4.2. Antimicrobial Properties and Cytotoxicity of Selenium Nanoparticles and Chlorella vulgaris Crude Extract
The antimicrobial activity of SeNPs in combination with C. vulgaris CE was evaluated against various bacterial strains, including clinical isolates and pathogenic bacteria. Inhibitory growth zone measurements revealed variable antimicrobial effects of SeNPs, C. vulgaris CE, and their combination at a concentration of 500 mg/L. For E. coli, the combination of C. vulgaris CE and SeNPs significantly enhanced the inhibitory effect compared to C. vulgaris CE alone, increasing the growth inhibition zone from 32 ± 1 mm to 39 ± 1 mm (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was observed between SeNPs alone and their combination for this strain. In the case of a clinical isolate of E. coli, the combination significantly increased the growth inhibition zone to 12 ± 1 mm (P < 0.001). Similarly, for A. baumannii, the growth inhibition zones significantly increased from 35 ± 1 mm for SeNPs and 38 ± 1 mm for C. vulgaris CE to 42 ± 1 mm when combined (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). Notably, S. aureus did not show a significant increase in the inhibition zone among the treatment groups. Conversely, the clinical isolate of A. baumannii exhibited no growth inhibition when tested alone, indicating potential resistance to the treatments. For S. epidermidis, results were mixed; there was no inhibition with SeNPs alone, but a significant increase to 29 ± 1 mm was observed when combined with C. vulgaris CE (P < 0.001). Additionally, a significant increase in the inhibition zone was noted for S. epidermidis, rising from 25 ± 1 mm with C. vulgaris CE to a greater value when combined with SeNPs (P < 0.01). Furthermore, S. saprophyticus demonstrated improved sensitivity to both SeNPs and C. vulgaris CE, with inhibition zones measuring 36 ± 1 mm and 42 ± 1 mm, respectively, and significantly reaching 47 ± 1 mm in their combination (P < 0.001).
Ampicillin (100 µg/mL) (
15) was used as a positive control, demonstrating inhibitory effects on various bacterial strains. The results showed that
E. coli exhibited a zone of inhibition measuring 12 ± 1 mm, while
S. aureus showed a larger zone of 40 ± 1 mm. Other strains, including
S. saprophyticus,
S. epidermidis, and clinical
S. aureus sp. A+, displayed zones of inhibition measuring 27 ± 1 mm, 35 ± 1 mm, and 22 ± 1 mm, respectively. In contrast, the clinical strain of
E. coli and both clinical and non-clinical strains of
A. baumannii were found to be resistant (
Figure 2A).

Antimicrobial properties and cytotoxicity of selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) and Chlorella vulgaris crude extract (C. vulgaris CE). A, well diffusion assay results demonstrating the antimicrobial activity of SeNPs and C. vulgaris CE against various pathogenic bacteria: (1) Growth inhibition zones were measured in millimeters (mm) for each treatment combination, including SeNPs, C. vulgaris CE, their combination (SeNPs + C. vulgaris CE), and ampicillin (100 µg/mL) against Escherichia coli, clinical E. coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, clinical A. baumannii, Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, S. saprophyticus, and clinical S. aureus sp. A+. (2) A bar chart illustrating the results of the well diffusion assay of SeNPs, C. vulgaris CE, and their combination against pathogenic bacteria; B, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and; C, minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) data for the aforementioned bacterial strains in the presence of SeNPs, C. vulgaris CE, and their combination (SeNPs + C. vulgaris CE). The MIC and MBC data are presented as (1) heatmap and (2) bar chart; D, MBC results for SeNPs and C. vulgaris CE against pathogenic bacteria, with growth inhibition assessed across different concentrations (0 - 10,000 mg/L) of SeNPs, C. vulgaris CE, and their combination (SeNPs + C. vulgaris CE); E, cytotoxicity assessment using the MTT assay on the MCF-7 cell line for SeNPs, C. vulgaris CE, and their combination, with significance indicated as follows: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001.
As detailed Table 1 in the Supplementary File and
Figure 2B and
C, the antibacterial efficacy of the bacterial strains was further assessed using MIC, MBC, and FIC values.
Escherichia coli showed a significant decrease in MIC and MBC values when treated with the combination of
C. vulgaris CE and SeNPs compared to
C. vulgaris CE alone (P < 0.001). In contrast, these values significantly increased in the combination treatment compared to SeNPs alone (P < 0.001), resulting in a ΣFIC value of 8.1036, indicating that SeNPs alone are more effective for this strain.
Conversely, the clinical isolate of E. coli exhibited significant synergy, with MIC values decreasing to 78 ± 1 mg/L (P < 0.001) when treated with the combination of C. vulgaris CE and SeNPs, compared to values of 5000 ± 1 mg/L and 1250 ± 1 mg/L for the individual treatments, respectively. This resulted in ΣFIC values of 0.0780, signifying synergy. Similarly, A. baumannii showed increased sensitivity (P < 0.001), with MIC and MBC values of 312 ± 1 mg/L when treated with the combination, whereas individual treatments with C. vulgaris CE and SeNPs yielded significantly higher values of 625 ± 1 mg/L and 2500 ± 1 mg/L, respectively (ΣFIC = 0.6240). For the clinical isolate of A. baumannii, the combination with SeNPs did not enhance the effect of C. vulgaris CE; however, it did lead to increased MIC and MBC values compared to SeNPs alone (P < 0.001), resulting in a ΣFIC of 3.0000.
Among gram-positive bacteria,
S. aureus exhibited a significant decrease in MIC and MBC values with the combination treatment compared to
C. vulgaris CE alone (P < 0.001). However, these values increased significantly in the combination compared to SeNPs alone (P < 0.001), leading to a ΣFIC value of 2.0156, indicating that SeNPs alone are more effective for this strain.
Staphylococcusepidermidis also showed increased sensitivity (P < 0.001), with MIC and MBC values of 78 ± 1 mg/L and 156 ± 1 mg/L when treated with the combination, while individual treatments with
C. vulgaris CE and SeNPs yielded significantly higher values (ΣFIC = 0.0702).
Staphylococcussaprophyticus demonstrated reduced MIC and MBC values of 78 ± 1 mg/L when treated with the combination of SeNPs and
C. vulgaris CE, compared to using them alone (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively; ΣFIC = 0.0390). Finally, the clinical isolate
S. aureus sp. A+ exhibited reduced MBC values of 39 ± 1 mg/L (P < 0.001) when treated with the combination, compared to higher values for SeNPs and
C. vulgaris CE alone. The observed results in MIC values for the combination were significantly lower compared to SeNPs (P < 0.001) and
C. vulgaris CE alone (P < 0.01), with a ΣFIC value of 0.5624. The detailed MBC results are illustrated in
Figure 2D.
The data did not indicate a clear relationship between sensitivity to ampicillin and the observed synergistic effects in the strains tested. Ampicillin-sensitive strains, such as E. coli and S. aureus, showed a favorable response to SeNPs, exhibiting lower MIC and MBC concentrations. Additionally, other sensitive strains, including S. saprophyticus, S. epidermidis, and clinical S. aureus sp. A+, demonstrated a significant synergistic effect. In contrast, ampicillin-resistant strains, including the clinical strain of E. coli and the clinical strain of A. baumannii, did not exhibit any synergistic effects. However, another ampicillin-resistant strain, A. baumannii, displayed notable synergistic effects.
The viability of MCF-7 cell lines was assessed using the MTT assay to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of
C. vulgaris CE, SeNPs, and their combination at a concentration of 5 mg/L (
Figure 2E). The results indicated that both
C. vulgaris CE and SeNPs exhibited relatively low cell viability, with percentages of 49.75 ± 3.75% and 44.46 ± 4.26%, respectively, suggesting low cytotoxicity when administered individually. However, the combination of
C. vulgaris CE and SeNPs resulted in a significant decrease in cell viability, dropping to 29.36 ± 2.64% (P < 0.001).