SCCO is an extremely rare and aggressive ovarian malignancy, which accounts for less than 1% of all ovarian neoplasms (
2). It may be growing rapidly, and sometimes, the clinical history may be short. The majority of patients are beyond stage I at presentation (
6), and only around 20% to 25% have disease confined to the ovary. Two types of primary SCCO have been described, the hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) and the pulmonary type (SCCOPT). SCCOPT was first reported in 1992 by Eichhorn et al. (
2). It typically affects postmenopausal women with a median age of 49 - 59 years (
4,
7). The clinical manifestations are usually atypical, including abdominal pain, bloating, and abdominal mass. A few may suffer from irregular vaginal bleeding.
Pathological morphology shows that most of the tumors are small round cells, with few cytoplasm, hyperchromatic nuclei and unobvious nucleoli, arranged in sheets, nests, islands and trabeculae. Neuroendocrine markers such as neuron specific enolase (NSE), CD56, CgA and synaptophysin (Syn) are usually expressed (
6,
8). In our case, CD56 and Syn were positive, and CgA was partially positive.
To date, literature reports about SCCOPT are relatively rare, and most of them are related to its pathological characteristics, treatment and prognosis, with only few literatures emphasizing on its imaging features. Hence, radiologists have insufficient understanding about it. Due to its similarity with epithelial ovarian cancers in clinical symptoms and laboratory tests, it is not easily distinguished pre-operatively. Based on our patient’s pathological manifestations and previous literatures, we summarize the specific MRI findings of SCCOPT.
Approximately 25% - 50% of pure SCCOPT may involve bilateral ovaries (
2). Most of the reported lesions are large in size and irregular in shape, with a maximum size of 30 cm. The majority of SCCOPT is ill-defined with lobulated or nodular appearance. Most literatures (
7,
9-
11) report it as predominantly solid with focal hemorrhage and necrosis (as some cases did not mention whether they existed or not, the incidence could not be calculated), while some other cases present as solid cystic masses (
12), with the cystic part mostly being mucus, significant necrosis and cystic degeneration. No cases of cystic SCCOPT have been reported. But when combined with other tumors (such as serous or myxoid tumors or mature cystic teratoma), it could be mainly cystic (
8,
13). Calcification has not been mentioned in the literature. Based on previous studies (
9,
14) and our case, SCCOPT features iso- to hypo-intense signal on T1WI, with spot-like high-signal when hemorrhage is present. On T2WI, the lesion shows mixed signals, mainly slightly higher or intermediate signals. T2WI FS of the solid component shows slightly higher signal with focal low signal, and the cystic part shows T2 isointense to water. DWI and ADC mapping show restricted diffusion in the solid component (hyperintense on DWI and hypointense on ADC mapping) due to hypercellularity of cancer cells and high nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio. On enhanced scan, the solid component of the tumor enhances distinctly and persistently (
14), which is different from the fast-in and fast-out type of enhancement of ovarian epithelial cancer. As malignant tissue is generally separated by fibrous stripes of varying thickness (
2,
10), SCCOPT has a characteristic honeycomb-like enhancement. Pelvic effusion occurs in more than half of patients. Lymphadenopathy, as well as peritoneal, omental and mesenteric metastases are also common. When coexisting with other tumors, SCCOPT’s MRI manifestations are variable, which may lead to misdiagnosis. Moreover, it is difficult to distinguish with metastatic tumors when bilateral ovaries are involved.
Allowing for its rarity, SCCOPT remains a challenging tumor to treat. Standard primary surgical debulking is the treatment of choice, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. There is no clear consensus for the optimal regime for postoperative chemotherapy because of the small number of patients and unavailability of follow-up data. Pelvic radiation remains enigmatic. Patients diagnosed with SCCOPT usually carry a very poor survival, generally dying rapidly within 2 years (
6). There are also reports that indicate better prognosis when occurring with other tumors, which may be attributed to the small proportion of SCCOPT (
15).
In our case, the imaging findings of the lesion are roughly consistent with the above literatures’ description. Unfortunately, because of our insufficient understanding of SCCOPT, we failed to make a precise diagnosis. The main differential diagnosis includes ovarian epithelial cell carcinoma and thecoma-fibromas. Ovarian epithelial cell carcinoma shares a similar age of onset, clinical symptoms, and laboratory tests with our patient, as well as certain MR manifestations. MR appearance of ovarian epithelial carcinoma is a variable combination of cystic and solid components, with the solid component exhibiting apparent enhancement and restricted diffusion. Different pathological subtypes have different characteristics (
16): serous cancers and clear cell cancers are predominantly unilocular cysts with intermediate signal papillary projections inside; mucinous tumors feature different signal intensities of locules based on variable content; and endometrioid tumors are associated with endometrial hyperplasia or frank endometrial carcinoma in up to one - third of cases. The MR characteristics of thecoma-fibromas are hypo-intensity on both T1 and T2 weighted images. After administration of gadolinium, these tumors have variable enhancement depending on the proportion of fibrous cells and thecal cells, with reports of negligible and avid enhancement (
17,
18). Moreover, hormones secreted by thecal cells may cause endometrial thickening, which was also seen in our patient.
In conclusion, when an ovarian tumor appears as a large, heterogeneous, complex and irregular mass, with the solid component exhibiting restricted diffusion on DWI and honeycomb-like persistent enhancement, SCCOPT should be considered. But as the number of case reports is small, and the imaging findings has a lot of overlap with other ovarian tumors, more data are needed to better understand its specific manifestations.