Coronary artery bypass graft surgery is a widely recognized procedure for improving cardiac function and enhancing patients' quality of life (
12). However, it is also associated with a considerable risk of postoperative delirium, which remains a significant clinical concern (
13). Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartic acid antagonist that modulates noradrenergic and serotonergic neurons in the locus coeruleus, is an anesthetic with analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. It aids postoperative recovery and satisfaction in cardiac surgery patients by reducing C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels. Recent studies have indicated that the impact of ketamine administration on the incidence of delirium following CABG surgery is still not well-defined (
14,
15).
Hence, additional studies are required in this field to enhance postoperative recovery and mitigate the potential risks associated with ketamine administration. In this study, we opted to administer ketamine via infusion at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg, not exceeding 50 mg, over a maximum duration of 5 minutes during anesthesia induction. This approach was designed to leverage its anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties while minimizing the risk of adverse effects typically associated with higher dosages (
16-
18).
The findings of this study suggest that intravenous ketamine administration during anesthesia induction significantly lowered the incidence of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing CABG surgery. Specifically, ketamine showed a protective effect against delirium at both 24 and 48 hours after surgery, highlighting its potential as an effective intervention in this high-risk group. This result is particularly important considering the considerable negative impact of delirium on patient outcomes, including extended ICU stays, elevated healthcare costs, and long-term cognitive deterioration. Although ketamine was associated with a lower delirium incidence, event counts were small and the study remained moderately powered. Effect size estimates (RR = 0.17, NNT = 5) suggest potential clinical benefit, but confirmatory multicenter trials are required. The exploratory nature and limited statistical power of subgroup analyses also warrant cautious interpretation.
The reduction in delirium incidence with ketamine use aligns with its pharmacological properties, including its NMDA receptor antagonism and anti-inflammatory effects (
8,
15).
Our study aligns with the findings of Hudetz et al. and Siripoonyothai and Sindhvananda (
8,
13) Hudetz et al. demonstrated that administering ketamine at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg during anesthesia induction for cardiac surgery with CPB effectively reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium (P = 0.01) (8). Siripoonyothai and Sindhvananda found that ketamine infusion at a dose of 1 mg/kg/h during CPB reduced delirium incidence within 24 hours postoperatively (P = 0.04) (
8).
Additionally, Wittwer et al. observed no significant difference in the incidence of delirium between patients administered ketamine at doses of 1 - 2 mg/kg and those receiving propofol (P = 0.23) (
2). Similarly, a study on orthopedic surgery patients revealed no notable difference in postoperative mental status between those who received a ketamine bolus of 0.5 mg/kg and the placebo group (
19). Cameron et al. also reported no difference in the incidence of delirium between the ketamine and placebo groups in a cohort of 80 patients undergoing CABG surgery (P = 0.28) (
20).
Notably, our findings contrast with those of several large, high-quality studies reporting no benefit of ketamine in the prevention of postoperative delirium. In a multicentre randomized controlled trial involving 672 patients undergoing major cardiac and non-cardiac surgery, Avidan et al. found that intraoperative ketamine administration (0.5 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion) did not reduce the incidence of delirium compared with placebo (
16). Similarly, Hovaguimian et al., in a systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials, concluded that ketamine had no significant effect on postoperative delirium prevention (
14). The discrepancies between these neutral findings and our results may be explained by several methodological and clinical differences across studies, including heterogeneity in patient populations (mixed surgical cohorts versus isolated CABG procedures), ketamine dosing strategies, timing and duration of administration, and the delirium assessment instruments used. Importantly, the length of postoperative follow-up may have played a critical role, as many of the negative studies assessed delirium beyond 48 hours, thereby capturing delayed-onset delirium that may not have been detected within the limited observation window of our study.
Additional differences can be observed when comparing our results with those of Wittwer et al. Several methodological factors may account for the divergent findings. First, the studies employed different delirium screening tools; Wittwer et al. used the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU), whereas we applied the ICDSC. Although both instruments are validated, they differ in sensitivity and diagnostic thresholds, potentially influencing delirium detection rates. Second, the study populations varied substantially. Wittwer et al. included elderly patients (≥ 70 years) undergoing complex cardiac surgeries, such as multivalve procedures and redo sternotomies, while our trial was restricted to patients undergoing isolated CABG with a wider age range (40 - 80 years) (
2). Differences in age, surgical complexity, and baseline vulnerability to delirium may therefore have contributed to the observed outcome variability. Furthermore, the comparator interventions were not equivalent, as ketamine was compared with propofol in Wittwer et al.’s study (
2), whereas our trial employed a placebo control during anesthesia induction. Variations in ketamine dosing and anesthetic protocols may have further influenced the results.
Taken together, these differences in study design, patient characteristics, assessment methodologies, and follow-up duration underscore the inherent complexity of delirium research. Given the conflicting evidence in the current literature, our findings should be interpreted cautiously and considered hypothesis-generating rather than definitive. Confirmation in larger, multicentre trials with standardized delirium assessment tools and extended postoperative follow-up is warranted before ketamine can be recommended as a routine strategy for delirium prevention in patients undergoing CABG surgery.
In our triple-blind randomized clinical trial, we examined the effect of intravenous ketamine on the incidence of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing CABG surgery. The results show that administering ketamine at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg significantly reduces the occurrence of delirium at both 24 and 48 hours following surgery in this patient group.
Our findings suggest that a single intraoperative dose of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) may be associated with a reduced incidence of early postoperative delirium in patients undergoing CABG, potentially offering a simple and low-cost intervention within the anesthetic protocol for this high-risk population. If confirmed, such an effect could have downstream implications for ICU resource utilization and associated healthcare costs, although these secondary outcomes were not formally assessed in our study.
It is important to note, however, that the observed effect is based on a small number of delirium events — particularly only two cases in the ketamine group — and was limited to a 48 hour observation window, which may not capture delayed-onset delirium, the peak incidence of which often occurs beyond this timeframe. Furthermore, we did not systematically collect data on ketamine-related adverse effects (e.g., emergence phenomena, hemodynamic instability), limiting our ability to conduct a comprehensive risk-benefit assessment.
While our results contribute to the ongoing discussion on pharmacological strategies for delirium prevention, they should be interpreted as preliminary. The absence of biomarker, neuroimaging, or long-term cognitive assessments precludes any inference regarding neuroprotection or lasting neurological benefits. Rather than indicating a definitive therapeutic role, our findings support the need for larger, rigorously designed trials that include extended follow-up, standardized delirium screening, and thorough safety monitoring. Such studies are necessary before ketamine can be recommended as a routine adjunct in the perioperative care of CABG patients.
5.1. Limitations
A limitation of our study was its single-center design, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other institutions and populations. Additionally, due to time constraints, this study focused only on delirium incidence at 24 and 48 hours post-surgery, without examining the long-term effects of ketamine on delirium or other postoperative complications. Our 48 hour follow-up may have missed delayed-onset delirium, potentially underestimating true incidence. Moreover, the absence of systematic adverse event monitoring prevents a comprehensive risk–benefit assessment of ketamine in this context. Although our age range (40 - 80 years) reflects the typical demographic undergoing CABG in our clinical setting, the relative underrepresentation of older adults — particularly those over 80, who are at highest risk for delirium — may limit the applicability of our findings to more elderly populations. Convenience sampling may further limit the generalizability of our findings, and we did not assess long-term cognitive outcomes after hospital discharge. Furthermore, the exclusion of patients with psychiatric disorders, cerebrovascular disease, or high BMI limits the applicability of our results to many real-world CABG patients who commonly present with these comorbidities. Future studies are recommended to be conducted on larger and more diverse populations, including patients with various comorbidities and demographic differences, to enhance the generalizability of the results and gain a better understanding of ketamine's effects in different groups.
5.2. Conclusions
This study suggests that a single intravenous dose of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) administered during anesthetic induction may be associated with a lower incidence of early postoperative delirium in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, with reduced rates observed at both 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. However, the small number of delirium events — particularly only two cases in the ketamine group — substantially limits the strength and precision of these findings. Additionally, the 48 hour follow-up window may have missed delayed-onset delirium, potentially underestimating the true incidence. While these preliminary results support further exploration of ketamine’s role in delirium prevention, they should be interpreted with caution. Larger, multicenter randomized trials with extended follow-up periods, standardized delirium assessment protocols, and comprehensive monitoring of ketamine-related adverse effects are essential before any recommendations for clinical implementation can be made. This study contributes to ongoing efforts to identify effective strategies for mitigating postoperative delirium, a common and serious complication in surgical populations.