding between HSP90 and HAKAI in 5637 and T24 cells; C, Western blotting detected the expression of HSP90 protein in daurisoline-treated 5637 and T24 cells; D, Co-IP assay verified the targeting relationships among HSP90, HAKAI, and E-cadherin (E-cad) in 5637 and T24 cells. An unpaired t-test was used for the two-group comparisons. One-way analysis of variance was used for the multi-group comparisons, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
4.6. Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibition Offsetting the Effects of HAKAI on Bladder Cancer Cells
Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibition offsets the effects of HAKAI in bladder cancer cells; A, qRT-PCR; and B, western blotting measured the expression of HAKAI in 5637 and T24 cells treated with geldanamycin or DMSO. After cell transfection and geldanamycin treatment, C, transwell assay assessed the invasion of 5637 and T24 cells; D, qRT-PCR; and E, western blotting measured the expressions of E-cadherin (E-cad), N-cadherin (N-cad), vimentin, and Snail-1 in 5637 and T24 cells; F, matrigel-based tube formation assay assessed the angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) cultured in conditioned medium of 5637 and T24 cells. An unpaired t-test was used for the two-group comparisons. One-way analysis of variance was used for the multi-group comparisons, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
4.7. Daurisoline Suppressing Bladder Carcinoma Growth in Nude Mice
Daurisoline suppresses bladder carcinoma growth in nude mice; nude mice were given hypodermic injection of T24 cells with stably overexpressed HAKAI or negative control T24 cells. The mice in the daurisoline + HAKAI group were later treated with daurisoline. A, Tumor volume; B and C, the expressions of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), HAKAI, E-cadherin (E-cad), N-cadherin (N-cad), vimentin, and Snail-1 in the tumors; D, positive rates of Ki67 and CD31 in the tumors. One-way or two-way analysis of variance was used for the multi-group comparisons, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.






