1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Study Samples
3.2. Antiseptic Susceptibility Testing
3.3. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
3.4. Detection of Genes
3.5. Typing of Bacterial Isolates
3.6. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Antibiotic Susceptibility Test
| Resistance Phenotype | Pattern | Values | Resistant Antibiotic | No. | Sensitive | No. | Having at Least A Gene | qacE | qacEΔ1 | qacE + qacEΔ1 | blaOXA-23 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XDR | A | 14 (20) | SAM, FEP, AMI, TOB, PI + TZ, CAZ, MEM, IMI, DOR, CIP, TGC | 11 | - | - | 9 (64.2) | 2 (14.28) | 2 (14.28) | 9 (64.2) | 14 (100) |
| MDR | B | 3 (4.2) | SAM, FEP, AMI, TOB, PI + TZ, CAZ, MEM, IMI, DOR, CIP | 10 | TGC | 1 | 1 (33.3) | 0 | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.6) | 3 (100) |
| C | 2 (2.8) | SAM, CAZ, MEM, TGC | 4 | FEP, AMI, TOB, PI + TZ, IMI, DOR, CIP | 7 | 1 (50) | 0 | 1 (50) | 0 | 1 (50) | |
| D | 2 (2.8) | SAM, MEM, TGC | 3 | FEP, AMI, TOB, PI + TZ, IMI, DOR, CIP, CAZ | 8 | 2 (100) | 0 | 0 | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | |
| E | 2 (2.8) | SAM, DOR, MEM, TGC | 4 | FEP, AMI, TOB, PI + TZ, IMI, CAZ, CIP | 7 | 2 (100) | 0 | 0 | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | |
| Non-MDR | F | 13(18.5) | SAM, TGC | 2 | FEP, AMI, TOB, PI + TZ, CAZ, MEM, IMI, DOR, CIP | 9 | 4 (30.7) | 1 (7.6) | 3 (23) | 6 (46.1) | 0 |
| G | 3 (4.2) | SAM | 1 | FEP, AMI, TOB, PI + TZ, CAZ, MEM, IMI, DOR, CIP, TGC | 10 | 1 (33.3) | 0 | 0 | 1 (33.3) | 0 | |
| H | 9 (12.8) | 0 | 0 | SAM, FEP, AMI, TOB, PI + TZ, CAZ, MEM, IMI, DOR, CIP, TGC | 11 | 2 (22.2) | 1 (11.1) | 0 | 1 (11.1) | 1 |
a DOR, doripenem: 10 mg; MEM, meropenem: 10 mg; TGC, tigecycline: 15 mg; IMI, imipenem: 10 mg; CAZ, ceftazidime: 30 mg; SAM, ampicillin + sulbactam: 20 mg; FEP, cefepime: 30 mg; AMI, amikacin: 30 mg; TOB, tobramycin: 10 mg; CIP, ciprofloxacin; PI + TZ, piperacillin + tazobactam.
b Values are expressed as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated.
4.2. Antiseptic Resistance Gene Distribution
4.3. Antibiotic Resistance Gene Distribution
| PCR Result for Antiseptic Resistance Genes | Values | BTC | P b | BKC | P b | CHG | P b | Resistance Gene, Distribution Pattern | BTC | BKC | CHG | blaOXA-23 c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | 53 (75.7) | 24.0 (1.9 - 62.5) | 0.001 d | 46.1 (1.9 - 125) | 0.001 d | 107.7 (31.2 - 250) | 0.001 d | qacE, 7 (13.2) | 15.90 (1.9 - 31.2) | 28.1 (1.9 - 62.5) | 53.3 (31.2 - 62.5) | 4 (6.7) |
| qacEΔ1, 11 (20.7) | 21.4 (1.9 - 62.5) | 27.8 (1.9 - 62.5) | 56.6 (31.2 - 62.5) | 9 (15.4) | ||||||||
| qacEΔ1 + qacE, 35 (66.0) | 26.5 (7.8 - 62.5) | 55.4 (7.8 - 125) | 134.7 (31.2-250) | 31 (52.5) | ||||||||
| Negative | 17 (24.3) | 10.56 (7.8-15.6) | 17.22 (3.9 - 62.5) | 29.4 (15.6 - 31.2) | 10.56 (7.8 - 15.6) | 17.22 (3.9 - 62.5) | 29.4 (15.6 - 31.2) | 15 (25.4) |
Abbreviations: BTC, benzethonium chloride; BKC, benzalkonium chloride; CHG, chlorhexidine digluconate.
a Values are expressed as mean (µg/mL) range or No. (%).
b One-way ANOVA test.
cblaOXA-23, antibiotic resistance gene.
d Significant.
4.4. Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations Against Antiseptics
5. Discussion
| Place of Study | Genes (Rate in %) | References | |
|---|---|---|---|
| qacE | qacE∆1 | ||
| Iran | |||
| North Khorasan | 13.2 | 20.7 | Current study |
| Ardabil | 26.3 | 73.7 | (40) |
| Hamadan | 1.1 | 36.9 | (41) |
| Qazvin | 17.5 | 92.5 | (42) |
| Tehran and Esfahan | 59 | 91.5 | (43) |
| Other countries | |||
| Australia and India | 100 | 46.2 % | (44) |
| Brazil | - | 48 | (45) |
| Egypt | 13.4 | 47.2 | (46) |
| Egypt | 33 | 78 | (44) |
| Germany | 2.7 | 10 | (22) |
| Saudi Arabia | 18.2 | - | (39) |
| Iraq | - | 97.1 | (47) |
| Bangladesh | 34.72 | 93.05 | (39) |
