The findings of the current investigation demonstrate that several perinatal characteristics, including maternal chronological age at the time of delivery, level of maternal education attained, infant weight at birth, child weight at the time of assessment, and documented history of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia within the initial postpartum period exhibited meaningful associations with variations in cognitive performance as evaluated during early childhood.
Based on the results, the cognitive scores of 3 toddlers (6%) fell into the At Risk Group, 5 toddlers (10%) fell into the Emerging Group, and the remaining 42 toddlers (84%) were classified into the Competent Group which is within acceptable ranges according to the guidelines of the Bayley test (
8,
9).
Study participants were selected based on specific inclusion criteria in order to establish a well-defined sample population suitable for addressing the research questions. Individuals between 18 - 22 months of age residing in Zahedan City who had no documented health conditions or developmental abnormalities based on comprehensive medical records were considered eligible. Additionally, only those minor subjects whose parents or legal guardians provided written informed consent were enrolled. Selecting infants in this age range captures a critical developmental window where major cognitive advancement occurs and allows the validated Bayley scales to be used. Comprehensive records provide important perinatal and neonatal data like birth weight, maternal age, and delivery complications that may impact cognitive development. Restricting the geographic boundary to people living in the Zahedan area reduces variability from other regions and represents the local population. Obtaining written informed consent from parents or legal guardians was necessary to confirm voluntary enrollment, which is a crucial ethical principle when involving human subjects, particularly pediatric populations, in research activities. Overall, these criteria allow access to a specific population during a key developmental timeframe while also ensuring ethical research standards.
The exclusion criteria for premature birth and neonatal hospitalization were chosen for several important reasons. Premature birth is a known risk factor for adverse cognitive outcomes, so excluding premature infants eliminates a major confounding variable. Neonatal hospitalization suggests complications or illnesses that could independently impact cognition so excluding these cases controls for health status. Together, these criteria allow the study to focus on a relatively homogenous, healthy sample of "low-risk" toddlers at baseline and assess the impact of more subtle variables. By excluding premature infants and those hospitalized as newborns, variability from pre-existing conditions is reduced. This helps establish a sample of healthy infants to then identify perinatal and postnatal factors subtler than major prematurity or illness that may still impact cognitive development. Overall, these exclusion criteria minimize major confounding effects on cognition in order to isolate subtler factors.
Previous studies have found that maternal age is an important variable for cognitive development in children. Teenage mothers may face additional challenges, such as limited financial resources, lower social support, and lower educational attainment, which may indirectly affect children's cognitive development. They may have less access to prenatal care and are less well-informed about childrearing practices. On the other hand, older women may have more established careers and higher socioeconomic status. They may have more resources to invest in their child's development, such as better access to healthcare, quality education, and an enriched home environment (
10). Our study on the age range of our mothers (21 - 40 years) found a significant and negative association between maternal age and a child’s cognitive performance, which is consistent with previous findings. However, because the present study examined only the 21- to 40-year-old age groups, further studies examining the effects of maternal age across a broader range, including adolescent mothers (younger than 18 years) and older mothers (older than 40 years), are needed. Broadening the age range could provide further insights. Longitudinal studies tracking children of various age groups and their maternal caregivers over an extended period could elucidate longer-term impacts of maternal age on cognitive development. Direct comparisons between discrete maternal age brackets (e.g., adolescent vs. third-decade mothers) may explicate intergroup differences and mechanisms underlying associations between maternal age and child cognition. Additionally, evaluating interventions like social support, parenting education, and financial assistance for mitigating detrimental impacts on teen or older mothers could be informative. Repeating investigations across diverse populations and settings could assess generalizability and determine paternal age and paternal-maternal age interaction effects on youth development.
Maternal education is often associated with higher socioeconomic status, which may be beneficial for cognitive development in children. Mothers with higher levels of education tend to have better access to resources, such as books, educational toys, and a stimulating environment. They may also be more knowledgeable about child development and engage in enriching their interactions with their infants. Conversely, lower maternal education is associated with socioeconomic disadvantages that may negatively affect children's cognitive abilities. Limited access to resources and knowledge about child development may lead to fewer opportunities for cognitive stimulation and a less supportive home environment (
11). The results of our study also confirm this problem. However, further research is needed to examine how maternal education level influences the quality of mother-child interactions, availability and use of learning materials in the home, parenting knowledge and practices, and utilization of community resources supporting cognitive development. Studies should also analyze academic readiness and achievement as outcome measures, follow children longitudinally, consider generational effects and family influences, replicate findings in diverse populations, evaluate relevant parenting education programs, and assess mothers' beliefs about child development and how these relate to parenting approaches across education levels. A comprehensive understanding of how maternal education impacts toddler cognition will require observation of parent-child dynamics in the home, analysis of materials and experiences provided, consideration of broader family and community contexts, longitudinal tracking of academic trajectories, and replication in varied settings.
Babies born with low birth weight are at a higher risk of cognitive deficits in their development. This is because crucial brain development occurs during the later stages of pregnancy. Births that are too early or too small interrupt this normal process of brain development. Areas related to learning, memory, executive function, and language are the most affected (
6). This is contrary to the results of our study, which found a positive correlation between birth weight and cognitive status in infants.
Children’s weight and growth in infancy also affect their cognitive abilities. Malnutrition or being underweight can slow brain and body development. An adequate diet of healthy foods supports optimal brain growth and function, as neural connections multiply rapidly during infancy. Deficiencies in essential vitamins, minerals, and nutrients impede cognitive development (
12,
13). Our study also showed an association between the child’s weight and cognitive status.
Existing studies have linked untreated severe neonatal jaundice requiring phototherapy or exchange transfusion with poorer neurological outcomes and cognitive abilities later in childhood. Children may have deficits in fine motor skills, language development, memory, attention, and visuospatial processing (
14). Our study results were consistent with these findings.
This study, which found no correlation between breastfeeding and children’s cognitive abilities, differs markedly from much of the existing literature showing positive effects (
15,
16). There are some possible reasons for this discrepancy, such as the timing of the study (most studies show effects occurring later, such as at school-going age). Testing may have been too early to detect more subtle effects); the definition of breastfeeding-the "all/none" categorization does not account for the dose-response observed at longer durations (e.g., > 6 months) and the limited sample size.
5.1. Limitations
This investigation has several limitations that should be acknowledged. The sample size of 50 toddlers from a specific geographic region may not be fully representative of the broader population. The narrow age range of 18-22 months provides insights into a critical developmental stage but cannot characterize longer-term trajectories. The binary categorization of breastfeeding did not account for dose-response effects that may occur at longer durations. Causation cannot be determined from the observed statistical associations. Additionally, the observational design means other unaccounted variables may impact findings. Follow-up studies should enroll larger, more diverse samples across expanded age ranges. Breastfeeding should be treated as a continuous variable measuring duration. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs may better isolate causal mechanisms. Overall, while this study identified meaningful associations during a key developmental window, the limitations affect generalizability and causal inferences.
5.2. Conclusions
Our investigation discovered a correlation between increased neonatal birth weights (within normal parameters) and sufficient infantile weight gain, as well as advanced maternal educational attainment and the absence of neonatal jaundice, with elevated cognitive assessment results at 18 - 22 months of age. Inversely, toddlers within the same age range gestated by older maternal subjects displayed decreased cognitive scores. Through examination of the statistical association, we can ascertain the underlying causal mechanisms of this relationship. Additional research endeavors should be conceived and actualized to garner further elucidation.