Candida glabrata is a crucial non-
albicans species with increasing prevalence and resistance to antifungal drugs (
1,
25). Evaluating the diversity of molecular genotypes with antifungal susceptibility profiles of
C. glabrata is an essential technique for epidemiology investigation, population genetics analysis, and clinical practice guidelines. Some researchers used the six defined markers (ERG3, MTI, RPM2, GLM4, GLM5, and GLM6) for
C. glabrata analysis and reported different discriminatory powers, including 0.964 (
23), 0.941 (
11), 0.88 (
22), and 0.84 (
26). However, in our study, the highest discriminatory power was calculated to be 0.978 for the six markers.
Nineteen multi-loci unrelated MLP genotypes were detected in the 22
C. glabrata isolates, including two (10.5%) identical genotypes (G4 and G5) and 17 (89.5%) singleton genotypes. However, different studies have reported various numbers of genotypes in the form of candidiasis. For example, in a previous study in Iran, 35 different genotypes, (39.3% singletons genotypes and 60.7% identical genotypes) were identified among 61 vaginal isolates of
C. glabrata. (
23). Abbes et al. (
11) identified 37 genotypes for 85
C. glabrata isolates originating from different Tunisia sources. Of the isolates, 69.4% and 30.6% had shared and singleton genotypes, respectively. However, we observed no similarity between Abbes et al.’s genotypes detected in urine samples and our urine isolates. According to the MStree, two clusters of our genotypes (Clusters 1 and 2) were related to genotypes of
C. glabrata isolates reported in a previous study in Iran (
23). However, the third cluster was entirely connected with Chinese genotypes (
22). In the present study, Fst was > 0.05, and according to Abbes et al.'s study, this species has a low genetic differentiation level in different hospital wards (
27). In our hospital, 22.7% of the isolates had the same genotype. Moreover, Abbes et al. (
9) observed 38% similarity in the genotypes and considered interpatient transfers of isolates in the hospital essential in transmitting diseases.
All the
C. glabrata isolates were sensitive to fluconazole, and only three (13.6%) of the isolates were resistant to caspofungin. The highest resistance rate against fluconazole in the urinary
C. glabrata isolates was 50% in Singla et al.'s report (
28). In contrast, Patel and Bhavsar (
29) reported that 20% of
C. glabrata isolated from urine samples were resistant to fluconazole. Moreover, only one (5.6%) of urine isolates of
C. glabrata had MIC > 64 µg/mL for fluconazole in Brazil (
30). Hence, fluconazole is defined as the primary choice for candiduria treatment; however, amphotericin B can be used to treat azole-resistance isolates,
C. glabrata, and
C. krusei (
28). Resistance in
C. glabrata against caspofungin was diverse in reports, including 0.5, 4, 33.3, and 42.1% in different countries (
13,
22,
31,
32), although several researchers indicated no resistance (
33-
35).
Our results indicated that all the
C. glabrata isolates were wild-type for voriconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B. In a similar vein, Kooshki et al. (
36) reported that
C. glabrata isolates were all susceptible to amphotericin B, voriconazole, and itraconazole. Moreover, Nademi et al. (
37) reported that
C. glabrata isolated from nosocomial candiduria were all susceptible to amphotericin B at MIC ≤ 1, whereas only 25% of isolates in Singla et al.’s report (
28) had resistance to amphotericin B. Furthermore, Patel and Bhavsar showed that
C. glabrata isolates were all susceptible to voriconazole (
29). Also, 13, 35.3, 50, and 77.8% of
C. glabrata isolates were resistant to itraconazole in ST-Germain et al.’s (
15), Sellami et al.’s (
16), Singla et al.’s (
28), and Badiee et al.’s (
32) reports, respectively.
In the present study, 77.3% of the
C. glabrata isolates were non-wild type (MIC > 1 µg/mL) for posaconazole (
22). This result is inconsistent with the study conducted by Morales-Lo'pez et al. (
38) and Zarei Mahmoudabadi et al. (
31), showing that 100% of isolates were sensitive to posaconazole. However, Hou et al. (
22) showed that only 7.3% of
C. glabrata isolates from different sources were the non-wild type for posaconazole. Zaoutis et al. (
33) reported a range of 0.5 to < 16 µg/mL with MIC
90 = 2 µg/mL for 15
C. glabrata isolates. The deficient range of luliconazole, 0.00048 - 0.0039 µg/mL, with MIC
90 = 0.0018 in our study is comparable to that in Taghipour et al.’s study (
39). In our study, no differences were found regarding antifungal susceptibility or genotype profiles among the tested isolates associated with sources of isolates, similar to the results reported by Safdar et al. (
40) and Abbes et al. (
9).
Extracellular enzyme secretion was considered one of the virulence factors in
Candida species. Our results indicated that
C. glabrata isolates had no esterase and phospholipase activities. However, Sachin et al. (
41) showed a low phospholipase and hemolytic activity rate (28.5 and 21.4%, respectively) in
C. glabrata isolates. They also reported the highest enzymatic activity in proteinase (42.8%) among
C. glabrata isolated from different sources. Deorukhkar and Saini (
42) showed that enzymatic activity among
C. glabrata isolates originated from various clinical specimens, varying from 15% for hemolysin activity to 38.3% in phospholipase production. They also reported a proteinase production rate of 36.6% in these isolates.
5.1. Conclusion
It was found that high genetic diversity existed among the urinary C. glabrata isolates. Moreover, based on the MStree, two clusters of our genotypes were related to C. glabrata genotypes in a previous study in Iran, and the third cluster was entirely connected with Chinese genotypes. The majority of the isolates were the non-wild type for posaconazole, but were rarely resistant to other antifungals. Furthermore, hemolysin and proteinase secreted as the main virulence factors among the urinary C. glabrata isolates.