Anesthesia is usually induced in the supine position, and the patient is prepared for surgery in the lithotomy position. The patient assumed the Trendelenburg position during and placed in the supine position after the surgery. While such postural changes occur, cardiovascular volume changes also occur, and it is difficult to determine whether perfusion occurs efficiently in peripheral tissues. Among the various positions, the Trendelenburg position significantly increases stroke volume and improves multiple hemodynamic parameters in adult patients (
5). Ultimately, these changes lead to improved perfusion. In this study, we aimed to confirm whether these changes were reflected in Pi using a noninvasive device.
In actual monitoring devices, PVi is automatically calculated based on the Pi value using the following formula (Equation 1):
The Pi is the measured ratio of pulsatile to non-pulsatile signals in the plethysmography waveform of an infrared light-emitting diode (LED).
However, the distribution of the PVi and Pi values shows an inverse relationship for each posture because the increase and decrease in the peripheral pulse waveform width affects the calculated value. Masimo devices support Pi ranging from 0.02 to 20% as a non-invasive measure of the pulse strength of the arteriolar blood volume interrogated by the pulse oximeter sensor. The Pi reflects the change in blood volume with each heartbeat in the fingers (
6). The Pi is clearly related to peripheral tissue perfusion (
7) but also depends on other variables that affect the local arteriolar volume, including vessel compliance (
8). A Pi value of ≤ 1 is considered to denote low perfusion while that of > 1 is considered to denote normal perfusion. These values are comparable to the Pi thresholds for normal and low perfusion determined in previous studies (
7-
9). Most anesthetics induce vasodilation by increasing the vasoconstriction threshold. Anesthesia can also cause temperature redistribution, which further affects peripheral perfusion (
10). The future value of considering perioperative changes in Pi during surgical procedures for monitoring temperature redistribution, vasodilatation, and efficacy of anesthesia has been suggested. Therefore, when our results showed the trend of the Pi while applying these conditions as equally as possible, we were.
The Pi can be used in various applications. In addition to studies based on the fluid volume of patients in critical care or surgery, studies using the Pi to assess the success or failure of patients who have undergone regional anesthesia have also been reported (
11-
13). Therefore, the Pi was found to be more sensitive to the condition of the patient than the other indices when the environmental conditions were applied equally and its trend was confirmed (
Table 3 and
Figure 2).
Although the trendelenburg position is expected to enhance venous return and potentially increase cardiac filling pressures, our findings did not show a significant change in PVi. This may be attributed to the compensatory mechanisms maintaining hemodynamic stability under anesthesia or to the limitations of PVi as a surrogate for dynamic changes in preload under these specific conditions. Trendelenburg position enhances venous return and stroke volume; however, PVi is a dynamic index reflecting respiratory-induced variation in pleth waveform amplitude, not absolute preload. Under controlled ventilation with constant tidal volume, respiratory-driven variability may not increase even if preload increases. Additionally, anesthesia-induced vasodilation and reduced sympathetic tone may blunt cyclic variation in peripheral vasculature. Therefore, even though preload increased, the PVi did not show significant change.
Also, SpOC did not show a significant difference when observed with this noninvasive device, even though lung mechanics changed with postural changes (
14). Ppeak significantly increased in the Trendelenburg position when the same tidal volume was set due to an increase in abdominal pressure. This may be attributed to the maintenance of SpOC in a range that does not significantly affect hemoglobin concentrations or SpO
2 when the respiratory mechanics of the patient do not show a significant enough difference to induce critical changes. Despite postural effects on lung mechanics (e.g., increased Ppeak), SpOC remained stable because hemoglobin concentration did not change significantly and SpO
2 remained within a narrow range. The SpOC is relatively insensitive to short-term mechanical changes when ventilation remains controlled.
This study had some limitations. This study was limited to gynecological surgeries. This may be controversial; however, various types of routine postural changes are required in gynecological surgery. In addition, the study was limited to one patient group because only a few surgical factors affected the volume status of the patient, such as excessive bleeding. The parameters were measured using a single product, and differences by manufacturer could not be compared; however, it is meaningful for analyzing trends. Findings may not generalize to other manufacturers because only a Masimo device was used. Nevertheless, we found that continuous changes and peripheral perfusion maintenance could be effectively monitored according to the posture of the patient when monitoring patients using Pi. These results are useful for judging false-positive or negative values when recognizing abnormal indicators relative to other monitoring devices, and they can facilitate appropriate anesthetic management to patients. Furthermore, the index may be more useful not only for healthy patients, but also for patients with conditions that can be affected by even small volume changes.