Malaria elimination is the common goal of WHO and Iran’s health system. This study was conducted in accordance with the malaria elimination program in Iran. Despite the use of a sensitive molecular technique, microscopic methods, and RDT, there were no cases of asymptomatic malaria among treated cases in Bashagard district. In recent years, local malaria transmission has decreased in Iran and according to the WHO classification, Iran is a candidate for the malaria elimination phase (API < 1/1000) (
7). In the elimination phase, all effective factors in creating a malaria transmission cycle in the region should be considered. Besides, all positive cases must be diagnosed and timely treated, especially low parasite and asymptomatic cases that are not detectable by routine methods. Moreover, malaria treated cases can act as asymptomatic reservoirs in malaria-endemic areas and consequently, they should be taken into consideration (
11). In the malaria elimination program, in addition to microscopic and RDT methods, more robust and sensitive diagnostic techniques, including tools to enable the detection of parasite carriers (low parasitism, asymptomatic infections) are required. In this study, microscopic, serology, and molecular methods were used simultaneously to increase sensitivity in the diagnosis of
Plasmodium species.
The findings showed that because of the great surveillance system for case finding, diagnosis, and treatment of malaria cases, there were no positive malaria treated cases in Bashagard district. It can be concluded that the timely and appropriate treatment of malaria cases, as well as monitoring of the treatment process, is one of the key strategies for the control and elimination of malaria. These results supported those of the previous investigations in Bashagard district, reporting no cases of asymptomatic malaria (
3,
23,
24). The results were also in agreement with those of a study performed by Amirshekari et al. in Kerman province, which revealed no asymptomatic malaria cases among indigenous people (
26). In contrast, the study by Shahbazi et al. showed two asymptomatic carriers of malaria in treated cases in Bashagard and Minab districts (
11). Another survey in Minab district also indicated some cases of asymptomatic malaria. The difference between the study results might be attributed to differences in the monitoring of health systems, as well as to specific climatic and environmental conditions (
2).
Several reports have demonstrated the high prevalence of asymptomatic malaria in the world, especially in Central and South America, Africa, and East Asia, which is not aligned with the present study results. This contradiction might have resulted from genetic diversity in humans, parasites, and carriers of malaria, different weather conditions, demographic characteristics, living conditions, population movements, and differences in surveillance systems (
27,
28). The strengths of this study included its high sensitivity and accuracy of diagnosis resulted from the proper sample size and using a sensitive molecular method along with microscopic and RDT methods. However, the study limitations were related to field sampling and following up of cases due to the displacement of the study population.
5.1. Conclusions
It can be claimed that the robust malaria surveillance system (detection, diagnosis, and treatment of positive cases of malaria and monitoring of the treatment process) has caused the malaria elimination program to be successfully implemented in Bashagard district. According to the malaria elimination program, a series of research is necessary for the study region to monitor and evaluate asymptomatic malaria in high-risk areas.