SCLC is the most common primary pulmonary neuroendocrine malignancy, and the most common sites of metastases are the bones, liver, adrenal glands, and brain. Gastrointestinal metastases of primary lung cancer have been reported to have an incidence ranging from 4.7 to 14% on autopsy, and the small bowel is the most commonly reported site (
1,
2). Perianal/anal or perirectal/rectal metastasis originating from primary lung cancer is extremely rare, with only 15 published reports (
1-
8). To the best of our knowledge, there are only three reports of perianal or perirectal metastases from SCLC, including the present study (
6-
8).
The symptoms of perianal/perirectal metastases may be nonspecific or similar to those of primary gastrointestinal malignancies (
5,
6). Diagnosis may be delayed since anal cancers are generally attributed to hemorrhoids (
9). In previous studies that analyzed cases of perianal and anal metastases from primary lung cancers, abscess formation was the most prevalent presentation (
1). In the present case, the patient experienced perianal pain, and physical examination showed an internal hemorrhoid, substantiating the possibility of misdiagnosis. In the diagnosis of anal cancer or metastasis, standard workup includes digital rectal examination and systemic radiological evaluation (
9). The recommendations published by the European Society for Medical Oncology in 2014 advocate the use of pelvic MRI or endoanal ultrasound for diagnosis (
9). CT can be used to assess the extent of distant metastases, mainly in the liver and lungs. In the present study, enhanced CT imaging revealed a heterogeneous enhancement of the perianal metastatic tumor from the lung, with a necrotic portion and enlarged inguinal lymph nodes. The mass showed intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging and intermediate to high signal intensity with a necrotic portion on T2-weighted imaging. Suto et al. have reported that muscle metastasis showed slightly low signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging but equal or higher signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging compared to the surrounding muscle and a heterogeneous contrast enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (
10). In the present case, the appearance of perianal metastasis was nonspecific on MRI, but MRI might define the extent of the lesion better.
For treatment, patients should undergo systemic single chemotherapy or combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy (
1). However, patients with perianal or perirectal malignancies may present with intestinal stenosis or obstruction, which requires urgent surgical intervention. Palliative surgery can also be performed in cases where hemorrhage and external mass cause severe discomfort to the patient (
1). Pulmonary malignancy with gastrointestinal/colonic metastasis has been reported to have a poor prognosis, with a median survival time of 3 months (
4). In the present case, radiation therapy was performed on the perianal area without surgical intervention since the patient had already been receiving systemic chemotherapy for SCLC.
In conclusion, our report describes a rare case of perianal metastasis from SCLC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on perianal metastasis from SCLC diagnosed using MRI. Furthermore, spread of lung cancer to atypical areas should not be overlooked, and radiologists and clinicians should be aware of its imaging features.