MDR
A. baumannii is an important pathogen that is involved in nosocomial infections especially in ICU wards. This bacterium is one of the most important problems encountered in hospitals, clinics and public health centers (
19). This organism is very difficult to eradicate due to its inherent and acquired resistance against multiple classes of antibiotics, so that very few effective therapeutic options remain available. Aminoglycosides have been an important group of antibiotics in treatment of serious bacterial infections, especially those with aerobic Gram negative bacteria, but recent reports indicated the emergence of resistance to aminoglycosides in
Acinetobacter isolates in different parts of the world. Aminoglycoside resistance in
Acinetobacter primarily results from inactivation of the antibiotic by specific modifying enzymes such as acetyl transferases, phosphotransferases, and adenylyl transferases.
This study focused on resistance to different aminoglycosides in clinically important isolates of A. baumannii, with emphasis on gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin. The prevalence of AMEs encoding genes were investigated in A. baumannii isolates recovered from patients hospitalized in Tabriz city in the North West of Iran. Findings of the present study showed that 65.11% of the studied Acinetobacter isolates were positive for aacC1 genes. This indicates a high prevalence of resistance due to aacC1 gene in the studied cases. Also other aminoglycoside−modifying enzyme genes detected by PCR were aphA6 (60.46 %), aadA1 (27.9 %) and aadB (18.6 %). These results indicate that the rate of resistance by aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme types aphA6, aadA1 and aadB have increased significantly over the past years.
Moniri et al. (
20) evaluated antimicrobial susceptibility and aminoglycoside resistance genes of sixty
Acinetobacter strains isolated from hospitalized patients in Kashan city. They reported the presence of acetyltransferase genes (aacC1) in 63.3% of
Acinetobacter isolates. Other genes including phosphotransferase (aphA6) and adenylyl transferase (aadA1 and aadB) were detected in 65%, 41.7% and 3.3%, of the isolates, respectively. In our study the prevalence of aphA6 and aadA1 genes was much lower than that reported from Kashan city but the prevalence of aadB genes was significantly higher in our study. These findings showed that clinical isolates of
Acinetobacter in hospitals carry various kinds of aminoglycoside resistance genes. Also,
Acinetobacter isolates in the study of Moniri et al. from Kashan city showed the highest resistance rate against amikacin, tobramycin and ceftazidim, respectively; while isolated bacteria were more sensitive to ampicillic/subactam. The resistance rates reported for amikacin and tobramycin were 80% and 68.3%, respectively. There is little difference between our findings and this study. In our study the resistance rate to amikacin was 81% and tobramycin 63%. Another study in Iran was done by Shahcheraghi and his colleagues in Tehran (
21), which showed the highest resistance (100%) to cefixime that was very similar to our study. The lowest resistance was reported against colistin (4.2 %) whereas in our study, 19% of isolates were resistant to colistin (
21).
In a study done by Lee and his colleagues in Korea in 2011 (
12), the majority of aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes detected by PCR were aacC1 (56%), aadB (48%), and aphA6 (71%) (
12). Nemec and his colleagues in Czech Republic in 2004 investigated the diversity of genes encoding aminoglycoside
−modifying enzymes and their association with class 1 integrons in
A. baumannii and reported aminoglycoside resistance genes in 95 % of isolates: aacC1 (n = 68), aadA1 (n = 68), aphA6 (n = 55), and aadB (n = 31) (
18). The rate of resistance in our study was considerably higher than the rates found for other geographical regions including Korea and Czech Republic.
Akers et al. (
22) in 2010 studied the susceptibility of 107 isolates of
A. baumannii-calcoaceticus complex to amikacin, gentamicin and tobramycin using the disk diffusion method. The susceptibility to aminoglycoside antibiotics were reported 96.6% to gentamicin and 77.5% to tobramycin. In the Akers study, 56.1% of isolates contained two and 3.7% contained three AME genes. In our study resistance to gentamicin and tobramycin were 86 % and 63%, respectively. In the present study, isolates with two AME genes were seen in 32 (31.06%) cases for aacC1 and aphA6; 17 (16.5%) cases for aadA1 and aphA6 genes; 15 (14.56%) cases for aacC1 and aadA1; 10 (9.7%) cases for aphA6 and aadB; 8 (7.76%) cases for aadA1 and aadB genes and 6 (5.82%) isolates had aacC1 and aadB genes. These results are in agreement with some other studies that have found that aacC1 and aphA6 genes are the most common AME genes in
A. baumannii isolates. Lee et al. and Moniri et al. (12, 20)detected aacC1 in 56% and 63.3 % of isolates, respectively. In another study that was done by Nigro et al. (
23) in Australia they investigated the pattern of resistance to aminoglycosides in sixty
−one multi-resistant
A. baumannii strains isolated between 2000 and 2010 in six Australian hospitals. In this work the isolates were screened for AME genes; aadB, aacC1, aphA1b, aphA6 and OXA 23 beta
-lactamase gene (
20). They found that the aphA6 gene was present in combination with aacC1 and aphA1 in two isolates.
Our study results showed a remarkable diversity of genes encoding aminoglycoside
−modifying enzymes in the study region. The multiple resistance mechanisms in
A. baumannii isolates make this bacterium a major clinical and public health concern. Resistance of these bacteria to commercially available drugs subsequently makes their therapy extremely difficult. Our study results indicated that the genes related to AME are prevalent in the
A. baumannii strains in the study region which highlighted the necessity of considering preventive measure to control dissemination of resistance genes (
21).