This cross-sectional study of 182 children with suspected epilepsy at a tertiary hospital in Southern Vietnam provides insight into routine EEG utilization and diagnostic yield. The prevalence of abnormal EEG findings was 54.4%, and age and neurological history were identified as robust independent predictors. These findings highlight the context-dependent nature of EEG interpretation in pediatric seizure disorders.
The strong association between older age (3 - < 13 years) and abnormal EEG findings is consistent with neurophysiological maturation, whereby epileptiform patterns become more reliable after infancy (
12). A study from Indonesia reported abnormal EEG findings in 53.8% of children with first unprovoked seizures, most of whom were aged > 5 years (
13). The prevalence in our cohort (54.4%) likely reflects a referred population with a higher pretest probability. Supporting evidence comes from Owolabi et al., who found that older age was independently associated with abnormal EEG findings in Saudi children (
14). Conversely, the lower yield in children aged < 3 years highlights diagnostic challenges related to less specific electrographic patterns (
12). However, cautious interpretation is warranted. Alternative explanations include referral bias, as younger children with febrile seizures may undergo EEG less often; the potential underrepresentation of sleep EEG in younger children because no sedation was used; and the peak incidence of mid-childhood epilepsy syndromes, such as absence epilepsy and Rolandic epilepsy (
15). After adjustment for seizure type, the age effect remained robust (aOR = 6.44). Nevertheless, residual confounding by these factors cannot be excluded, suggesting that the age effect reflects both biological maturation and contextual factors.
The association between a history of neurological disorders and abnormal EEG findings was significant (aOR = 2.92), corroborating studies linking structural-genetic etiologies to EEG patterns (
9). This finding supports prioritizing EEG in this high-risk subgroup, in contrast to some broader studies in which definitional differences may explain null findings (
14).
Febrile presentation, defined as temperature ≥ 38°C, showed a strong trend toward normal EEG findings (aOR = 0.39; P = 0.06), supporting the distinction between acute symptomatic seizures and unprovoked epileptic activity. This contrasts another study, in which 83.2% of children with suspected epilepsy presented with fever, although the EEG correlation was not directly examined. Ko et al. (
16) further demonstrated that EEG abnormalities in patients with febrile seizures are often linked to underlying encephalopathy rather than predicting future epilepsy.
The lack of an association between abnormal EEG findings and laboratory markers, such as monocytosis and lymphocytosis, is noteworthy. Although Shayo et al. reported a similarly high rate of generalized seizures (82.4% vs 66.7%), their analysis did not examine hematological correlates (
17). This reinforces the principle that epilepsy diagnosis remains rooted in clinical history and EEG rather than routine bloodwork, as emphasized in recent reviews (
18).
Clinical heterogeneity reflects real-world referral practice. The main findings remained robust in sensitivity analyses, including analyses excluding febrile children and analyses stratified by neurological history. However, the small febrile subgroup (n = 33) limits definitive inference, and the nonsignificant trend warrants caution. Unmeasured factors, such as vitamin D deficiency, which is highly prevalent in children with epilepsy treated with anticonvulsants, may confound associations between clinical history and EEG findings and should be explored in future research (
19).
5.1. Limitations
Several limitations should be considered. First, clinical heterogeneity and modest sample sizes for key subgroups, including febrile children (n = 33), focal seizures (n = 32), and adolescents (n = 15), precluded robust stratified analyses and limited generalizability to these subgroups. Second, the EEG protocol did not systematically incorporate sleep deprivation, prolonged monitoring, or sedation; therefore, younger children may have had fewer sleep recordings, potentially underestimating abnormalities in this age group. Third, residual confounding by unmeasured variables, such as antiepileptic drug use, timing since the last seizure, and socioeconomic status, as well as possible referral bias, because physicians may order EEG more selectively in older children, cannot be excluded. Fourth, this single-center study was conducted in a referred, higher-risk population and may not be generalizable to community or primary care settings, although the findings are likely applicable to similar tertiary centers in low- and middle-income countries.
5.2. Conclusions
In conclusion, at a tertiary referral center in Southern Vietnam, EEG diagnostic yield varied by age and clinical context; children aged ≥ 3 years and those with neurological disorders benefited most. These findings apply primarily to selective referral settings in low- and middle-income countries and not to community or primary care populations. In febrile infants and young children, normal EEG findings should be interpreted cautiously. A stratified approach is recommended for afebrile children aged ≥ 3 years and those with neurological disorders. Extrapolation to febrile or focal seizure subgroups requires caution because of small sample sizes.