The FRDA is a multisystemic neurodegenerative disorder in which cardiac disease remains the most common cause of premature mortality. The cardiac phenotype of FRDA includes concentric LVH, diastolic dysfunction, and diffuse myocardial fibrosis, even in the absence of overt symptoms (
3). In our case series, all four patients demonstrated various degrees of cardiac involvement, highlighting the clinical heterogeneity of FRDA cardiomyopathy. Myocardial fibrosis in FRDA, detectable through CMR techniques such as T1 mapping and LGE, is a hallmark of disease progression and a predictor of adverse outcomes (
6). In particular, native T1 elevation and increased ECV correlate with the extent of fibrotic remodeling and serve as valuable non-invasive biomarkers for early detection (
13,
20).
Two of our patients demonstrated significantly elevated native T1 values and non-ischemic LGE patterns, suggesting diffuse interstitial fibrosis even in the absence of systolic dysfunction. The pathophysiology underlying cardiac involvement in FRDA is rooted in mitochondrial dysfunction, resulting in impaired oxidative phosphorylation, iron accumulation, and cellular energy deficits in cardiomyocytes (
2). This leads to myocyte hypertrophy, fibrosis, and eventual decline in both diastolic and systolic function. As previously reported, diastolic dysfunction often precedes systolic impairment and may remain subclinical for years (
7). This emphasizes the importance of advanced imaging modalities in identifying preclinical cardiac changes.
Our findings align with prior longitudinal studies indicating that cardiac phenotype progression is more closely related to age at onset and GAA repeat length than to neurologic severity or disease duration (
9). These genotype-phenotype correlations may help guide individualized monitoring strategies and prognostication. Additionally, FRDA patients with diabetes or severe scoliosis, as seen in our cohort, may be at higher risk for accelerated cardiac decline (
10).
A key strength of our study lies in the comprehensive use of CMR imaging. Techniques such as LGE and T1 mapping enable a tissue characterization approach, offering insights beyond conventional echocardiography. Previous studies have shown that myocardial fibrosis detected on CMR correlates with electrocardiographic abnormalities and increased arrhythmic risk in FRDA (
12). In our series, subepicardial and mid-wall LGE were observed, patterns typically associated with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, supporting previous histopathologic and imaging evidence (
21).
This case series highlights the phenotypic heterogeneity of cardiac involvement in FRDA, emphasizing the critical role of advanced CMR imaging in delineating myocardial structure and function. We observed a spectrum of cardiac manifestations — from concentric LVH with preserved EF and no fibrosis (case 3) to advanced cardiomyopathy with extensive fibrosis and reduced systolic function (cases 1, 2, and 4). These variations underscore the importance of detailed imaging assessments in identifying clinically meaningful cardiac differences, which may otherwise remain subclinical.
Our observations align with earlier echocardiographic and autopsy-based studies that reported concentric LVH as a hallmark of FRDA, contrasting with the asymmetric hypertrophy typical of sarcomeric HCM (
5,
7,
22). While echocardiography has traditionally been the modality of choice, it may underestimate the burden of myocardial fibrosis and cannot reliably assess diffuse interstitial changes (
9). The CMR, particularly LGE and native T1 mapping, allows for the identification of both focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis. Our findings confirm the utility of these techniques in uncovering pathology not detectable by conventional imaging.
Importantly, the disparity between cases — especially between case 3 and the others — may be related to differing disease durations, frataxin expression levels, or mitochondrial dysfunction thresholds, though these were not quantified in our series. Prior studies have shown a correlation between GAA repeat length and cardiac severity (
7,
20), suggesting that genetic profiling combined with imaging may enhance risk stratification. However, due to the cross-sectional nature of our analysis and the lack of genetic data, such correlations remain speculative in our cohort.
The CMR-based myocardial fibrosis is increasingly recognized as a strong predictor of adverse outcomes in various cardiomyopathies, including FRDA. In the largest longitudinal FRDA cohort to date, Pousset et al. demonstrated that cardiac involvement was the major determinant of mortality, with myocardial fibrosis being a critical prognostic factor (
9). In our series, reduced EF and LGE positivity were observed in the same individuals, further supporting their prognostic interplay. Unfortunately, due to the absence of long-term follow-up in our cohort, we could not establish a direct link between fibrosis and clinical outcomes.
The clinical management implications of these findings are considerable. Current consensus guidelines for HCMs recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in high-risk patients with fibrosis, reduced EF, or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (
23). Similar risk-guided strategies could be adapted for FRDA, particularly in those with significant LGE burden. Moreover, early identification of cardiac involvement using CMR may prompt closer monitoring, lifestyle adjustment, and potential pharmacologic interventions aimed at mitigating myocardial remodeling.
This case series demonstrates the heterogeneity of cardiac involvement in FA and affirms the value of CMR imaging in unmasking myocardial fibrosis and LVH, even in the early or subclinical stages. Based on our findings, we recommend that CMR — particularly when including LGE and T1 mapping — be considered an essential component of baseline and longitudinal cardiac evaluation in FRDA patients, regardless of echocardiographic findings. Clinicians should maintain a high Index of Suspicion for cardiac involvement in FRDA and consider early imaging even in asymptomatic individuals. Identifying myocardial fibrosis early may inform decisions regarding pharmacologic therapy, exercise restriction, or more intensive cardiac monitoring.
Future research in FRDA cardiomyopathy should focus on several key objectives. Firstly, there is a critical need to establish standardized, CMR-based risk stratification models specific to the FRDA population. Concurrently, studies must validate the prognostic value of quantitative biomarkers, specifically fibrosis burden and LV mass, as independent predictors of clinical outcomes. Furthermore, interventional trials are warranted to investigate the impact of initiating early cardiac therapy — such as ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, or novel antifibrotic agents — on long-term morbidity and mortality. Finally, longitudinal studies are essential to explore the natural progression of these imaging biomarkers and their precise relationship with hard clinical endpoints, including arrhythmia, heart failure hospitalization, and sudden cardiac death.
Integrating these insights into multidisciplinary care models could significantly improve cardiac outcomes and overall survival in patients with FA. This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the retrospective and cross-sectional design inherently limits the ability to assess longitudinal changes in cardiac function or to establish causal relationships. No standardized clinical or imaging follow-up was available for the included patients, and therefore, the progression of cardiac involvement over time could not be evaluated. This lack of longitudinal data limits our understanding of the temporal evolution of cardiac abnormalities in FA.
Moreover, the study was conducted in a single center with a relatively small number of patients, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Despite these limitations, we believe our results provide meaningful insights into the cardiac manifestations of FA and underscore the need for prospective longitudinal studies to better characterize disease progression and outcomes.
In conclusion, our findings support the use of CMR as a noninvasive, comprehensive tool for characterizing the cardiac phenotype in FRDA. The integration of structural, functional, and tissue-based markers enables refined clinical decision-making and may facilitate the development of personalized treatment strategies. Given the prognostic importance of myocardial fibrosis and LV dysfunction, routine CMR screening should be considered in all FRDA patients, particularly during the early stages of neurological disease.