Forty-five of 5329 (0.8%) pregnant women who delivered their babies in the Niknafs hospital reported opium consumption. This number is likely an underestimate of the true prevalence of opium usage during pregnancy in this population since the data were obtained solely by maternal self-reports in the postpartum period. Many women addicted to illicit drugs may have denied the fact because they were not confident of remaining anonymous and suspected legal persecution. Some simply did not believe that their addiction might have been harmful to their babies, and therefore declined participation in the survey. Unwillingness for disclosure of addiction and fear of legal persecution has been reported by other researchers, too (
2,
4,
9,
10,
18,
26). Data collection through self-reporting is a cost-effective way to assess the effects of illicit drug usage during pregnancy. This method has been applied in many other studies (
4,
9,
27,
28). Substance-abusing mothers are more likely to be young (
14,
29), usually within the age range of 18-30 (
14). In the current investigation, the opium-addicted mothers were in the age range of 16 - 43, a wider range compared to previous reports. We found a significant difference in the educational level between the addicted and control subjects. Twenty-eight cases (62.2%) did not receive education beyond primary school. Lower level of education in pregnant addicts has been observed in previous studies (
14,
29). In this study, opium was the only illicit substance of abuse and there was not a significant difference in the usage rate between residents of urban and rural areas. All women of rural areas in the opium-addicted and control groups as well as the majority of women of urban areas in both groups were housewives. Opium-addicts had significantly lower economic condition (P = 0.001). The correlation between lower household income and addiction during pregnancy has been found in previous studies (
4,
7). In a report by Correia et al. 59% of 164 pregnant addicts were unemployed (
29). Abdel-Latif et al. reported that neonates of substance-using mothers in rural areas of New South Wales were exposed more frequently to nonopioid drugs, whereas neonates from such mothers in urban areas were often exposed to opiates (
4). Hans et al. reported that black women and poorer women particularly use cocaine, while white women and better educated women are more likely to use alcohol (
7). Considering prenatal care, our data did not show a significant difference between opium-addicted cases and the control group. In a review by Schempf et al. early prenatal care was defined as an initial visit within the first trimester with four or more total visits. Having an unwanted pregnancy and not receiving early prenatal care were associated with both cocaine and opiate abuse (
2). In another report, pregnant addicts had limited prenatal care and did not receive drug therapy (
26). In several previous studies, poor prenatal care was a common problem in alcohol consumers (
12,
17,
30). In a report from Portugal, 82% of 164 pregnant addicts had not planned their pregnancy and had attended their first prenatal clinic in the 19th week of pregnancy (
29). The opium-addicted and control groups in the current study did not differ regarding the adequacy of prenatal care, i.e. at least two prenatal visits to an obstetric clinic at 6 - 10 weeks and 26 - 30 weeks of gestation, and obtaining prenatal laboratory tests. While these criteria provide a reasonable measure of comparing groups within this specific population, lack of further prenatal care details limit the generalizability of the findings to other investigations which used more stringent definition for adequate prenatal care within their study population. Our data indicated that, compared to the control group mothers, the opium-addicted women were more likely to have opium-addicted husbands. Substance-abusing women commonly have relationship with men who are also drug users (
7,
29). These women were likely to have been raised by parents who were substance abusers, and they may have addicted children as well (
2,
20). The majority of cases in the present study had opium smokers in their family including their husbands or other close relatives.
Results of laboratory tests for sexually-transmitted diseases in the present study were negative in the both groups. In a report from Spain, two of 16 heroin-addicted pregnant women had a history of syphilis and five were positive for HIV infection (
1). In a 10-year survey from Spain on infants of substance-using pregnant women, HIV infection was found in 2% and hepatitis C infection in 3% of neonates (
31). In another 10-year survey from Croatia, of 85 pregnant heroin and/or methadone addicts, 49% were hepatitis C virus and 14% hepatitis B virus carriers (
32). In a report by Correia et al. 61% of 164 pregnant addicts were unmarried (
29). They possibly had multiple partners. Some of them were polydrug users, practicing different routes of administration such as injection. Absence of sexually-transmitted diseases in our population may be due to all participants being married women, maintaining a single partner, and using inhalation rather than injection method. The rate of abnormal serology in pregnant women who use opiates is directly related to the route of drug administration and lifestyle (
5). In our study, both groups did not report heavy cigarette smoking during pregnancy, and did not drink alcohol. In a report from Australia, 62% of pregnant women presented in a methadone therapy clinic, smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day (
12). In a survey from USA, over half of pregnant and 2/3 of nonpregnant women used cigarettes and alcohol (
14). Cigarette smoking among mothers who used cocaine and/or opiate resulted in significantly lower birth weight in their newborns (
15). In a sample of polydrug abusers, the adverse outcomes of smoking in the newborns were more serious than that of substance abuse (
16). Cigarette smoking is strongly related to fetal growth restriction, while alcohol is a known teratogen (
2). In Iran, cigarette smoking is not socially accepted for women, and alcohol consumption is forbidden in Islamic countries.
All of the cases in this study were single-drug abusers. In a recent study from Tehran (capital of Iran), the prevalence of substance abuse among 100,620 deliveries in five university hospitals was 0.5%. The most common abused substance was opium (62.6%), followed by crack (a mixture of heroin and amphetamine, 20.3%) (
25). In a study by Lifshitz et al. 12 (54.5%) of 22 female drug abusers were addicted to two to three drugs (
11). In a report from Croatia, a combination of heroin and methadone had been used in 11% of 85 pregnancies (
32). Consumption of different classes of substances has been observed in several studies (
3,
15,
19,
29). The high incidence of poly-substance abuse further complicated the attribution of specific perinatal complications to a specific substance (
9). None of our cases received methadone therapy. This kind of therapy is not a routine treatment in obstetric clinics of Iran, and pregnant addicts are usually advised to decrease the drug dosage. Treatment of opium-addicted women with methadone seemed to increase the growth parameters of their infants compared with women who did not receive methadone (
26). Early administration of methadone in heroin-addicted pregnant women was associated with increased maternal care and reduced premature labor (
12). On the other hand, there has been some evidence that methadone, when used in pregnancy, has been associated with an increased risk of perinatal mortality, premature delivery, and LBW, compared to nonusers (
5). The risks and benefits of methadone therapy should be carefully evaluated before its administration.
There were no maternal perinatal death in the opium-addicted group, but one mother died of severe dystocia in the control group. Premature delivery and PROM were more prevalent in the cases with opium abuse, but were not significantly higher than control group. Several studies showed that maternal use of heroin and other opiates increased the risk of abruptio placenta, eclampsia, premature labor, stillbirth, and intrauterine growth retardation (
2,
26). Vucinovic et al. showed that premature delivery was significantly more common in pregnant addicts (
32). Fajemiokun-odudeyi et al. showed that opiate usage in pregnant women carried a significant risk of preterm delivery that might be associated with other lifestyle factors rather than drug usage itself (
5). There have been other studies reporting that maternal use of opiate or cannabis did not seem to be associated with LBW or preterm birth (
2,
3). Aside from an anorexic effect, no other mechanism for the effect of opiates on fetal growth or timing of delivery has been described (
2). Drug abuse is one of the predisposing factors for a high-risk pregnancy and its complications include interventional or instrumental delivery. In a report from Israel, out of 22 female drug abusers admitted to the delivery room, four were subjected to C-section for maternal reasons (
11). A case-control study by Goler in USA showed that the prevalence of C-section in pregnant addicts and controls were relatively similar (17.2% vs. 17.8%) and all of the C-sections were due to obstetrical reasons (
33). The results of our study showed that C-section delivery was more prevalent in control subjects, and more than 1/3 of C-section procedures in this group were due to the mothers’ wishes. C-section deliveries in opium abuse cases were less frequent but more likely due to obstetrical reasons.
Prematurity and LBW are linked with low Apgar score and neonatal death. We did not find low 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores in the neonates of both groups. There was no neonatal death in either group of infants in the current study. In a previous report, 5-minute Apgar scores for 23 of 24 narcotic-exposed neonates were 9 or 10 (
11). In Vucinovic’s study, seven of 85 opiate-exposed newborns (8%) had 5-minute Apgar score ≤ 7. In their study of prenatal opiate exposure, 21% of the infants were premature, 33% had LBW, and four died in the neonatal period (
32). Infants of substance-using mothers were significantly more likely to have lower gestational age, birth weight and head circumference compared with nonexposed infants (
4).
In the present study, the frequency of LBW among the opium-exposed neonates was significantly higher than the control group neonates (20% vs., 6.6%, respectively), but there was no significant difference in the head circumferences between the two groups. Two other limited studies found no differences in head circumference or delivery time among opiate-exposed and nonexposed infants (
34,
35). In another investigation, opiate usage was not significantly related to LBW after adjustment of smoking and lack of prenatal care (
2). There were six premature babies in nine LBW cases in our study. The opium-addicted women, the majority of whom had poor economic condition, were at higher risks of PROM and premature labor. Consequences of drug abuse will result from a combination of specific toxic effects of illicit drugs and nonspecific effects of the environment (
30). The incidence of congenital anomalies in our study was 2.2% (1 of 45) in the both groups. The incidence of congenital anomalies in several previous reports varied from 2.8% to 16.3% (
4,
19,
31). In a report from Croatia, the risk of congenital anomalies was 3-fold in a group of addicted mothers (
32). No consistent pattern of anomalies has been attributed to illicit drug usage in large-scale epidemiological studies (
2,
10).
Our data indicated that 32 of 45 (71.1%) opium-exposed newborns suffered from NAS. Newborns with NAS score of ≥ 8 were transferred to the neonatology unit for treatment. A factor not recorded as part of our study was the duration of hospitalization. In a previous report, the need for treatment for NAS was a major reason for transferring neonates born to opioid-dependent women to the neonatology unit (
12).
A potential limitation of this study was that we did not ask about the previous history of maternal medical illnesses such as diabetes or hypertension, stillbirth or abortion, history of illnesses in the neonates' siblings, and the number of children in the family. Another significant limitation was the small sample size which probably affected the outcomes.
The study population investigated in this research was a unique sample of pregnant addicts. Contrary to many previous studies, our study group members were not polydrug abusers, heavy cigarette smokers, alcohol consumers, or unmarried women with unwanted pregnancies, and were not positive for antibodies of sexually-transmitted infections. Similar to many other reports, majority of the participants especially among the opium-addicted group, were from low socioeconomic backgrounds with poor levels of education, and a familial structure encouraging their addiction such as husbands practicing substance abuse. Subjects were addicted to opium smoking as opposed to alternative methods of drug delivery such as injection. While the results did not reveal any significant difference between the study and control groups regarding the obstetric complications in mothers, opium-exposed infants, compared to the control group, were more likely to be categorized as LBW. These data should be interpreted considering the exact role of in-utero opium exposure beside other genetic, personal, and environmental factors which probably contributed to the fetal growth restriction.