Data from studies evaluating natural history (
19), magnetic resonance imaging (
20) immunology (
21) and histopathology (
4) of MS suggest that the PPMS differs significantly from RRMS. Being able to predict a patient’s MS course is highly desirable but lacking. Nowadays, conventional T2-weighted MRI is widely used to assess lesion burden in MS. However, T2 lesion burden has a poor correlation with disability in MS (
22,
23) and consequently, it cannot differentiate the subtypes of the disease (
23). It is accepted that the MRS quantification may provide evidence of irreversible tissue damage in MS by estimating brain metabolite quantities more specific than T2-weighted MRI (
14).
When comparing PPMS patients with RRMS patients we found that:
(a) In agreement with previous studies, there was a significant NAA/Cr decrease in non-enhancing lesions (
7) of PPMS patients when compared to RRMS. It could be related to either a more pronounced NAA reduction or Cr increase in PPMS than in the RRMS subtype. This finding is most probably due to different pathophysiological mechanisms such as axonal damage (reduced NAA) and/or gliosis (increased Cr) in PPMS patients. The NAA/Cr ratio reduction may suggest a neuronal/axonal integrity loss in these patients (
14).
(b) We found that Cr concentration (a marker of gliosis) was significantly higher in non-enhancing lesions of PPMS than that of RRMS. This increase in Cr reflects a more severe gliosis in our PPMS group and is consistent with other studies (
7). Age has a well-established direct correlation with the increased brain Cr level (
7) and because the PPMS subtype tends to start in an older age than RRMS, it could be a potential confounding factor for increased Cr level in PPMS. Since the MS groups in our study had no difference in their disease duration and age, the increased Cr concentration in PPMS patients can be attributed to the more severe gliotic nature of the PPMS subtype.
(c) In agreement with Suhy J et al. (
7), no significant difference in Cho or NAA/Cho measures was detected between the chronic lesions of PPMS and those of the RRMS patients.
(d) In contrast to some other studies (
7,
24), no NAA difference was detected between our MS subtypes. This may be explained by the fact that our MS patients had no significant difference regarding age or disease duration and we only included chronic non-enhancing lesions.
The data from lesions could be contaminated by volume averaging from nearby focal lesions or CSF. To avoid this, we carefully selected voxels that predominantly included the lesion tissue. Nevertheless, contamination from adjacent tissue or partial volume effects cannot be completely prevented because of the coarse MRS spatial resolution.
In conclusion, these results suggest that Cr concentration or NAA/Cr ratio in non-enhancing lesions can potentially differentiate between RRMS and PPMS subtypes. Further studies comparing PPMS and RRMS groups with the same EDSS are suggested.
We also suggest designing a longitudinal study on PPMS and RRMS separately to track the changes of metabolites with disease chronicity and time.