J Cell Mol Anesth

Image Credit:J Cell Mol Anesth

A Comparative Study Between the Efficacy of Magnesium Sulphate and Dexmedetomidine for Cough Suppression During Anesthetic Emergence in Smokers Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

Author(s):
Sahar Mohamed TalaatSahar Mohamed Talaat1, Mohamed Shahat MohamedMohamed Shahat Mohamed1,*, Mohsen Abdelghani BassionyMohsen Abdelghani Bassiony1, Noha Mohamed AbdelazizNoha Mohamed Abdelaziz1, Mohamed Abdel-Fattah GhoneimMohamed Abdel-Fattah Ghoneim1
1Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Journal of Cellular & Molecular Anesthesia:Vol. 10, issue 3; e164623
Published online:Sep 13, 2025
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jul 19, 2025
Accepted:Aug 22, 2025
How to Cite:Mohamed Talaat S, Shahat Mohamed M, Abdelghani Bassiony M, Mohamed Abdelaziz N, Ghoneim M A. A Comparative Study Between the Efficacy of Magnesium Sulphate and Dexmedetomidine for Cough Suppression During Anesthetic Emergence in Smokers Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.J Cell Mol Anesth.2025;10(3):e164623.https://doi.org/10.5812/jcma-164623.

Abstract

Background:

Emergence coughing following general anesthesia (GA) is common in smokers and may result in severe complications, including hemodynamic instability, bronchospasm, wound dehiscence, increased intracranial pressure (ICP), and raised intraocular pressure. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) and magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) have demonstrated antitussive properties through distinct pharmacological mechanisms, but direct comparisons in smokers undergoing abdominal surgery remain limited.

Objectives:

The present study aimed to compare their efficacy in suppressing emergence cough in active smokers and assess their effects on hemodynamics and sedation.

Methods:

This double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled 165 active smokers classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II, scheduled for elective abdominal surgeries under GA, who were evenly stratified into three groups: Dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg), MgSO4 (30 mg/kg), and placebo. Study drugs were infused over 10 minutes during wound closure. Cough severity and incidence were recorded from cessation of anesthesia to 10 minutes post-extubation. Hemodynamic parameters and sedation (Ramsay Sedation Score) were monitored for 30 minutes post-extubation.

Results:

Both DEX and MgSO4 significantly reduced coughing incidence (30.9% and 60.0% vs. 87.3% in controls, P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively) and severity (median scores: 0 vs. 2, P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine was superior to MgSO4 in both outcomes (P = 0.002). Dexmedetomidine induced early and sustained reductions in heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP; P < 0.001), while MgSO4 showed delayed hemodynamic effects post-extubation. Sedation was deeper with DEX (median Ramsay score: 2 vs. 1; P < 0.001) but did not delay recovery.

Conclusions:

Both DEX and MgSO4 effectively reduce emergence coughing in smokers. Dexmedetomidine offers superior cough suppression and hemodynamic stability but with deeper sedation.

1. Background

Cough, mucus hypersecretion, and airflow obstruction are well-documented consequences of cigarette smoking. These adverse effects are not limited to active smokers but are also observed in passive smokers (1). Studies have demonstrated that both active and passive smokers experience significantly more complications during the administration and recovery phases of anesthesia compared to non-smokers (2, 3). Coughing during emergence from general anesthesia (GA) occurs in approximately 40% to 76% of intubated cases (4). Peri-extubation coughing may result in significant complications, including increases in heart rate (HR) and BP, bronchospasm, intracerebral hemorrhage, raised intracranial pressure (ICP), elevated intraocular pressure, wound dehiscence after laparotomy, and cervical hematoma following thyroidectomy or carotid endarterectomy (5-7).

Several factors have been implicated in post-extubation coughing, including mechanical irritation from the laryngoscope blade, the endotracheal (ET) intubation technique, the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff and its size, straining during extubation, accumulated secretions, and smoking (8). Various strategies have been employed to minimize emergence-related coughing. These include the use of a laryngeal mask airway, performing deep extubation, and administering systemic agents such as tramadol, short-acting opioids, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine (DEX). Additionally, local anesthetics and corticosteroids applied near the tracheal tube cuff have shown efficacy in reducing airway irritation (9, 10).

Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-adrenoreceptor agonist, possesses anxiolytic, sedative, analgesic, and amnestic effects. It also exerts sympatholytic effects by lowering systemic norepinephrine levels, thereby reducing BP and HR. Furthermore, it may suppress coughing by inhibiting C-fiber-mediated bronchial contractions, a mechanism thought to contribute to its antitussive effect (11).

Magnesium is an essential ion involved in numerous physiological processes in the heart, brain, and skeletal muscles. Its smooth muscle-relaxant, spasmolytic, and anti-inflammatory properties contribute to reduced coughing, bronchial irritation, and bronchospasm during emergence from anesthesia (12).

2. Objectives

This investigation aims to compare the effectiveness of DEX and magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) in suppressing emergence coughing in smokers, while also evaluating their effects on hemodynamic stability and sedation.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design and Population

This randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical investigation was conducted at Ain Shams University hospitals in Cairo, Egypt, between July 2022 and August 2023. Prior to study initiation, ethical approval was secured from the REC of the Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University (approval No.: FMASU MD 61/2022). Additionally, the trial was prospectively registered with PACTR under registration number PACTR202308591985746 on August 17, 2023. Written informed consent was secured from all participants before enrollment. A total of 165 adult cases who were scheduled to undergo elective open abdominal surgeries, including procedures such as hernia repair and appendectomy, were recruited upon confirmation of eligibility.

3.2. Eligibility Criteria

Eligible participants were adults (18 - 60 years) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II (13), who were active smokers (≥ 1 pack/day for ≥ 1 year); passive smokers were excluded. Patients were ineligible if they had pulmonary disease (asthma, interstitial fibrosis, chronic cough), were taking sedatives, antitussives, or ACE inhibitors, had a difficult airway, or contraindications to MgSO4 or DEX (allergy, bradyarrhythmias). Those with chronic renal failure (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) were also excluded due to magnesium’s renal clearance. Because magnesium potentiates rocuronium, neuromuscular recovery was closely monitored before extubation; no delays were observed, though a rescue plan was prepared.

3.3. Randomization and Blinding

After eligibility confirmation and consent, cases were randomly assigned to one of three equal groups (n = 55 each) using a computer-generated randomization sequence. The groups included the MgSO4 group (group M), the DEX group (group D), and controls (group C). To maintain allocation concealment, assignments were enclosed in opaque, sealed envelopes that were not accessible until the point of intervention. A single designated investigator, who was responsible for preparing the study drugs and not involved in case care or outcome assessment, unsealed the envelopes. Both the attending anesthesiologist and the outcome assessor were blinded to group allocation. To ensure blinding, study drugs were diluted to identical volumes (100 mL) of normal saline (NS) with indistinguishable appearance and infused over 10 minutes. Outcome assessors and attending anesthesiologists were independent and unaware of group allocation.

3.4. Anesthetic Management

Preoperative assessment included a comprehensive medical history, physical examination, and laboratory investigations comprising CBC, liver and kidney function tests, and coagulation profile. An ECG was performed for cases over 40 years of age. All cases fasted for at least eight hours before surgery. Upon arrival in the operating room, standard ASA monitoring was instituted, including non-invasive BP (NIBP), ECG, pulse oximetry (SpO2), and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2). After IV cannulation, Ringer’s acetate was given at 10 mL/kg. Anesthesia was induced after three minutes of preoxygenation using IV fentanyl 2 µg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.5 mg/kg to facilitate ET intubation with an appropriately sized tube. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane at a concentration of 2 - 3% in a closed-circuit system with 50% oxygen. Mechanical ventilation parameters were adjusted to maintain ETCO2 between 32 and 38 mmHg. All cases received 1 g of IV paracetamol and 4 mg of ondansetron as antiemetic prophylaxis.

During subcutaneous tissue closure, cases in group M were administered 30 mg/kg of MgSO4 diluted in 100 mL of NS intravenously over a 10-minute period. The group D received 0.5 µg/kg of DEX prepared in 100 mL of NS, also infused over 10 minutes. In contrast, group C was given an equivalent volume of NS over the same duration. Concurrently, the sevoflurane concentration was adjusted to 1% and subsequently discontinued at the conclusion of the surgical procedure.

Reversal of neuromuscular blockade was achieved using neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg and atropine 0.02 mg/kg. Emergence was facilitated by gentle stimulation such as verbal commands and sternal rubs. Extubation was performed once cases regained consciousness, demonstrated adequate spontaneous ventilation with sufficient tidal volume, and showed signs of neuromuscular recovery. Following extubation, all cases received 100% oxygen via face mask for five minutes. In cases of bradycardia (HR < 50 bpm) during or after DEX infusion, atropine 0.5 mg IV was planned as first-line management, and infusion would be discontinued if bradycardia persisted. No patient required discontinuation of infusion.

3.5. Outcome Measures

Primary outcomes encompassed the severity and frequency of coughing during emergence, evaluated from discontinuation of the inhalational agent to ten minutes post-extubation. Cough severity was rated using a standardized 4-point scale: Zero indicated no cough, 1 indicated a single cough with SpO2 ≥ 95%, 2 denoted multiple coughs with SpO2 ≥ 95%, 3 indicated multiple coughs with SpO2 < 95%, and 4 denoted severe coughing with SpO2 < 95% requiring IV medication. This evaluation was conducted by an independent anesthesiologist blinded to group allocation.

Secondary outcomes encompassed variations in hemodynamic measures and assessment of sedation levels. Hemodynamic monitoring included HR, assessed via continuous ECG, and mean arterial pressure (MAP), measured using NIBP monitoring. Both parameters were recorded every five minutes starting from the time of study drug infusion until 30 minutes post-extubation. Sedation was assessed at 30 minutes post-extubation using the Ramsay Sedation Score, which ranges from 1 (anxious or agitated) to 6 (no response to external stimuli) (14).

3.6. Sample Size Calculation

Sample size estimation was conducted based on data derived from the study by Hur et al. (15), who reported an effect size of 0.24 when comparing magnesium infusion with placebo for reducing the incidence of cough during anesthetic emergence. Assuming a moderate effect size and employing a one-way ANOVA for three groups, a total sample of 165 cases (55 cases per group) was determined to be sufficient to achieve 80% statistical power (β = 0.20) at a 0.05 level of significance (α = 0.05).

3.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using the SPSS software package (SPSS for Windows®, Version 16.0, Chicago, SPSS Inc.) after the data had been meticulously collected, coded, and organized. Continuous variables were summarized as mean ± SD or median with interquartile range (Q1 - Q3), while categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages. For post hoc analysis, Tukey’s HSD, Fisher’s exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test were applied where appropriate. Depending on data distribution, one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for numerical variables, while categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test. Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons, with significance set at P < 0.05.

4. Results

A total of 165 cases were enrolled in this investigation, all of whom completed the protocol without any exclusions (Figure 1).

CONSORT flow diagram for the study
Figure 1.

CONSORT flow diagram for the study

The baseline demographic characteristics were comparable among the three study groups. No substantial variations were found in terms of age (P = 0.771), sex distribution (P = 0.912), body weight (P = 0.462), Body Mass Index (BMI; P = 0.298), smoking quantity in packs per day (P = 0.826), or type of surgical procedure performed (P = 0.511, Table 1).

Table 1.Demographic Data Among the Studies Cases a, b, c
VariablesGroup C (N = 55)Group D (N = 55)Group M (N = 55)
Age (y)40.62 ± 10.6641.58 ± 11.5042.15 ± 11.52
Sex
Male40 (72.7)39 (70.9)41 (74.5)
Female15 (27.3)16 (29.1)14 (25.5)
Height (cm)176.91 ± 18.26180.62 ± 20.14179.64 ± 19.92
Weight (kg)81.56 ± 13.3985.14 ± 15.6883.41 ± 16.51
BMI (kg/m2)30.42 ± 2.0831.74 ± 3.5631.05 ± 1.84
Smoking (Pack/d)1.15 ± 0.231.52 ± 0.111.38 ± 0.21
Surgery
Appendectomy25 (45.5)26 (47.3)24 (43.6)
Hernioplasty23 (41.8)22 (40.0)25 (45.5)
Partial colectomy5 (9.1)4 (7.3)5 (9.1)
Splenoctomy2 (3.6)3 (5.5)1 (1.8)

Abbreviations: Group C, control group; group M, magnesium sulfate group; group D, dexmedetomidine group; BMI, Body Mass Index.

a Values are expressed as No. (%) or mean ± SD.

b Baseline characteristics are presented descriptively.

c No statistical testing was performed in accordance with CONSORT guidelines.

With respect to coughing severity during emergence from anesthesia, both the group D and group M demonstrated significantly lower cough severity scores relative to group C, with P-values of < 0.001 and 0.003, respectively. Furthermore, cough severity in group D was substantially lower than in group M (P < 0.001). Similarly, the incidence of coughing was significantly reduced in groups D and M relative to group C (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively), and a substantially lower incidence was also observed in group D compared to group M (P = 0.002, Table 2).

Table 2.Primary Outcomes (Coughing Severity, Coughing Incidence) Among the Studies Cases
VariablesGroup CGroup D aGroup M bP-Valuec
Coughing severity [median (Q1 - Q3)]2 (1 - 3)0 (0 - 1) 2(0 - 2) < 0.001
Incidence of cough [No. (%)]48 (87.3)17 (30.9)33 (60.0)< 0.001

Abbreviations: Group C, control group; group M, magnesium sulfate group; group D, dexmedetomidine group; Q1, first quartile; Q3, third quartile.

a Significantly lower than the other two groups.

b Significantly lower than group C.

c Statistically significant < 0.05.

No substantial variations were observed in baseline hemodynamic parameters among the three groups. Specifically, both HR and MAP measured five minutes before drug infusion were comparable across group C, group D, and group M, with P = 0.671 for HR and P = 0.768 for MAP (Table 3).

Table 3.Secondary Outcomes Among the Studies Cases a
Variables (min)Group C (N = 55)Group D (N = 55)Group M (N = 55)P-Value
HR (bpm)
HR 5 before drug infusion89.59 ± 9.2686.43 ± 12.8488.61 ± 10.510.671
HR 5 after drug infusion91.25 ± 11.0678.20 b ± 10.4487.15 ± 11.11< 0.001 d
HR 5 after extubation117.78 ± 8.7783.65 b ± 16.57105.45 c ± 17.81< 0.001 d
HR 10113.2 ± 8.1479.04 b ± 18.23102.4 c ± 16.63< 0.001 d
HR 15107.64 ± 8.0878.22 b ± 16.5696.84 c ± 14.84< 0.001 d
HR 20103.69 ± 8.7477.04 b ± 15.6494.51 c ± 14.40< 0.001 d
HR 25101.0 ± 7.4277.78 b ± 14.0691.95 c ± 12.79< 0.001 d
HR 3098.38 ± 6.9178.27 b ± 14.5890.33 c ± 11.71< 0.001 d
MAP (mmHg)
MAP 5 before drug infusion81.26 ± 8.4380.34 ± 13.8480.89 ± 12.380.768
MAP 5 after drug infusion89.49 ± 11.6382.8 b ± 15.97100.8 ± 17.33< 0.001 d
MAP 5 after extubation114.53 ± 10.2481.45 b ± 15.89100.42 c ± 17.12< 0.001 d
MAP 10110.84 ± 8.3179.16 b ± 16.0197.45 c ± 16.95< 0.001 d
MAP 15104.33 ± 7.7276.75 b ± 15.1595.22 c ± 17.29< 0.001 d
MAP 20101.80 ± 7.4676.25 b ± 14.9194.42 c ± 14.64< 0.001 d
MAP 2597.93 ± 7.7576.64 b ± 13.0892.51 c ± 13.08< 0.001 d
MAP 3098.02 ± 8.8179.29 b ± 12.7290.95 c ± 12.54< 0.001 d
Degree of sedation [median (Q1 - Q3)]1 (1 - 1)2 (1 - 3)1 (1 - 2)< 0.001 d

Abbreviations: Group C, control group; group M, magnesium sulfate group; group D, dexmedetomidine group; HR, heart rate; bpm, beats per minute; MAP, mean arterial pressure; Q1, first quartile; Q3, third quartile.

a Values are expressed as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

b Significantly lower than the other two groups.

c Significantly lower than group C.

d Statistically significant < 0.05.

Following drug administration, group D exhibited a substantial reduction in both HR and MAP beginning five minutes post-infusion and continuing throughout the entire 30-minute observation period, with P < 0.001 at all subsequent time points. In contrast, group M demonstrated a delayed but statistically significant decline in HR and MAP starting five minutes after extubation, also persisting through to the 30-minute mark, compared to group C (P < 0.001 for all post-extubation measurements; Table 3).

The level of sedation, determined using the Ramsay Sedation Score, was substantially higher in both group D and group M relative to controls [median (Q1 - Q3): 2 (1 - 3) and 1 (1 - 2), respectively, versus 1 (1 - 1); P < 0.001]. Moreover, group D showed markedly deeper sedation relative to group M (P < 0.001), indicating a more pronounced sedative effect of DEX (Table 3).

5. Discussion

Emergence from GA is often associated with adverse responses, such as coughing, elevated HR, and increased BP (16). In the present study, both DEX and MgSO4 were found to be effective in reducing the intensity and frequency of emergence cough compared to saline controls. When comparing the MgSO4 group to controls, HR and MAP were markedly reduced starting five minutes post-extubation, accompanied by a higher degree of sedation.

Several mechanisms may explain the cough-suppressing effects of MgSO4. These include its bronchodilatory properties via inhibition of cholinergic neuromuscular transmission, anti-inflammatory effects, NMDA receptor blockade in lungs and airways, and its ability to inhibit calcium-mediated smooth muscle contraction. Additionally, magnesium reduces endplate potential magnitude and decreases muscle fiber excitability by acting as a calcium channel blocker at presynaptic nerve terminals, thereby limiting acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction (17, 18).

Our findings harmonize with those reported by Deshpande et al. (19), who documented that DEX significantly suppressed emergence cough in cases undergoing mastoidectomy. However, contrary to our results, their study showed no significant antitussive effect with 30 mg/kg of MgSO4.

Similarly, studies by Rashmi et al. (20) and Tandon and Goyal (21) also concluded that DEX was more effective than MgSO4 in preventing emergence cough. Further support comes from investigations by Guler et al. (22) and Mistry et al. (23), who found that DEX at doses of 0.5 µg/kg and 0.3 µg/kg, respectively, substantially reduced cough incidence upon emergence from anesthesia. A systematic review and meta-analysis by Tung et al. (4), including 70 studies, demonstrated that DEX, fentanyl, remifentanil, IV lidocaine, intracuff lidocaine, and topical lidocaine all reduced moderate to severe peri-extubation coughing. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis ranked DEX as the most effective agent in reducing moderate to severe coughing.

Although DEX provided earlier and more profound hemodynamic stability, MgSO4’s delayed attenuation of HR and MAP after extubation may be advantageous in patients where sedation is undesirable, such as in ambulatory settings or patients requiring early postoperative neurological assessment. Therefore, MgSO4 offers a safer alternative for attenuating stress responses while minimizing the sedative burden.

Regarding MgSO4, our findings concur with a study by Hur et al. (15), which reported a reduction in cough severity following one-lung ventilation. However, in contrast to our study, MgSO4 did not reduce the overall incidence of coughing.

Jafarzadeh et al. (24) reported no substantial variation between DEX and MgSO4 in suppressing emergence cough, which differs from our findings. In another contrasting report, Kim et al. (25) found that DEX, administered as a 0.4 µg/kg/h infusion from induction to extubation, did not reduce coughing. This discrepancy may be explained by the use of desflurane for maintenance anesthesia, a volatile agent correlated with a high incidence of coughing (26).

Dexmedetomidine attenuates the stress response and stabilizes hemodynamics by activating central α2-receptors in the vasomotor center of the brainstem, resulting in reduced norepinephrine release, bradycardia, and hypotension (20). Sedation is achieved through parasympathetic activation and suppression of sympathetic tone originating from the locus coeruleus (27).

Magnesium sulfate exerts its hemodynamic effects via calcium channel antagonism, direct vasodilation, and inhibition of catecholamine release through sympathetic ganglion blockade, resulting in reduced arterial pressure. It also depresses sinus node activity and prolongs atrioventricular nodal refractoriness (19, 28). Its sedative effects stem from NMDA receptor inhibition — blocking the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the CNS — which also decreases the requirement for sedative-hypnotic agents during GA (17, 29).

Although sedation is often considered an undesirable side effect due to its potential to delay recovery and prolong post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stays, the sedation levels associated with both DEX and MgSO4 in this study were not sufficient to delay recovery or case transfer from PACU. Our findings regarding hemodynamic responses and sedation levels during emergence are consistent with those documented by Rashmi et al. (20), Deshpande et al. (19), and Jafarzadeh et al. (24). Similarly, Choudhary et al. (30) observed greater sedation in the DEX group relative to MgSO4, and greater sedation in the MgSO4 group relative to controls.

Concerning hemodynamic effects, Khadke and Gopal Agrawal (31) found that IV MgSO4 provided better hemodynamic stability than esmolol during emergence from GA. Likewise, Marashi et al. (14) reported that cases in the NS group exhibited higher levels of responsiveness and alertness post-extubation relative to those in the MgSO4 group. However, Tandon and Goyal (21) found no substantial variation in hemodynamic attenuation between DEX and MgSO4 groups, in contrast to our results.

5.1. Conclusions

Dexmedetomidine demonstrated superior performance in cough suppression, hemodynamic control, and sedation depth, without delaying postoperative recovery. Magnesium sulfate also provided considerable benefit, particularly in reducing airway irritation and stabilizing post-extubation hemodynamics.

5.2. Limitations

This study has limitations. Neuromuscular monitoring was not employed, despite the potential of MgSO4 to potentiate non-depolarizing muscle relaxants; however, no clinically significant recovery delays were observed. The trial was registered with PACTR (No. PACTR202308591985746) on August 17, 2023, after enrollment began, making delayed registration another limitation.

5.3. Future Studies

Future studies should incorporate quantitative neuromuscular monitoring to objectively assess this effect.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Kopa-Stojak PN, Pawliczak R. Comparison of the effects of active and passive smoking of tobacco cigarettes, electronic nicotine delivery systems and tobacco heating products on the expression and secretion of oxidative stress and inflammatory response markers. A systematic review. Inhal Toxicol. 2024;36(2):75-89. [PubMed ID: 38394073]. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958378.2024.2319315.
  • 2.
    Erhan OL, Ileri A, Bulut OK, Ozer AB. Passive Smoking Also Affects Recovery from Anaesthesia. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2017;45(4):242-3. [PubMed ID: 28868176]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5579222]. https://doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2017.46656.
  • 3.
    Reddy VV, Mallem D, Krishna SR, Kotra V, Chooi WH, Goh KW, et al. Perioperative Cardiopulmonary Complications in Smokers and Non-smokers Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Prospective Study. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2024;15(2):171-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976500x241246412.
  • 4.
    Tung A, Fergusson NA, Ng N, Hu V, Dormuth C, Griesdale DEG. Medications to reduce emergence coughing after general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124(4):480-95. [PubMed ID: 32098647]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.041.
  • 5.
    Shady O, Kamaly A, Hakim K, Hussien R. Pharmacological Methods to Decrease Coughing on Emergence Following General Anesthesia with Tracheal Intubation in Lower Abdominal Surgeries. Ain Shams Med J. 2021;72(4):741-53. https://doi.org/10.21608/asmj.2021.222673.
  • 6.
    Luthra A, Prabhakar H, Rath GP. Alleviating Stress Response to Tracheal Extubation in Neurosurgical Patients: A Comparative Study of Two Infusion Doses of Dexmedetomidine. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2017;8(Suppl 1):S49-56. [PubMed ID: 28936072]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5602261]. https://doi.org/10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_91_17.
  • 7.
    Vyas A, Singh Baghel K, Nandurkar P, Tripathi S. Comparison of conventional awake extubation with endotracheal tube – laryngeal mask airway exchange extubation for evaluation of respiratory and hemodynamic parameters during emergence in neurosurgical patients. Asian J Med Sci. 2022;13(12):37-42. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v13i12.47827.
  • 8.
    Venkitesh A, Angel Nelson A, Shetti AN. The Effect of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Shape on Post-extubation Sore Throat in Critically Ill Patients in a Rural Tertiary Care Hospital. Cureus. 2023;15(7). e42519. [PubMed ID: 37637631]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10457499]. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42519.
  • 9.
    Wong TH, Weber G, Abramowicz AE. Smooth Extubation and Smooth Emergence Techniques: A Narrative Review. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2021;2021:8883257. [PubMed ID: 33510786]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7822686]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8883257.
  • 10.
    Sakae TM, Souza RLP, Brand Uo JCM. Impact of topical airway anesthesia on immediate postoperative cough/bucking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2023;73(1):91-100. [PubMed ID: 33895219]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9801204]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.03.016.
  • 11.
    Lee S. Dexmedetomidine: present and future directions. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019;72(4):323-30. [PubMed ID: 31220910]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6676029]. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19259.
  • 12.
    Dahake JS, Verma N, Bawiskar D. Magnesium Sulfate and Its Versatility in Anesthesia: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. 2024;16(3). e56348. [PubMed ID: 38633961]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11021848]. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.56348.
  • 13.
    Hendrix JM, Garmon EH. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
  • 14.
    Marashi SM, Hassan Nikkhouei R, Movafegh A, Shoeibi G, Marashi S. Comparison of the Effects of Magnesium Sulfate and Remifentanil on Hemodynamic Responses During Tracheal Extubation After Laparotomy: A Randomized Double-blinded Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2015;5(4). e25276. [PubMed ID: 26478862]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4604289]. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.25276.
  • 15.
    Hur M, Kim JY, Kim DH, Yoo JY, Shin HB, Park B, et al. Antitussive effect of a magnesium infusion during anesthetic emergence in patients with double-lumen endotracheal tube: a randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12(10):5691-9. [PubMed ID: 33209401]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7656382]. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1977.
  • 16.
    Benham-Hermetz J, Mitchell V. Safe tracheal extubation after general anaesthesia. BJA Educ. 2021;21(12):446-54. [PubMed ID: 34840816]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8606605]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2021.07.003.
  • 17.
    Herroeder S, Schonherr ME, De Hert SG, Hollmann MW. Magnesium--essentials for anesthesiologists. Anesthesiol. 2011;114(4):971-93. [PubMed ID: 21364460]. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318210483d.
  • 18.
    An LJ, Gui B, Su Z, Zhang Y, Liu HL. Magnesium sulfate inhibits sufentanil-induced cough during anesthetic induction. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(8):13864-8. [PubMed ID: 26550339]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4613024].
  • 19.
    Deshpande JP, Panse NA, Madke EK. Comparative Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine and Magnesium Sulphate in Mitigating Pressor Response while Extubation in Patients undergoing Mastoidectomies. Arch Anesth Crit Care. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v8i3.9609.
  • 20.
    Rashmi P, S PK, K AK. Attenuating stress response of extubation in craniotomy: Dexmedetomidine vs magnesium sulphate. Int J Med Anesthesiol. 2021;4(1):118-21. https://doi.org/10.33545/26643766.2021.v4.i1b.208.
  • 21.
    Tandon N, Goyal S. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate in attenuation of airway and pressor responses during extubation in patients undergoing craniotomies. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2017;4(5):1033-7.
  • 22.
    Guler G, Akin A, Tosun Z, Eskitascoglu E, Mizrak A, Boyaci A. Single-dose dexmedetomidine attenuates airway and circulatory reflexes during extubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49(8):1088-91. [PubMed ID: 16095449]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00780.x.
  • 23.
    Mistry T, Purohit S, Arora G, Gill N, Sharma J. Attenuation of extubation responses: Comparison of prior treatment with verapamil and dexmedetomidine. J Neuroanaesthesiol Crit Care. 2018;3(1):33-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2348-0548.173234.
  • 24.
    Jafarzadeh E, Modir H, Moshiri E, Barsari FZ, Almasi-Hashiani A. Comparison of dexmedetomidine, lidocaine, magnesium sulfate, and remifentanil in cough suppression during endotracheal extubation: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Bali J Anesthesiol. 2022;6(3):171-6.
  • 25.
    Kim SY, Kim JM, Lee JH, Song BM, Koo BN. Efficacy of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on emergence agitation and quality of recovery after nasal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(2):222-8. [PubMed ID: 23524149]. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet056.
  • 26.
    White PF, Tang J, Wender RH, Yumul R, Stokes OJ, Sloninsky A, et al. Desflurane versus sevoflurane for maintenance of outpatient anesthesia: the effect on early versus late recovery and perioperative coughing. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(2):387-93. [PubMed ID: 19608808]. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181adc21a.
  • 27.
    Bindu B, Pasupuleti S, Gowd UP, Gorre V, Murthy RR, Laxmi MB. A double blind, randomized, controlled trial to study the effect of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic and recovery responses during tracheal extubation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29(2):162-7. [PubMed ID: 23878434]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3713660]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.111665.
  • 28.
    Biesenbach P, Martensson J, Lucchetta L, Bangia R, Fairley J, Jansen I, et al. Pharmacokinetics of Magnesium Bolus Therapy in Cardiothoracic Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018;32(3):1289-94. [PubMed ID: 29169799]. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2017.08.049.
  • 29.
    de Baaij JH, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ. Magnesium in man: implications for health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2015;95(1):1-46. [PubMed ID: 25540137]. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00012.2014.
  • 30.
    Choudhary N, Verma A, Verma J, Singh RP, Ray S, Sharma J. Comparison of Infusion Dexmedetomidine with Magnesium Sulphate for Attenuation of the Haemodynamic Response During Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients. Int J Acad Med Pharm. 2023;5(2):1505-12.
  • 31.
    Khadke SJ, Gopal Agrawal C. Comparison of IV magnesium sulphate and IV esmolol in attenuating hemodynamic extubation response after general anesthesia. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2020;7(3):457-65. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2020.083.
Indexed in

Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles