The proteins carrying the Rh antigens are transmembrane proteins, structurally similar to ion channels. Either placental sensitization or transfusion leads to the development of antibodies against Rh factor (
1). Rh antigens are located only on red blood cells (RBC) and RhO (D) antigen is the most important antigen in the Rh system, as it is highly immunogenic. Asians are reported to have less than 1% of the RhD-negative blood group and alleles (
1). Red blood cells lacking Rh antigens are known to have an abnormal shape, increased osmotic fragility and thus, shortened life span leading to hemolytic anemia. Despite tremendous advances, the incidence of Rh alloimmunization remains as an important cause for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, more so in the developing countries with limited anti D availability. A study from west Bengal reported an incidence of 2.4% Rh-negative woman (16/657) (
4). Although it is less than 10%, a neonate with isoimmuzation is a medical emergency (
1-
4). Transplacental passage of maternal antibodies in Rh isoimmunization results in the hemolytic disease of fetus and neonate (HDFN) due to immune hemolysis of fetal or neonatal RBC5. This leads to progressive anemia coupled with hypoalbuminemia and fetal heart failure (hydrops fetalis), an important cause for still births and early neonatal deaths. Those who survive can manifest with hyperbilirubinemia, anemia, kernicterus and neonatal morbidity and mortality (
6,
7).
Rh D is the most potent immunogen with even 0.1 to 1 mL of Rh D positive red cells stimulating antibody production (
5,
8). The identification of antibodies in the mother predicts the potential risk for HDFN and Rh-negative women with initial absence of antibodies requires prophylaxis. When prophylactic Rh IG is administered, anti D can be detected up to 8 weeks by an indirect agglutination test/indirect coombs test [IAT/ICT]). Similarly, immune anti D becomes detectable by 4 weeks after exposure to D positive cells reaching its peak by 6 - 8 weeks. Prophylactic anti D levels fall with time while immune anti D levels remain stable or rise, differentiating both conditions (
8). Serial determination of antibodies coupled with medical history enables identification of either immune or prophylactic anti D. The antenatal screening protocol recommends all pregnant women to get tested for ABO, Rh D type along with a red cell antibody screen at 12 weeks of gestation (
9). When significant antibody titers are detected, periodic monthly retesting till 32 weeks, followed by twice weekly till term are recommended. If alloantibodies are absent in the first antenatal visit, screening needs to be repeated at 28 - 32 weeks and no further screening is needed if the titers are negative (
10). If a woman receives anti D injection, sampling should be done prior to the anti D injection.
In the present study, 70% of mothers had Rh-positive neonates, which is comparable to previous study by Agarwal et al. (
1). In the present study, the anti D coverage was 86% and the majority received it within 24 hours after the delivery of an Rh-positive neonate. Cochrane review shows that antenatal prophylaxis [100 µg, 500 UI of anti-D IgG at 28th to 34th weeks] reduces the risk of alloimmunization of Rh(D)-negative pregnant women from 1% to 0.2% along with the reduction in the immunization of subsequent pregnancies. Number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one case of sensitization is 213 (
5). However, literature reports that 1.8% of Rh (D)-negative women continue to produce anti-D antibodies despite postnatal prophylaxis, due to small transplacental hemorrhages during pregnancy 5.This could be tackled by anti D administration during pregnancy.
A multicentric systematic review by Bhutani et al. (
7) reported 0.36% of Rh disease with 24% risk for mortality, 13% risk for kernicterus and 11% for stillbirths. Three- quarters of mortality was reported from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Prevalence of kernicterus due to Rh disease from South Asia is 28 per 100000 live births. Majority of neonates with kernicterus had impairments. Countries with neonatal mortality rate (NMR) < 5 had good Rh prophylaxis and less Rh disease (
7). It has been reported that, 15% of women with previous sensitization develop Rh isoimmunization. An estimated prevalence for South Asia is 385 per 100000 in contrast to that of developed countries with a prevalence of 2.5 per 100000 live births. They reported a prevalence of Rh disease as 277/100,000 live births. Most of the Rh disease and extreme hyperbilirubinemia occurred in countries with NMR > 15, which accounts for 60% of the global live births. Walker et al. (
11) in their large series of Rh pregnancies reported that 33% of the neonates required no treatment. Also, in the current study 23.8% of the neonates did not require any treatment. Hsia et al. (
12) reported that 50% of neonates with peak TB > 30mg/dL, when untreated developed kernicterus, in par with observations reported by Mollison and Walker (
13). In the current study, only two neonates had extreme hyperbilirubinemia (TSB > 22mg/dL) requiring ET and had kernicterus and abnormal NSG. The incidence of kernicterus was 3.2%. Although this incidence rate is much less than the literature, it leads to permanent impairment in those children. The goal of optimum neonatal care includes prevention of kernicterus. These neonates in the present study were outborns and had features of kernicterus prior to the admission to the NICU and could not be reverted with exchange transfusion, as they had stage II kernicterus. However, they were under periodic neurodevelopmental follow-up and MRI imaging. The incidence of Rh isoimmunization has been reported to be 13% by Freda et al. (
14-
19) and the current study found an incidence of 14.3%,which was comparable. Also, 46.5% of the study neonates received IVIG and had showed decline in the bilirubin levels with immunoglobulin therapy. Mean phototherapy duration, and mean duration of hospitalization were significantly less in neonates treated with IVIG compared to other neonates. A randomized controlled study by Girish et al. from all India institutes of medical sciences, New Delhi, reported that neonates receiving 1g /kg of IVIG had shortened duration of phototherapy (55.4+/-49 hours in a high-dose group) when compared to those who received 0.5 g/kg (77.3+/-57.2). There was no significant difference in the duration of hospitalization between both the groups (8.4+/-6.9 and 13.6+/-14.8 days). In this study, only high-dose IVIG (1 g/kg/dose) was used with significant reduction in duration of phototherapy and hospitalization. Also, the mean duration of phototherapy and hospitalization in the IVIG group of the current study is comparable to the high- dose IVIG group of Girish et al. study (
20). Similarly, IVIG has also been used in Iran in HDFN (due to Rh isoimmunization) to reduce the need for exchange transfusion (
14). Immunoprophylaxis both during antenatal period as well as postnatal remains the prime mode of prevention of Rh disease especially in resource poor settings where intrauterine transfusions are not available, one like the present study. The anti D immunoprphylaxis was quite good in the present study, probably contributing to fewer incidences of Rh isoimmunization and kernicterus. Only 6.9% of the multipara mothers had still births. Presence of high serum bilirubin levels, DCT positivity and abnormal NSG in neonates born to grand multiparous mothers indirectly suggest their sensitization in previous pregnancies. As nations with higher NMR (≥ 15) are at the greatest risk for neonatal mortality from Rh disease and EHB, prevention of Rh sensitization and optimum care of every neonate along with management of extreme hyperbilirubinemia is a vital implementation priority.