1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Materials
3.2. Animals and Housing Conditions
3.3. Methamphetamine-Induced Withdrawal Syndrome Model
3.4. Study Design
3.5. Behavioral Studies
3.5.1. Open-Field Test
3.5.2. Forced Swimming Test
3.5.3. Elevated Plus Maze
3.5.4. Novel Object Recognition Test
3.6. Biochemical and Molecular Assays
3.6.1. Measurement of Glutathione Content in Hippocampal Tissue
3.6.2. Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power Assay
3.6.3. Determination of Malondialdehyde Content in Hippocampal Tissue
3.6.4. Determination of Protein Carbonyl Content in Hippocampal Tissue
3.6.5. Determination of Nitric Oxide Concentration in Hippocampal Tissue
3.6.6. Total RNA Extraction
| Name | Sequence (5′→3′) | GenBank |
|---|---|---|
| Tlr4 | CCGCTCTGGCATCATCTTCA | NM_021297.3 |
| >TCCCACTCGAGGTAGGTGTT | ||
| Bdnf | ATCCACTGAGCAAAGCCGAA | NM_007540.4 |
| CCTGGTGGAACATTGTGGCT | ||
| JNK | TTACTGTGTCACGCCATGCT | NM_016700.5 |
| GAGCTTCTCTGTACTGGCGG | ||
| GAPDH | ACTAACCCTGCGCTCCTG | NM_001256799.2 |
| CCCAATACGACCAAATCAGA |
3.6.7. Gene Expression Assay by Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
3.7. Histopathological Investigation
3.8. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Behavioral Experiments
Effects of methamphetamine and empagliflozin on (A) horizontal activity and (B) vertical activity in the open-field test; (C) immobility time in the forced swimming test; (D) anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze; and (E) cognitive performance in the novel object recognition test. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 10). One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey post hoc tests was used to determine statistical significance. Symbols denote: ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001 vs the control group; # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, and ### P < 0.001 vs the METH group.
4.2. Biochemical Assays
| Groups | MDA (nM/g Tissue) | FRAP (mM/g Tissue) | GSH (µM/g Tissue) | Protein Carbonyl (µM/g Tissue) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 118.4 ± 7.9 | 430.7 ± 29.3 | 217.3 ± 15.5 | 1.02 ± 0.004 |
| EMPA (10 mg/kg) | 117.9 ± 8.1 | 442.4 ± 28.1 | 219.2 ± 5.2 | 0.86 ± 0.08 |
| METH (2 mg/kg) | 203 ± 5.7*** | 192.7 ± 33*** | 72.2 ± 3.4*** | 2.09 ± 0.11*** |
| METH + EMPA (0.5 mg/kg) | 164.2 ± 10.4***### | 456.3 ± 14.17## | 117.4 ± 5.8***### | 1.16 ± 0.08### |
| METH + EMPA (1 mg/kg) | 147.5 ± 10**### | 412.6 ± 67.6## | 192.6 ± 34.3### | 1.22 ± 0.07### |
| METH + EMPA (2 mg/kg) | 139.4 ± 8.9### | 412.2 ± 65.2## | 216.5 ± 25.2### | 1.17 ± 0.12### |
| METH + EMPA (10 mg/kg) | 112 ± 4.6### | 386.2 ± 30.5# | 180.8 ± 8.6### | 1.36 ± 0.06*### |
| METH + FLX | 117.3 ± 1.7### | 415.1 ± 9.48## | 209.8 ± 14.9### | 1.01 ± 0.21### |
a Values are expressed as the mean±SD (n=4). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc tests was employed to determine statistical significance.
b* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 vs. control group; # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 vs. METH group.
4.2.2. Effect of Empagliflozin on Methamphetamine Withdrawal-Induced Alterations in Hippocampal Nitric Oxide Levels
Effects of methamphetamine and empagliflozin treatment on nitric oxide levels in the hippocampus of mice. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey post hoc tests was used to determine statistical significance. Symbols denote: * P < 0.05; # P < 0.05 and ## P < 0.01.
4.3. Gene Expression
Effects of methamphetamine and empagliflozin treatment on (A) Tlr4, (B) JNK, and (C) Bdnf gene expression in the hippocampus. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey post hoc tests was used to determine statistical significance. Symbols denote: ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001 vs the control group; # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, and ### P < 0.001 vs the METH group.
4.4. Effects of Treatments on Histopathological Alterations in the Cerebral Cortex and Dentate Gyrus
| Groups | Cerebral cortex (Inflammatory cell accumulation) | Dentate gyrus (Basophilic necrosis) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 0 |
| EMPA (10 mg/kg) | 0 | 0 |
| METH (2 mg/kg) | 2 | 3 |
| METH + EMPA (0.5 mg/kg) | 0 | 2 |
| METH + EMPA (1 mg/kg) | 0 | 1 |
| METH + EMPA (2 mg/kg) | 0 | 0 |
| METH + EMPA (10 mg/kg) | 0 | 0 |
| METH + FLX | 0 | 0 |
Histopathological alterations in the cerebral cortex and dentate gyrus following METH withdrawal and post-withdrawal treatments. (A) Representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of the cerebral cortex from the control, empagliflozin (EMPA) 2 mg/kg, METH, METH + EMPA 0.5 mg/kg, METH + EMPA 1 mg/kg, METH + EMPA 2 mg/kg, and METH + fluoxetine 5 mg/kg groups. Mild inflammatory cell accumulation is evident in the METH group, whereas cortical architecture appears normal in the control, EMPA-alone, all METH + EMPA, and METH + fluoxetine groups. (B) Representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of the dentate gyrus from the same experimental groups. Marked basophilic neuronal necrosis is observed in the METH group, which is reduced in a dose-dependent manner in the METH + EMPA 0.5 and 1 mg/kg groups and completely prevented in the METH + EMPA 2 mg/kg and METH + fluoxetine groups. Histopathological changes in both regions were graded on a semiquantitative scale from 0 (no change) to 5 (severe change), as summarized in Table 3. Magnification: ×400.




