In this study, similar to studies by Farajnia in Tabriz, Iran, and Sinha in India, the majority of isolates of
A. baumannii were detected in respiratory samples (
15,
16). In contrast, in a study by Vazirzadeh et al., isolates were more commonly obtained from catheter samples (
17). Various factors, including consumption of antibiotics, clonal spread of resistant microorganisms, and drug resistance mechanisms of different species, result in the dissemination of highly resistant pathogens to commonly used antibiotics. Previous research reported increased resistance of
A. baumannii to various antibiotics and MDR strains hampered the recovery of patients by lowering the efficacy of many common antibiotics (
18). The frequency of
A. baumannii isolates detected in the present study (62.5%) was in line with that reported by Mirnejad et al., who found that the prevalence of MDR
A. baumannii isolates ranged from 32.7% to 93% (
19).
In the current study, the highest rate of antibiotic resistance was observed against ceftriaxone (100%), amikacin (96.2%), ceftazidime (95%), and cefotaxime (91.2%), and the highest rate of antibiotic susceptibility was observed against polymyxin B (13.8%). Furthermore, 95.4% of the
A. baumannii isolates were resistant to various cephalosporins. This finding is consistent with the results of other studies, which reported that 60% - 100% of
A. baumannii isolates were resistant to this class of drugs (
19-
22). In a study by Kheltabadi et al., only 20% of isolates were resistant to ampicillin/sulbactam (
20). In contrast, in the present study, 52.5% of the isolates showed resistance to ampicillin/sulbactam. Due to its ability to inhibit β-lactamases, ampicillin/sulbactam is generally used to treat respiratory and urinary infections. The discord in the findings may be due to differences in the pattern of consumption of antibiotics in this area, as well as increased
Acinetobacter resistance to ampicillin/sulbactam.
Carbapenems are one of the most commonly used antibiotics to treat bacterial infections. Hujer et al. reported that only 25% and 20% of
A. baumannii isolates were resistant to the carbapenems meropenem and imipenem, respectively (
23). However, recent reports pointed to the increased
A. baumannii resistance to carbapenems (
17,
21,
22), in common with the observations in the present study.
Among various drug resistance-inducing mechanisms, ESBLs play an important role in resistance to commonly used antibiotics, such as penicillin and cephalosporins. Due to the widespread dissemination among nosocomial pathogens via plasmids and integrons, ESBL genes can cause further expansion of drug resistance, including MDR isolates (
14,
24). Various studies have reported frequencies of ESBL genes in
A. baumannii ranging from 25% to 93.45% (
25-
28). In the present study, among the 80 examined isolates of
A. baumannii, 53.8% were ESBL producers, which is consistent with the results of previous studies. Among the study genes,
SHV (41.9%) was the most frequent, followed by
TEM (25.6%). Similarly, Safari et al. reported that
SHV (58%) and
TEM (20%) were the most frequent ESBL genes detected in their study (
14). In a study conducted in Iraq, Azhar et al. reported that
SHV (25%) was the most frequently detected ESBL gene (
29).
In line with the findings of the present research, another study also found that the prevalence of SHV gene was higher in
A. baumannii isolates (
30). Khalilzadegan et al. reported that
CTX-M (19.4%) and
TEM (3.2%) were the most frequently detected ESBL genes (
21). On the contrary, in the present study, the most frequent gene was
SHV.
SHV gene is originated from
Klebsiella pneumoniae (
31). A high frequency of
K. pneumoniae bearing SHV gene could likely explain the increased spread and diffusion of
SHV gene in bacterial isolates, especially
A. baumannii in hospital settings in Kermanshah (
32). Various factors can explain the discord in reports on the frequencies of ESBL-producing isolates. These include differences in patterns, especially overuse and misuse, of the consumption of antibiotics; differences in the types of antibiotics used; prolonged hospital stays; use of invasive techniques in diagnoses; and differences in diagnostic methods used to identify genes (
33).