Currently, CDI is regarded as a nationwide burden due to its increasing morbidity and mortality. The increasing incidence of CDI has been well- documented in many populations, especially among the elderly and in groups that were previously considered low risk (
5). Indeed, the incidence rates of CDI in some large tertiary health care centers in China were found to be similar to those reported in Western countries (
11,
16). Despite this, no epidemiological studies have been conducted to investigate
C. difficile in county level hospitals in China.
To our knowledge, this was the first report of the epidemiological features of strains isolated from a county level hospital in China. In the present study, 13.2% of all the samples were positive for toxigenic
C. difficile, which is similar to the corresponding rate in a tertiary hospital in the same province (
11).
In the present study, as the incidence of CDI was higher from June to August, it could be said that there is a seasonal (summer) correlation of CDI incidence. We speculate that increase in diarrhea incidence during the summer may be attributed to increased utilization of antibiotics in the winter and spring months. In Western countries, studies have found that patients are at a higher risk of CDI for 1 to 3 months following cessation of antibiotic therapy (
17). Therefore, it is expected that peak CDI incidence occurs between June and August after infection over winter and spring.
MLST genotyping identified 13 different STs for all the toxigenic strains with ST-54, ST-3, and ST-35 being the 3 most common types. Previous studies have reported ST-54, ST-35, and ST-37 as the top 3 prevalent genotypes in China (
18). In addition, Zhou et al. found ST-54 and ST-37 to be the prevalent genotypes in the Chinese city of Shanghai10. Therefore, the epidemiology of
C. difficile in the city of Wenling was similar to that seen in larger tertiary health care centers in China. ST-3 has been rarely reported as the main epidemic genotype in China, except in a report by Fang et al. (
19), who isolated ST-3 from cancer patients. In addition, ribotype 001 (ST-3) was identified as the most common PCR ribotype responsible for nosocomial infection in European countries9. However, Tian et al. found that the carrier rate of ST-3 in healthy infants and healthy adults was 32.7% and 11.0%, respectively (
20). This may be the reason why ST-3 was one of the most commonly encountered type seen in this study, as it is a county level hospital for first visit patients. Different geographical locations and antibiotic regimens used in these studies may be additional reasons. Thus, further work is needed to confirm our hypothesis.
Among these clinical isolates, A–B+ strains accounted for 11.5% of the toxigenic isolates, and all A–B+ strains belonged to ST-37. Although strains belonging to ST-37 do not produce a binary toxin, this was the main A–B+ strain found in a tertiary hospital in Hangzhou (
11), and it has been the reported cause of widespread disease in Asia. In addition, Huang et al. reported that ST-37 was the most common genotype in Shanghai (
21). Despite this, it is still unknown why A–B+ strains, and especially ST-37, cause widespread disease in Asia. Although the isolation rate of ST-37 was not as high as that reported previously, it is of concern because it was isolated at a county level hospital.
Metronidazole and vancomycin are the 2 most commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents for the treatment of
C. difficile infections in humans. In this study, all identified toxigenic stains showed susceptibility to metronidazole and vancomycin. According to EUCAST, the breakpoint for linezolid was 4 µg/mL. The toxigenic strains in our study were susceptible to linezolid with MIC
50 and MIC
90 values, which were considerably below 4 µg/mL. However, 1 toxigenic ST-37 strain showed reduced susceptibility to linezolid, with a MIC of 4 µg/mL. Marin et al. previously reported that linezolid has a high MIC against the isolates of toxigenic
C. difficile including ribotype 017(ST-37) (
22). Further studies are required to determine the possible mechanism of resistance in this strain.
Other studies have shown that strains commonly exhibit resistance to moxifloxacin, which was always associated with macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance (
23). Huang et al. conducted a study in Shanghai and found that 46.4% and 35.7% of 74
C. difficile isolates were resistant to moxifloxacin and tetracycline, respectively 24. However, the toxigenic strains in our study showed lower resistance rates to moxifloxacin and tetracycline (13.1% and 6.6%, respectively). This may be connected with the different antibiotic regimens used and the environmental factors unique to the city of Wenling. The toxigenic strains had high resistance rates to clindamycin, levofloxacin, and erythromycin. Nearly all of the toxigenic strains (96.7%, 59/61) were resistant to ciprofloxacin, which was similar to that reported by Huang et al. (
24).
Our study had several limitations. First, the population size was small and the surveillance period was short. During the 1.5-year period, only 460 patients were enrolled. This may be due to the lack of clinical suspicion of C. difficile infection in diarrhea in China, especially in hospitals at this county/provincial level. Second, detailed information for cases of infection was obtained only for some epidemiological characteristics, and risk factors for CDI were not analyzed. Furthermore, treatment and outcome characteristics of patients with CDI were not analyzed because most patients were discharged quickly or transferred to other hospitals.
In conclusion, the incidence of
C. difficile infection and molecular characteristics of the isolates in county level hospitals in this study were similar to those in nonoutbreak periods in some large tertiary health care hospitals in China (
11,
24). The results of the present study also indicate that CDI may be a common problem, and large-scale multicenter studies are required to reveal the actual extent of the burden of CDI in county level hospitals.