Journal of Cellular & Molecular Anesthesia
Outlines
Retracted: Magnesium Gargle Versus Ketamine Gargle in Postoperative Sore Throat Pain; A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial [J Cell Mol Anesth. 2020;5(3): e149598]
Author(s):
1Anesthesiology Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2Department of Bio-statistics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Published online:Jul 08, 2026
Article type:Original Articles
Received:Jun 04, 2024
Accepted:Jul 08, 2026
The editors have expressed concern about this article. See Expression of Concern for Magnesium Gargle versus Ketamine Gargle in Postoperative Sore Throat Pain; A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial [J Cell Mol Anesth. 2020;5(3):e149598].
How to Cite:Teymourian H, Saeedi N, Mohseni G, Khorasanizadeh S, Hajizade N. Retracted: Magnesium Gargle Versus Ketamine Gargle in Postoperative Sore Throat Pain; A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial [J Cell Mol Anesth. 2020;5(3): e149598]. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2020;5(3):e149598. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jcma.v5i3.29471
Dear Readers,
The article entitled Magnesium Gargle versus Ketamine Gargle in Postoperative Sore Throat Pain; A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial, published in the Journal of Cellular and Molecular Anesthesia, is hereby retracted (1).
Following concerns regarding the reliability and validity of the reported data, the Editorial Office of the Journal of Cellular and Molecular Anesthesia conducted a post-publication assessment in accordance with the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and its guidance for handling concerns about unreliable published findings.
The editorial assessment included a detailed evaluation of the reported data, statistical analyses, tables, and the information available to support the published results.
During this assessment, substantial inconsistencies were identified in the reported statistical analyses. Specifically, several values presented in Tables 2 and 3 were found to be mathematically incompatible with the reported sample sizes and measurement characteristics. These inconsistencies raised serious concerns regarding the reliability of the reported dataset and, consequently, the validity of the study’s findings.
During the course of the investigation, the authors requested retraction of the article after acknowledging analytical inaccuracies in the statistical processing of certain subgroups and indicating their intention to repeat the statistical analyses using corrected methodology. However, after careful editorial evaluation, the reliability of the published data could not be adequately verified.
Accordingly, the Editor-in-Chief and the Editorial Board have decided to retract this article in order to preserve the integrity of the scientific record and to ensure that readers are not misled by findings whose reliability cannot be confirmed.
This retraction is issued solely because the published data are considered unreliable. The journal makes no determination regarding the authors’ intentions or the presence of research misconduct.
The Editorial Office sincerely regrets that these concerns were not identified during the original peer-review and publication process. The journal remains committed to maintaining the highest standards of research integrity, transparency, and publication ethics.
Prof. Ali Dabbagh, MD
Editor-in-Chief
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Anesthesia
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Tehran, Iran
References
- 1.Teymourian H, Saeedi N, Mohseni G, Khorasanizadeh S, Hajizade N. Magnesium Gargle versus Ketamine Gargle in Postoperative Sore Throat Pain; A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2010;5(3).
Copyright
Copyright © 2020, Teymourian et al. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Crossmark
Checking
Comments
Number of Comments:0Cited by
- Scopus by DOI: 2
Last Update: 2 weeks ago
- Scopus by Title: 2
Last Update: 2 weeks ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 2
Last Update: 2 weeks ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 6 days ago
Ordering Reprints
Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCCÂ
Search Relations
Author(s):
Related Articles